Welcome!
Hariom om om om om om om om om om om om om om om om om om — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
122.176.154.214 (
talk)
17:01, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Naveentirthani, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}}
after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Asaram Bapu. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Tito Dutta (
talk)
02:32, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Asaram Bapu. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Tito Dutta (
talk)
02:39, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at
Asaram Bapu, you may be
blocked from editing.
Eye
snore
02:45, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Tito Dutta ( talk) 18:03, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Tito Dutta ( talk) 03:47, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Keep on doing good work! Ankush98 ( talk) 04:28, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Asaram Bapu, you may be
blocked from editing.
Tito Dutta (
talk)
05:03, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Fut.Perf.
☼
06:42, 23 January 2013 (UTC)Tito Dutta ( talk) 10:42, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Tito Dutta ( talk) 14:53, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
You should be aware that mynews.in fails a wikipedia policy regarding the use of self published sources. In addition, another problem with your edits is that they are promotional and do not display a neutral point of view. Grayfell ( talk) 02:16, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 06:13, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Please read Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. We DO NOT used self-published sources for edits like this: [1]. I see that you have already been blocked once for your partisan editing of that article - I suggest that you conform with policy in future, rather than having it happen again. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 15:49, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
–But the source has News Paper cuttings, which doesnt have online version. Can I know why its wrong to give links like these? Naveentirthani ( talk) 15:51, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Asaram Bapu is already listed in List of Hindu gurus and saints. Wikipedia list articles organize by alphabetical order of name, not counting titles. Please do not include names more than once. Thank you. Grayfell ( talk) 06:21, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Please read over Template:Infobox criminal. It specifically says "This template is generally reserved for convicted serial killers, gangsters, mass murderers, old west outlaws, murderers, mafia members, fugitives, FBI 10 Most Wanted, serial rapist, mobsters, and other notorious criminals." Both cases you listed seem to be scam or fraud cases, which do not fit the criteria for Template:Infobox criminal. Please continue the discussion on Talk: Asaram per WP:BRD. HickoryOughtShirt?4 ( talk) 08:35, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Asaram shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
As User:HickoryOughtShirt?4 has already explained it to you above in great detail, please do not change the infobox again without discussing. Infobox criminal is applicable here due to the rape conviction. DBig Xrayᗙ 12:16, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
It appears that you have no interest in editing an encyclopaedia but just want to do promo edits on one subject. Any further disruption and you will be blocked. — Spaceman Spiff 11:47, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hariom om om om om om om om om om om om om om om om om om — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
122.176.154.214 (
talk)
17:01, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Naveentirthani, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}}
after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Asaram Bapu. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Tito Dutta (
talk)
02:32, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Asaram Bapu. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Tito Dutta (
talk)
02:39, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at
Asaram Bapu, you may be
blocked from editing.
Eye
snore
02:45, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Tito Dutta ( talk) 18:03, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Tito Dutta ( talk) 03:47, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Keep on doing good work! Ankush98 ( talk) 04:28, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Asaram Bapu, you may be
blocked from editing.
Tito Dutta (
talk)
05:03, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Fut.Perf.
☼
06:42, 23 January 2013 (UTC)Tito Dutta ( talk) 10:42, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Tito Dutta ( talk) 14:53, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
You should be aware that mynews.in fails a wikipedia policy regarding the use of self published sources. In addition, another problem with your edits is that they are promotional and do not display a neutral point of view. Grayfell ( talk) 02:16, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 06:13, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Please read Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. We DO NOT used self-published sources for edits like this: [1]. I see that you have already been blocked once for your partisan editing of that article - I suggest that you conform with policy in future, rather than having it happen again. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 15:49, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
–But the source has News Paper cuttings, which doesnt have online version. Can I know why its wrong to give links like these? Naveentirthani ( talk) 15:51, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Asaram Bapu is already listed in List of Hindu gurus and saints. Wikipedia list articles organize by alphabetical order of name, not counting titles. Please do not include names more than once. Thank you. Grayfell ( talk) 06:21, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Please read over Template:Infobox criminal. It specifically says "This template is generally reserved for convicted serial killers, gangsters, mass murderers, old west outlaws, murderers, mafia members, fugitives, FBI 10 Most Wanted, serial rapist, mobsters, and other notorious criminals." Both cases you listed seem to be scam or fraud cases, which do not fit the criteria for Template:Infobox criminal. Please continue the discussion on Talk: Asaram per WP:BRD. HickoryOughtShirt?4 ( talk) 08:35, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Asaram shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
As User:HickoryOughtShirt?4 has already explained it to you above in great detail, please do not change the infobox again without discussing. Infobox criminal is applicable here due to the rape conviction. DBig Xrayᗙ 12:16, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
It appears that you have no interest in editing an encyclopaedia but just want to do promo edits on one subject. Any further disruption and you will be blocked. — Spaceman Spiff 11:47, 13 November 2023 (UTC)