This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello Nagarjuna198, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:Ramcrk. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Please do not leave incorrect warnings for other editors. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:24, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

I looked at the edits that triggered your warnings to Ramcrk and can't see anything that deserves them, let alone final warnings. Seems like a straightforward content dispute so please make sure you use the talk pages to discuss. -- NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:43, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Please look at the citations he provides to prove his point of view. he is indeed making disruptive edits

If you have issues with the sources then discuss that on the article's talk page. Giving final warnings is completely inappropriate. -- NeilN ^{talk to me} 02:00, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Nagarjuna198, I have discussed with several administrators in talk page at [1] before creating Andhra page(see this version, which you deleted without discussion.) I am open to discussion. Lets discuss about it. My intention to create the page is, there is so much confusion about the word Andhra. Lot of people don't know which Andhra we are talking about. We have Seema-Andhra, Andhra Pradesh, Coastal Andhra, Telugu language. All 4 of them are called Andhra some time or other. How do people know which Andhra a particular news paper article or govt document talking about? My effort is to remove such confusion. I welcome your suggestions in this regard. Ramcrk ( talk) 02:24, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Please review WP:NOTVAND and stop trying to get Ramcrk blocked on the basis of vandalism. If you persist, it is quite likely your actions will come under scrutiny. -- NeilN ^{talk to me} 02:26, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

I dont care if you support him for a wrong reason. I am just trying to keep Wikipedia clean. But I think you should read his edits before talking

What is the point of having this Andhra page if you replicate the content in coastal Andhra? One time I used redirect from Andhra page to coastal Andhra. But later came up with this page as I saw the need for such page to avoid the confution about word Andhra. I hope you see my point. I am not trying to bring Telangana history into Andhra. I was merely trying to explain how Andhra word became synonymous with Telugu starting 11th century and how some govt documents used Andhra word to refer to seema-Andra region. Ramcrk ( talk) 02:36, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four halfwidth tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 02:02, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Andhra. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NeilN ^{talk to me} 02:32, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Yes, Ramcrk was also reminded of WP:3RR. -- NeilN ^{talk to me} 02:58, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you harm Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Ramcrk with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. T H F S W ( T · C · E) 02:37, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Nagarjuna198. You have new messages at Talk:Andhra.
Message added 03:07, 14 April 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Satavahana dynasty has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Again, read WP:NOTVAND. Keep referring to Ramcrk's edits as vandalism and you'll be reported. NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:56, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Satavahana_dynasty. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ¬ Aog ^{hac 2z} | 19:11, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

When there is an on-going discussion and you revert, it obviously calls for a warning. If I was giving a fake warning, then an admin would not have left these comments here. — Abhishek ^{Talk to me} 12:41, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

I suggest you continue the discussion (and provide reliable sources) to back up your version on the talk page, Nagarjuna198. If you continue to edit war against two editors, you will be blocked. From what I'm seeing in the discussion, there are reasonable reliable sources to support the version you keep removing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:30, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four halfwidth tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 01:56, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

		The Modest Barnstar
		Thanks for your recent contributions! - Mike Restivo ( talk) 20:17, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	Nagarjuna198 ( talk) 23:19, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 03:35, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar! It is much appreciated. You also asked if I could semi-protect the Telugu Language article; alas, I cannot. See if you can get one of the active editors or admins to do that for you. Good luck! best regards, Mike Restivo ( talk) 11:52, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

You are welcome. Sure, I will find someone. Nagarjuna198 ( talk)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Central Dravidian Group Languages. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. jsfouche ☽☾ Talk 03:38, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Please review the definition for vandalism. My edits in no way come close to that. You created a new article that does not expand upon an existing article. That does not mean it is not real, just that it does not meet criteria for a new, separate article. All the other branches of that group all have redirected articles to the main article as well. That is how it should be. Also, remember, do not remove CSD tags from articles you created. jsfouche ☽☾ Talk 03:42, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Ok

Please do not change the spelling of anyone's name away from a version that is clearly the most widely used, and has long been used in Wikipedia, as you recently did with the name of Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan. If you look at the names he used for his byline in the books that he published, it was always Radhakrishnan, not Radhakrishna (try both versions in Google Bookview -- inauthor:Radhakrishnan or inauthor:Radhakrishna, along with inauthor:Sarvepalli - there are thousands for Radhakrishnan, absolutely zero for your preferred version of "Radhakrishna"). Clearly, the man Radhakrishnan himself would have disagreed with how you wanted to spell his name (in English). I see from comments on this talk page that others have also been concerned that you engage in tendentious editing. Please take this as a signal that you should be more thoughtful in how you go about trying to edit Wikipedia. Regards -- Presearch ( talk) 21:27, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

You're still doing it. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 07:33, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Please don't search and replace occurrences of article name within articles as you did here and here. It damages links, and is a major change. Please discuss at article talk first. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 06:56, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

In case you didn't know, spaces usually come after punctuation marks.

Instead of this:

• I like bunnies.They are not only cute,but friendly too.

Try this:

• I like bunnies. They are not only cute, but friendly too.

Thank you, Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 06:59, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Please stop screwing with the article. What's the point? — kwami ( talk) 06:28, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

You stop your reverse strategy. Its you who is screwing with the article. If you continue this, you will be blocked by Admins. Nagarjuna198 ( talk)

No, you were being disruptive. You were simply defacing the article. If anyone is blocked, it will be you.

Also, for a WP:Fringe claim like Telugu being Indo-Aryan, we need WP:secondary sources. That's because any nutcase can get published; we rely on evaluations of them. I've looked around, but this idea is so far-out that I can't find anything that even mentions it! Please read WP:WEIGHT: we aren't going to report that anyone thinks Telugu is Indo-Aryan unless we have reliable sources that this is actually considered a viable possibility by somebody noteworthy. — kwami ( talk) 06:54, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Read carefully. No one said telugu is Indo-Aryan. Stop pushing ur personal Agends Nagarjuna198 ( talk)

You said it's Indo-Aryan! This was covered on the talk page, if you'd bother to read something other than your own opinion.

And if you think deleting nonsense from an article is vandalism, I suggest you read WP:Vandalism.

Since you apparently aren't aware of what you're adding to the article, I'll postpone asking for the language project to intervene until you have a chance to review it. Since you seem to have missed it, I'll repeat it here:

A few linguists [...] believe that Telugu is the Vikriti language, a language descended from Sanskrit

Now, Sanskrit is an Indo-Aryan language. If Telugu descends from Sanskrit, then it's an Indo-Aryan language as well. Unless you're arguing that Sanskrit is Dravidian? — kwami ( talk) 01:06, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

You are missing point. There is no proof that Indic and Dravidian languages are related. Absence of proof is not proof of absence. So some notable linguists are of the opinion that Telugu and sanskrit are related. So what? Nagarjuna198 ( talk)

Its only minority view and those minority are notable linguists. Its worth mentioning them. Nagarjuna198 ( talk)

Now, edit warring over my own talk page will get you blocked. I'll block you myself if you don't knock it off. — kwami ( talk) 01:06, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

You cant scare people and prevent them from editing. what you are doing is unacceptable. Nagarjuna198 ( talk)

I have requested for ban for kwami for his abusive behavior here Foodie 377 ( talk) 17:02, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 00:30, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on File:Vizag 70 feet ganesh.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Spaceman Spiff 21:57, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 01:50, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Here's the link on where to file a sock puppet investigation concerning your baseless allegations that User:Linguistic Science is my sock puppet. If you think you're right, then start the investigation. Don't wait. If you have any courage at all, then put your money where your mouth is. If you don't know, then shut the hell up and stop the innuendo. You claim to have studied linguistics. Then prove it and act like an educated linguist. Stop the ridiculous nationalist POV pushing at Telugu language that has absolutely nothing to do with linguistic science and act like the educated grown up you claim to be. -- Taivo ( talk) 03:25, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 04:50, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

I have had an eye on it. And I will keep watching it. Also, I feel you can restore some of the content because about 10000 bytes of the article has been shaved off since Kwami and Taivo showed up.I cannot believe that all of that is non-genuine as claimed by Taivo. I still get a kick out of how these guys were crying over how widely known "Italian of the east" is for Telugu. Even Google Suggest brings it up. Cheers Foodie 377 ( talk) 08:38, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Telugu language. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. You are now continuing to edit war and calling good edits as vandalism; all this right after your prior block expired. If you don't stop this, you are likely to be blocked again. — Spaceman Spiff 16:59, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions, but you have been moving pages of Telugu articles altering the spellings. please stop this: first of all there is a lot of difference between tha(త) and ta(ట), if u know the language u would have understood and secondly be careful in using the most widely used spelling to maintain consistency through out the web. please google the spellings before u change and also also try looking at the references that were cited in the articles. regards, DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 09:49, 18 July 2012 (UTC).

ta(త) and ta(ట) and థ-tha according to transliteration. Read about transliteration.( Nagarjuna198 ( talk))

Hello, Nagarjuna198. You have new messages at Talk:Shubha Lagnam.
Message added 13:13, 18 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

§§ AnimeshKulkarni ( talk) 13:13, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Nagarjuna198. You have new messages at DH85868993's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Pavitra Bandham. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 05:51, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, you may be blocked from editing. Please discuss the changes before out rightly moving the page.I hope you know about WP:CONSENSUS.Please dont use transliteration as the only cause and move every page.We have the article of Odisha named as Orissa because of WP:COMMONNAME.Most of the same rule can be applied here too.Consider this the last time we will tell you this.IF you CONTINUE this moving of pages without due consensus, we will have to ask an administrator to review you and your edits.Seriously and Sincerely TheStrike Σagle 15:35, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Ok Nagarjuna198 ( talk)

Hello, Nagarjuna198. You have new messages at Strike Eagle's talk page.
Message added 05:43, 22 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 05:43, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

some one is vandalising the page Telugu cinema, users vensatry and secret of success are reverting back new edits with 2010 edits, just revert those edits and do the needful, restrict agenda driven vandalism Ba7431 ( talk) 11:03, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chandas (Telugu), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telugu ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:15, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

H Nagarjuna198, when you move a page, please give an appropriate reason why you moved that page. Thanks. Tolly 4 bolly 15:43, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Sure Nagarjuna198 ( talk)

1. The Telugu version is titled as Siva not Shiva.

2. The CD cover is Hindi film's CD cover titles SHIVA

UNDERSTAND??? NON SENSE Murrallli ( talk) 10:17, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

I am just trying to make the Siva (1989 Telugu film) article better. That CD cover is not Hindi. Its Telugu. Nagarjuna198 ( talk)

okay okay dont give BP to me now Murrallli ( talk) 12:24, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

lol Nagarjuna198 ( talk)

Hi. You moved it to Viśakhapatnam without explanation. A post above advised you to give such explanations. You also added to the article "sometimes spelled as Vishakhapatnam". Google shows 16.6 million hits for Vishakhapatnam and 16 hits for the new Viśakhapatnam. Please explain. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 05:40, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

I've reverted your change. I see above in this page that you did something similar previously with Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan and that you received appropriate feedback for it. Editors do not create their own names for subjects that are well recorded in English, it should be discussed and a consensus obtained. If you have evidence that the name should be said differently from the way it is written and it is not already there, then include this evidence in the article. Imc ( talk) 07:51, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

I see nothing but warnings, warning, and warnings. I just noticed a few from me from 2011. Please edit in accordance with the will of the community. I see you've also been blocked three times. I just don't understand why you make such controversial edits. Don't you trust the community? Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 05:44, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Spot-checking your page moves shows that the new names go against google page hits.

I just spot checked three at random:

• You moved Premaku Swagatham to Premaku Swagatam with triple the google hits for the former.

• You moved Sommokadidhi Sokokadidhi to Sommokadidi Sokokadidi with almost double the google hits for the former.

• You moved Vasantham to Vasantam with 18 times the google hits for the former.

I brought your now-reverted move of Visakhapatnam‎ to Viśakhapatnam to your attention and you have since moved:

• Jagadeka Veerudu Athiloka Sundari to Jagadeka Veerudu Atiloka Sundari with 139k to 18k for the former.

So, please stop making page moves until the community decides whether or not your page moves have been appropriate. Thank you, Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 10:16, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Ok Nagarjuna198 ( talk)

Namaste, Nagarjuna198. You have got at least one new message at the Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics. Please continue the discussion there!
Message added by Tito Dutta ( contact) 10:41, 19 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time.

1 more new message! -- Tito Dutta ( contact) 13:28, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Sign using four tildes (~~~~) and not three tildes (~~~) -- Tito Dutta ( contact) 11:26, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Telugu grammar ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Period and Full Stop

Akkineni Nageswara Rao ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Iddaru Mitrulu

Jayasudha ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tirupati

Kalasha ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Telugu

S. V. Krishna Reddy ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mast

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 00:03, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

You are making too many edits depending one personal opinion. Please don't make changes on pronunciation "th"→"T" etc unless you can add reliable sources in support! -- Tito Dutta ( contact) 00:09, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Yes, but I was just asking, రచ = what? Does it mean anything? In ictu oculi ( talk) 07:18, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

రచ (Racha) = means nothing in Telugu. రచ్చ(Rachcha) means 'Rumpus'. Even google has spelling Rachcha. However community decided to go with 'Racha' as poster has that spelling. Nagarjuna198 ( talk)

That's what I thought, but since I don't have my big Telugu dictionary here, I didn't say so. I know రచ్చ means rumpus. As per recent discussion I do not agree with the "ban" on use of Indian scripts in ledes - though actually I added it on autopilot as standard editing practice in this case - seems to me that en.wp needs to raise its standards overall about Dravidian languages, and have Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Telugu the same as we have Wikipedia:Manual of Style/France and French-related. Otherwise misspellings like this one will persist. Anyway, Tito Dutta is correct to say please use the WP:RM mechanism. In ictu oculi ( talk) 07:57, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing out the blue blur said RAmCHAran, that was what I needed to Support - but it's no big deal if the article is left misspelled. I think there's a longer term bigger issue which needs addressing. Enough has been said on the RM now, best to leave it. Best wishes. In ictu oculi ( talk) 09:12, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you so much. Nagarjuna198 ( talk)

Please don't say to Tito "hellbent on mispelling Telugu names" - Tito is a moderate careful editor. Better not to say that to others either. Take it easier and it'll go easier, Cheers. In ictu oculi ( talk) 00:19, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Sure. I just take lot of time to edit on wiki. Its just my frustration. I will apologize. Nagarjuna198 ( talk) 00:24, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I added this table to romanization of Telugu. What the article needs now is some references about actual usage, for example a recent newspaper article commenting on AP Highways Dept policy on road signs? Or a source saying romanization is same/different in Telangana vs Coastal Andhra? some sources like that. Maybe can you locate such sources and add? Cheers. In ictu oculi ( talk) 00:55, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Telangana Accent is different from Andhra accent ( mostly choice of words) but its Telugu as well and alphabets are same. I will get the references soon Nagarjuna198 ( talk) 00:59, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

It needed a citation before adding it to Wikipedia! -- Tito Dutta ( contact) 01:02, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

In Unicode, Telugu Brahmic script (or Indic script) is encoded. As of Unicode version 6.0 the following script has been encoded:

• Telugu script (0C00..0C7F) ^[1]

There are severals standards that developed over time. Here is an arbitrary selection of some of them used for Telugu:

• ISO 15919 Transliteration of Devanagari and related Indic scripts into Latin characters is an international standard for the transliteration of Indic scripts to the Latin alphabet formed in 2001. It uses diacritics to map the much larger set of Brahmic consonants and vowels to the Latin script.

• The International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) is a system of phonetic notation based on the Latin alphabet, devised by the International Phonetic Association.

• The Rice Translitetation Standard (RTS)

^[2]

ISO clearly states "Transliteration of Devanagari and related Indic scripts into Latin characters"
Reference List

• Telugu Tranliteration
• Unicode Standard(may be old)
• Telugu

Sure, feel free to add directly to romanization of Telugu, I don't WP:OWN it :) In ictu oculi ( talk) 01:32, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

• Write new message at the bottom of a discussion, not between two talks.
• Write WP:ES (more details at WP:FIES.
• Use WO:TWINKLE -- Tito Dutta ( contact) 02:17, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Namaste, Nagarjuna198. You have got at least one new message at the Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics. Please continue the discussion there!
Message added by Tito Dutta ( contact) 15:59, 22 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time.

You are continuously misunderstanding and misinterpreting things. If you can not understand, ask. Why did you change "Seethamma">>"Sitamma" here when the article title spells "Seethamma"? -- Tito Dutta ( contact) 16:26, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

I didnt change anything in the lead. The article says also spelled as sitamma. So whats worng in changing interpretation section? Nagarjuna198 ( talk) 16:33, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

It seems, you don't have the least interest to learn things. Above, I asked you to write edit summary, you did not pay any attention. Read the consensus again at INB, there should not be any Indic script in lead and infobox! -- Tito Dutta ( contact) 16:47, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Oops I will make sure I will write proper summaries. This is what I saw "I believe that the consensus was that it was ok to use indic scripts in an info box. In which case, you would have no problem finding sources. --regentspark (comment) 21:14, 3 May 2013 (UTC)" Nagarjuna198 ( talk) 16:50, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hindu calendar may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 08:42, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

from where shivamani is coming into our discussion, I did not write about shivamani I am writing about u putting year of release of every film, we will put year of film while creating an article, only if already a movie with the same name has been released, dont waste my time, by deviating from what i wrote, and dont pull out past issues, time waste Murrallli ( talk) 12:09, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bhogaraju Pattabhi Sitaramayya ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Telugu

Paduka Pattabhishekam ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bharata

Romanization of Telugu ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Telugu

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:35, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

tho patu koncham saradaga undadam alavatu, bevakoof anna ani emi anukoku amma Murrallli ( talk) 12:48, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

You are still continuing your disruptive edits. You were told not to add Indic script in lead or infobox without reaching consensus. Why did you close this RM yourself Talk:Vaikuntha Ekadashi? You know nothing of Wikipedia and has no interest to learn too. Everytime someone posts something at your talk page, you just remove the section! -- Tito Dutta ( contact) 23:29, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Just see what that guy posted. It made no sense. He is saying he has BP, Even if he calls any one Bewakoof, they shouldnt mind. Its absolute crap as he is trying to say filmi dialogues.

@Tito Dutta: Please feel free to teach me the things I dont know. Nagarjuna198 ( talk) 23:33, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

• It is useless to try to teach you something! I told you to write edit summary at least 4 times and you promised too. But still you are continuing without edit summary! Why are you still adding Indic script when you were told not to do so! -- Tito Dutta ( contact) 23:40, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

I promise you I will write edit summary, I just missed out on few occasions. Please consider that as human error and not deliberate. I wont add indic scripts for movies and persons but I think as per rfc, it is fine to add indic for Geographic locations right? Nagarjuna198 ( talk) 23:44, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Also about Twinkle, I didnt quite understand how to use it. Nagarjuna198 ( talk) 23:56, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

• After enabling Twinkle in preference, you'll get a "Tw" link at upper right corner of pages. Go to your sandbox to test that first. Twinkle page has full details on it Twinkle -- Tito Dutta ( contact) 00:21, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Got it!Nagarjuna198 01:53, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

I'm seeing a pattern here. You make edits that you feel are right, but know are against the wishes of the community. The community tells you. You politely say something like "Sorry. I am trying to help." and then you continue the same way.

If you're smart enough to edit, then you're smart enough to understand talk page posts that object to your edits. So, it's very difficult for me to accept that we aren't being clear. It seems more and more like this pattern is a strategy you are using to continue doing what you think is right, while knowing full well that the community does not.

So, please, please following the community's wishes. If you do not, someone will probably bring this to the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents and you may end up blocked from editing. Please just make edits that we all agree with. We don't want to lose you, but we also don't want you to edit against community wishes. Please tell me that you understand and will comply. Thank you, Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 23:51, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

* I will understand and will comply

• After the discussion, I never moved a page without RM. Indic Scripts section is something I was not 100% clear about. Nagarjuna198 ( talk) 00:00, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

I'm very happy we're clear. Thank you, my friend and happy editing. :) Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 00:05, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

• See this edit, he is (once again) promising to write edit summary and forgetting to write in the same edit! -- Tito Dutta ( contact) 00:18, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Please cut me some slack :-). Its not deliberate. I will make sure I will. Nagarjuna198 ( talk) 00:58, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Nagarjuna198. You have new messages at Nagarjuna198's talk page.
Message added 01:48, 28 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nagarjuna198 01:48, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Nagarjuna198. You have new messages at Nagarjuna198's talk page.
Message added 01:49, 28 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nagarjuna198 01:49, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Are you okay? You are reverting my edit at my talk archive? -- Tito Dutta ( contact) 02:09, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

I Clicked on your contribs. I tried to see the diff on some vandal.. but it was not intended. Nagarjuna198 03:00, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

• Oh sure, it happens! No worries then! -- Tito Dutta ( contact) 03:43, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

I have recently reported another RM, see it here: Wikipedia_talk:Requested_moves. So note, never move or close your own RMs, it might be controversial. -- Tito Dutta ( contact) 19:08, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Sure. I asked for closure in my recent RM. Nagarjuna198 21:27, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

• ALL RMs are automatically included and monitored by a bot and you can find those in WP:RM. One does not need to request closure. In addition, your signature is broken! -- Tito Dutta ( contact) 03:17, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

• I have hunch that you are stalking my contribution page and posting in the discussions I am participating. Please don't. I don't need your !supports! -- Tito Dutta ( contact) 03:32, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

• I have just bumped in to those pages and YES from your contribs but I am just presenting my views. I am sure you dont need my support but I am only doing something I believe in(Remember I deferred from you in other discussions) Nagarjuna198 ( talk) 03:38, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Lava Kusa ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Ghantasala and Raghavulu

Culture of Andhra Pradesh ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tirupati

Mridangam ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Nandi

Parivartana ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Samudrala

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:36, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello. You have a new message at Anna Frodesiak's talk page. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 18:31, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi Nagarjuna198, about your edit at Vishnu Sharma: please note that in Sanskrit, शर्मन् (śarman) is not a root like the common a-ending राम (rāma) etc. Unlike the stem rāma, whose nominative singular (प्रथमाविभक्तिः एकवचनम्) is rāmaḥ (it declines as रामः रामौ रामाः), this one शर्मन् declines as शर्मा शर्माणौ शर्माणः). Please see this link for details. Shreevatsa ( talk) 16:32, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Man. You seem to be very knowledgeable. I really appreciate your comment. Nagarjuna198 ( talk) 23:06, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Wrt this this edit of yours, note that the original version of the article was correct, and you introduced a typo. It so happens that all sorts of mistakes can be found on the internet; if you search for any misspelling you're sure to find hits for it. To ascertain what the correct spelling is, you must look at a dictionary or some reliable source (not random internet searches). Even to ascertain what the more common spelling on the internet is, you must do a seach for both the spellings in question, not just the one you think is right: for instance, in this case, if you search for prasthānatrayi OR prasthānatrayī then you'll see that even on the internet the more common spelling is the latter. Even the book you found (with a typo) for the wrong spelling, has three other locations on Google Books which have the right spelling. Please be more careful in future. Shreevatsa ( talk) 19:53, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

You did this wrong spelling thing again at Mīmāṃsā. The fact is that Mīmāṃsā is a feminine word and ends with a dīrgha ā, just like sītā, gītā etc. You introduced the wrong spelling and even introduced a reference just because you found some place on the internet with the wrong spelling. Next time, please do some work and check that you haven't made a mistake. If you need help with figuring out how to look up a Sanskrit dictionary, I'll be glad to help you: there are good ones online by Apte and Monier-Williams. Please refer to them first, and assume that the previous editors of the article have not made a mistake, before introducing your own mistakes. (See a books search also.) Shreevatsa ( talk) 20:01, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Another one at Shastri (degree), where you changed the correct śāstrī / शास्त्री to the incorrect śastri / शस्त्रि with edit comment "There wont be Deergha in the end in sanskrit". This is another word with 'n' ending, śāstrin declined as śāstrī śāstriṇau śāstriṇaḥ. There is no such thing as "śāstri" that you introduced, without the dīrgha.
PLEASE STOP changing correct spellings to wrong spellings like this. Check a dictionary first. If you continue to do this it will appear that you are introducing mistakes this intentionally. Shreevatsa ( talk) 20:40, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dheerasankarabharanam ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Telugu

Kalyani (raga) ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Telugu

Mayamalavagowla ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Telugu

Shuddha Saveri ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Telugu

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:52, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

If you view the image over there in the page of "vishwa mohini", the poster itself spells it has "Viswa Mohini" and not "Vishwa Mohini" and that was what exactly I edited it to. So, shouldn't the official name as per the makers of the film be used here? Please do explain how it comes under vandalism with a proper rationale. Please revert it back if you find my edit as disruptive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kekamohan ( talk • contribs) 03:39, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Why didnt you write edit summary? Nagarjuna198 ( talk) 05:24, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

* Vishwa Mohin -> Viswa Mohini - You didnt write edit summary. Also you didnt provide Valid reference.

* All your other moves were disruptive. Nagarjuna198 ( talk) 05:37, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

It wasn't deliberate and will provide edit summary from now on. Regarding Nartanasala, refer to this link http://www.snapdeal.com/product/narthanasala-panadava-vanavas-telugu-audio/545902 . The image is of the official Audio CD and the image mentions the name as "Narthanasaala" with "sa" used to transliterate the sound "శ" as opposed to sha. It goes that Telugu has a different pronunciation to that of Indo-Aryan languages as regards to a few sounds(like almost all Telugu people use the proper name of Vignan-like that of the famous education group, and not "Vigyan") and most Telugu films use "sa" for "శ" as can be seen in Telugu film websites. References whenever they are of reputable sources will be provided form now onwards. Kekamohan ( talk • contribs)

You are assuming that శ is always pronounced as 'Sa'. You are wrong. Then why would we have two letters శ and స? In hindi people pronounce श and ष same way. In Bihar, UP, श and स are both written/pronouces as 'Sa' but in Standard Hindi, its श- 'Sha' and ष-Shha
However, Telugu distinguishes between శ,ష and స. Telugu is not uniform language. Telugu is one such language which exhibits the Diglossia. The pronounciation differes from region to region. For Standard Telugu -See Romanization of Telugu, శ-śa, ష-ṣa and స-sa. Point is both the spellings are right. You have to show CBFC certificate or Official Title(Not Blogs) as Citation Nagarjuna198 ( talk) 01:55, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Nartanasala - Nartanasala doesnt have official poster or Title in English. Transliteration of నర్తనశాల is Nartanaśāla. Your spelling Narthanasala=నర్థనశాల NOT నర్తనశాల
See also Nartanasala-1, Nartanasala-2; Nartanashala (new).
The Image of Audio doesnt have english spelling. Its not a good idea to hover over wrong spellings in the web and repeat them. Nagarjuna198 ( talk) 04:34, 12 June 2013 (UTC)