|
Hello Ohsin,
I highly disagree with your constant reverts on the article on Herve Jaubert. His books are clearly islamophobic, which is very important when it comes to the Latifa case, which is why it is of extreme importance to mention this in the article. Your argument about neutral viewpoint in this case is completely invalid and therefore I reverted your changes.
Have a good day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:E914:6C00:D1E7:9CB9:DC3C:4B03 ( talk) 22:54, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Hey Ohsin,
Hope you know what wikipedia is all about. Even a naive won't add dead wikilink what you have done. CartoSat-2A/2B/2C are all subcategories of CartoSat-2. If a page for subproject doesn't exist it can be directed to its parent project. Please refrain from doing unethical editing.
hlo Itsjagbir ( talk) 07:53, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi Oshin, I am not here to Spam Wikipedia. That is not my intent. GeospatialWorld.net produces authentic news and information on satellite industry & geospatial industry. Like in the case of PSLV, we have the quote from the ISRO chief himself on the privatization of the program by 2020. We wanted this information to be available on the wiki.
When it comes to certain industry-related terms, that are highly niche like geospatial, we specialise in that. And such kind of information is missing on Wikipedia, and my aim is to get this information updated. Like acquisitions by companies, change of business information, new product or offering from big companies, the latest information from multi-lateral organizations etc. This where you will see my contributions to DigitalGlobe, MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates, Luciad, International Civil Aviation Organization etc.
I would be happy to add such information, without citing geospatialworld.net, but then someone will ask for them, what should we do in such a case?
@harsham ( talk) 06:35, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Ohsin. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The information that you added in the modifications to the rocket after Sub-orbital seems to be too tech oriented for an average reader. So I have made the following changes. If you feel they are not appropriate please go ahead and undo.
Composite Payload fairing shape changed to Ogive. Nosecones shape on S200 strap on motors changed from straight to slanted ones. Grain configuration of S200 Motor Head End Segment changed to reduce the dynamic pressure in transonic regime, validated through third S200 static test ST03 on 14th June 2015. Closure of inter tank structure in C25 cryogenic stage.
Also you seem to have removed the reference to the planned manned mission stating that this is not approved. But since there is a detailed description of the CARE module we need to have some outcome on why it was tested. A rewording might be more appropriate than removal which I have done -- Hagennos ❯❯❯ Talk 14:39, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:IRNSS series 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 19:07, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to
Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum. Thank you.
MPS1992 (
talk)
23:44, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced or
poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at
Latifa bint Mohammed Al Maktoum (II). Content of this nature could be regarded as
defamatory and is in violation of
Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. your edit summary "Matter ongoing needs visibility." is entirely inadequate to justify edit-warring this material about a non-notable individual, who has not been charged with anything, back into the article. See also
Wikipedia:Edit warring.
MPS1992 (
talk)
23:58, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, just to let you know, I find describing me as "ham-handed" to be rather offensive, although I will WP:AGF that was not your intention. Irregardless, please could you avoid such phrasing. Thank you. MPS1992 ( talk) 22:49, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Ohsin... I added a factual event and duly provided a reliable source. It's up to the reader to verify the fact and the source, and form an informed opinion based on analyzing the facts presented. I would genuinely appreciate if you would discuss my edits with me before reverting them. Explorium ( talk) 02:51, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Latifa Al Maktoum 1985.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{ Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MPS1992 ( talk) 00:36, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
-- Cameron11598 (Talk) 18:52, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Latifa bint Mohammed Al Maktoum (II), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tail number ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:23, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi Oshin, couple of weeks ago I created in the French Wikipedia a disambiguation page about princess Latifa al Maktoum, seeing that Dubai authorities were using the ambiguity in order to try to mask her disappearing. Such a page doesn't exist in WP:en, so I have just tried a translation [ [1]]. Could you please check my draft (do not hesitate to improve my English!) before I publish it? Best, JohnNewton8 ( talk) 18:54, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:IRNSS series 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:03, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of PSLV launches, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SSTL ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:25, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi
I saw you reverted my edit citing no source, It's called common sense. Specification of the bus doesn't change overnight just like fuel of rocket. The satellite is under 3000kg and as per I-2K page all satellite under 3000kg falls under 12k bus hence the name I2000 -India 2000.
I don't know why moderation is source based which shouldn't always be the case. I can understand citing a source for new information is paramount but if that information is readily used in Wikipedia it shouldn't warrant multiple citations, especially when you have a dedicated page for this.
Anyway, you are the boss! Feel free to go through various India Satellite program under 3000kg and check which bus they opt for. Here refer this - Template:Indian spacecraft
Regards
P.s- Even I-2K page is not well written or had full info.
Shashpant ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:51, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
I noticed that the gray background in your signature looks unbalanced as you're using normal spaces in the span tag. Your signature code is currently
[[User:Ohsin|<span style="background-color: LightGray; color: Black"> Ohsin </span>]]
when it should be
[[User:Ohsin|<span style="background-color: LightGray; color: Black"> Ohsin </span>]]
or
[[User:Ohsin|<span style="background-color: LightGray; color: Black; white-space: pre-wrap;"> Ohsin </span>]]
The first one looks like this:
Ohsin ; the others look like this:
Ohsin . This happens as span tag collapses spaces inside it. You can avoid that either by using non-breaking spaces or by using the CSS tag white-space: pre-wrap;
. —
Gazoth (
talk)
22:22, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Please stop removing sourced contents from Wikipedia article on PSLV — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.107.10.178 ( talk) 14:59, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Ohsin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Ohsin. I recently removed a lot of content from the page Latifa Al Maktoum. You then reverted my edit with the edit summary, "Reverting unexplained removal of referenced content." Let me explain why I removed the content.
The page 'Latifa Al Maktoum' is a disambiguation page. Disambiguation pages are not articles. They are navigation guides that serve to direct Wikipedia readers to the page they want when article titles are ambiguous. For example, since there are several notable people named Latifa Al Maktoum, someone searching for that name might be interested in any one of the various people. The disambiguation page just points them to the various articles about those people.
Disambiguation pages have their own style, which is described at WP:Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages (shortcut MOS:DAB). This style includes not using references, having only one active 'blue' link per bullet item, and including only links to current Wikipedia articles, or to potential articles that are linked from other current articles ('red links').
Since Latifa bint Mohammed Al Maktoum (I) is mentioned at Dubai Culture, and Latifa bint Mohammed Al Maktoum (III) is mentioned at Mohammed bin Hamad bin Mohammed Al Sharqi, I left those red links on the page. The other people named Latifa Al Maktoum are not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia that I could find, so I removed them from the page. I also removed all the references, as the Manual of Style requires.
What should happen next is that articles should be written at both of those names, turning the red links blue. (When that happens, the links to Dubai Culture and Mohammed bin Hamad bin Mohammed Al Sharqi should be removed from the disambiguation page.)
I hope this clears things up. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Cnilep ( talk) 02:29, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Hey Oshin, are you Indian or of any other nationality? Bramhesh Patil ( talk) 09:21, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Hey Oshin, I have a question for you. When you said undid revision by GummiBear139, did you mean undid revision by that IP adress to last revision by GummiBear139? I never changed Swain to Swine. Just needed to clear some things up. GummiBear139 19:32, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
GummiBear139 (talk) 19:47, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
I am aware that there are no references yet to the visual odometry. But I felt it was important to state the purpose for the wheel pattern, and that it was not just a stunt. The reference is bound to come soon, so please hang on. I think it was astute for public relations to select the logos they did. I really think the landing is going to be successful, a lot of world-class talent has been poured on this mission. Cheers, Rowan Forest ( talk) 20:43, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello. A small request: If you come across some scientific results from Chandrayaan-2, please let me know. I would like to start documenting its achievements. Thanks, Rowan Forest ( talk) 13:38, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Ohsin 22:28, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
If your uploads get deleted, you can upload from the PIB gallery. Just choose “department of space” and it will throw up tons of pictures which are currently tagged for deletion. Just telling.-— Vaibhavafro 💬 10:47, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
I have got some good news there.— Vaibhavafro 💬 16:22, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Where did you got those images of PSLV, Mars Orbiter Mission pictures of Mars. I need more of them to be added in Pages. Barsha kanungo ( talk) 08:40, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Please comment at Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Mohammed_bin_Rashid_Al_Maktoum. Debresser ( talk) 08:51, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I can't imagine that this has been fun for either of us and I would like to reach a meaningful consensus. The current guidelines for the avoidance of Indic scripts seems to stem from laziness and a disregard towards India's cultural and linguistic uniqueness. Adding a translation would help standardize the situation, every other article pertaining to a region where a regional language exists has a local language translation. But for Indian articles this is avoided for some reason that I just can't wrap my head around. It seems to make sense for personalities since they often hail from many different backgrounds and thus have several possible languages. However, for national organizations, companies and other such national level bodies, the usage of Hindi seems to be an easy decision to make since it is one of India's two official languages. I would like to revive a discussion on this issue and bring about a change in the current MOS guidelines. I would greatly appreciate it if you could help me with this endeavour.
Thanks and regards, Debitpixie ( talk) 10:26, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for your point of view, I appreciate it but still don't entirely agree with it. While I would like the rules to be changed, I no longer believe it is possible for me to do so alone. So unless I find a couple more likeminded people I'll have to leave the issue as it is. Once again I would like to apologize for the trouble that I have caused you, I did what I did in the heat of the moment and definitely regret doing so now. Who would've guessed wikipedia could get one so riled up. I would also like to thank you for taking such good care of the ISRO page, I hope you continue to maintain and add new content on there. If you ever require any assistance, please let me know on my talk page.
Thanks and regards, Debitpixie ( talk) 13:02, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Please explain why the section on In Popular Culture was removed from the ISRO page. ISRO is going in significance and will be reference more in popular culture going forward.
If you feel this is not significant enough to warrant its own section, which section in the page would you like to put that information in? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayonpradhan ( talk • contribs) 04:33, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Instead of making a unilateral decision, can you please have a panel of editors decide on this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayonpradhan ( talk • contribs) 02:22, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for your recent contributions to
Small Satellite Launch Vehicle. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining
WikiProject Rocketry? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's rocketry-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the
list of participants. Please see our
list of open tasks for ideas on where to get started.
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 10:03, 12 October 2020 (UTC) |
Thanks for uploading File:GSAT-6 Spacecraft.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
{{
Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jumpytoo Talk 00:28, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
My revision on List of space stations was reverted from https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_space_stations&oldid=986545769 to https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_space_stations&oldid=986673766
Can you tell me what's wrong with it? Isn't Indian Space Station program named Gaganyaan?
Sntshkmr60 ( talk) 12:31, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
When will new satellite of ISRO will be placed into orbit.
I think that in February 2021 ( Amazônia 1) In march 2021 ( SSLV ) In April 2021 ( GISAT )
What you think about it
Please response VISHU VISHESH VERMA ( talk) 04:51, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Okk thank you Ohsin VISHU VISHESH VERMA ( talk) 12:22, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
ududufi 2405:204:9321:67AF:B8D5:B634:2A6A:2D0F ( talk) 05:02, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Gisat 1 satellite can be launch at the last of Jan,2021 or not .
As i also research about this So i think that i ask you
So it can happen or not. VISHU VISHESH VERMA ( talk) 12:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks foe this information VISHU VISHESH VERMA ( talk) 10:16, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
So,please make the table in Eos 02 page. VISHU VISHESH VERMA ( talk) 09:14, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Can you help me expand the article GSAT-24? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harshdeep2021 ( talk • contribs) 07:14, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Hey Ohsin,
I hope that you are aware that wikipedia allows editors to add a citation from any reliable and well-knowned source(both State-Owned and private). The Source of the Specific reverted part was from "INDIA TODAY" and "India Times", both of them are credible and well-knowned media group in India. Currently your "Revert" has been "Removed" and the article is back to it's previous edit because it is not necessary to use only "Government Documents" as source. if I have failed to deliver my message or I have Mistaken, Feel free to contact me in my talk page.
Hoping you have Understand my point
Centriputal
Regards Centriputal ( talk) 21:02, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited RISAT-1A, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page C band. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 05:55, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Indian Space Programs Barnstar | |
Thank You for your continuous contribution to all the articals regarding Indian Space Programs It helps people alot (Including me), you maintained the quality standards of articals and facts, It really priceless but accept this small thank from me. Standing Alone ( talk) 04:21, 18 June 2022 (UTC) |
Dear Ohsin,
You have reverted the change that I have done to article ISRO about the New Space Research Facility (SRF) established by ISRO. This is a genuine information and details about can be seen in ISRO website as well. It is fully functional and craters were created for testing rover in Chandrayan-1 and it is being used for Chandrayan-2 as well. Please apply the changes I did. https://www.isro.gov.in/update/10-may-2012/ruby-year-celebrations-isro-satellite-centre-bangalore
Thank you, Surya Suryaprasad5 ( talk) 18:41, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Bambi Narayanan doesn’t have a doctorate. He is not a Dr. Get your facts correct before vandalising [1] ChandlerMinh ( talk) 05:43, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Regarding the lead section of ISRO, as Danial Case pointed out in GA review, lead section of ISRO's article is too long, we can discuss about this thing in talk page of ISRO and hopefully get new and stable solution
also please check out
This edit, I think it needs to be reverted
Thank You,
Standing Alone (
talk)
11:31, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello Ohsin, referring to this edit. I'm wondering whether I should revert that edit, it being list article including both realised and concept vehicles with media coverage. The list article doesn't necessarily include approved, funded and realised systems as reasoned in edit but most those ever envisaged. That belongs to Comparison of orbital launch systems. The list anyway may have to be amended for other reasons though. Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk) 15:17, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello Ohsin, I'm looking to greatky trim down the ULV article removing all the OR and insert in NGLV initiative. I'm wondering whether you would suggest NGLV on a section of recent developments of page title ULV or ULV as a section (I move the article to NGLV). Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk) 02:47, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Payload details of Chandrayaan 3 is released by ISRO in its website. And the picture of Lander in assembly phase (as a screengrab of ISRO documentary, copyright unclear) is available in multiple sources. Since you are experienced with the handling of related articles, could you take this into consideration? Editor8220 ( talk) 04:13, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle into
Draft:PSLV Orbital Experimental Module (POEM). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. —
Diannaa (
talk)
13:46, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to
Mangalyaan programme, please use the
preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up
recent changes and the
page history, as well as helping prevent
edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the
help desk for assistance.
Thank you.
Sam
Sailor
09:13, 24 July 2023 (UTC) (please
ping on reply)
Hi Ohsin, I've seen you contribute to the article and related space articles, so wanted to get your opinion on this if you have some input: /info/en/?search=Talk:Chandrayaan-2#Separate_Vikram_Lander_section_into_its_own_standalone_article
It is making it harder to update articles with information on landers when I am talking about Vikram lander on Chandrayaan 3 but have to link to a sub-section of Chandrayaan 2. -- Molochmeditates ( talk) 13:54, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
|
Hello Ohsin,
I highly disagree with your constant reverts on the article on Herve Jaubert. His books are clearly islamophobic, which is very important when it comes to the Latifa case, which is why it is of extreme importance to mention this in the article. Your argument about neutral viewpoint in this case is completely invalid and therefore I reverted your changes.
Have a good day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:E914:6C00:D1E7:9CB9:DC3C:4B03 ( talk) 22:54, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Hey Ohsin,
Hope you know what wikipedia is all about. Even a naive won't add dead wikilink what you have done. CartoSat-2A/2B/2C are all subcategories of CartoSat-2. If a page for subproject doesn't exist it can be directed to its parent project. Please refrain from doing unethical editing.
hlo Itsjagbir ( talk) 07:53, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi Oshin, I am not here to Spam Wikipedia. That is not my intent. GeospatialWorld.net produces authentic news and information on satellite industry & geospatial industry. Like in the case of PSLV, we have the quote from the ISRO chief himself on the privatization of the program by 2020. We wanted this information to be available on the wiki.
When it comes to certain industry-related terms, that are highly niche like geospatial, we specialise in that. And such kind of information is missing on Wikipedia, and my aim is to get this information updated. Like acquisitions by companies, change of business information, new product or offering from big companies, the latest information from multi-lateral organizations etc. This where you will see my contributions to DigitalGlobe, MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates, Luciad, International Civil Aviation Organization etc.
I would be happy to add such information, without citing geospatialworld.net, but then someone will ask for them, what should we do in such a case?
@harsham ( talk) 06:35, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Ohsin. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The information that you added in the modifications to the rocket after Sub-orbital seems to be too tech oriented for an average reader. So I have made the following changes. If you feel they are not appropriate please go ahead and undo.
Composite Payload fairing shape changed to Ogive. Nosecones shape on S200 strap on motors changed from straight to slanted ones. Grain configuration of S200 Motor Head End Segment changed to reduce the dynamic pressure in transonic regime, validated through third S200 static test ST03 on 14th June 2015. Closure of inter tank structure in C25 cryogenic stage.
Also you seem to have removed the reference to the planned manned mission stating that this is not approved. But since there is a detailed description of the CARE module we need to have some outcome on why it was tested. A rewording might be more appropriate than removal which I have done -- Hagennos ❯❯❯ Talk 14:39, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:IRNSS series 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 19:07, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to
Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum. Thank you.
MPS1992 (
talk)
23:44, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced or
poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at
Latifa bint Mohammed Al Maktoum (II). Content of this nature could be regarded as
defamatory and is in violation of
Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. your edit summary "Matter ongoing needs visibility." is entirely inadequate to justify edit-warring this material about a non-notable individual, who has not been charged with anything, back into the article. See also
Wikipedia:Edit warring.
MPS1992 (
talk)
23:58, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, just to let you know, I find describing me as "ham-handed" to be rather offensive, although I will WP:AGF that was not your intention. Irregardless, please could you avoid such phrasing. Thank you. MPS1992 ( talk) 22:49, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Ohsin... I added a factual event and duly provided a reliable source. It's up to the reader to verify the fact and the source, and form an informed opinion based on analyzing the facts presented. I would genuinely appreciate if you would discuss my edits with me before reverting them. Explorium ( talk) 02:51, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Latifa Al Maktoum 1985.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{ Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MPS1992 ( talk) 00:36, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
-- Cameron11598 (Talk) 18:52, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Latifa bint Mohammed Al Maktoum (II), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tail number ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:23, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi Oshin, couple of weeks ago I created in the French Wikipedia a disambiguation page about princess Latifa al Maktoum, seeing that Dubai authorities were using the ambiguity in order to try to mask her disappearing. Such a page doesn't exist in WP:en, so I have just tried a translation [ [1]]. Could you please check my draft (do not hesitate to improve my English!) before I publish it? Best, JohnNewton8 ( talk) 18:54, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:IRNSS series 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:03, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of PSLV launches, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SSTL ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:25, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi
I saw you reverted my edit citing no source, It's called common sense. Specification of the bus doesn't change overnight just like fuel of rocket. The satellite is under 3000kg and as per I-2K page all satellite under 3000kg falls under 12k bus hence the name I2000 -India 2000.
I don't know why moderation is source based which shouldn't always be the case. I can understand citing a source for new information is paramount but if that information is readily used in Wikipedia it shouldn't warrant multiple citations, especially when you have a dedicated page for this.
Anyway, you are the boss! Feel free to go through various India Satellite program under 3000kg and check which bus they opt for. Here refer this - Template:Indian spacecraft
Regards
P.s- Even I-2K page is not well written or had full info.
Shashpant ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:51, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
I noticed that the gray background in your signature looks unbalanced as you're using normal spaces in the span tag. Your signature code is currently
[[User:Ohsin|<span style="background-color: LightGray; color: Black"> Ohsin </span>]]
when it should be
[[User:Ohsin|<span style="background-color: LightGray; color: Black"> Ohsin </span>]]
or
[[User:Ohsin|<span style="background-color: LightGray; color: Black; white-space: pre-wrap;"> Ohsin </span>]]
The first one looks like this:
Ohsin ; the others look like this:
Ohsin . This happens as span tag collapses spaces inside it. You can avoid that either by using non-breaking spaces or by using the CSS tag white-space: pre-wrap;
. —
Gazoth (
talk)
22:22, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Please stop removing sourced contents from Wikipedia article on PSLV — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.107.10.178 ( talk) 14:59, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Ohsin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Ohsin. I recently removed a lot of content from the page Latifa Al Maktoum. You then reverted my edit with the edit summary, "Reverting unexplained removal of referenced content." Let me explain why I removed the content.
The page 'Latifa Al Maktoum' is a disambiguation page. Disambiguation pages are not articles. They are navigation guides that serve to direct Wikipedia readers to the page they want when article titles are ambiguous. For example, since there are several notable people named Latifa Al Maktoum, someone searching for that name might be interested in any one of the various people. The disambiguation page just points them to the various articles about those people.
Disambiguation pages have their own style, which is described at WP:Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages (shortcut MOS:DAB). This style includes not using references, having only one active 'blue' link per bullet item, and including only links to current Wikipedia articles, or to potential articles that are linked from other current articles ('red links').
Since Latifa bint Mohammed Al Maktoum (I) is mentioned at Dubai Culture, and Latifa bint Mohammed Al Maktoum (III) is mentioned at Mohammed bin Hamad bin Mohammed Al Sharqi, I left those red links on the page. The other people named Latifa Al Maktoum are not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia that I could find, so I removed them from the page. I also removed all the references, as the Manual of Style requires.
What should happen next is that articles should be written at both of those names, turning the red links blue. (When that happens, the links to Dubai Culture and Mohammed bin Hamad bin Mohammed Al Sharqi should be removed from the disambiguation page.)
I hope this clears things up. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Cnilep ( talk) 02:29, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Hey Oshin, are you Indian or of any other nationality? Bramhesh Patil ( talk) 09:21, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Hey Oshin, I have a question for you. When you said undid revision by GummiBear139, did you mean undid revision by that IP adress to last revision by GummiBear139? I never changed Swain to Swine. Just needed to clear some things up. GummiBear139 19:32, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
GummiBear139 (talk) 19:47, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
I am aware that there are no references yet to the visual odometry. But I felt it was important to state the purpose for the wheel pattern, and that it was not just a stunt. The reference is bound to come soon, so please hang on. I think it was astute for public relations to select the logos they did. I really think the landing is going to be successful, a lot of world-class talent has been poured on this mission. Cheers, Rowan Forest ( talk) 20:43, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello. A small request: If you come across some scientific results from Chandrayaan-2, please let me know. I would like to start documenting its achievements. Thanks, Rowan Forest ( talk) 13:38, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Ohsin 22:28, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
If your uploads get deleted, you can upload from the PIB gallery. Just choose “department of space” and it will throw up tons of pictures which are currently tagged for deletion. Just telling.-— Vaibhavafro 💬 10:47, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
I have got some good news there.— Vaibhavafro 💬 16:22, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Where did you got those images of PSLV, Mars Orbiter Mission pictures of Mars. I need more of them to be added in Pages. Barsha kanungo ( talk) 08:40, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Please comment at Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Mohammed_bin_Rashid_Al_Maktoum. Debresser ( talk) 08:51, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I can't imagine that this has been fun for either of us and I would like to reach a meaningful consensus. The current guidelines for the avoidance of Indic scripts seems to stem from laziness and a disregard towards India's cultural and linguistic uniqueness. Adding a translation would help standardize the situation, every other article pertaining to a region where a regional language exists has a local language translation. But for Indian articles this is avoided for some reason that I just can't wrap my head around. It seems to make sense for personalities since they often hail from many different backgrounds and thus have several possible languages. However, for national organizations, companies and other such national level bodies, the usage of Hindi seems to be an easy decision to make since it is one of India's two official languages. I would like to revive a discussion on this issue and bring about a change in the current MOS guidelines. I would greatly appreciate it if you could help me with this endeavour.
Thanks and regards, Debitpixie ( talk) 10:26, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for your point of view, I appreciate it but still don't entirely agree with it. While I would like the rules to be changed, I no longer believe it is possible for me to do so alone. So unless I find a couple more likeminded people I'll have to leave the issue as it is. Once again I would like to apologize for the trouble that I have caused you, I did what I did in the heat of the moment and definitely regret doing so now. Who would've guessed wikipedia could get one so riled up. I would also like to thank you for taking such good care of the ISRO page, I hope you continue to maintain and add new content on there. If you ever require any assistance, please let me know on my talk page.
Thanks and regards, Debitpixie ( talk) 13:02, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Please explain why the section on In Popular Culture was removed from the ISRO page. ISRO is going in significance and will be reference more in popular culture going forward.
If you feel this is not significant enough to warrant its own section, which section in the page would you like to put that information in? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayonpradhan ( talk • contribs) 04:33, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Instead of making a unilateral decision, can you please have a panel of editors decide on this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayonpradhan ( talk • contribs) 02:22, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for your recent contributions to
Small Satellite Launch Vehicle. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining
WikiProject Rocketry? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's rocketry-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the
list of participants. Please see our
list of open tasks for ideas on where to get started.
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 10:03, 12 October 2020 (UTC) |
Thanks for uploading File:GSAT-6 Spacecraft.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
{{
Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jumpytoo Talk 00:28, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
My revision on List of space stations was reverted from https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_space_stations&oldid=986545769 to https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_space_stations&oldid=986673766
Can you tell me what's wrong with it? Isn't Indian Space Station program named Gaganyaan?
Sntshkmr60 ( talk) 12:31, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
When will new satellite of ISRO will be placed into orbit.
I think that in February 2021 ( Amazônia 1) In march 2021 ( SSLV ) In April 2021 ( GISAT )
What you think about it
Please response VISHU VISHESH VERMA ( talk) 04:51, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Okk thank you Ohsin VISHU VISHESH VERMA ( talk) 12:22, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
ududufi 2405:204:9321:67AF:B8D5:B634:2A6A:2D0F ( talk) 05:02, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Gisat 1 satellite can be launch at the last of Jan,2021 or not .
As i also research about this So i think that i ask you
So it can happen or not. VISHU VISHESH VERMA ( talk) 12:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks foe this information VISHU VISHESH VERMA ( talk) 10:16, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
So,please make the table in Eos 02 page. VISHU VISHESH VERMA ( talk) 09:14, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Can you help me expand the article GSAT-24? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harshdeep2021 ( talk • contribs) 07:14, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Hey Ohsin,
I hope that you are aware that wikipedia allows editors to add a citation from any reliable and well-knowned source(both State-Owned and private). The Source of the Specific reverted part was from "INDIA TODAY" and "India Times", both of them are credible and well-knowned media group in India. Currently your "Revert" has been "Removed" and the article is back to it's previous edit because it is not necessary to use only "Government Documents" as source. if I have failed to deliver my message or I have Mistaken, Feel free to contact me in my talk page.
Hoping you have Understand my point
Centriputal
Regards Centriputal ( talk) 21:02, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited RISAT-1A, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page C band. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 05:55, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Indian Space Programs Barnstar | |
Thank You for your continuous contribution to all the articals regarding Indian Space Programs It helps people alot (Including me), you maintained the quality standards of articals and facts, It really priceless but accept this small thank from me. Standing Alone ( talk) 04:21, 18 June 2022 (UTC) |
Dear Ohsin,
You have reverted the change that I have done to article ISRO about the New Space Research Facility (SRF) established by ISRO. This is a genuine information and details about can be seen in ISRO website as well. It is fully functional and craters were created for testing rover in Chandrayan-1 and it is being used for Chandrayan-2 as well. Please apply the changes I did. https://www.isro.gov.in/update/10-may-2012/ruby-year-celebrations-isro-satellite-centre-bangalore
Thank you, Surya Suryaprasad5 ( talk) 18:41, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Bambi Narayanan doesn’t have a doctorate. He is not a Dr. Get your facts correct before vandalising [1] ChandlerMinh ( talk) 05:43, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Regarding the lead section of ISRO, as Danial Case pointed out in GA review, lead section of ISRO's article is too long, we can discuss about this thing in talk page of ISRO and hopefully get new and stable solution
also please check out
This edit, I think it needs to be reverted
Thank You,
Standing Alone (
talk)
11:31, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello Ohsin, referring to this edit. I'm wondering whether I should revert that edit, it being list article including both realised and concept vehicles with media coverage. The list article doesn't necessarily include approved, funded and realised systems as reasoned in edit but most those ever envisaged. That belongs to Comparison of orbital launch systems. The list anyway may have to be amended for other reasons though. Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk) 15:17, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello Ohsin, I'm looking to greatky trim down the ULV article removing all the OR and insert in NGLV initiative. I'm wondering whether you would suggest NGLV on a section of recent developments of page title ULV or ULV as a section (I move the article to NGLV). Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk) 02:47, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Payload details of Chandrayaan 3 is released by ISRO in its website. And the picture of Lander in assembly phase (as a screengrab of ISRO documentary, copyright unclear) is available in multiple sources. Since you are experienced with the handling of related articles, could you take this into consideration? Editor8220 ( talk) 04:13, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle into
Draft:PSLV Orbital Experimental Module (POEM). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. —
Diannaa (
talk)
13:46, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to
Mangalyaan programme, please use the
preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up
recent changes and the
page history, as well as helping prevent
edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the
help desk for assistance.
Thank you.
Sam
Sailor
09:13, 24 July 2023 (UTC) (please
ping on reply)
Hi Ohsin, I've seen you contribute to the article and related space articles, so wanted to get your opinion on this if you have some input: /info/en/?search=Talk:Chandrayaan-2#Separate_Vikram_Lander_section_into_its_own_standalone_article
It is making it harder to update articles with information on landers when I am talking about Vikram lander on Chandrayaan 3 but have to link to a sub-section of Chandrayaan 2. -- Molochmeditates ( talk) 13:54, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)