![]() | |
Wikipedia ads | file info – #173 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | |||
|
||||||
no archives yet ( create) |
WOW! Nice user page! Can I copy the design? I'll borrow it to design a new one for myself :) Ateshi- Baghavan 20:44, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Nice work on Geology of Azerbaijan! Piano non troppo ( talk) 08:08, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi I am having trouble understanding your edits. For example in Nasir al-Din Tusi, a Persian author who pre-dates the formation of Azerbaijani-Turkic speaking ethnicity, you put an stamp from the republic of Azerbaijan claiming him as Azeri. He is from Tus in Khorasan. In Babak Khorramdin, you made a claim that he is an Azerbaijani-Turk but the area was not even Turkic speaking then and no serious academic source entertains such a theory. In Caucasian Albania template, you put an Azerbaijan flag. Now you put a separatist flag in Iranian Azerbaijan. You also do not use the talkpage. It is like putting the Talysh flag, Lezgin flag, Karabakh flag in say Lenkoran or Shusha. So if Karabakh flag is put in every city that is within now the Karabakh republic, would you complain? Do you think this type of editing is for creating an Encyclopedia? I am having trouble understanding your edit pattern, maybe you can explain it better. But from this pattern, I do not observe neutrality. Note I wrote this because you said before you are not anti-Iranian in another place, but putting a fringe separatist flag in mainstream Iranian pages is not only Encyclopedic but it is not really a good way to calm down the usual tensions that exists between neighbors in that part of the world. Best wishes.-- Nepaheshgar ( talk) 01:59, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi, to fix {{ wikipedia ads}}, I changed the number of ad for WikiProject Azerbaijan to 173, so I reuploaded the ad as File:WikiProject Azerbaijan Ad.gif and nominated File:Qxz-ad187.gif for deletion. Svick ( talk) 19:47, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
The article RPE Automatic Lines has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
Proposed Deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
RadioFan (
talk)
12:33, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
The article RPE Neftgazavtomat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
Proposed Deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
RadioFan (
talk)
12:34, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
The article Radiogurashdirma has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
Proposed Deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
RadioFan (
talk)
12:34, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Neftçi, xoş gördük.
Xahiş edirəm "Azərbaycan Silahlı Qüvvələri" ilə bağlı məqaləyə nəzər yetir. Mən orada kiçik əlavələr etmişəm. Məncə onlar qalsa, məqaləyə daha çox hərbiyyəlik və qüvvət gətirər. Xahiş edirəm, xəbərim olmadan ləğv etməyin.
Uğurlar ;) -- Proger ( talk) 21:59, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
I am confused with the File:Azeri Babek schoolbook.jpg It said that this image is from a fourth grade schoolbook and that you are the author of the image. Are you the author of the image in the original text book???? If yes, please provide what sources you were using making this image also you might want better identification of the schoolbook and yourself. If you only scanned the image from the book the image cannot be free and require some sort of a fair use rationale Alex Bakharev ( talk) 02:37, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Wow you did a great job on Environment of Azerbaijan and its related articles State Reserves of Azerbaijan, National Parks of Azerbaijan, Orography of Azerbaijan, Climate of Azerbaijan, Fauna of Azerbaijan, Flora of Azerbaijan, Rivers and lakes in Azerbaijan and Environmental issues in Azerbaijan. Your welcome to upload any of my Azerbaijan album photos on Flickr which you can find here under recommended copyright. RetlawSnellac ( talk) 12:49, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Mursel. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:41, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello. User:RetlawSnellac is known to violate copyright of several photos and impersonate their real author. As there was a strong correlation between that account activities and yours I reported about incidents, and voiced my suspicion, regarding your account. Please comment on situation here. Kind regards -- Aleksey Chalabyan a.k.a. Xelgen ( talk) 21:40, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Aghdara (Mardakert) Monument 1978 - 1988.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:05, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Per the evidence presented at the ANI thread, and two uninvolved behavioural analyses ( here and here), I have blocked you for one week for sock puppetry. Further engagement in this activity after your block's expiry will result in a much longer block. Thank you. PeterSymonds ( talk) 11:25, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
The article Caspian Sea and Azerbaijan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
Proposed Deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. --
Lambiam
18:20, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Hey thanks a lot for the assitance in the article Tourism in Azerbaijan. Keep up the good work!-- NovaSkola ( talk) 09:22, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi there! I hope you don't mind using the layout of your userpage. Cheers, Zitterbewegung Talk 21:36, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
There was already a peer review open for Azerbaijan and there cannot be two open PRs at the same time, so I deleted your request and merged your text with the existing PR. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 00:00, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
See you've just reverted all my hard work. I did wonder whether I should chat to you before I did it. Never mind - we can have the conversation now. I've got two major issues. First, there are no English sources that describe the 'Az Interior Guard' as an 'Interior Guard,' but there are lots of sources calling it the Internal Troops. Even the reference in the 'Interior Guard' article calls it the 'Internal Troops,' as well as the Ministry's official site [1]. Second, all the material depicts the Az Air and Air Defence Force, as per Jane's Sentinel Security Assessments, the reference I provided, as one force, no two. Can you provide sources saying (a) it's the Interior Guard? and (b) there are two separate air arms of service? Otherwise I would like, with all due respect, to revert your reverts. I'm really happy to discuss this, but the translations seem to indicate, as per the rest of the fSU, that the Interior Troops carried over, and the air arm is one merged force. We need to be accurate in our depictions, not inaccurate. Buckshot06 (talk) 20:39, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
(od) I'm sorry to say I still do not agree - I think Air Forces in the plural without explaining that it's both Air and Air Defence just explains half while not reflecting the official name of the force. That's my problem: as far as I can tell, the official name of the force has both 'Air Force' and 'Air Defence' in its title. Tell you what: why don't we wait for Askari Mark to return and give us a third opinion, but while we are waiting, if you able to find an official air arm website or Azeri government website listing military branches - any language, don't worry about translation - maybe that will give us an official view. Buckshot06 (talk) 21:04, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
(od) (2) According to this [3] the 'Border Guard' is actually the 'State Border Service,' which matches with Azerbaijan#Military. Do you have any official documents saying it's actually the 'Border Guard?' Buckshot06 (talk) 07:07, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Im a real reasonable person, so far I have agreed with your changes, I also want to keep things accurate but lets just get some 3rd perspective suggestions on this, that would be the best. I do have some new suggestions:
Finally, as the IISS is a reliable source, so is Jane's Defence Weekly. Please do not remove sourced data from it. Buckshot06 (talk) 21:47, 27 November 2009 (UTC) I would like to hear your insight about these points. Neftchi ( talk) 11:39, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
<outdent>Sorry for taking so long to get back to you both, but I’ve had limited time lately. Fortunately, I had earlier gathered a good deal of English-language material on the AzAF while I was working on the Armenian Air Force article, and I was going to work on that one afterwards (before getting sidetracked elsewhere). I’ve gone through that material and some more recent sources I found last over the course of last week. While I can’t offer a definitive answer, the more reliable and authoritative sources refer to the Azeri Air Force and Air Defense Force as a unified organization, and this seems to have been the case since the national defense organizations were established in Oct. 1991 through at least the spring of 2009. (A typical example is Defence in the Republic of Azerbaijan.) Leading news and diplomatic sources formally reporting the murder of Lt. Gen. Rail Rzayev last February note his title as being the chief of the “air force and air defense command”. [4] Nonetheless, the exact formal organization of this command is unclear. While it appears that the air defense is directly subordinate to the head of the unified command – particularly since the term “Air Force” seems to be used to represent both the aviation arm specifically and the unified command as a whole – I have found nothing specific on the AzAF command structure. I haven’t fully dug through Milaz.info, but so far I’ve found nothing useful on this issue. Perhaps you have some suggestions, Neftchi? As far as Wikipedia is concerned, these forces could be addressed in one or two articles, but inasmuch as it appears to be a unified command, I tend to concur with Neftchi that it should be one article under the AzAF title, since this appears to be common usage. Askari Mark (Talk) 22:35, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Template:Azeri Picture has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk)
05:23, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Nagorno-Karabakh Defense Army, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted.
Jane's Defence Weekly is a well-respected,
reliable source. Thank you.
Buckshot06
(talk)
21:32, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be
blocked from editing. Do not delete sourced content, as you did with
this edit to
Armed Forces of Armenia
Buckshot06
(talk)
04:32, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Template:Azeri Tasks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk)
00:53, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
I've just been taking a look at the main Azerbaijan article. The information is in the history section, though without the word 'secular.' I would advise you to use Google Books or similar to find the required page numbers, as this will avoid people having to search through the whole book for the reference. I'll take a look at ADR as well. Buckshot06 (talk) 06:30, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello dear Babek, I wish to ask your attention to this matter which you have more knowledge on, I hope you can contribute on this. Neftchi ( talk) 22:15, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Xoş gördük, Neftçi.
İngilis dilli vikipediyada işlərinin hamısı təqdirə layiqdir və alqışlanır. Bu üzdən səndən bir faylın lisenziyası ilə bağlı yardım istəyirəm. Xahiş edirəm bu faylın lisenziya formasını bulmağa mənə yardım edəsən. Şəkil dahi M.Ə.Rəsulzadəyə aiddir və mövzünün başlığında da qeyd etmişəm. Mümkünsə bu işdə mənə yardımçı ol. Təşəkkür. -- Proger ( talk) 08:35, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Drive-by reversions without even bothering to comment on the talkpage (or, like as not, so much as care to read the relevant discussion) are not acceptable. Due to this and various other recent incidents you are limited to one revert per page per day for all articles relating to Armenia and Azerbaijan, under WP:ARBAA2. Thank you. Moreschi ( talk) 21:50, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
I've reverted your additions to this and the Az Armed Forces article. YOU MUST PROVIDE RELIABLE SOURCES!! Please feel free to readd if you do so. Buckshot06 (talk) 21:20, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello Neftchi! Thank you for your contributions. I am a
bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an
Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The
biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure
verifiability, all biographies should be based on
reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current
759 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{
unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
Thanks!-- DASHBot ( talk) 20:53, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi there. You might want to take a look at this. Thanks.-- Marshal Bagramyan ( talk) 18:18, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Per this AE thread, I have blocked you for 72 hours for violating the 1 revert per article per day restriction you are currently under. You are also for the remainder of the 4 month revert restriction required to post a note on the talk page explaining your rationale whenever you revert any article in the subject area, excepting cases of obvious vandalism. If you wish to contest this block, please post a {{ unblock}} request. To contest the additional revert restriction, you can post an appeal at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. henrik• talk 21:13, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Azerbaijani Armed Forces, you will be
blocked from editing. Do not add misleading information to the Az Armed Forces article. The source you referenced gives no indication that the
Namer APC is to be produced in Azerbaijan. Stop adding unreliable information.
Buckshot06
(talk)
08:57, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi there, can you please take a look at this, [6]. Thanks.-- Marshal Bagramyan ( talk) 19:49, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
With this diff of early 2009 you again distorted material regarding Azeri defence arrangements. The source said an agreement had been reached that Azerbaijan would produce certain material in the future. You cited and referenced that to indicate that Azerbaijan produced such material now. This is not allowed - it's simply untrue, as well as a violation of WP:CRYSTAL. Any further such distortions may result in blocks. Buckshot06 (talk) 07:40, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Neftchi, McGraw-Hill wishes to use your photo of file SV100067.jpg in a college textbook. Please email me at shirley_lanners@mcgraw-hill.com for details. Thank you! Shirley Lanners, Permissions Coordinator for McGraw-Hill CLS —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ma3dward ( talk • contribs) 15:59, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:SV102262.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock (TALK) 21:52, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SV102262.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --— ξ xplicit 00:57, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Please be aware of this message [7] Aregakn ( talk) 19:46, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Merhaba, the article at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reactions_to_the_Gaza_flotilla_raid has this sentence: Cüneyt Ülsever, a commentator in the daily Hürriyet, was quoted by The Wall Street Journal, saying that “People will understand very soon that the IHH is harming Turkey, and warned that the effect of the crisis would be to persuade the West that Turkey is aligning itself with the likes of Iran, Syria, Hamas and Hezbollah.[3][49]
I have just seen that you removed a political scientist's statement, replaced it with Azerbaijani official statement. I think Cüneyt Ülsever's comment should also be removed because it is not official view. What do you think? Kavas ( talk) 15:45, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
I have received no emails from u-- NovaSkola ( talk) 21:40, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello, can u make Azerbaijani people collage from images that available in Wikipedia Commons and we can use in Azerbaijani people article as all nations got this collage, and only we have only 1 random picture. -- NovaSkola ( talk) 04:56, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Qardaş sənin məndəki nömrən silinib! Bu yazını görən kimi mənə dərhal əlaqə yarat! Bilmirəm necə səni tapım! -- Proger ( talk) 23:32, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Do you not understand that the total figure cited of 595 includes a certain number (27 or so) of that vehicle, then the total number does not add up if you change one of the sub-figures? You have to list the alternate source number separately!! Buckshot06 (talk) 09:23, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
That map completely ignores the political situation of the time, and simply shows what Azerbaijanis claimed. You are assuming that Azerbaijan controlled all of the regions it claimed. That map is simply a proposal for the Azerbaijani state, issued by the government of Azerbaijan. Using this map is like Armenians using Wilsonian Armenia for the Armenian state in 1918 (simply because Armenians claimed it). At least my map for the democratic republic of armenia shows more than simply what Armenia claimed. It shows the regions that were under Armenian control, and the regions under Azerbaijani control. Please be objective. Kentronhayastan ( talk) 15:33, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
Any more edits like this and you will be blocked. Buckshot06 (talk) 20:42, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi Neftchi! there's an investigation on suckpuppet case and I am accused to be your sockpuppet.. Can you respond it here plz?-- KHE'O ( talk) 01:16, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi Neftchi, I see you're having more fun with carpets, I answered a WP:3O about this issue before, if you have a look at the talk page you'll see I suggested adding a carpet from a less contestable area. You'll have to excuse me on not really knowing an awful lot about the Armenia/Azerbaijan issue, but it seems to me this would be an easy problem to fix. Would you have a look at Talk:Culture of Armenia and see if there's anything you can do? Thanks, Bigger digger ( talk) 22:14, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Dear Neftchi. Can you comment on
Talk:Tsitsernavank Monastert and
Talk:Gandzasar Monastery?
Dighapet (
talk)
14:07, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
![]() | |
Wikipedia ads | file info – #173 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | |||
|
||||||
no archives yet ( create) |
WOW! Nice user page! Can I copy the design? I'll borrow it to design a new one for myself :) Ateshi- Baghavan 20:44, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Nice work on Geology of Azerbaijan! Piano non troppo ( talk) 08:08, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi I am having trouble understanding your edits. For example in Nasir al-Din Tusi, a Persian author who pre-dates the formation of Azerbaijani-Turkic speaking ethnicity, you put an stamp from the republic of Azerbaijan claiming him as Azeri. He is from Tus in Khorasan. In Babak Khorramdin, you made a claim that he is an Azerbaijani-Turk but the area was not even Turkic speaking then and no serious academic source entertains such a theory. In Caucasian Albania template, you put an Azerbaijan flag. Now you put a separatist flag in Iranian Azerbaijan. You also do not use the talkpage. It is like putting the Talysh flag, Lezgin flag, Karabakh flag in say Lenkoran or Shusha. So if Karabakh flag is put in every city that is within now the Karabakh republic, would you complain? Do you think this type of editing is for creating an Encyclopedia? I am having trouble understanding your edit pattern, maybe you can explain it better. But from this pattern, I do not observe neutrality. Note I wrote this because you said before you are not anti-Iranian in another place, but putting a fringe separatist flag in mainstream Iranian pages is not only Encyclopedic but it is not really a good way to calm down the usual tensions that exists between neighbors in that part of the world. Best wishes.-- Nepaheshgar ( talk) 01:59, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi, to fix {{ wikipedia ads}}, I changed the number of ad for WikiProject Azerbaijan to 173, so I reuploaded the ad as File:WikiProject Azerbaijan Ad.gif and nominated File:Qxz-ad187.gif for deletion. Svick ( talk) 19:47, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
The article RPE Automatic Lines has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
Proposed Deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
RadioFan (
talk)
12:33, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
The article RPE Neftgazavtomat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
Proposed Deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
RadioFan (
talk)
12:34, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
The article Radiogurashdirma has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
Proposed Deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
RadioFan (
talk)
12:34, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Neftçi, xoş gördük.
Xahiş edirəm "Azərbaycan Silahlı Qüvvələri" ilə bağlı məqaləyə nəzər yetir. Mən orada kiçik əlavələr etmişəm. Məncə onlar qalsa, məqaləyə daha çox hərbiyyəlik və qüvvət gətirər. Xahiş edirəm, xəbərim olmadan ləğv etməyin.
Uğurlar ;) -- Proger ( talk) 21:59, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
I am confused with the File:Azeri Babek schoolbook.jpg It said that this image is from a fourth grade schoolbook and that you are the author of the image. Are you the author of the image in the original text book???? If yes, please provide what sources you were using making this image also you might want better identification of the schoolbook and yourself. If you only scanned the image from the book the image cannot be free and require some sort of a fair use rationale Alex Bakharev ( talk) 02:37, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Wow you did a great job on Environment of Azerbaijan and its related articles State Reserves of Azerbaijan, National Parks of Azerbaijan, Orography of Azerbaijan, Climate of Azerbaijan, Fauna of Azerbaijan, Flora of Azerbaijan, Rivers and lakes in Azerbaijan and Environmental issues in Azerbaijan. Your welcome to upload any of my Azerbaijan album photos on Flickr which you can find here under recommended copyright. RetlawSnellac ( talk) 12:49, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Mursel. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:41, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello. User:RetlawSnellac is known to violate copyright of several photos and impersonate their real author. As there was a strong correlation between that account activities and yours I reported about incidents, and voiced my suspicion, regarding your account. Please comment on situation here. Kind regards -- Aleksey Chalabyan a.k.a. Xelgen ( talk) 21:40, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Aghdara (Mardakert) Monument 1978 - 1988.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:05, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Per the evidence presented at the ANI thread, and two uninvolved behavioural analyses ( here and here), I have blocked you for one week for sock puppetry. Further engagement in this activity after your block's expiry will result in a much longer block. Thank you. PeterSymonds ( talk) 11:25, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
The article Caspian Sea and Azerbaijan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
Proposed Deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. --
Lambiam
18:20, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Hey thanks a lot for the assitance in the article Tourism in Azerbaijan. Keep up the good work!-- NovaSkola ( talk) 09:22, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi there! I hope you don't mind using the layout of your userpage. Cheers, Zitterbewegung Talk 21:36, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
There was already a peer review open for Azerbaijan and there cannot be two open PRs at the same time, so I deleted your request and merged your text with the existing PR. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 00:00, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
See you've just reverted all my hard work. I did wonder whether I should chat to you before I did it. Never mind - we can have the conversation now. I've got two major issues. First, there are no English sources that describe the 'Az Interior Guard' as an 'Interior Guard,' but there are lots of sources calling it the Internal Troops. Even the reference in the 'Interior Guard' article calls it the 'Internal Troops,' as well as the Ministry's official site [1]. Second, all the material depicts the Az Air and Air Defence Force, as per Jane's Sentinel Security Assessments, the reference I provided, as one force, no two. Can you provide sources saying (a) it's the Interior Guard? and (b) there are two separate air arms of service? Otherwise I would like, with all due respect, to revert your reverts. I'm really happy to discuss this, but the translations seem to indicate, as per the rest of the fSU, that the Interior Troops carried over, and the air arm is one merged force. We need to be accurate in our depictions, not inaccurate. Buckshot06 (talk) 20:39, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
(od) I'm sorry to say I still do not agree - I think Air Forces in the plural without explaining that it's both Air and Air Defence just explains half while not reflecting the official name of the force. That's my problem: as far as I can tell, the official name of the force has both 'Air Force' and 'Air Defence' in its title. Tell you what: why don't we wait for Askari Mark to return and give us a third opinion, but while we are waiting, if you able to find an official air arm website or Azeri government website listing military branches - any language, don't worry about translation - maybe that will give us an official view. Buckshot06 (talk) 21:04, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
(od) (2) According to this [3] the 'Border Guard' is actually the 'State Border Service,' which matches with Azerbaijan#Military. Do you have any official documents saying it's actually the 'Border Guard?' Buckshot06 (talk) 07:07, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Im a real reasonable person, so far I have agreed with your changes, I also want to keep things accurate but lets just get some 3rd perspective suggestions on this, that would be the best. I do have some new suggestions:
Finally, as the IISS is a reliable source, so is Jane's Defence Weekly. Please do not remove sourced data from it. Buckshot06 (talk) 21:47, 27 November 2009 (UTC) I would like to hear your insight about these points. Neftchi ( talk) 11:39, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
<outdent>Sorry for taking so long to get back to you both, but I’ve had limited time lately. Fortunately, I had earlier gathered a good deal of English-language material on the AzAF while I was working on the Armenian Air Force article, and I was going to work on that one afterwards (before getting sidetracked elsewhere). I’ve gone through that material and some more recent sources I found last over the course of last week. While I can’t offer a definitive answer, the more reliable and authoritative sources refer to the Azeri Air Force and Air Defense Force as a unified organization, and this seems to have been the case since the national defense organizations were established in Oct. 1991 through at least the spring of 2009. (A typical example is Defence in the Republic of Azerbaijan.) Leading news and diplomatic sources formally reporting the murder of Lt. Gen. Rail Rzayev last February note his title as being the chief of the “air force and air defense command”. [4] Nonetheless, the exact formal organization of this command is unclear. While it appears that the air defense is directly subordinate to the head of the unified command – particularly since the term “Air Force” seems to be used to represent both the aviation arm specifically and the unified command as a whole – I have found nothing specific on the AzAF command structure. I haven’t fully dug through Milaz.info, but so far I’ve found nothing useful on this issue. Perhaps you have some suggestions, Neftchi? As far as Wikipedia is concerned, these forces could be addressed in one or two articles, but inasmuch as it appears to be a unified command, I tend to concur with Neftchi that it should be one article under the AzAF title, since this appears to be common usage. Askari Mark (Talk) 22:35, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Template:Azeri Picture has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk)
05:23, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Nagorno-Karabakh Defense Army, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted.
Jane's Defence Weekly is a well-respected,
reliable source. Thank you.
Buckshot06
(talk)
21:32, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be
blocked from editing. Do not delete sourced content, as you did with
this edit to
Armed Forces of Armenia
Buckshot06
(talk)
04:32, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Template:Azeri Tasks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk)
00:53, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
I've just been taking a look at the main Azerbaijan article. The information is in the history section, though without the word 'secular.' I would advise you to use Google Books or similar to find the required page numbers, as this will avoid people having to search through the whole book for the reference. I'll take a look at ADR as well. Buckshot06 (talk) 06:30, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello dear Babek, I wish to ask your attention to this matter which you have more knowledge on, I hope you can contribute on this. Neftchi ( talk) 22:15, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Xoş gördük, Neftçi.
İngilis dilli vikipediyada işlərinin hamısı təqdirə layiqdir və alqışlanır. Bu üzdən səndən bir faylın lisenziyası ilə bağlı yardım istəyirəm. Xahiş edirəm bu faylın lisenziya formasını bulmağa mənə yardım edəsən. Şəkil dahi M.Ə.Rəsulzadəyə aiddir və mövzünün başlığında da qeyd etmişəm. Mümkünsə bu işdə mənə yardımçı ol. Təşəkkür. -- Proger ( talk) 08:35, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Drive-by reversions without even bothering to comment on the talkpage (or, like as not, so much as care to read the relevant discussion) are not acceptable. Due to this and various other recent incidents you are limited to one revert per page per day for all articles relating to Armenia and Azerbaijan, under WP:ARBAA2. Thank you. Moreschi ( talk) 21:50, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
I've reverted your additions to this and the Az Armed Forces article. YOU MUST PROVIDE RELIABLE SOURCES!! Please feel free to readd if you do so. Buckshot06 (talk) 21:20, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello Neftchi! Thank you for your contributions. I am a
bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an
Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The
biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure
verifiability, all biographies should be based on
reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current
759 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{
unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
Thanks!-- DASHBot ( talk) 20:53, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi there. You might want to take a look at this. Thanks.-- Marshal Bagramyan ( talk) 18:18, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Per this AE thread, I have blocked you for 72 hours for violating the 1 revert per article per day restriction you are currently under. You are also for the remainder of the 4 month revert restriction required to post a note on the talk page explaining your rationale whenever you revert any article in the subject area, excepting cases of obvious vandalism. If you wish to contest this block, please post a {{ unblock}} request. To contest the additional revert restriction, you can post an appeal at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. henrik• talk 21:13, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Azerbaijani Armed Forces, you will be
blocked from editing. Do not add misleading information to the Az Armed Forces article. The source you referenced gives no indication that the
Namer APC is to be produced in Azerbaijan. Stop adding unreliable information.
Buckshot06
(talk)
08:57, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi there, can you please take a look at this, [6]. Thanks.-- Marshal Bagramyan ( talk) 19:49, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
With this diff of early 2009 you again distorted material regarding Azeri defence arrangements. The source said an agreement had been reached that Azerbaijan would produce certain material in the future. You cited and referenced that to indicate that Azerbaijan produced such material now. This is not allowed - it's simply untrue, as well as a violation of WP:CRYSTAL. Any further such distortions may result in blocks. Buckshot06 (talk) 07:40, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Neftchi, McGraw-Hill wishes to use your photo of file SV100067.jpg in a college textbook. Please email me at shirley_lanners@mcgraw-hill.com for details. Thank you! Shirley Lanners, Permissions Coordinator for McGraw-Hill CLS —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ma3dward ( talk • contribs) 15:59, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:SV102262.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock (TALK) 21:52, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SV102262.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --— ξ xplicit 00:57, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Please be aware of this message [7] Aregakn ( talk) 19:46, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Merhaba, the article at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reactions_to_the_Gaza_flotilla_raid has this sentence: Cüneyt Ülsever, a commentator in the daily Hürriyet, was quoted by The Wall Street Journal, saying that “People will understand very soon that the IHH is harming Turkey, and warned that the effect of the crisis would be to persuade the West that Turkey is aligning itself with the likes of Iran, Syria, Hamas and Hezbollah.[3][49]
I have just seen that you removed a political scientist's statement, replaced it with Azerbaijani official statement. I think Cüneyt Ülsever's comment should also be removed because it is not official view. What do you think? Kavas ( talk) 15:45, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
I have received no emails from u-- NovaSkola ( talk) 21:40, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello, can u make Azerbaijani people collage from images that available in Wikipedia Commons and we can use in Azerbaijani people article as all nations got this collage, and only we have only 1 random picture. -- NovaSkola ( talk) 04:56, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Qardaş sənin məndəki nömrən silinib! Bu yazını görən kimi mənə dərhal əlaqə yarat! Bilmirəm necə səni tapım! -- Proger ( talk) 23:32, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Do you not understand that the total figure cited of 595 includes a certain number (27 or so) of that vehicle, then the total number does not add up if you change one of the sub-figures? You have to list the alternate source number separately!! Buckshot06 (talk) 09:23, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
That map completely ignores the political situation of the time, and simply shows what Azerbaijanis claimed. You are assuming that Azerbaijan controlled all of the regions it claimed. That map is simply a proposal for the Azerbaijani state, issued by the government of Azerbaijan. Using this map is like Armenians using Wilsonian Armenia for the Armenian state in 1918 (simply because Armenians claimed it). At least my map for the democratic republic of armenia shows more than simply what Armenia claimed. It shows the regions that were under Armenian control, and the regions under Azerbaijani control. Please be objective. Kentronhayastan ( talk) 15:33, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
Any more edits like this and you will be blocked. Buckshot06 (talk) 20:42, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi Neftchi! there's an investigation on suckpuppet case and I am accused to be your sockpuppet.. Can you respond it here plz?-- KHE'O ( talk) 01:16, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi Neftchi, I see you're having more fun with carpets, I answered a WP:3O about this issue before, if you have a look at the talk page you'll see I suggested adding a carpet from a less contestable area. You'll have to excuse me on not really knowing an awful lot about the Armenia/Azerbaijan issue, but it seems to me this would be an easy problem to fix. Would you have a look at Talk:Culture of Armenia and see if there's anything you can do? Thanks, Bigger digger ( talk) 22:14, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Dear Neftchi. Can you comment on
Talk:Tsitsernavank Monastert and
Talk:Gandzasar Monastery?
Dighapet (
talk)
14:07, 6 April 2011 (UTC)