This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 |
I found an edit of yours re this IP on my watchlist ... I blocked it and requested a global block on the IP, because of the relevant user's previous cross-wiki abuse. Graham 87 06:14, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Hey! How's it going?
Just letting you know I'm still working on the Picts article. Reverting all the changes I've made is not constructive. I realize it's a lot of edits but the article needs work. I'm trimming the content down to make it more concise, but I'm leaving everything sourced okay so the article is okay even while I edit. Just give me 24 hours to complete my edits then we can go and take out whatever is not necessary after discussing on the Talk Page.
Thanks :) LightProof1995 ( talk) 12:24, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Hey. Just to clarify my edit on this. I was confused by your edits and butchered my edit summary.
The source is not authoritative and does not say that the two are analogous. It's just one speaker in a debate arguing for 'premier', in an obvious political context. Scotland and Canadian provinces are also obviously not directly analogous, and the source doesn't mention South African or Australian examples. // Hippo43 ( talk) 01:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
LightProof1995 ( talk) 02:59, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
I’m not sure what your problem with me is but I would like to assure you I have not been sockpuppeting whatsoever. I am a genuine user who has been making useful contributions. Therefore if you want to continue to make these false allegations and reverting all my edits I suggest you do so to an admin who could possibly investigate this matter for both of us. Let me know if you would like to discuss whatever problem you may have. BlaineCreek ( talk) 20:12, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. BlaineCreek ( talk) 20:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I don't know which quote you want to use to verify what has been said in the '2023 creation' section, so I provided some possible quotes from The Telegraph article.
"Another thing had also happened in the intervening period: the rise of the Scottish National Party. With the Union hanging in the balance, was it really the right decision to give the Edinburgh dukedom to someone descending fast down the royal ranking? Why not confer the title on the Princess Royal, a trusted royal trouper whose love of Scotland is well known?"
"It should not go unnoticed that this announcement came just weeks after Nicola Sturgeon, Scotland’s First Minister, announced her resignation. With the prospect of Scottish independence now looking less likely, there is far less risk in making the trusty Wessexes the Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh for now, if not forever."
These quotes come from Camilla Tominey.
DDMS123 ( talk) 17:57, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Cheers for stepping in there. There's banter (I do it too) and then there's... that. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 20:06, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
As ever, Mutt, you have come across as rude and passive aggressive with your insults on the Scotland talk page and, for what it's worth, is unappreciated.
We may have disagreements on which image is best, but I do not appreciate your choice of words when using the term "idiosyncratic preferences" and would ask you to consider reflecting on this and refrain for using personal insults in the future.
Wikipedia is a community built on common understanding and respect for everyone, yes, we may not always get it right and agree, but try and show some respect as you are not the only one around here with a point of view. Under no circumstances should any user, you or anyone else, ever feel the need to use rudeness when users are trying to improve articles in good faith. I would kindly ask you to consider this and reflect on your choice of language and actions, as I am sure you are aware of Wikipedia's policies. Goodreg3 ( talk) 23:20, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Aren't those four words American terms that are not used in British English?
At least Host Clubs and Gravure Idols are completely unheard of in Europe. 2.44.107.155 ( talk) 19:42, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for keeping an eye on the NOTBROKEN socks. I'm not sure whether they've become more prolific or you're finding new accounts that we'd overlooked, but either way it's a valuable contribution. Certes ( talk) 09:38, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page The Hershey Company, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 21:18, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page AB InBev, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 23:29, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Matt, you're right: the Wikipedia:Convenience link takes you to a different page, but the citation itself says "pp. 349, 740" – two pages, which cannot realistically be provided simultaneously through a single URL. If you find that too confusing, perhaps we should remove the URL entirely. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 19:51, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Londonski ( talk · contribs) - what do you think? I have almost missed him it's been so long! 10mmsocket ( talk) 17:33, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Sportspeople from Valleyfield, Fife indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 05:06, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
A recent edit to WP:Oversight aroused my suspicions. Is Kung Hibbe back? Both accounts' home wiki is Swedish. Interaction is fairly strong considering the new account's low edit count, but there are only a couple of Canada edits and nothing Scottish. What do you think? Certes ( talk) 16:38, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
So, hypothetically if I re-add it, but instead of using Inglis use English so it's Scots English instead of Scots Inglis could it stay BigFoxGaming ( talk) 00:15, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Something I have been looking at in the last few months is 28 Roseangle (not to be confused with the murder house) which there is quite a bit online about the history due to the compulsory purchase etc. I have created a draft at User:Crouch, Swale/28 Roseangle which you could look at if you want. I'm not sure it would pass the notability guidelines as its only category C and without a name but there may be enough coverage. I just though you might be interested as you seem to be interested in the Fife area, thanks. Crouch, Swale ( talk) 22:09, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 |
I found an edit of yours re this IP on my watchlist ... I blocked it and requested a global block on the IP, because of the relevant user's previous cross-wiki abuse. Graham 87 06:14, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Hey! How's it going?
Just letting you know I'm still working on the Picts article. Reverting all the changes I've made is not constructive. I realize it's a lot of edits but the article needs work. I'm trimming the content down to make it more concise, but I'm leaving everything sourced okay so the article is okay even while I edit. Just give me 24 hours to complete my edits then we can go and take out whatever is not necessary after discussing on the Talk Page.
Thanks :) LightProof1995 ( talk) 12:24, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Hey. Just to clarify my edit on this. I was confused by your edits and butchered my edit summary.
The source is not authoritative and does not say that the two are analogous. It's just one speaker in a debate arguing for 'premier', in an obvious political context. Scotland and Canadian provinces are also obviously not directly analogous, and the source doesn't mention South African or Australian examples. // Hippo43 ( talk) 01:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
LightProof1995 ( talk) 02:59, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
I’m not sure what your problem with me is but I would like to assure you I have not been sockpuppeting whatsoever. I am a genuine user who has been making useful contributions. Therefore if you want to continue to make these false allegations and reverting all my edits I suggest you do so to an admin who could possibly investigate this matter for both of us. Let me know if you would like to discuss whatever problem you may have. BlaineCreek ( talk) 20:12, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. BlaineCreek ( talk) 20:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I don't know which quote you want to use to verify what has been said in the '2023 creation' section, so I provided some possible quotes from The Telegraph article.
"Another thing had also happened in the intervening period: the rise of the Scottish National Party. With the Union hanging in the balance, was it really the right decision to give the Edinburgh dukedom to someone descending fast down the royal ranking? Why not confer the title on the Princess Royal, a trusted royal trouper whose love of Scotland is well known?"
"It should not go unnoticed that this announcement came just weeks after Nicola Sturgeon, Scotland’s First Minister, announced her resignation. With the prospect of Scottish independence now looking less likely, there is far less risk in making the trusty Wessexes the Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh for now, if not forever."
These quotes come from Camilla Tominey.
DDMS123 ( talk) 17:57, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Cheers for stepping in there. There's banter (I do it too) and then there's... that. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 20:06, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
As ever, Mutt, you have come across as rude and passive aggressive with your insults on the Scotland talk page and, for what it's worth, is unappreciated.
We may have disagreements on which image is best, but I do not appreciate your choice of words when using the term "idiosyncratic preferences" and would ask you to consider reflecting on this and refrain for using personal insults in the future.
Wikipedia is a community built on common understanding and respect for everyone, yes, we may not always get it right and agree, but try and show some respect as you are not the only one around here with a point of view. Under no circumstances should any user, you or anyone else, ever feel the need to use rudeness when users are trying to improve articles in good faith. I would kindly ask you to consider this and reflect on your choice of language and actions, as I am sure you are aware of Wikipedia's policies. Goodreg3 ( talk) 23:20, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Aren't those four words American terms that are not used in British English?
At least Host Clubs and Gravure Idols are completely unheard of in Europe. 2.44.107.155 ( talk) 19:42, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for keeping an eye on the NOTBROKEN socks. I'm not sure whether they've become more prolific or you're finding new accounts that we'd overlooked, but either way it's a valuable contribution. Certes ( talk) 09:38, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page The Hershey Company, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 21:18, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page AB InBev, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 23:29, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Matt, you're right: the Wikipedia:Convenience link takes you to a different page, but the citation itself says "pp. 349, 740" – two pages, which cannot realistically be provided simultaneously through a single URL. If you find that too confusing, perhaps we should remove the URL entirely. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 19:51, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Londonski ( talk · contribs) - what do you think? I have almost missed him it's been so long! 10mmsocket ( talk) 17:33, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Sportspeople from Valleyfield, Fife indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 05:06, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
A recent edit to WP:Oversight aroused my suspicions. Is Kung Hibbe back? Both accounts' home wiki is Swedish. Interaction is fairly strong considering the new account's low edit count, but there are only a couple of Canada edits and nothing Scottish. What do you think? Certes ( talk) 16:38, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
So, hypothetically if I re-add it, but instead of using Inglis use English so it's Scots English instead of Scots Inglis could it stay BigFoxGaming ( talk) 00:15, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Something I have been looking at in the last few months is 28 Roseangle (not to be confused with the murder house) which there is quite a bit online about the history due to the compulsory purchase etc. I have created a draft at User:Crouch, Swale/28 Roseangle which you could look at if you want. I'm not sure it would pass the notability guidelines as its only category C and without a name but there may be enough coverage. I just though you might be interested as you seem to be interested in the Fife area, thanks. Crouch, Swale ( talk) 22:09, 12 December 2023 (UTC)