-- 03:14, Saturday, February 11, 2017 ( UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
The article Farooq Siddiqi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Velella
Velella Talk
10:14, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
@ Velella:Thanks your Quick support. I mentioned all reference exactly who i mentioned in Article. I recheck it. Naqash.sakhawat ( talk) 10:26, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Farooq Siddiqi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – Dream out loud ( talk) 19:25, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello! Naqash.sakhawat,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
KGirlTrucker81
huh?
what I've been doing
15:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
|
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 ( talk) 16:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet of
Naqash3000 (
talk ·
contribs ·
global contribs ·
page moves ·
user creation ·
block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk)
23:20, 12 February 2017 (UTC) |
Naqash.sakhawat ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #17520 was submitted on Feb 13, 2017 13:29:29. This review is now closed.
-- UTRSBot ( talk) 13:29, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Naqash.sakhawat ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #17526 was submitted on Feb 14, 2017 00:35:10. This review is now closed.
-- UTRSBot ( talk) 00:35, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
I received your unblock request through email. The problem is not that you created an article on Farooq Siddiqi but that you've evaded a previous block by creating multiple accounts. The previous block was for several reasons, among them that you were editing disruptively. Your article seems to have been sourced enough to avoid speedy deletion this time, which does address one of the reasons why you were initially blocked. However, if you want to be unblocked, you will need to address the other concerns: repeatedly recreating deleted articles, using multiple accounts, and disruptive editing. From what I can tell, you're simply repeating the unblock requests made in User talk:Naqash3000, and that's usually not a good idea. It's better to read through WP:GAB and try to address the reasons why the previous request was rejected. If you don't understand why, I'm not really sure what to suggest. You could ask questions here, and maybe someone will assist you. Keep in mind that Wikipedia is staffed by volunteers, though. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 14:47, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Good Work NaqashKashmiri ( talk) 14:49, 2 April 2017 (UTC) |
Hello, Naqash.sakhawat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " sandbox".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Linguist un Eins uno 17:27, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Farooq Siddiqi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farooq Siddiqi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 18:17, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
-- 03:14, Saturday, February 11, 2017 ( UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
The article Farooq Siddiqi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Velella
Velella Talk
10:14, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
@ Velella:Thanks your Quick support. I mentioned all reference exactly who i mentioned in Article. I recheck it. Naqash.sakhawat ( talk) 10:26, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Farooq Siddiqi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – Dream out loud ( talk) 19:25, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello! Naqash.sakhawat,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
KGirlTrucker81
huh?
what I've been doing
15:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
|
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 ( talk) 16:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet of
Naqash3000 (
talk ·
contribs ·
global contribs ·
page moves ·
user creation ·
block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk)
23:20, 12 February 2017 (UTC) |
Naqash.sakhawat ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #17520 was submitted on Feb 13, 2017 13:29:29. This review is now closed.
-- UTRSBot ( talk) 13:29, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Naqash.sakhawat ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #17526 was submitted on Feb 14, 2017 00:35:10. This review is now closed.
-- UTRSBot ( talk) 00:35, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
I received your unblock request through email. The problem is not that you created an article on Farooq Siddiqi but that you've evaded a previous block by creating multiple accounts. The previous block was for several reasons, among them that you were editing disruptively. Your article seems to have been sourced enough to avoid speedy deletion this time, which does address one of the reasons why you were initially blocked. However, if you want to be unblocked, you will need to address the other concerns: repeatedly recreating deleted articles, using multiple accounts, and disruptive editing. From what I can tell, you're simply repeating the unblock requests made in User talk:Naqash3000, and that's usually not a good idea. It's better to read through WP:GAB and try to address the reasons why the previous request was rejected. If you don't understand why, I'm not really sure what to suggest. You could ask questions here, and maybe someone will assist you. Keep in mind that Wikipedia is staffed by volunteers, though. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 14:47, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Good Work NaqashKashmiri ( talk) 14:49, 2 April 2017 (UTC) |
Hello, Naqash.sakhawat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " sandbox".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Linguist un Eins uno 17:27, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Farooq Siddiqi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farooq Siddiqi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 18:17, 23 December 2017 (UTC)