![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 55 | ← | Archive 57 | Archive 58 | Archive 59 | Archive 60 | Archive 61 | → | Archive 65 |
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:27, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi! Ogress. I got the message on my talk. I have quite a bit to say on this matter (I don't know if you have encountered that user's previous edits), but I was wondering if you can leave me an email address (it can just be any; not your personal one) where I can discuss in detail with you.-- Balthazarduju ( talk) 09:42, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello Ogress. It seems Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Talk:Shang dynasty.23Language has new development since there is a volunteer moderator. Can you notify users like Lathrindor, Zanhe, Kanguole to come back to the discussion? Thanks!-- Balthazarduju ( talk) 17:18, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Your complaint about the length of a post at the dispute resolution noticeboard was in my section, not in yours. I have moved it. Robert McClenon ( talk) 17:19, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi Ogress, it looks like on the Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Shang_dynasty.23Language, Easy772 has added his last Craniometrics discussion from the Talk:Shang dynasty to the noticeboard. Can Easy772 do that? The section in the Dispute resolution noticeboard is called "Talk:Shang dynasty#Language", but Easy772 just decided to add these physical craniometrics discussion onto the noticeboard even though the discussion was about something different. I think we should let users like Lathrindor, Zanhe, Kanguole know about this new development right?-- Balthazarduju ( talk) 21:55, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I have created a discussion on the recent issues regarding WP:Caste system In India in ANI and specifically reported suspicious behavior of concerted behavior of a group of editors including you. Have a look. Regards AB Talk 08:09, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 00:42, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
I've got the 2010 reprint. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 04:03, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
From NGSM. Never gonna See me ( talk) 02:37, 26 June 2015 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Resilient Barnstar |
From South Asia. Never gonna See me ( talk) 02:38, 26 June 2015 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Jñāneśvar may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:28, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Kagyu may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 10:13, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi @ Ogress:, I agree with you that Ajivika and Carvaka are not part of Hinduism. Can you pls help remove the Hinduism sidebar from these pages? I had removed them from the pages but @ Editor2020: has reverted them. - Mohanbhan ( talk) 08:42, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I was reading the policy conversations you mentioned on this subject and had a hard time figuring out what their actual conclusions were. I was wondering if you could explain or point me to a place where it simply states the policy instead of the debate over it. Either way this seems like a troubling policy to implement for historical articles. As a linguist knows that removing the devanagari AND the IAST from Sanskrit articles means that there is vital information missing from the page that the IPA does not provide. To be able to use any of these articles academically (which I do, studying for my masters in yoga studies and history) one needs to have the standards of Indic academia addressed. If you were academically studying these topics, the IPA is useless to you, and only the IAST matters. That's the only reason there is an International Alphabet of Sanskrit Transliteration that is nearly universal in Indic studies. I understand removing excessive modern indic translations with their thousand regional variations, but this is removing troves of important information about a static and dead language, and you're not even replacing it with the IPA first, so the next editor will have a harder time making a proper IPA transliteration. Very concerning. It feels like watching books burn. Iṣṭa Devatā ( talk) 16:59, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Or is it just in headers, keeping the infobox? Iṣṭa Devatā ( talk) 17:06, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
And then this is even more confusing, since that page is self conflicting [ [1]] Iṣṭa Devatā ( talk) 17:24, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Please indent your replies. True; that other policy is part of the problem when dealing with a committee-run organisation. Nonetheless, nearly everyone agrees that WP:INDICSCRIPTS is concise and very specific, and therefore should be followed as-is. {{Indic}}, after all, is used in many places aside from the first sentence(s) of the lede. It is useful for etymology or in the body of the article. It's an all-purpose tool. Ogress smash! 18:08, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello Ogress. On Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Shang_dynasty.23Language, Easy772 has wrote a draft of that Craniometrics content he wanted to add (from the Talk:Shang_dynasty#Craniometrics) to the dispute resolution noticeboard. You and users such as @ Lathdrinor: and @ Zanhe: should come to the noticeboard and look at it.-- Balthazarduju ( talk) 23:27, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
Views/Day | Quality | Title | Content | Headings | Images | Links | Sources | Tagged with… |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
172 |
![]() |
Buddhism and Hinduism ( talk) | Add sources | |||||
162 |
![]() |
Madhubani art ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Add sources | |
16 |
![]() |
Sitatapatra ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Add sources | |
100 |
![]() |
Koshi river ( talk) |
![]() |
Add sources | ||||
148 |
![]() |
Sangha ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
Add sources | |||
16 |
![]() |
Mandarava ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
Add sources | |||
19 |
![]() |
Gyalwang Drukpa ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Cleanup | ||
13 |
![]() |
Yosef Hayyim ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Cleanup |
625 |
![]() |
Tantra ( talk) | Cleanup | |||||
102 |
![]() |
Buddhism in the United States ( talk) | Expand | |||||
511 |
![]() |
Ford E-Series ( talk) |
![]() |
Expand | ||||
198 |
![]() |
False awakening ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Expand | ||
88 |
![]() |
Buddhist ethics ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Unencyclopaedic | ||
164 |
![]() |
Anatta ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
Unencyclopaedic | |||
22 |
![]() |
Seungsahn ( talk) |
![]() |
Unencyclopaedic | ||||
61 |
![]() |
Newar people ( talk) | Merge | |||||
2 |
![]() |
Eijnhoro Formation ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Merge |
48 |
![]() |
Maudgalyayana ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Merge | ||
395 |
![]() |
Saṃsāra ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Wikify | ||
26 |
![]() |
Yijing (monk) ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Wikify | ||
144 |
![]() |
Buddhist cosmology ( talk) |
![]() |
Wikify | ||||
5 |
![]() |
Rajni Goyal ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Orphan | |
4 |
![]() |
Jagdish Mandir Kurseong ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Orphan |
1 |
![]() |
USJJO ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Orphan | |
24 |
![]() |
Southern Kurdish ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Stub | ||
23 |
![]() |
Tushita ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Stub | |
2 |
![]() |
Basic Education High School No. 1 Meiktila ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Stub |
4 |
![]() |
Supushpachandra ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Stub | |
5 |
![]() |
Bhaishajyaraja ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Stub | ||
6 |
![]() |
Candraprabha ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Stub |
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:52, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Shang Dynasty". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 8 July 2015.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by
MediationBot (
talk) on
behalf of the Mediation Committee.
02:57, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Looks like we both edited the same article recently. Thanks much for the help and expansions. Information is scant, so any information is appreciated. -- Ph0kin ( talk) 05:38, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
{{subst:arbcom notice| Talk Page Etiquette}} /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Talk_Page_Etiquette Soham321 ( talk) 09:38, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
This is a courtesy notice to advise that the "Talk Page Etiquette" arbitration case, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined by the committee on account of the fact that it appears to have been withdrawn. Further information is available at the above link. On behalf of the committee, Lankiveil ( speak to me) 14:11, 4 July 2015 (UTC).
Hello Ogress. I'm not sure if you've seen this page Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Shang Dynasty. In the section "Parties' agreement to mediation", both Kanguole and Easy772 have voiced their views. Would you gave your view on this?-- Balthazarduju ( talk) 20:39, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 55 | ← | Archive 57 | Archive 58 | Archive 59 | Archive 60 | Archive 61 | → | Archive 65 |
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:27, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi! Ogress. I got the message on my talk. I have quite a bit to say on this matter (I don't know if you have encountered that user's previous edits), but I was wondering if you can leave me an email address (it can just be any; not your personal one) where I can discuss in detail with you.-- Balthazarduju ( talk) 09:42, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello Ogress. It seems Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Talk:Shang dynasty.23Language has new development since there is a volunteer moderator. Can you notify users like Lathrindor, Zanhe, Kanguole to come back to the discussion? Thanks!-- Balthazarduju ( talk) 17:18, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Your complaint about the length of a post at the dispute resolution noticeboard was in my section, not in yours. I have moved it. Robert McClenon ( talk) 17:19, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi Ogress, it looks like on the Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Shang_dynasty.23Language, Easy772 has added his last Craniometrics discussion from the Talk:Shang dynasty to the noticeboard. Can Easy772 do that? The section in the Dispute resolution noticeboard is called "Talk:Shang dynasty#Language", but Easy772 just decided to add these physical craniometrics discussion onto the noticeboard even though the discussion was about something different. I think we should let users like Lathrindor, Zanhe, Kanguole know about this new development right?-- Balthazarduju ( talk) 21:55, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I have created a discussion on the recent issues regarding WP:Caste system In India in ANI and specifically reported suspicious behavior of concerted behavior of a group of editors including you. Have a look. Regards AB Talk 08:09, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 00:42, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
I've got the 2010 reprint. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 04:03, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
From NGSM. Never gonna See me ( talk) 02:37, 26 June 2015 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Resilient Barnstar |
From South Asia. Never gonna See me ( talk) 02:38, 26 June 2015 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Jñāneśvar may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:28, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Kagyu may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 10:13, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi @ Ogress:, I agree with you that Ajivika and Carvaka are not part of Hinduism. Can you pls help remove the Hinduism sidebar from these pages? I had removed them from the pages but @ Editor2020: has reverted them. - Mohanbhan ( talk) 08:42, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I was reading the policy conversations you mentioned on this subject and had a hard time figuring out what their actual conclusions were. I was wondering if you could explain or point me to a place where it simply states the policy instead of the debate over it. Either way this seems like a troubling policy to implement for historical articles. As a linguist knows that removing the devanagari AND the IAST from Sanskrit articles means that there is vital information missing from the page that the IPA does not provide. To be able to use any of these articles academically (which I do, studying for my masters in yoga studies and history) one needs to have the standards of Indic academia addressed. If you were academically studying these topics, the IPA is useless to you, and only the IAST matters. That's the only reason there is an International Alphabet of Sanskrit Transliteration that is nearly universal in Indic studies. I understand removing excessive modern indic translations with their thousand regional variations, but this is removing troves of important information about a static and dead language, and you're not even replacing it with the IPA first, so the next editor will have a harder time making a proper IPA transliteration. Very concerning. It feels like watching books burn. Iṣṭa Devatā ( talk) 16:59, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Or is it just in headers, keeping the infobox? Iṣṭa Devatā ( talk) 17:06, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
And then this is even more confusing, since that page is self conflicting [ [1]] Iṣṭa Devatā ( talk) 17:24, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Please indent your replies. True; that other policy is part of the problem when dealing with a committee-run organisation. Nonetheless, nearly everyone agrees that WP:INDICSCRIPTS is concise and very specific, and therefore should be followed as-is. {{Indic}}, after all, is used in many places aside from the first sentence(s) of the lede. It is useful for etymology or in the body of the article. It's an all-purpose tool. Ogress smash! 18:08, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello Ogress. On Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Shang_dynasty.23Language, Easy772 has wrote a draft of that Craniometrics content he wanted to add (from the Talk:Shang_dynasty#Craniometrics) to the dispute resolution noticeboard. You and users such as @ Lathdrinor: and @ Zanhe: should come to the noticeboard and look at it.-- Balthazarduju ( talk) 23:27, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
Views/Day | Quality | Title | Content | Headings | Images | Links | Sources | Tagged with… |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
172 |
![]() |
Buddhism and Hinduism ( talk) | Add sources | |||||
162 |
![]() |
Madhubani art ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Add sources | |
16 |
![]() |
Sitatapatra ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Add sources | |
100 |
![]() |
Koshi river ( talk) |
![]() |
Add sources | ||||
148 |
![]() |
Sangha ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
Add sources | |||
16 |
![]() |
Mandarava ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
Add sources | |||
19 |
![]() |
Gyalwang Drukpa ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Cleanup | ||
13 |
![]() |
Yosef Hayyim ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Cleanup |
625 |
![]() |
Tantra ( talk) | Cleanup | |||||
102 |
![]() |
Buddhism in the United States ( talk) | Expand | |||||
511 |
![]() |
Ford E-Series ( talk) |
![]() |
Expand | ||||
198 |
![]() |
False awakening ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Expand | ||
88 |
![]() |
Buddhist ethics ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Unencyclopaedic | ||
164 |
![]() |
Anatta ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
Unencyclopaedic | |||
22 |
![]() |
Seungsahn ( talk) |
![]() |
Unencyclopaedic | ||||
61 |
![]() |
Newar people ( talk) | Merge | |||||
2 |
![]() |
Eijnhoro Formation ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Merge |
48 |
![]() |
Maudgalyayana ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Merge | ||
395 |
![]() |
Saṃsāra ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Wikify | ||
26 |
![]() |
Yijing (monk) ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Wikify | ||
144 |
![]() |
Buddhist cosmology ( talk) |
![]() |
Wikify | ||||
5 |
![]() |
Rajni Goyal ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Orphan | |
4 |
![]() |
Jagdish Mandir Kurseong ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Orphan |
1 |
![]() |
USJJO ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Orphan | |
24 |
![]() |
Southern Kurdish ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Stub | ||
23 |
![]() |
Tushita ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Stub | |
2 |
![]() |
Basic Education High School No. 1 Meiktila ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Stub |
4 |
![]() |
Supushpachandra ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Stub | |
5 |
![]() |
Bhaishajyaraja ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Stub | ||
6 |
![]() |
Candraprabha ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Stub |
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:52, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Shang Dynasty". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 8 July 2015.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by
MediationBot (
talk) on
behalf of the Mediation Committee.
02:57, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Looks like we both edited the same article recently. Thanks much for the help and expansions. Information is scant, so any information is appreciated. -- Ph0kin ( talk) 05:38, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
{{subst:arbcom notice| Talk Page Etiquette}} /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Talk_Page_Etiquette Soham321 ( talk) 09:38, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
This is a courtesy notice to advise that the "Talk Page Etiquette" arbitration case, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined by the committee on account of the fact that it appears to have been withdrawn. Further information is available at the above link. On behalf of the committee, Lankiveil ( speak to me) 14:11, 4 July 2015 (UTC).
Hello Ogress. I'm not sure if you've seen this page Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Shang Dynasty. In the section "Parties' agreement to mediation", both Kanguole and Easy772 have voiced their views. Would you gave your view on this?-- Balthazarduju ( talk) 20:39, 5 July 2015 (UTC)