Almost everything you've posted so far is a personal attack on me. Somehow, I don't think you started editing Wikipedia yesterday. Kauffner ( talk) 05:15, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
Moved to: Template_talk:Infobox_settlement/Other_templates_up_for_TfD#Redirects_for_deletion_-_they_break_tools NVanMinh ( talk) 01:04, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
I don't get it? the template points to settlement template; nothing is categorized, so WP:OC#SHAREDNAMES cannot apply. Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 01:54, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi there. I thought I should probably leave a comment here, because it is pretty hard to communicate effectively when conversations are scattered across multiple template talk pages. First, an apology - I should have checked how many transclusions the redirects in question had. Now that I know there were no transclusions, I can see that this was a perfectly reasonable request. If they had had any transclusions I probably would not have added the template, however, as that looks really ugly in articles. I know that it is the established procedure to add the template, but in cases where doing things like that would wreck articles, the articles should get priority. (This would be a good example of a time to apply WP:IAR.) Let me know if you have any other questions about edit requests and related things, and I'll be happy to answer when I have a chance. Best regards — Mr. Stradivarius ( have a chat) 09:40, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, don't have time for your request. I am sure other bot operators will step forward to get you the data. — Ganeshk ( talk) 12:41, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Why are you still orphaning the redirects and creating wikilinks to common terms? You need to stop this immediately, as I have asked you before. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 06:15, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
I have asked for an uninvolved admin to have a look (see here). Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 06:40, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
Dear NVanMinh,
Between 02:24 and 02:34 UTC on the 21th of December you have changed the name of 22 articles and 1 template about kecamatan in Indonesia, without giving a reason. I have not found any place where the move of these articles was discussed. In my opinion, for historical reasons district is not a valid translation for kecamatan. Could you please give your reason for these edits?
Yours Sincerely,
Tjibbe I ( talk) 09:54, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:52, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
Almost everything you've posted so far is a personal attack on me. Somehow, I don't think you started editing Wikipedia yesterday. Kauffner ( talk) 05:15, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
Moved to: Template_talk:Infobox_settlement/Other_templates_up_for_TfD#Redirects_for_deletion_-_they_break_tools NVanMinh ( talk) 01:04, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
I don't get it? the template points to settlement template; nothing is categorized, so WP:OC#SHAREDNAMES cannot apply. Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 01:54, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi there. I thought I should probably leave a comment here, because it is pretty hard to communicate effectively when conversations are scattered across multiple template talk pages. First, an apology - I should have checked how many transclusions the redirects in question had. Now that I know there were no transclusions, I can see that this was a perfectly reasonable request. If they had had any transclusions I probably would not have added the template, however, as that looks really ugly in articles. I know that it is the established procedure to add the template, but in cases where doing things like that would wreck articles, the articles should get priority. (This would be a good example of a time to apply WP:IAR.) Let me know if you have any other questions about edit requests and related things, and I'll be happy to answer when I have a chance. Best regards — Mr. Stradivarius ( have a chat) 09:40, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, don't have time for your request. I am sure other bot operators will step forward to get you the data. — Ganeshk ( talk) 12:41, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Why are you still orphaning the redirects and creating wikilinks to common terms? You need to stop this immediately, as I have asked you before. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 06:15, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
I have asked for an uninvolved admin to have a look (see here). Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 06:40, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
Dear NVanMinh,
Between 02:24 and 02:34 UTC on the 21th of December you have changed the name of 22 articles and 1 template about kecamatan in Indonesia, without giving a reason. I have not found any place where the move of these articles was discussed. In my opinion, for historical reasons district is not a valid translation for kecamatan. Could you please give your reason for these edits?
Yours Sincerely,
Tjibbe I ( talk) 09:54, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:52, 21 December 2012 (UTC)