You said:
“ | About Nickleback. If you had bothered to actually look at the revision, you would have noticed that i did not add any information (hence, your template was not only misplaced, but also rude) and i removed the refs from the infobox because they make the box look clogged, which as i have read recently is also an issue in the infobox discussion. In any case, you did not even try to initiate conversation before blocking me. I hereby demand that you unblock me within 60 minutes, or i will have to request assistance from other administrators, for adminstrator abuse. | ” |
It is simply not the case that I did not even try to initiate conversation with you. I did, see here, which you blanked rather than responding to, here. This was not the first time you have blanked warnings from your page. See here, where you blanked similar warnings. Given that you were removing citations from a band whose genre is particularly and regularly disputed, and continued to do so after being warned about this and did so without any further communication or even meaningful edit summary, I believe my actions were appropriate. If you are willing to refrain from this sort of behaviour in the future (for example, moving the genre citations down into the article and leaving a comment in the infobox), I would be happy to unblock you. -- Yamla ( talk) 17:09, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Please stop changing them. You are violating WP:EW on Amon Amarth and Opeth for no reason. Genre delimiters do not need to be changed and changing them only causes edit wars. As you can see you have been reverted by me and The Haunted Angel. On another note, I agree with you on the Firefox article. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 20:13, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Blizzard Beast
$ODIN$
21:09, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Wrong. There's one big difference with what you and I are doing. I know there is no consensus either way, first off. The big difference is that I don't go around to band pages and turn them to line breaks, I leave them the way they are and if someone changes them, then I revert them even if they changed comma breaks to line breaks. Besides there was a huge war on the Amon Amarth page before (and yes, I was involved) and it was decided by admins to leave it alone (in line break form). I'm just keeping pages as they are. I don't go around changing bullshit for no reason. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 21:47, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
You're invited to the above once your block is over. Do try to remain calm and civil if you wish to take part in the discussion. -- Bardin ( talk) 14:35, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Aesthetically prettier? Traitor. :) ~ | twsx | talk cont | ~ 12:59, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
You said:
“ | About Nickleback. If you had bothered to actually look at the revision, you would have noticed that i did not add any information (hence, your template was not only misplaced, but also rude) and i removed the refs from the infobox because they make the box look clogged, which as i have read recently is also an issue in the infobox discussion. In any case, you did not even try to initiate conversation before blocking me. I hereby demand that you unblock me within 60 minutes, or i will have to request assistance from other administrators, for adminstrator abuse. | ” |
It is simply not the case that I did not even try to initiate conversation with you. I did, see here, which you blanked rather than responding to, here. This was not the first time you have blanked warnings from your page. See here, where you blanked similar warnings. Given that you were removing citations from a band whose genre is particularly and regularly disputed, and continued to do so after being warned about this and did so without any further communication or even meaningful edit summary, I believe my actions were appropriate. If you are willing to refrain from this sort of behaviour in the future (for example, moving the genre citations down into the article and leaving a comment in the infobox), I would be happy to unblock you. -- Yamla ( talk) 17:09, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Please stop changing them. You are violating WP:EW on Amon Amarth and Opeth for no reason. Genre delimiters do not need to be changed and changing them only causes edit wars. As you can see you have been reverted by me and The Haunted Angel. On another note, I agree with you on the Firefox article. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 20:13, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Blizzard Beast
$ODIN$
21:09, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Wrong. There's one big difference with what you and I are doing. I know there is no consensus either way, first off. The big difference is that I don't go around to band pages and turn them to line breaks, I leave them the way they are and if someone changes them, then I revert them even if they changed comma breaks to line breaks. Besides there was a huge war on the Amon Amarth page before (and yes, I was involved) and it was decided by admins to leave it alone (in line break form). I'm just keeping pages as they are. I don't go around changing bullshit for no reason. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 21:47, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
You're invited to the above once your block is over. Do try to remain calm and civil if you wish to take part in the discussion. -- Bardin ( talk) 14:35, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Aesthetically prettier? Traitor. :) ~ | twsx | talk cont | ~ 12:59, 28 April 2008 (UTC)