This user may have left Wikipedia. NewEnglandYankee has not edited Wikipedia since August 2018. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
there's an equally large amount of more accurate references that use the proper spelling of chapathi.
chapathi is pronounced with a soft T like in 'thing' or 'thin'. not with a hard T like in Tea.
i'm not sure how to do a page title change, i'd love for that to happen. if you can get the ball rolling that'd be great. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.44.177.134 ( talk) 23:13, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
not a 'heaven sent' anything, but more of a proper spelling that preserves proper pronunciation/transliteration.
after all it isn't an english word and has a proper accurate pronunciation. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
174.44.177.134 (
talk)
23:53, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for fighting bias from both sides! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8805:A980:3E80:B5F0:539E:C0B1:A661 ( talk) 21:46, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello NewEnglandYankee!
I am writing in your in reference the following message; "I'm NewEnglandYankee. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mihrab, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. As a rule, the burden of proof is on you in cases like this. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 22:43, 24 February 2018 (UTC)"
I actually added the following 6 references to wikipedia article during my original edit. Did you miss them?
DR. F. Ruhe
1-The Ostia Mithraea: An Introduction to the Cult of Mithras.
brewminate.com/the-ostia-mithraea-an-introduction-to-the-cult-of-mithras-and-tour-o...
2- Cumont, F. The Mysteries of Mithra. Trans. T. J. McCormack. London, 1903, reprint
New York, 1956
3- Renan, E. Marc-Aurèle et la. fin du monde antique. Paris, 1882.
4- JDStone. Mithras= Christianity. - jdstone.org/cr/files/mithraschristianity.html
5- Hugh Fogelman. Christianity uncovers: Viewed through open eyes. page 33
6- Celebrating Yalda Night - Iran Review. www.iranreview.org › Iran Review › About Iran › Iran's Heritage — Preceding unsigned comment added by DR. F. Ruhe ( talk • contribs) 22:52, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi NewEnglandYankee, I deleted the content because I actually posted the content. The problem was that this is for a grade in my class and somehow it didn't get linked with the class so I wouldn't get a grade for it. I'm trying to link my wikipedia with the class so I can repost it. Thanks. I'll delete it again. -Unbiasedpanda — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unbiasedpanda ( talk • contribs) 18:22, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Killy has gained a large following online with the music video for his song “Killaminjaro” garnering over 15 million views on YouTube. He’s definitely a notable Canadian artist and deserves his own page. Peepeetimesthree ( talk) 00:34, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello! I have only reverted two edits. It seems any effort to present the page in an unbiased light is quickly stomped out by threats. I am open to a discussion, however, your recent actions do not appear to be receptive an unbiased opinion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.219.32.108 ( talk) 01:23, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Sorry about that. I added the explanation. We're discussing this very issue on the talk page and there is an editor being extremely uncooperative. I am trying to engage in a discussion to provide as much objective information as possible and he rudely dismisses anything that I state. If you're an administrator and you could help intervene as an unbiased third party, that would be much appreciated.
He claims that I should be reported for edit warring - but I really think he should be reported for both edit warring and harassment (as well as not agreeing to cooperate and publishing whatever materials without consensus) 50.250.227.83 ( talk) 02:26, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello Abc382628 ( talk) 18:42, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello Abc382628 ( talk) 18:42, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
there was never a macedonian language, there are no reliable proofs other than that it was greek as archaic stones depict
there was never a macedonian language, there are no reliable proofs other than that it was greek as archaic stones depict antoniodimitriadis ( talk) 22:13, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Please read this book K.L. Pradhan (2012) book: Thapa politics in Nepal Also, Baburam Acharya is the most reliable historian in Nepal.
Laxman Hamal and Gyanmani Nepal are good historians.
And lesser reliable Joshi, Bhuwan Lal; Rose, Leo E. (1966), Democratic Innovations in Nepal: A Case Study of Political Acculturation, University of California Press, p. 551 also points somewhat to the historical fact.
Shivaram Singh Basnyat family is the only noble family from Basnyat group and with 4 generations of nobles till 1846, rise of Rana dynasty. Khaptadi are mere Chhetri clans and can be adjusted in Basnet article since both share same family name.
Please tell me why you think it is alright to just call the political positioning of the National Fascist Party as "Far-Right". As I have mentioned before, the National Fascist Party encompassed many political beliefs that were both left and right wing, hence the Syncretic positioning, as it is not sole to any individual side. Not all ideologies are just placed on one spot on a line. The entire concept of Syncretic Ideological beliefs is the point of the uniqueness of the National Fascist Party. Education with fact should be taught in an unbias and fair manner. The narrative that it was a "Far-Right" party is false. You can even read the Doctrine of Fascism, the guide for which the party's ideology was based upon. Yes, while it is largely taught as being a Far-Right party, in truth it is not. It is only taught that way because those who risk to question the labels set after World War 2 have faced ridicule and scorn. So what is the point of wikipedia if we continue to uphold this false information for the sake of not making others who are sensitive to the information unhappy and mad. It is controversial, yes, but it is truth. The correct political positioning of the National Fascist Party is Syncretic. In no way is it excluding the right wing beliefs, however just labeling it as "Far-Right" completely excludes the left-wing aspects to the party.
You're on Yankee. This is exactly the problem. Even in the page it lists the origins and founders of the National Fascist Party, many of whom happened to be radical left-wing visionaries. The Doctrine of Fascism is undeniably neither solely left or right. It is a blend, a mix, a unity, an amalgamation, of both ideals. A synonym to those words is Syncretic, a valid standing on the traditional political spectrum. If we fail to account for what the party's ideals were, than history itself is being taught with bias. And your attempt to compare the category Syncretic to a made-up category, as you call it"Lizard-alien takeover". This is not some made up category, it is a completely valid standing on the political spectrum.
Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to User talk:DatGoodDude342— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:12, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Hey hey, buddy. I really appreciate the assistance you gave resolving the issue I had with that IP User on my talk page. I'd give you a hug, but you can't really do that over a computer now, can you? Thanks a lot! DatGoodDude342 ( talk) 03:26, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi! I'm using a computer at a public library and got a vandalism warning from you directed to some other user of the library. This is a shared IP from the library, so I expect it to continue making off-and-on vandalism edits. I'm not sure if you ban preemptively, but I would recommend it if possible. I can log in if I need to make an edit, and I'm sure anyone else making constructive edits from here could do so as well. Just wanted to give you a heads up. 50.205.174.210 ( talk) 22:37, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
For his excellent work in crushing and eviscerating the Vandals at the gates of Rome (for instance, his recent reversion of silly edits to the article Death of Cleopatra), I, PericlesofAthens, dub thee, NewEnglandYankee, Knight of Anti-Vandalism and Guardian of Wikipedia. Stand and be proud, good sir knight! Pericles of Athens Talk 23:48, 1 May 2018 (UTC) |
Hi NewEnglandYankee, I am just writing to tell you that there is no conflict in interest with me editing the BioMart page. My username is from my school ID and I am editing the page as a final project for my bioinformatics class. I'd appreciate it if you would let me keep my edits up till at least tomorrow morning since it is being graded tonight. After that, do whatever you want. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bm208613 ( talk • contribs) 00:04, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Okay I'm not some silly 6 year old twerp and I can make my own edits. I know that. You keep deleting my work on the Orinoco crocodile, little do you know, what I edit is actually true. They have been placed on Latin America's 72 most dangerous animals list. It's not 'unsourced' it's factual. Sloppiness ( talk) 00:07, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Okay.
Perhaps you'd be willing to spend 2 minutes furnishing me with an explanation for why you deleted my response without aknowledgment? -- 178.78.65.15 ( talk) 01:21, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
2. I am not connected to any facebook attack. I'm sorry if my edits, which I repeat WERE SOURCED, were in any way reminiscent of an attack. Whether my edits were "unhelpful" is not really the point. I resent being called a troll, I resent being accused of attacking the page, I was attempting to add some information from a legitimate history programme to the page. Like I said, if this wasn't done eloquently enough for you, you have every right to edit, but I will not be insulted and bullied. 3. See 1. -- 178.78.65.15 ( talk) 01:36, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello. I have to let you know for future references that all users have the right to edit their own talkpage. I will have to ask that in the future you do not reinstate unwanted warnings on other users' talkpages. Thank you. CLCStudent ( talk) 01:33, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
I have opened an AN/I regarding this user here: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Stringcatt regards Mztourist ( talk) 07:00, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, I thought the removal was of established content. You were correct to revert my mistake. - Conservatrix ( talk) 01:18, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
This edit doesn't need a cite. It's noted and cited in the text of the article itself, and generally it's not necessary to repeat cites in the lede.
That being said, I agree with your removal; that's not really a lede-worthy factoid. TJRC ( talk) 03:05, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Could you, please, explain your deletion of information and saying the twitter is a poor source of information while there is refercence to official twitter of Juno and moreover to a newspaper article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.108.28.63 ( talk) 20:12, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
So sorry, on mobile and accidentally hit save before finishing the edit summary explaining that redirect. Sorry for the trouble! Innisfree987 ( talk) 02:09, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
My edit of his death is accurate, I cannot provide "sources" because they don't honestly exist, even in reports from law enforcement, that bumbled his entire situation... please don't undo my edits, I provided the current picture of dennis, and I think the suggestion that his death was suicide is entirely inaccurate, though I left enough for people to draw their own conclusions, those of us who knew him, and were in regular contact with him up to his death know that a lot more was going on... thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gomicao ( talk • contribs) 02:42, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
What are your sources that his death was heroin based, or suicidal? Bluelight forums yield no real sources of information other than regrets, and have nothing to do with the conversations had in a sensitive situation that shows facts not conjecture... if you are shooting for accuracy or respect for the individual these edits would not be undone!
Where are your sources for the current information if i may ask? Link me? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Gomicao (
talk •
contribs)
03:07, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
no fact for 2million casuatlies — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.244.200.2 ( talk) 19:51, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Thanks for dealing with recent IP vandalism and trolling. I appreciate your effort. Keep it up! Abelmoschus Esculentus ( talk to me) 02:16, 26 May 2018 (UTC) |
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish on Constantinople, though. The tags you're repeatedly removing are legitimate requests for citations. Since your edits have now been reverted three times, by two different editors, please discuss the matter on the article's talk page before doing anything else. Thank you. NewEnglandYankee ( talk) 19:29, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Check Talk Sleath56 ( talk) 19:36, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi @ NewEnglandYankee:. This is regarding Lingam as a phallus symbol. In the talks of the page and it has been nominated for the deletion. Moreover writing <While the symbol is a phallic symbol in origin, it is usually no longer considered to be such by most devouts> gives the idea that Lingam is a phallus symbol. Wording needs to be improved शिव साहिल ( talk) 04:17, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Hey I reported him too ARMcgrath ( talk) 03:43, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
He was all yours happy Wiki ATM ( talk) 03:45, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Didn't mean to revert the maintenance bot on Talk:List of fictional turtles.
I was trying to figure out how to fix it when you fixed it for me. Thanks!
I was under the understanding that Wikipedia is an open source information collaboration . Perhaps you can clarify why my addition is being removed ?
First my opinion is a valid as anyone else s , the world is more than just the USA . If what I have written is not right .. then why not re write it, as you see fit , so it is as you feel right ( open source contribution ) , but removal of a whole section of important history is both biased and without the freedom that Wikipedia promotes . It is a valid section add to it , why do you remove it ?
SEE BELOW previous post ...to user Apparition11 ....it is not a editing war it is a valid contribution.
James you clearly do not have sufficient knowledge of the relevance to this company or IP rights and its history to it ... I suggest you search other IP rights postings in other articles before you attack this one .
The world has changed , and IP rights from virtually every company are compromised and mentioning the reality of this is both relevant and valid .. and is not promotional .. In fact I was sold false product and fake product from others using this companies name .. so please tell me how that is promotional and not factual, it is an important point of reference find third party reference regarding this https://www.ipo.gov.uk/t-challenge-decision-results/o49714.pdf.
I do not consider that Trade Marks and IP rights are anything other than a factual part of this companies history .. Once again why remove the whole section if its not right .. re-write it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.109.129.37 ( talk) 10:22, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
False memory page edit from May. Cute Sgerbic ( talk) 18:48, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
I have fixed it and used a neutral tone. Thanks for the info!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MSA1234 ( talk • contribs) 01:33, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Why do you keep removing his quote from the page "Baizuo"? As someone who has lived in Hong Kong and lived a couple years in the mainland I can tell you that this is an accurate way of showing the meaning of that word to people who have not seen it before, and then you warn me about "edit wars" haha, despite me already talking about it on the "talk" page. It is funny because the people the word is describing are the ones trying to remove it, but it is also concerning as the farleft are the ones always trying to remove criticism of them. That is sad as one of the reasons I left China to go to the US is for ideas of freedom, but that is also being attacked here with political correctness just like in China.
To see who really rules over you, just see who you aren't allowed to criticize. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jezza2K01 ( talk • contribs) 16:08, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
The Civility Barnstar | |
Thanks so much for your help earlier and for being so patient with this newby editor!!
comedy.bookings ( talk) 02:20, 26 July 2018 (UTC) |
On the contrary, there is plenty of supporting citations, including IMF's own study, for something that is self-evident (what effect a 25% drop in GDP would have on the Debt to GDP ratio). I had corrected the article before I saw your comment, but there should be no issue. If you want, we can agree on a different title, but certainly not "aftermath" Skartsis ( talk) 05:19, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
I am insulted that you accused me of Bad Faith just because you disagree with my attemtps to add some neutrality to an article. I will now explain my actions.
I expect an immediate apology and a retraction of your act of bad faith. I knew what I was doing, and I know that Wikipedia is riddled with bias in certain categories. If you have ever believed in
Wikipedia:Neutral Point of View, you will revert your changes and leave mine in place.
You owe me an apology.
-
2602:306:39D6:CBA0:A585:FD4A:6AD2:25D0 (
talk)
01:34, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
P.S.: The "butt" thing was an accident. I have a script called " Butt to Butt" that alters text automatically. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:39D6:CBA0:A585:FD4A:6AD2:25D0 ( talk) 01:36, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
You should always check your sources before responding to any edits made. Thank you.
For someone that says that they don't care, you surely can't leave it alone. So, please do as you say and "don't care".
Facebook is the source, but evidently it can't be added.
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thank you for your helpful reverts! XYZt ( talk) 00:19, 10 August 2018 (UTC) |
I have closed the report at WP:ANEW and blocked the IP for 24 hours. However, you did not help matters by edit-warring yourself, although you had tried to communicate with the IP as much as possible and consensus was on your side. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:52, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello, NewEnglandYankee. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
This user may have left Wikipedia. NewEnglandYankee has not edited Wikipedia since August 2018. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
there's an equally large amount of more accurate references that use the proper spelling of chapathi.
chapathi is pronounced with a soft T like in 'thing' or 'thin'. not with a hard T like in Tea.
i'm not sure how to do a page title change, i'd love for that to happen. if you can get the ball rolling that'd be great. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.44.177.134 ( talk) 23:13, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
not a 'heaven sent' anything, but more of a proper spelling that preserves proper pronunciation/transliteration.
after all it isn't an english word and has a proper accurate pronunciation. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
174.44.177.134 (
talk)
23:53, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for fighting bias from both sides! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8805:A980:3E80:B5F0:539E:C0B1:A661 ( talk) 21:46, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello NewEnglandYankee!
I am writing in your in reference the following message; "I'm NewEnglandYankee. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mihrab, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. As a rule, the burden of proof is on you in cases like this. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 22:43, 24 February 2018 (UTC)"
I actually added the following 6 references to wikipedia article during my original edit. Did you miss them?
DR. F. Ruhe
1-The Ostia Mithraea: An Introduction to the Cult of Mithras.
brewminate.com/the-ostia-mithraea-an-introduction-to-the-cult-of-mithras-and-tour-o...
2- Cumont, F. The Mysteries of Mithra. Trans. T. J. McCormack. London, 1903, reprint
New York, 1956
3- Renan, E. Marc-Aurèle et la. fin du monde antique. Paris, 1882.
4- JDStone. Mithras= Christianity. - jdstone.org/cr/files/mithraschristianity.html
5- Hugh Fogelman. Christianity uncovers: Viewed through open eyes. page 33
6- Celebrating Yalda Night - Iran Review. www.iranreview.org › Iran Review › About Iran › Iran's Heritage — Preceding unsigned comment added by DR. F. Ruhe ( talk • contribs) 22:52, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi NewEnglandYankee, I deleted the content because I actually posted the content. The problem was that this is for a grade in my class and somehow it didn't get linked with the class so I wouldn't get a grade for it. I'm trying to link my wikipedia with the class so I can repost it. Thanks. I'll delete it again. -Unbiasedpanda — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unbiasedpanda ( talk • contribs) 18:22, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Killy has gained a large following online with the music video for his song “Killaminjaro” garnering over 15 million views on YouTube. He’s definitely a notable Canadian artist and deserves his own page. Peepeetimesthree ( talk) 00:34, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello! I have only reverted two edits. It seems any effort to present the page in an unbiased light is quickly stomped out by threats. I am open to a discussion, however, your recent actions do not appear to be receptive an unbiased opinion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.219.32.108 ( talk) 01:23, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Sorry about that. I added the explanation. We're discussing this very issue on the talk page and there is an editor being extremely uncooperative. I am trying to engage in a discussion to provide as much objective information as possible and he rudely dismisses anything that I state. If you're an administrator and you could help intervene as an unbiased third party, that would be much appreciated.
He claims that I should be reported for edit warring - but I really think he should be reported for both edit warring and harassment (as well as not agreeing to cooperate and publishing whatever materials without consensus) 50.250.227.83 ( talk) 02:26, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello Abc382628 ( talk) 18:42, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello Abc382628 ( talk) 18:42, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
there was never a macedonian language, there are no reliable proofs other than that it was greek as archaic stones depict
there was never a macedonian language, there are no reliable proofs other than that it was greek as archaic stones depict antoniodimitriadis ( talk) 22:13, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Please read this book K.L. Pradhan (2012) book: Thapa politics in Nepal Also, Baburam Acharya is the most reliable historian in Nepal.
Laxman Hamal and Gyanmani Nepal are good historians.
And lesser reliable Joshi, Bhuwan Lal; Rose, Leo E. (1966), Democratic Innovations in Nepal: A Case Study of Political Acculturation, University of California Press, p. 551 also points somewhat to the historical fact.
Shivaram Singh Basnyat family is the only noble family from Basnyat group and with 4 generations of nobles till 1846, rise of Rana dynasty. Khaptadi are mere Chhetri clans and can be adjusted in Basnet article since both share same family name.
Please tell me why you think it is alright to just call the political positioning of the National Fascist Party as "Far-Right". As I have mentioned before, the National Fascist Party encompassed many political beliefs that were both left and right wing, hence the Syncretic positioning, as it is not sole to any individual side. Not all ideologies are just placed on one spot on a line. The entire concept of Syncretic Ideological beliefs is the point of the uniqueness of the National Fascist Party. Education with fact should be taught in an unbias and fair manner. The narrative that it was a "Far-Right" party is false. You can even read the Doctrine of Fascism, the guide for which the party's ideology was based upon. Yes, while it is largely taught as being a Far-Right party, in truth it is not. It is only taught that way because those who risk to question the labels set after World War 2 have faced ridicule and scorn. So what is the point of wikipedia if we continue to uphold this false information for the sake of not making others who are sensitive to the information unhappy and mad. It is controversial, yes, but it is truth. The correct political positioning of the National Fascist Party is Syncretic. In no way is it excluding the right wing beliefs, however just labeling it as "Far-Right" completely excludes the left-wing aspects to the party.
You're on Yankee. This is exactly the problem. Even in the page it lists the origins and founders of the National Fascist Party, many of whom happened to be radical left-wing visionaries. The Doctrine of Fascism is undeniably neither solely left or right. It is a blend, a mix, a unity, an amalgamation, of both ideals. A synonym to those words is Syncretic, a valid standing on the traditional political spectrum. If we fail to account for what the party's ideals were, than history itself is being taught with bias. And your attempt to compare the category Syncretic to a made-up category, as you call it"Lizard-alien takeover". This is not some made up category, it is a completely valid standing on the political spectrum.
Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to User talk:DatGoodDude342— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:12, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Hey hey, buddy. I really appreciate the assistance you gave resolving the issue I had with that IP User on my talk page. I'd give you a hug, but you can't really do that over a computer now, can you? Thanks a lot! DatGoodDude342 ( talk) 03:26, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi! I'm using a computer at a public library and got a vandalism warning from you directed to some other user of the library. This is a shared IP from the library, so I expect it to continue making off-and-on vandalism edits. I'm not sure if you ban preemptively, but I would recommend it if possible. I can log in if I need to make an edit, and I'm sure anyone else making constructive edits from here could do so as well. Just wanted to give you a heads up. 50.205.174.210 ( talk) 22:37, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
For his excellent work in crushing and eviscerating the Vandals at the gates of Rome (for instance, his recent reversion of silly edits to the article Death of Cleopatra), I, PericlesofAthens, dub thee, NewEnglandYankee, Knight of Anti-Vandalism and Guardian of Wikipedia. Stand and be proud, good sir knight! Pericles of Athens Talk 23:48, 1 May 2018 (UTC) |
Hi NewEnglandYankee, I am just writing to tell you that there is no conflict in interest with me editing the BioMart page. My username is from my school ID and I am editing the page as a final project for my bioinformatics class. I'd appreciate it if you would let me keep my edits up till at least tomorrow morning since it is being graded tonight. After that, do whatever you want. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bm208613 ( talk • contribs) 00:04, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Okay I'm not some silly 6 year old twerp and I can make my own edits. I know that. You keep deleting my work on the Orinoco crocodile, little do you know, what I edit is actually true. They have been placed on Latin America's 72 most dangerous animals list. It's not 'unsourced' it's factual. Sloppiness ( talk) 00:07, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Okay.
Perhaps you'd be willing to spend 2 minutes furnishing me with an explanation for why you deleted my response without aknowledgment? -- 178.78.65.15 ( talk) 01:21, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
2. I am not connected to any facebook attack. I'm sorry if my edits, which I repeat WERE SOURCED, were in any way reminiscent of an attack. Whether my edits were "unhelpful" is not really the point. I resent being called a troll, I resent being accused of attacking the page, I was attempting to add some information from a legitimate history programme to the page. Like I said, if this wasn't done eloquently enough for you, you have every right to edit, but I will not be insulted and bullied. 3. See 1. -- 178.78.65.15 ( talk) 01:36, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello. I have to let you know for future references that all users have the right to edit their own talkpage. I will have to ask that in the future you do not reinstate unwanted warnings on other users' talkpages. Thank you. CLCStudent ( talk) 01:33, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
I have opened an AN/I regarding this user here: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Stringcatt regards Mztourist ( talk) 07:00, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, I thought the removal was of established content. You were correct to revert my mistake. - Conservatrix ( talk) 01:18, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
This edit doesn't need a cite. It's noted and cited in the text of the article itself, and generally it's not necessary to repeat cites in the lede.
That being said, I agree with your removal; that's not really a lede-worthy factoid. TJRC ( talk) 03:05, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Could you, please, explain your deletion of information and saying the twitter is a poor source of information while there is refercence to official twitter of Juno and moreover to a newspaper article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.108.28.63 ( talk) 20:12, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
So sorry, on mobile and accidentally hit save before finishing the edit summary explaining that redirect. Sorry for the trouble! Innisfree987 ( talk) 02:09, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
My edit of his death is accurate, I cannot provide "sources" because they don't honestly exist, even in reports from law enforcement, that bumbled his entire situation... please don't undo my edits, I provided the current picture of dennis, and I think the suggestion that his death was suicide is entirely inaccurate, though I left enough for people to draw their own conclusions, those of us who knew him, and were in regular contact with him up to his death know that a lot more was going on... thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gomicao ( talk • contribs) 02:42, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
What are your sources that his death was heroin based, or suicidal? Bluelight forums yield no real sources of information other than regrets, and have nothing to do with the conversations had in a sensitive situation that shows facts not conjecture... if you are shooting for accuracy or respect for the individual these edits would not be undone!
Where are your sources for the current information if i may ask? Link me? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Gomicao (
talk •
contribs)
03:07, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
no fact for 2million casuatlies — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.244.200.2 ( talk) 19:51, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Thanks for dealing with recent IP vandalism and trolling. I appreciate your effort. Keep it up! Abelmoschus Esculentus ( talk to me) 02:16, 26 May 2018 (UTC) |
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish on Constantinople, though. The tags you're repeatedly removing are legitimate requests for citations. Since your edits have now been reverted three times, by two different editors, please discuss the matter on the article's talk page before doing anything else. Thank you. NewEnglandYankee ( talk) 19:29, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Check Talk Sleath56 ( talk) 19:36, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi @ NewEnglandYankee:. This is regarding Lingam as a phallus symbol. In the talks of the page and it has been nominated for the deletion. Moreover writing <While the symbol is a phallic symbol in origin, it is usually no longer considered to be such by most devouts> gives the idea that Lingam is a phallus symbol. Wording needs to be improved शिव साहिल ( talk) 04:17, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Hey I reported him too ARMcgrath ( talk) 03:43, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
He was all yours happy Wiki ATM ( talk) 03:45, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Didn't mean to revert the maintenance bot on Talk:List of fictional turtles.
I was trying to figure out how to fix it when you fixed it for me. Thanks!
I was under the understanding that Wikipedia is an open source information collaboration . Perhaps you can clarify why my addition is being removed ?
First my opinion is a valid as anyone else s , the world is more than just the USA . If what I have written is not right .. then why not re write it, as you see fit , so it is as you feel right ( open source contribution ) , but removal of a whole section of important history is both biased and without the freedom that Wikipedia promotes . It is a valid section add to it , why do you remove it ?
SEE BELOW previous post ...to user Apparition11 ....it is not a editing war it is a valid contribution.
James you clearly do not have sufficient knowledge of the relevance to this company or IP rights and its history to it ... I suggest you search other IP rights postings in other articles before you attack this one .
The world has changed , and IP rights from virtually every company are compromised and mentioning the reality of this is both relevant and valid .. and is not promotional .. In fact I was sold false product and fake product from others using this companies name .. so please tell me how that is promotional and not factual, it is an important point of reference find third party reference regarding this https://www.ipo.gov.uk/t-challenge-decision-results/o49714.pdf.
I do not consider that Trade Marks and IP rights are anything other than a factual part of this companies history .. Once again why remove the whole section if its not right .. re-write it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.109.129.37 ( talk) 10:22, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
False memory page edit from May. Cute Sgerbic ( talk) 18:48, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
I have fixed it and used a neutral tone. Thanks for the info!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MSA1234 ( talk • contribs) 01:33, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Why do you keep removing his quote from the page "Baizuo"? As someone who has lived in Hong Kong and lived a couple years in the mainland I can tell you that this is an accurate way of showing the meaning of that word to people who have not seen it before, and then you warn me about "edit wars" haha, despite me already talking about it on the "talk" page. It is funny because the people the word is describing are the ones trying to remove it, but it is also concerning as the farleft are the ones always trying to remove criticism of them. That is sad as one of the reasons I left China to go to the US is for ideas of freedom, but that is also being attacked here with political correctness just like in China.
To see who really rules over you, just see who you aren't allowed to criticize. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jezza2K01 ( talk • contribs) 16:08, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
The Civility Barnstar | |
Thanks so much for your help earlier and for being so patient with this newby editor!!
comedy.bookings ( talk) 02:20, 26 July 2018 (UTC) |
On the contrary, there is plenty of supporting citations, including IMF's own study, for something that is self-evident (what effect a 25% drop in GDP would have on the Debt to GDP ratio). I had corrected the article before I saw your comment, but there should be no issue. If you want, we can agree on a different title, but certainly not "aftermath" Skartsis ( talk) 05:19, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
I am insulted that you accused me of Bad Faith just because you disagree with my attemtps to add some neutrality to an article. I will now explain my actions.
I expect an immediate apology and a retraction of your act of bad faith. I knew what I was doing, and I know that Wikipedia is riddled with bias in certain categories. If you have ever believed in
Wikipedia:Neutral Point of View, you will revert your changes and leave mine in place.
You owe me an apology.
-
2602:306:39D6:CBA0:A585:FD4A:6AD2:25D0 (
talk)
01:34, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
P.S.: The "butt" thing was an accident. I have a script called " Butt to Butt" that alters text automatically. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:39D6:CBA0:A585:FD4A:6AD2:25D0 ( talk) 01:36, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
You should always check your sources before responding to any edits made. Thank you.
For someone that says that they don't care, you surely can't leave it alone. So, please do as you say and "don't care".
Facebook is the source, but evidently it can't be added.
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thank you for your helpful reverts! XYZt ( talk) 00:19, 10 August 2018 (UTC) |
I have closed the report at WP:ANEW and blocked the IP for 24 hours. However, you did not help matters by edit-warring yourself, although you had tried to communicate with the IP as much as possible and consensus was on your side. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:52, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello, NewEnglandYankee. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)