Hi Nishkid. FYI, I have reinstated the indef block on User:Treva135 as he is persisting with his personal attacks despite further warnings. Best, Gwernol 20:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
I was just wondering, why did you have the page "Team Recon" deleted and protected? Thank you for your time. Paulhitthewall 00:10, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
I am sincerely sorry if my comment gave the impression that i felt that you were incapable of making decisions;that was absolutely not the imprssion that I intended to convey (and I re-iterate that the ageist comment was made by another editor, not by me). I felt that my comments related to the article ( Abaana), not to your handling of it, and if that is not the way it came across please accept my sincere apologies.-- Anthony.bradbury 00:46, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
User:Wikih8lulz needs to be outright banned for username, not just vandalism. User has 24 hour block only, but needs perm block for saying Wiki-hate lolz in his own username. - Patstuart (talk) (contribs) 02:22, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Niskid, my article has been vandalised personally by this Ip address 81.129.30.255 they haved added a notice that I' am impersonating a user. Please report it now, and have them warned.
Hey, just wondering about this edit. Why did you remove the Louisiana category? Are those going away or something? — Wknight94 ( talk) 01:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Hey, any idea why Lucille Ball was protected? Would it have anything to do with a persistent AOL vandal? Strangely enough, he seems to have gone away (for now, at least) after I sent him a message telling him he was wasting his time. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 03:21, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Apologies if this is in the wrong place, or in approriate. My colleage set this page up on my request and before he had finsihed editing it has changed and it was all very confusing. I have tried to pick up where he left of, and I am finding people talking about what is "notable" and what is not "notable". I was finding it hard to follow who was saying what. so i wont comment on past comments. What I will say is that notability is objective. Nobaby will totally agree, and if you guys spend you time arguing over it you will waste many hours.
What will say is this. I have held I dieing bady in my arms, and wept becuase I didn't have enough money to help. I met children who have been abducted, raped and forced to kill. I have held hands with children who have AIDS, and I have sat with street children on my knee. Many of these children Abaana support. We support over 3,000 children on a daily bases, and we do it through sacrafice. However there are millions still in need, and to be honest if we measured the work on Google hits, on numbers we would miss the point. There is no price you can put on an individuals life. Saving one life is notable!
Sorry to bother you. But is there anything that can be done about this User:Scorpion0422? He refuses to cite sources for his edits and removes every fact tag I put on things, please look at his edit summaries for South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut or just about any Simpsons or South Park episode article. He is not vandalizing, just being a dick and I don't want to editwar with him any longer but his blatant disregard for one of the most important policies here has got to stop. Is there a place to report such recalcitrance? Cheers. L0b0t 03:18, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi
On 30 October you deleted an article entitled "Café Crème" created by user PrincessBrat. I am trying to find a record of the AfD discussion and vote on this article but cannot locate it. Can you help? Thanks. Cristien Nikolas 17:23, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
|
A week ago I nominated myself, hoping to be able to help Wikipedia as an administrator as much as a WikiGnome. I am very glad many others shared my thoughts, including you. Thank you for your trust! Be sure I will use these tools to protect and prevent and not to harass or punish. Should you feel I am overreacting, pat me so that I can correct myself. I will take your advice, and whenever I have doubts, I will ask for suggestions before acting. Mistakes can be solved, but it is better to prevent them when possible. Thanks again for your support! ReyBrujo 19:36, 18 November 2006 (UTC) |
Would you be interested in helping out at WikiProject Munich? Kingjeff 21:29, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
It doesn't matter how much you know. Do you know any of Wikipedia policies? Maybe you could help Munich-related articles comform to Wikipedia policy. Kingjeff 21:34, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Do you think I'm missing anything on WikiProject Munich page? Kingjeff 21:55, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Check out the
Munich article. I noticed there is only one reference. Try
the Official Munich Homepage to see if you can reference anything in the article. One of the project divisions is an
Article Referencing Drive. Do you want to develop this page or do you want to wait till there is more members in this project?
Kingjeff
01:44, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for protecting Tourette syndrome, but I'm curious about why you felt it was necessary: vandal watchers have done a very good job of staying on top of the vandalism, and it hadn't been vandalized recently. I believe the article is OK without protection, because so many eyes are watching it. Regards, Sandy ( Talk) 21:35, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Hey, could you please fully-protect Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus? Thanks! Khoi khoi 22:01, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Oh, one more: Mashallah. Khoi khoi 22:30, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Lol, it's no big deal. It's not like I would've edited the page after it was protected (I know the rules). Khoi khoi 23:19, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi Nishkid. There's a request here to unprotect Tourette syndrome which you protected. The requesting user, Sandy, is a regular editor of this article, and so would probably know if protection is necessary. Could you have a look? Thanks. -- Majorly ( Talk) 23:36, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
I going to decline it, but apparently Majorly already unprotected it. Heh. Khoi khoi 00:16, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
I responded on my talk page. - Jmabel | Talk 00:53, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
This Ip address. Has recorded, continual, vandalism, on contribution list, and is currently on, Last warning, please block. This name: 64.12.116.200. Spacebot 17:43, 19 November 2006 (UTC) on 17:43 at 19th November 2006.
Apolodgies, the bot is just new. It may malfunction. Can you Register it for me? I' am a new user, not knowing how. If the bot causes more problems, could you please block it. It must have traced the Ip wrong. Register the bot please Galactian 17:50, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
The bot I created is causing havoc. I've added a script and its all going wrong. Its just blanked 19 articles. Please shut it down at once!!! Galactian 18:19, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
After that little situation. I' am not going to mess around with bots again. I'm going to do lots and lots of work myself. Catch vandals myself, and become a proud and famous contributor to Wikipedia. Galactian 18:30, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
I was wondering. How could I get a barnstar? A lot of users have them, and I don't. So far I have created 4 articles, which could be useful in future times.
The Ip address User:195.172.183.147 Over the last few days has been blanking articles and repeatedly abusing Geek He was put on his last warning by an Admin 3 days ago, the next day he continued vandalising and hasn't been punished. He isn't here at the moment, but block the Ip. Galactian 19:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC) It does exsist, use the Wikipedia search, and it'll be found.
Hey NishKid, First of all, I'd like to congradulate you on what a marvelous job you've done of your page and setting it up. Now, when It comes to Vandalproof, I'd like to use it, but I haven't yet got over 250 mainspace edits. I'm working to bring the number up, I'm at 115 or something like that, but It'll be a while before I'm actually allowed to use VandalProof. Anything you can do/suggest?? Thanks, Ardo 19:30, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
I need your help so I can create these Userbox things on my page. So I can step further into Wikipedia. Galactian 19:38, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
I was wondering. Who is the boss Admin of Wikipedia? Galactian 19:40, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm not sure if you know, but since China re-blocked Wikipedia, Exir Kamalabadi can no longer edit on Wikipedia, and we cannot continue with the admin coaching. =( Nishkid 64 20:29, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
I have found this user profile known as User: Professor Sunderland . His contributions show mostly Vandalism, and I have relised he has the Same IP as an indefinitley blocked user I found called User:Molag bal which was blocked for vandalism, I believe this user is a sockpuppet. please add a notice to his page that he is suspected of being a sockpuppet. Galactian 22:12, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
User:Galactian IS Professor Sunderland... you're being played with. Check the discussion on my talk page, that is, if he hasn't blanked it out again. Also note this: [2]. wikipediatrix 22:53, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Sorry about that - I've no idea! I've asked for an RFCU on Galictian to check his identity. Again, sorry! M a rtinp23 23:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Hello Nishkid, I hope you can help me with this. I just came across this vandal, he claims falsly that he is an administrator, I would appreciate if you would look into this. Thanks.__ Seadog ♪ 00:41, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Feel free to place this award on your user page, as a token of appreciation for your contributions. If you're willing to help spread the good cheer to others, please see the project page for the Random Smiley Award at: User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward
Hi nishkid! i wanted to thank you for sprotecting my request. It seems that User:Angr has disagreed with your decision and reversed it. I was wondering if you could please work out a resolution with them. - ΖαππερΝαππερ Babel Alexandria 19:29, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm not voting, I'm changing my opinion as to whether or not I support this user based on facts provided, as it stands after thinking about it I am pretty sure he could do a better job then 80% of our lazy sysops. thanks/ Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 22:38, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Take a look at this [4] and please remove the South Park section, there is a consensus on its removal. Thanks. *Spark* 23:45, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi! As you can tell, I didn't really care that much about unprotecting Weis Markets; it's been a couple of weeks, and I just looked back at it and realized that you denied the unprotection. I have no problem with that; the only reason I put in the request was that it had been protected for a month, and I thought that the policy is to not permanently protect pages. I read something months ago about AOL passing on some information that would let us block an individual end user, as opposed to a proxy IP. Any idea what's up with that? At the moment, AOL users can basically vandalize Wikipedia with impunity -- and they know it. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 01:28, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Hey Nishkid, I noticed you're reviewing a lot of the cases on requests for protection right now so I figured I'd ask you to review a decision I made about 30 minutes ago. Here's the diff for it [5]. I realized after I made the denial that someone suggested it be brought here in the deletion review that is now up for the article that was asked for unprotection. As I'm a commenter in that AfD, I probably should have this reviewed by someone else. Oh, and did I mention this is just my first day with the mop? :) Could you take a look at the revelant discussions on DRV and RPP for me?
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 47 | 20 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:42, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Try not to unprotect stuff too soon. -- Steel 14:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Please replace the semi-protection of Automobile. You previously agreed to PERMENANTLY semi-protect automobile. As was painstakingly explained before, short periods of semiprotection are of no use for this article. Please re-read my carefully researched proof that un-semiprotection is exceedingly counter-productive on either the original request for protection or in Talk:Automobile#RFPP_for_Automobile. The article was vandalised (predictably) within hours of your un-protection and will continue to be vandalised (typically) about 7 times per day. Since these vandals all come from different IP addresses (indeed different domains) and there is absolutely no pattern to the nature of their actions, we may conclude that these are just random visitors and not the actions of a small number of individuals who might be dissuaded by a short period of semi-protection.
Many of the editors of this article are heartily sick of spending hour upon hour of our time fixing up this article as a result of anonymous vandals when absolutely NO useful edits have ever been committed by anonymous users. SteveBaker 15:21, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Please re-add the semiprotection. This page was vandalized several times a day almost every day, by unregistered users, and the semiprotection helped greatly. Dlong 16:46, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
I know you're also in the stub-sorting WikiProject. All the Munich-related stub templates are ready for use. Kingjeff 19:18, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
They are right here. On member thinks I should propose these templates to the WikiProject Stub-sorting. Do you think I really need too? Kingjeff 21:57, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
The problem is they're already created. And I don't like the fact that One WikiProject tells another WikiProject what to do. Kingjeff 22:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
This isn't about experience. In fact, I went to them for help stub-sorting Munich-related articles because of their experience. I think all my stub templates are justified. I essentially copied the templates from WikiProject Germany. And the fact is I have less templaltes then they do. I honestly made these templates thinking that these would be the ones that would have a lot of articles in them. Kingjeff 22:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
On WikiProject Germany, there are 18 stub templates that I could have copied. I only copied half of those templates. So, it's not like I went crazy over creating stub templates and they're relevent to WikiProject Munich. Kingjeff 22:35, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Even though 1 is already on the discoveries list? Kingjeff 23:35, 21 November 2006 (UTC) All the WikiProject Munich Stub categories are up. Yo realize I had already combined some categories before I even created these stub categopries? Kingjeff 00:05, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
I don't agree with a WikiProject having this kind of atuthority. Kingjeff 00:17, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
I will have to appeal any decision that goes against the WikiProject Munich in the stub categories matter.
Kingjeff
00:36, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
I think Ignore all rules policy is the policy that should be inforced here since the current stub rules prevent WikiProject Munich from improving and maintaining Wikipedia's Munich-related articles. Kingjeff 17:17, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
I would like to bring to your attention my reply here. Please, don't take it personally, it is not, it is only about the issue, and I perfectly realize you are simply cought in the middle, and never doubt your integrity. Just want to point out that you were "trapped" by a couple of ill-intended users to put the block on that page at a moment when they have malitiously edited it. Unfortunately, this is not a singular case, but became a policy that was applied in several articles. This demands for raising the issue higher. The example of the page you have blocked at the malitious moment will have to be given, so I though it would be logical to let you know about this. Again, I would like to assure you that all civilized users view your actions in good-faith. : Dc76 23:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Ive localised my monobook now (see User:Glen_S/monobook.js) so it must be something Voice of All has done to a subpage. Am looking... Glen 23:56, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Check the history of Redemptionbot – a sock of Molag Bal and Professor Sunderland? What do you think? -- Majorly ( Talk) 16:36, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
I completely agree - a longer block on the IP is best (as a preventative measure against further socks), and the RFCU case is quite redundant, based on the evidence from the editing patterns. Thanks M a rtinp23 20:43, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Why did you delete Alan Marsden? —Preceding unsigned comment added by MeMeMe543 ( talk • contribs)
I know it isn't ideal, but shouldn't this article be permanently semi-protected? It's one of the most regularly-vandalised Wikipedia articles that I've seen, indeed it's happened a few more times since you removed the "Sprotect" a couple of days ago. Thanks, Responsible? 02:09, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
![]() |
Cheers! : ) — Rand fan ! ! has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile at others by adding {{ subst:smile}}, {{ subst:smile2}} or {{ subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
I will always protect someone's userpage if they request it, regardless of whether there is any vandalism or not. They're not encyclopedic articles so the "high level of vandalism" thing doesn't really apply IMO. I actually went and protected that other user's page, only to return to WP:RFPP to find you had declined it. -- Steel 16:24, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Dear Nishkid64,
This page is protected already. Some user were add a section;"Opinions_on_genocide",(with a racial-nationalist approach), which is unrelated with this article and no sources(Offered sources is from Armenian gecocide web page texts).
To keep the article "as it is" seems not so convenient.
Related discussions are being done in different genocide articles, to follow these discussions is irrelevant with this article.
at the
Talk:Mustafa_Kemal_Atatürk there is a consensus that this section no need here.(except some a few supporter)
*I kindly demand from you to clean only this section
Mustafa_Kemal_Atatürk#Opinions_on_genocide
Thanks in advance.
Kind regards.
Must
TC
16:45, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi Nishkid. FYI, I have reinstated the indef block on User:Treva135 as he is persisting with his personal attacks despite further warnings. Best, Gwernol 20:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
I was just wondering, why did you have the page "Team Recon" deleted and protected? Thank you for your time. Paulhitthewall 00:10, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
I am sincerely sorry if my comment gave the impression that i felt that you were incapable of making decisions;that was absolutely not the imprssion that I intended to convey (and I re-iterate that the ageist comment was made by another editor, not by me). I felt that my comments related to the article ( Abaana), not to your handling of it, and if that is not the way it came across please accept my sincere apologies.-- Anthony.bradbury 00:46, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
User:Wikih8lulz needs to be outright banned for username, not just vandalism. User has 24 hour block only, but needs perm block for saying Wiki-hate lolz in his own username. - Patstuart (talk) (contribs) 02:22, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Niskid, my article has been vandalised personally by this Ip address 81.129.30.255 they haved added a notice that I' am impersonating a user. Please report it now, and have them warned.
Hey, just wondering about this edit. Why did you remove the Louisiana category? Are those going away or something? — Wknight94 ( talk) 01:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Hey, any idea why Lucille Ball was protected? Would it have anything to do with a persistent AOL vandal? Strangely enough, he seems to have gone away (for now, at least) after I sent him a message telling him he was wasting his time. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 03:21, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Apologies if this is in the wrong place, or in approriate. My colleage set this page up on my request and before he had finsihed editing it has changed and it was all very confusing. I have tried to pick up where he left of, and I am finding people talking about what is "notable" and what is not "notable". I was finding it hard to follow who was saying what. so i wont comment on past comments. What I will say is that notability is objective. Nobaby will totally agree, and if you guys spend you time arguing over it you will waste many hours.
What will say is this. I have held I dieing bady in my arms, and wept becuase I didn't have enough money to help. I met children who have been abducted, raped and forced to kill. I have held hands with children who have AIDS, and I have sat with street children on my knee. Many of these children Abaana support. We support over 3,000 children on a daily bases, and we do it through sacrafice. However there are millions still in need, and to be honest if we measured the work on Google hits, on numbers we would miss the point. There is no price you can put on an individuals life. Saving one life is notable!
Sorry to bother you. But is there anything that can be done about this User:Scorpion0422? He refuses to cite sources for his edits and removes every fact tag I put on things, please look at his edit summaries for South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut or just about any Simpsons or South Park episode article. He is not vandalizing, just being a dick and I don't want to editwar with him any longer but his blatant disregard for one of the most important policies here has got to stop. Is there a place to report such recalcitrance? Cheers. L0b0t 03:18, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi
On 30 October you deleted an article entitled "Café Crème" created by user PrincessBrat. I am trying to find a record of the AfD discussion and vote on this article but cannot locate it. Can you help? Thanks. Cristien Nikolas 17:23, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
|
A week ago I nominated myself, hoping to be able to help Wikipedia as an administrator as much as a WikiGnome. I am very glad many others shared my thoughts, including you. Thank you for your trust! Be sure I will use these tools to protect and prevent and not to harass or punish. Should you feel I am overreacting, pat me so that I can correct myself. I will take your advice, and whenever I have doubts, I will ask for suggestions before acting. Mistakes can be solved, but it is better to prevent them when possible. Thanks again for your support! ReyBrujo 19:36, 18 November 2006 (UTC) |
Would you be interested in helping out at WikiProject Munich? Kingjeff 21:29, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
It doesn't matter how much you know. Do you know any of Wikipedia policies? Maybe you could help Munich-related articles comform to Wikipedia policy. Kingjeff 21:34, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Do you think I'm missing anything on WikiProject Munich page? Kingjeff 21:55, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Check out the
Munich article. I noticed there is only one reference. Try
the Official Munich Homepage to see if you can reference anything in the article. One of the project divisions is an
Article Referencing Drive. Do you want to develop this page or do you want to wait till there is more members in this project?
Kingjeff
01:44, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for protecting Tourette syndrome, but I'm curious about why you felt it was necessary: vandal watchers have done a very good job of staying on top of the vandalism, and it hadn't been vandalized recently. I believe the article is OK without protection, because so many eyes are watching it. Regards, Sandy ( Talk) 21:35, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Hey, could you please fully-protect Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus? Thanks! Khoi khoi 22:01, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Oh, one more: Mashallah. Khoi khoi 22:30, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Lol, it's no big deal. It's not like I would've edited the page after it was protected (I know the rules). Khoi khoi 23:19, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi Nishkid. There's a request here to unprotect Tourette syndrome which you protected. The requesting user, Sandy, is a regular editor of this article, and so would probably know if protection is necessary. Could you have a look? Thanks. -- Majorly ( Talk) 23:36, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
I going to decline it, but apparently Majorly already unprotected it. Heh. Khoi khoi 00:16, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
I responded on my talk page. - Jmabel | Talk 00:53, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
This Ip address. Has recorded, continual, vandalism, on contribution list, and is currently on, Last warning, please block. This name: 64.12.116.200. Spacebot 17:43, 19 November 2006 (UTC) on 17:43 at 19th November 2006.
Apolodgies, the bot is just new. It may malfunction. Can you Register it for me? I' am a new user, not knowing how. If the bot causes more problems, could you please block it. It must have traced the Ip wrong. Register the bot please Galactian 17:50, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
The bot I created is causing havoc. I've added a script and its all going wrong. Its just blanked 19 articles. Please shut it down at once!!! Galactian 18:19, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
After that little situation. I' am not going to mess around with bots again. I'm going to do lots and lots of work myself. Catch vandals myself, and become a proud and famous contributor to Wikipedia. Galactian 18:30, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
I was wondering. How could I get a barnstar? A lot of users have them, and I don't. So far I have created 4 articles, which could be useful in future times.
The Ip address User:195.172.183.147 Over the last few days has been blanking articles and repeatedly abusing Geek He was put on his last warning by an Admin 3 days ago, the next day he continued vandalising and hasn't been punished. He isn't here at the moment, but block the Ip. Galactian 19:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC) It does exsist, use the Wikipedia search, and it'll be found.
Hey NishKid, First of all, I'd like to congradulate you on what a marvelous job you've done of your page and setting it up. Now, when It comes to Vandalproof, I'd like to use it, but I haven't yet got over 250 mainspace edits. I'm working to bring the number up, I'm at 115 or something like that, but It'll be a while before I'm actually allowed to use VandalProof. Anything you can do/suggest?? Thanks, Ardo 19:30, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
I need your help so I can create these Userbox things on my page. So I can step further into Wikipedia. Galactian 19:38, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
I was wondering. Who is the boss Admin of Wikipedia? Galactian 19:40, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm not sure if you know, but since China re-blocked Wikipedia, Exir Kamalabadi can no longer edit on Wikipedia, and we cannot continue with the admin coaching. =( Nishkid 64 20:29, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
I have found this user profile known as User: Professor Sunderland . His contributions show mostly Vandalism, and I have relised he has the Same IP as an indefinitley blocked user I found called User:Molag bal which was blocked for vandalism, I believe this user is a sockpuppet. please add a notice to his page that he is suspected of being a sockpuppet. Galactian 22:12, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
User:Galactian IS Professor Sunderland... you're being played with. Check the discussion on my talk page, that is, if he hasn't blanked it out again. Also note this: [2]. wikipediatrix 22:53, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Sorry about that - I've no idea! I've asked for an RFCU on Galictian to check his identity. Again, sorry! M a rtinp23 23:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Hello Nishkid, I hope you can help me with this. I just came across this vandal, he claims falsly that he is an administrator, I would appreciate if you would look into this. Thanks.__ Seadog ♪ 00:41, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Feel free to place this award on your user page, as a token of appreciation for your contributions. If you're willing to help spread the good cheer to others, please see the project page for the Random Smiley Award at: User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward
Hi nishkid! i wanted to thank you for sprotecting my request. It seems that User:Angr has disagreed with your decision and reversed it. I was wondering if you could please work out a resolution with them. - ΖαππερΝαππερ Babel Alexandria 19:29, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm not voting, I'm changing my opinion as to whether or not I support this user based on facts provided, as it stands after thinking about it I am pretty sure he could do a better job then 80% of our lazy sysops. thanks/ Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 22:38, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Take a look at this [4] and please remove the South Park section, there is a consensus on its removal. Thanks. *Spark* 23:45, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi! As you can tell, I didn't really care that much about unprotecting Weis Markets; it's been a couple of weeks, and I just looked back at it and realized that you denied the unprotection. I have no problem with that; the only reason I put in the request was that it had been protected for a month, and I thought that the policy is to not permanently protect pages. I read something months ago about AOL passing on some information that would let us block an individual end user, as opposed to a proxy IP. Any idea what's up with that? At the moment, AOL users can basically vandalize Wikipedia with impunity -- and they know it. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 01:28, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Hey Nishkid, I noticed you're reviewing a lot of the cases on requests for protection right now so I figured I'd ask you to review a decision I made about 30 minutes ago. Here's the diff for it [5]. I realized after I made the denial that someone suggested it be brought here in the deletion review that is now up for the article that was asked for unprotection. As I'm a commenter in that AfD, I probably should have this reviewed by someone else. Oh, and did I mention this is just my first day with the mop? :) Could you take a look at the revelant discussions on DRV and RPP for me?
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 47 | 20 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:42, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Try not to unprotect stuff too soon. -- Steel 14:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Please replace the semi-protection of Automobile. You previously agreed to PERMENANTLY semi-protect automobile. As was painstakingly explained before, short periods of semiprotection are of no use for this article. Please re-read my carefully researched proof that un-semiprotection is exceedingly counter-productive on either the original request for protection or in Talk:Automobile#RFPP_for_Automobile. The article was vandalised (predictably) within hours of your un-protection and will continue to be vandalised (typically) about 7 times per day. Since these vandals all come from different IP addresses (indeed different domains) and there is absolutely no pattern to the nature of their actions, we may conclude that these are just random visitors and not the actions of a small number of individuals who might be dissuaded by a short period of semi-protection.
Many of the editors of this article are heartily sick of spending hour upon hour of our time fixing up this article as a result of anonymous vandals when absolutely NO useful edits have ever been committed by anonymous users. SteveBaker 15:21, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Please re-add the semiprotection. This page was vandalized several times a day almost every day, by unregistered users, and the semiprotection helped greatly. Dlong 16:46, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
I know you're also in the stub-sorting WikiProject. All the Munich-related stub templates are ready for use. Kingjeff 19:18, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
They are right here. On member thinks I should propose these templates to the WikiProject Stub-sorting. Do you think I really need too? Kingjeff 21:57, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
The problem is they're already created. And I don't like the fact that One WikiProject tells another WikiProject what to do. Kingjeff 22:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
This isn't about experience. In fact, I went to them for help stub-sorting Munich-related articles because of their experience. I think all my stub templates are justified. I essentially copied the templates from WikiProject Germany. And the fact is I have less templaltes then they do. I honestly made these templates thinking that these would be the ones that would have a lot of articles in them. Kingjeff 22:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
On WikiProject Germany, there are 18 stub templates that I could have copied. I only copied half of those templates. So, it's not like I went crazy over creating stub templates and they're relevent to WikiProject Munich. Kingjeff 22:35, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Even though 1 is already on the discoveries list? Kingjeff 23:35, 21 November 2006 (UTC) All the WikiProject Munich Stub categories are up. Yo realize I had already combined some categories before I even created these stub categopries? Kingjeff 00:05, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
I don't agree with a WikiProject having this kind of atuthority. Kingjeff 00:17, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
I will have to appeal any decision that goes against the WikiProject Munich in the stub categories matter.
Kingjeff
00:36, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
I think Ignore all rules policy is the policy that should be inforced here since the current stub rules prevent WikiProject Munich from improving and maintaining Wikipedia's Munich-related articles. Kingjeff 17:17, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
I would like to bring to your attention my reply here. Please, don't take it personally, it is not, it is only about the issue, and I perfectly realize you are simply cought in the middle, and never doubt your integrity. Just want to point out that you were "trapped" by a couple of ill-intended users to put the block on that page at a moment when they have malitiously edited it. Unfortunately, this is not a singular case, but became a policy that was applied in several articles. This demands for raising the issue higher. The example of the page you have blocked at the malitious moment will have to be given, so I though it would be logical to let you know about this. Again, I would like to assure you that all civilized users view your actions in good-faith. : Dc76 23:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Ive localised my monobook now (see User:Glen_S/monobook.js) so it must be something Voice of All has done to a subpage. Am looking... Glen 23:56, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Check the history of Redemptionbot – a sock of Molag Bal and Professor Sunderland? What do you think? -- Majorly ( Talk) 16:36, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
I completely agree - a longer block on the IP is best (as a preventative measure against further socks), and the RFCU case is quite redundant, based on the evidence from the editing patterns. Thanks M a rtinp23 20:43, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Why did you delete Alan Marsden? —Preceding unsigned comment added by MeMeMe543 ( talk • contribs)
I know it isn't ideal, but shouldn't this article be permanently semi-protected? It's one of the most regularly-vandalised Wikipedia articles that I've seen, indeed it's happened a few more times since you removed the "Sprotect" a couple of days ago. Thanks, Responsible? 02:09, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
![]() |
Cheers! : ) — Rand fan ! ! has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile at others by adding {{ subst:smile}}, {{ subst:smile2}} or {{ subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
I will always protect someone's userpage if they request it, regardless of whether there is any vandalism or not. They're not encyclopedic articles so the "high level of vandalism" thing doesn't really apply IMO. I actually went and protected that other user's page, only to return to WP:RFPP to find you had declined it. -- Steel 16:24, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Dear Nishkid64,
This page is protected already. Some user were add a section;"Opinions_on_genocide",(with a racial-nationalist approach), which is unrelated with this article and no sources(Offered sources is from Armenian gecocide web page texts).
To keep the article "as it is" seems not so convenient.
Related discussions are being done in different genocide articles, to follow these discussions is irrelevant with this article.
at the
Talk:Mustafa_Kemal_Atatürk there is a consensus that this section no need here.(except some a few supporter)
*I kindly demand from you to clean only this section
Mustafa_Kemal_Atatürk#Opinions_on_genocide
Thanks in advance.
Kind regards.
Must
TC
16:45, 23 November 2006 (UTC)