This user is new to Wikipedia. Please assume good faith, remain civil, and be calm, patient, helpful, and polite while they become accustomed to Wikipedia and its intricacies. |
Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some
common sense Do's and Don'ts:
|
If you need further help, you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my
talk page or type {{helpme}}
here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can
contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
Remember to always
sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the
edit toolbar or by typing four
tildes (~~~~)
at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your
signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a
timestamp.
{{My sandbox}}
on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click
here to start it.Sincerely,
Jax 0677 (
talk) 13:14, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
(Leave me a message)
Hello, I'm Jack Greenmaven. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Magic in the Greco-Roman world because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Greenmaven ( talk) 05:33, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Grand Teton Vodka may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:42, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello: my AfC "The Organization Workshop” was declined today by “User Mutualawe” re: Contact the editor: mail: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:EmailUser/Mutualawe wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mutualawe
However, when I click the above link, I am told that ‘User Mutualawe” does not exist. (?) Could someone enlighten me, please? Many thanks
[1]
(Rafaelcarmen 13:04, 18 May 2013 (UTC))
Hi Mutualawe, Can I ask you to expand on your reason for declining Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Promescent, I am not sure specifically what section of WP:NOT you are referring to in your statement. It is doubly confusing for a new user (DataTalks only 57 edits) to simply be pointed to WP:NOT, with no explanation as to why. -- kelapstick( bainuu) 13:32, 18 May 2013 (UTC) This article read like a product placement to me. apologies if I have coded it incorrectly Dreams are real. TV is not. ( talk) 07:38, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
So wiki is s'pposed to have a page for every book the ny times reviews? Dreams are real. TV is not. ( talk) 07:36, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Kidstart is a page that promotes a website and nothing more which is why i deleted it Dreams are real. TV is not. ( talk) 07:32, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Re: The Organization Workshop - declined today 18 May 13 Dear Mutualawe: my MfC contains (numerous) references to published materials (including books and PhD theses which are accessible at/from University libraries). I would very much, indeed, appreciate if you could give me a couple of examples from my AfC of sources which are definitely not acceptable source material in line with wikipedia regulations – Many thanks beforehand! (Rafaelcarmen 14:23, 18 May 2013 (UTC))
I'm very skeptical about many of your AfC reviews. While we certainly could use help reviewing drafts, you haven't had so much as ten edits before today, and to be honest I don't think you have the experience to be sufficiently familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines to review drafts. Of the articles you accepted, quite a few don't seem to satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines, and I'm left wondering whether to move them back to AfC or to tag them for deletion. I would thus ask you to please stop reviewing until you have gathered more experience. Huon ( talk) 21:33, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
I came on with some spare time, I saw that there were over 1,000 articles for review and decided to use some of my spare (yet valuable) time to contribute. I see that even today, there are over 800 new articles for review. I use the approved of editing tools to aid me as I learn and used my best judgement while following notability guidelines. If you have any constructive suggestions, they would be welcome. Dreams are real. TV is not. ( talk) 07:46, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I have reverted your move of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Infectious diseases within American prisons to Infectious Diseases In American Prisons. This is because the page should not have existed: a bad bot edit had reinstated an AfC draft which had already been moved to the correct name, Infectious diseases within American prisons. Having duplicate articles is not a good idea. -- Redrose64 ( talk) 21:57, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
This user is new to Wikipedia. Please assume good faith, remain civil, and be calm, patient, helpful, and polite while they become accustomed to Wikipedia and its intricacies. |
Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some
common sense Do's and Don'ts:
|
If you need further help, you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my
talk page or type {{helpme}}
here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can
contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
Remember to always
sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the
edit toolbar or by typing four
tildes (~~~~)
at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your
signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a
timestamp.
{{My sandbox}}
on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click
here to start it.Sincerely,
Jax 0677 (
talk) 13:14, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
(Leave me a message)
Hello, I'm Jack Greenmaven. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Magic in the Greco-Roman world because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Greenmaven ( talk) 05:33, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Grand Teton Vodka may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:42, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello: my AfC "The Organization Workshop” was declined today by “User Mutualawe” re: Contact the editor: mail: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:EmailUser/Mutualawe wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mutualawe
However, when I click the above link, I am told that ‘User Mutualawe” does not exist. (?) Could someone enlighten me, please? Many thanks
[1]
(Rafaelcarmen 13:04, 18 May 2013 (UTC))
Hi Mutualawe, Can I ask you to expand on your reason for declining Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Promescent, I am not sure specifically what section of WP:NOT you are referring to in your statement. It is doubly confusing for a new user (DataTalks only 57 edits) to simply be pointed to WP:NOT, with no explanation as to why. -- kelapstick( bainuu) 13:32, 18 May 2013 (UTC) This article read like a product placement to me. apologies if I have coded it incorrectly Dreams are real. TV is not. ( talk) 07:38, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
So wiki is s'pposed to have a page for every book the ny times reviews? Dreams are real. TV is not. ( talk) 07:36, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Kidstart is a page that promotes a website and nothing more which is why i deleted it Dreams are real. TV is not. ( talk) 07:32, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Re: The Organization Workshop - declined today 18 May 13 Dear Mutualawe: my MfC contains (numerous) references to published materials (including books and PhD theses which are accessible at/from University libraries). I would very much, indeed, appreciate if you could give me a couple of examples from my AfC of sources which are definitely not acceptable source material in line with wikipedia regulations – Many thanks beforehand! (Rafaelcarmen 14:23, 18 May 2013 (UTC))
I'm very skeptical about many of your AfC reviews. While we certainly could use help reviewing drafts, you haven't had so much as ten edits before today, and to be honest I don't think you have the experience to be sufficiently familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines to review drafts. Of the articles you accepted, quite a few don't seem to satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines, and I'm left wondering whether to move them back to AfC or to tag them for deletion. I would thus ask you to please stop reviewing until you have gathered more experience. Huon ( talk) 21:33, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
I came on with some spare time, I saw that there were over 1,000 articles for review and decided to use some of my spare (yet valuable) time to contribute. I see that even today, there are over 800 new articles for review. I use the approved of editing tools to aid me as I learn and used my best judgement while following notability guidelines. If you have any constructive suggestions, they would be welcome. Dreams are real. TV is not. ( talk) 07:46, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I have reverted your move of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Infectious diseases within American prisons to Infectious Diseases In American Prisons. This is because the page should not have existed: a bad bot edit had reinstated an AfC draft which had already been moved to the correct name, Infectious diseases within American prisons. Having duplicate articles is not a good idea. -- Redrose64 ( talk) 21:57, 18 May 2013 (UTC)