An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of the largest evangelical churches, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manilla ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 15:16, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Evangelism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Copacabana ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 16:43, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Megachurch does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Megachurches are generally protestant but not always. Without an edit summary to understand the reason for your change, and without a source, it's WP:OR and will continue to be reverted. The alternative would be to explain on the article's talk page. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 00:42, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Doing a very thorough job. Keep it up! Erasmus Sydney ( talk) 23:26, 13 April 2020 (UTC) |
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 12:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Repentance (Christianity), you may be blocked from editing. Anupam Talk 02:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
You're quoting but not following Wikipedia:Independent_sources#Non-independent_sources. The infoboxes can't state the numbers as fact, they must make it clear they are a claim by the organisation. Doug Weller talk 12:23, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Evangelical theology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charity ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:20, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to publish a Marriage Course article. The course is run by almost every church denomination in over 100 countries and I was wondering whether it would be possible to include the article under Evangelical Christianity? Thank you! Jakub.cz ( talk) 09:18, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
In order to be A-Class, an article needs per WP:ACLASS to undergo one of two formal review processes with more than one review: either at the talk page of the article or at a WikiProject. You've been tagging a lot of pages where this has not happened as A-Class. I expect you to undo your ratings. – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 22:58, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Category:Bacolod Evangelical Church has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 01:39, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
See WP:FTN. Doug Weller talk 13:43, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Reformulated:
Also, not a policy or guideline, but something important to understand the above policies and guidelines: Wikipedia operates off of objective information, which is information that multiple persons can examine and agree upon. It does not include subjective information, which only an individual can know from an "inner" or personal experience. Most religious beliefs fall under subjective information. Wikipedia may document objective statements about notable subjective claims (i.e. "Christians believe Jesus is divine"), but it does not pretend that subjective statements are objective, and will expose false statements masquerading as subjective beliefs (cf. Indigo children).
You may also want to read User:Ian.thomson/ChristianityAndNPOV. We at Wikipedia are highbrow ( snobby), heavily biased for the academia.
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. All we do here is cite, summarize, and paraphrase professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources, without addition, nor commentary. We're not a directory, nor a forum, nor a place for you to "spread the word".
If (I'm not saying that you do, but if...) you are here to promote pseudoscience, extremism, fundamentalism or conspiracy theories, we're not interested in what you have to say. Tgeorgescu ( talk) 30 August 2020 00:42:15 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Evangelicalism into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. —
Diannaa (
talk)
13:17, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New International Version, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Portuguese and Spanish.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:34, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi. The official website of the organization can be a little tricky, because it uses the shorter name almost everywhere - but it is not a new official name. The official website of the organization, per the link found in the article, still uses the full ten-word name as used in the opening text of the article, and acknowledges on its own "About" page that it simply uses “The King Center” for short. The full name has not changed. The short-hand title "The King Center" was already set up as a redirect nearly fifteen years ago, and is one of five redirects to the article. Jmg38 ( talk) 20:26, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christianity and homosexuality, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Houston.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:13, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of the largest evangelical churches, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manilla ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 15:16, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Evangelism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Copacabana ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 16:43, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Megachurch does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Megachurches are generally protestant but not always. Without an edit summary to understand the reason for your change, and without a source, it's WP:OR and will continue to be reverted. The alternative would be to explain on the article's talk page. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 00:42, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Doing a very thorough job. Keep it up! Erasmus Sydney ( talk) 23:26, 13 April 2020 (UTC) |
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 12:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Repentance (Christianity), you may be blocked from editing. Anupam Talk 02:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
You're quoting but not following Wikipedia:Independent_sources#Non-independent_sources. The infoboxes can't state the numbers as fact, they must make it clear they are a claim by the organisation. Doug Weller talk 12:23, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Evangelical theology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charity ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:20, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to publish a Marriage Course article. The course is run by almost every church denomination in over 100 countries and I was wondering whether it would be possible to include the article under Evangelical Christianity? Thank you! Jakub.cz ( talk) 09:18, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
In order to be A-Class, an article needs per WP:ACLASS to undergo one of two formal review processes with more than one review: either at the talk page of the article or at a WikiProject. You've been tagging a lot of pages where this has not happened as A-Class. I expect you to undo your ratings. – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 22:58, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Category:Bacolod Evangelical Church has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 01:39, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
See WP:FTN. Doug Weller talk 13:43, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Reformulated:
Also, not a policy or guideline, but something important to understand the above policies and guidelines: Wikipedia operates off of objective information, which is information that multiple persons can examine and agree upon. It does not include subjective information, which only an individual can know from an "inner" or personal experience. Most religious beliefs fall under subjective information. Wikipedia may document objective statements about notable subjective claims (i.e. "Christians believe Jesus is divine"), but it does not pretend that subjective statements are objective, and will expose false statements masquerading as subjective beliefs (cf. Indigo children).
You may also want to read User:Ian.thomson/ChristianityAndNPOV. We at Wikipedia are highbrow ( snobby), heavily biased for the academia.
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. All we do here is cite, summarize, and paraphrase professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources, without addition, nor commentary. We're not a directory, nor a forum, nor a place for you to "spread the word".
If (I'm not saying that you do, but if...) you are here to promote pseudoscience, extremism, fundamentalism or conspiracy theories, we're not interested in what you have to say. Tgeorgescu ( talk) 30 August 2020 00:42:15 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Evangelicalism into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. —
Diannaa (
talk)
13:17, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New International Version, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Portuguese and Spanish.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:34, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi. The official website of the organization can be a little tricky, because it uses the shorter name almost everywhere - but it is not a new official name. The official website of the organization, per the link found in the article, still uses the full ten-word name as used in the opening text of the article, and acknowledges on its own "About" page that it simply uses “The King Center” for short. The full name has not changed. The short-hand title "The King Center" was already set up as a redirect nearly fifteen years ago, and is one of five redirects to the article. Jmg38 ( talk) 20:26, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christianity and homosexuality, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Houston.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:13, 15 November 2020 (UTC)