Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JIP | Talk 20:13, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you
vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to
Barrington, Cambridgeshire, you will be
blocked from editing.
Finngall
20:15, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Nomination of Justin Winslett for deletion
The article Justin Winslett is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Winslett until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Jezebel'sPonyo bons mots 20:56, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JIP | Talk 20:13, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you
vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to
Barrington, Cambridgeshire, you will be
blocked from editing.
Finngall
20:15, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Nomination of Justin Winslett for deletion
The article Justin Winslett is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Winslett until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Jezebel'sPonyo bons mots 20:56, 17 January 2011 (UTC)