Welcome to Wikipedia, Nuswantara! Thank you for your contributions. I am Murry1975 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{ help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Murry1975 ( talk) 09:10, 4 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Lucy (2014 film) page, your edit caused a broken reference name ( help). ( Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:28, 26 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Randall Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Night Before (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:13, 11 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Non-dropframe. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Abbey Lee Kershaw— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Non-Dropframe _talk 07:07, 15 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fast 8. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne ^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, Nuswantara. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Dear Zindagi, did not appear constructive and has been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠ ☎️ ✍⋡ 06:21, 2 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Udta Punjab. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Diff: [1] Your numerical changes are inconsistent with the existing sources including this archive. The discrepancy is indistinguishable from vandalism. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 06:29, 2 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Please stop making disruptive edits.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Diff: [2] [3] [4] [5] Unexplained removal of language info from the lead. If you have some sort of personal peeve about this content, take it up in a central location like WT:ICTF. But the mass removal of this content, which seems intuitive to the lead section, is disruptive without first achieving consensus. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 05:42, 3 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Why are you removing links to crore? [6] [7] We write for a global readership, not just for an Indian readership. Surely you don't think people in Brazil will know what a "crore" is, do you? If not, then we need to make the term accessible at least the first time it is used. Please stop removing these without justfication. You should also be aware of MOS:COMMONALITY, which discourages the use of crore anyway. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 05:54, 3 January 2017 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Baar Baar Dekho. Diff: [8] Last warning: Stop removing the language content from the lead until you have achieved consensus in a wide venue like WT:ICTF. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 06:01, 3 January 2017 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 07:30, 3 January 2017 (UTC) reply

For this. Please stop removing language information from articles. It's also unclear why you removed "upcoming" for an unreleased film. And some of your other changes are indistinguishable from vandalism, like here where you inexplicably remove Kay Kay Menon from the |starring= parameter of Haider (film) Infobox and push Tabu's name to the end, despite the fact that Tabu's name appears at the front of the cast list on the poster, where Menon's name appears as well. See Template:Infobox film instructions, since starring credits are not selected arbitrarily by editors such as yourself. There were other bizarre inconsistencies like here where you combine "romantic drama" from two unique wikilinks into a single wikilinks, but here you do the opposite, breaking a single "romance drama" link into two unique ones. Why? By the time you changed Rangoon, you already knew "romantic drama" was a wikilink that resolved. Or here where even though the combined "crime thriller" resolved somewhere, you inexplicably split it into two wikilinks. I don't get it, but it seems oddly inconsistent. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 07:48, 3 January 2017 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 18:01, 5 January 2017 (UTC) reply

You obviously continued your disruptive editing as Nova Nuswan. If you wish to edit here again, you will need to request an unblock from your first account, and you will need to convince a reviewing admin that you understand what you've previously been blocked for, as well as provide convincing assurance that you won't continue the disruptions. Any further block evasion will result in your edits being reverted on sight per WP:REVERTBAN, as well as prolonging any possibility of being unblocked. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 18:02, 5 January 2017 (UTC) reply