![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Additional information RaveenS 17:59, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
The content of the RfC is now in your userspace at User:Netmonger/RfC.
I don't believe in process for process sake, but I'd caution against simply reopening the existing case in case people who do believe in process accuse you of breaking that process (unless you can handle that!). I'd also caution against moving people's signature if they have signed in the wrong place (you should get them to do it themselves) and, if you ask them to move their signature, ensure you explain why so they know what they're doing and you can't be accused of "campaigning".
All of this is just advice, so please take it as such and ignore/adopt/improve as you see fit!
To relist the RfC, move it back to the old address but ensure that you or someone else tells everyone involved it has opened there.
Hope this helps. 〈 RED VEЯS〉 12:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi I saw the rating for
Colombo. Personally I have to agree that some work is needed on it. Do you want to start working together to improve it and then have it rated again?
I've got some great pictures that we could incorporate. Also, stuff like the intro need to be re-written completely to improve it per
WP:Mos. What do you think? --
snowolfD4(
talk /
@ )
18:40, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Please take part in the mediation Talk:Muhammad/Mediation to solve this dispute. I am leaving this message here because you have shown interest in this on Muhammad talk page. Wassalam. --- ALM 11:08, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
I have tried to resolve the conflict by creating a neutral article that is composed of both the articles without any attributions othersiwse we will alaways have edit wars. Hope you would support my attempt at harmonious editing withoiut further need to resort to edit wars RaveenS 15:05, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
Hello Netmonger, this barnstar is awarded for your ingenuity in coming with the Sri Lankan conflict template that resolved a lots of conflicts RaveenS 17:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC) |
You voiced your opinion in the original straw poll which has caused some confusion. Please do the same in a new version, Talk:Muhammad/Mediation#Suggestion_.28untainted.29, which should be clear and allow us to better assess consensus. gren グレン 22:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Please sign if any of these things applies to your understanding of this issue. Please put you name under all of the options you think would be acceptable. You can sign all or none of these, I'm hoping this will give us a more-fine grained understanding of the issue. [2]
Hi Netmonger!
I looked up the file you mentioned - I got it as a sound file. MediaWiki displays an image to show that a sound file has been uploaded. Was that what you were seeing? The actual link should provide a clickable sound file... although uploads of this type to Wikimedia's site won't play directly in Wikipedia - they need to be uploaded to Wikipedia or better still to Commons - assuming in the latter case that you have copyright clearance for the file.
Hope this helps and happy editing! 〈 RED VEЯS〉 19:49, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Do you have any sources on that ? RaveenS 13:41, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
there are few others that you required to have subscription available at
hope these would be of help ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗ Talk 11:39, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from
World Trade Center. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the
edit summary. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
RJASE1
Talk
18:16, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
World Trade Center. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not
repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a
consensus among editors.
RJASE1
Talk
18:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Dear Netmonger,
I am the original user of Rajsingam & DoDoBirds and shared the passwords with three of my friends as I am busy with my book "German Memories in Asia". As I have some problems over a few edits on Sri Lanka Conflict with them, I think one of them is posting various people which might damage my reputation.
I am not responsible these acts.
I apologize for my carelessness, which caused you, inconvenience.
Rajkumar Kanagasingam 08:01, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Rajkumar Kanagasingam 08:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
In my user page you had asked a question as to what I had against user Arsath. Till recently I believed Arsath was Lahiru_k was the same user because check user said so. Now I have changed my opinion see this User_talk:Lahiru_k#Fixing_links. Keep up your good work. As I have said earlier I am taking forced breaks from Wikipedia because at the end this should be a hobby not a vocation and this can become a passion and destroy ones education and career as I had said earlier to Snowulf. My passion is my family and my career and everything else including Wikipedia and HR issues should and will come later. Good editing RaveenS 14:22, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Whats going on this this Rajsingham fellow. I've now seen this thing spill over to a number of pages now. Does he really think that he can get away from his sock puppet use and personal attacks by saying he gave his password to his friends? That's one of the stupidest excuses I've heard. Considering that he says either Raveen or Bakaman used his account to abuse you, and they are in the US and India respectively, maybe a checkuser should be done to see where the edits originated from. If it says Sri Lanka, like I'm sure it will, that will pretty much clear everything up. -- snowolfD4( talk / @ ) 16:46, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
I have finnished creating the Notable_assassinations_of_the_Sri_Lankan_Civil_War article per the concensus we reached. I need your opinion as to proceed further with the re directs to this neutral article. Thanks RaveenS 20:37, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
This user is a member of the Harmonious Editing Club. |
I put it on my userpage. Abridged 13:39, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
You edited the template {{ cref}} without prior discussion or consent. This template is used by quite a lot of articles(several featured ones) and its specific layout is well established in wikipedia. Please name your reasons and ask at least the previous editors of the template for their consent. Thanks. Wandalstouring 08:53, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Clear vandalism going on in thius article RaveenS 14:26, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Additional information RaveenS 17:59, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
The content of the RfC is now in your userspace at User:Netmonger/RfC.
I don't believe in process for process sake, but I'd caution against simply reopening the existing case in case people who do believe in process accuse you of breaking that process (unless you can handle that!). I'd also caution against moving people's signature if they have signed in the wrong place (you should get them to do it themselves) and, if you ask them to move their signature, ensure you explain why so they know what they're doing and you can't be accused of "campaigning".
All of this is just advice, so please take it as such and ignore/adopt/improve as you see fit!
To relist the RfC, move it back to the old address but ensure that you or someone else tells everyone involved it has opened there.
Hope this helps. 〈 RED VEЯS〉 12:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi I saw the rating for
Colombo. Personally I have to agree that some work is needed on it. Do you want to start working together to improve it and then have it rated again?
I've got some great pictures that we could incorporate. Also, stuff like the intro need to be re-written completely to improve it per
WP:Mos. What do you think? --
snowolfD4(
talk /
@ )
18:40, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Please take part in the mediation Talk:Muhammad/Mediation to solve this dispute. I am leaving this message here because you have shown interest in this on Muhammad talk page. Wassalam. --- ALM 11:08, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
I have tried to resolve the conflict by creating a neutral article that is composed of both the articles without any attributions othersiwse we will alaways have edit wars. Hope you would support my attempt at harmonious editing withoiut further need to resort to edit wars RaveenS 15:05, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
Hello Netmonger, this barnstar is awarded for your ingenuity in coming with the Sri Lankan conflict template that resolved a lots of conflicts RaveenS 17:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC) |
You voiced your opinion in the original straw poll which has caused some confusion. Please do the same in a new version, Talk:Muhammad/Mediation#Suggestion_.28untainted.29, which should be clear and allow us to better assess consensus. gren グレン 22:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Please sign if any of these things applies to your understanding of this issue. Please put you name under all of the options you think would be acceptable. You can sign all or none of these, I'm hoping this will give us a more-fine grained understanding of the issue. [2]
Hi Netmonger!
I looked up the file you mentioned - I got it as a sound file. MediaWiki displays an image to show that a sound file has been uploaded. Was that what you were seeing? The actual link should provide a clickable sound file... although uploads of this type to Wikimedia's site won't play directly in Wikipedia - they need to be uploaded to Wikipedia or better still to Commons - assuming in the latter case that you have copyright clearance for the file.
Hope this helps and happy editing! 〈 RED VEЯS〉 19:49, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Do you have any sources on that ? RaveenS 13:41, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
there are few others that you required to have subscription available at
hope these would be of help ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗ Talk 11:39, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from
World Trade Center. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the
edit summary. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
RJASE1
Talk
18:16, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
World Trade Center. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not
repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a
consensus among editors.
RJASE1
Talk
18:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Dear Netmonger,
I am the original user of Rajsingam & DoDoBirds and shared the passwords with three of my friends as I am busy with my book "German Memories in Asia". As I have some problems over a few edits on Sri Lanka Conflict with them, I think one of them is posting various people which might damage my reputation.
I am not responsible these acts.
I apologize for my carelessness, which caused you, inconvenience.
Rajkumar Kanagasingam 08:01, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Rajkumar Kanagasingam 08:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
In my user page you had asked a question as to what I had against user Arsath. Till recently I believed Arsath was Lahiru_k was the same user because check user said so. Now I have changed my opinion see this User_talk:Lahiru_k#Fixing_links. Keep up your good work. As I have said earlier I am taking forced breaks from Wikipedia because at the end this should be a hobby not a vocation and this can become a passion and destroy ones education and career as I had said earlier to Snowulf. My passion is my family and my career and everything else including Wikipedia and HR issues should and will come later. Good editing RaveenS 14:22, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Whats going on this this Rajsingham fellow. I've now seen this thing spill over to a number of pages now. Does he really think that he can get away from his sock puppet use and personal attacks by saying he gave his password to his friends? That's one of the stupidest excuses I've heard. Considering that he says either Raveen or Bakaman used his account to abuse you, and they are in the US and India respectively, maybe a checkuser should be done to see where the edits originated from. If it says Sri Lanka, like I'm sure it will, that will pretty much clear everything up. -- snowolfD4( talk / @ ) 16:46, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
I have finnished creating the Notable_assassinations_of_the_Sri_Lankan_Civil_War article per the concensus we reached. I need your opinion as to proceed further with the re directs to this neutral article. Thanks RaveenS 20:37, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
This user is a member of the Harmonious Editing Club. |
I put it on my userpage. Abridged 13:39, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
You edited the template {{ cref}} without prior discussion or consent. This template is used by quite a lot of articles(several featured ones) and its specific layout is well established in wikipedia. Please name your reasons and ask at least the previous editors of the template for their consent. Thanks. Wandalstouring 08:53, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Clear vandalism going on in thius article RaveenS 14:26, 10 April 2007 (UTC)