Welcome!
Hello, Neptun88, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
--
The Red Pen of Doom
23:50, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Merzbow apparently considers you a single purpose account. -- The Red Pen of Doom 23:53, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Well, really nice that nobody cared to make me aware of the severe allegations that were held against me and this though they are easy to refute. This is the "evidence" presented by The Evil Spartan:
OK, I am reluctant to bring this before enforcement, because I know we will see the same crimineyload of wikilawyering that we saw in the recently closed Giovanni case. However, I believe the connection here is fairly obvious that
Neptun88 (
talk ·
contribs) is
Giovanni33 (
talk ·
contribs). The
checkuser case came up false, but this is not surprising, given Giovanni has been known to edit from IPs stemming from distinct locations around the globe (see below). The evidence:
I am pleased to see that Giovanni is finally branching out from only editing as a SPA. I think it's fairly obvious he learned from his Arbcom case that he was a touch too obvious last time. However, it's equally obvious that Giovanni is Giovanni, and he simply cannot keep himself from edit warring on his favorite pages, from using socks to back himself up, and from being mildly snipy. The Evil Spartan ( talk) 16:30, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
This is my response:
I am also stunned by Rlevse's comment on me causing "disruption". He doesn't seem to have read anything apart from the difflinks provided by The Evil Spartan. Otherwise, he might have noticed that the other side did nothing but to revert and was at least as "disruptive".-- Neptun88 ( talk) 17:47, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Neptun88 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
as stated above
Decline reason:
As stated above. Please contact ArbCom. — Tiptoety talk 22:53, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Welcome!
Hello, Neptun88, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
--
The Red Pen of Doom
23:50, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Merzbow apparently considers you a single purpose account. -- The Red Pen of Doom 23:53, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Well, really nice that nobody cared to make me aware of the severe allegations that were held against me and this though they are easy to refute. This is the "evidence" presented by The Evil Spartan:
OK, I am reluctant to bring this before enforcement, because I know we will see the same crimineyload of wikilawyering that we saw in the recently closed Giovanni case. However, I believe the connection here is fairly obvious that
Neptun88 (
talk ·
contribs) is
Giovanni33 (
talk ·
contribs). The
checkuser case came up false, but this is not surprising, given Giovanni has been known to edit from IPs stemming from distinct locations around the globe (see below). The evidence:
I am pleased to see that Giovanni is finally branching out from only editing as a SPA. I think it's fairly obvious he learned from his Arbcom case that he was a touch too obvious last time. However, it's equally obvious that Giovanni is Giovanni, and he simply cannot keep himself from edit warring on his favorite pages, from using socks to back himself up, and from being mildly snipy. The Evil Spartan ( talk) 16:30, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
This is my response:
I am also stunned by Rlevse's comment on me causing "disruption". He doesn't seem to have read anything apart from the difflinks provided by The Evil Spartan. Otherwise, he might have noticed that the other side did nothing but to revert and was at least as "disruptive".-- Neptun88 ( talk) 17:47, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Neptun88 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
as stated above
Decline reason:
As stated above. Please contact ArbCom. — Tiptoety talk 22:53, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.