![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Welcome!
Hello, Ramajois, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Lynch
7
14:20, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
ನಮಸ್ಕಾರ ಶ್ರೀರಾಮ್! ವಿಕಿಪೀಡಿಯಕ್ಕೆ ಸ್ವಾಗತ. ವಿಕಿಪೀಡಿಯಾದಲ್ಲಿ ನನ್ನ ಹೆಸರು ಮೈಕ್ ಲಿಂಚ್. ನಿಮ್ಮ ಕೆಲುವು edits ಗಳನ್ನು ನಾನು ಪರಿಶೀಲಿಸಿದೆನು. ಒಂದು ವಿಷಯವನ್ನು ಹೇಳಲು ಇಷ್ಟ ಪಡುತ್ತೇನೆ. ಬೇರೆಯವರ Userpage ಗಳನ್ನು edit ಮಾಡುವುದು ಕೆಲವರಿಗೆ ಇಷ್ಟವಾಗುವುದಿಲ್ಲ. ನಾನೆನೋ ಕನ್ನಡಿಗನೇ, ಅದಿಕ್ಕೆ ಆ userbox ಅನ್ನು ನನ್ನ userpage ಗೆ ಹಾಕಿದರಿಂದ ಹಾನಿ ಉಂಟಾಗಲಿಲ್ಲ. ಆದರೆ, ಕೆಲವು ಸಂಗತಿಗಳಲ್ಲಿ ಸದಸ್ಯರಿಗೆ ಅದು ಇಷ್ಟವಾಗುವುದಿಲ್ಲ.
ನಿಮಗೆ ಕನ್ನಡ ವಿಕಿಪೀಡಿಯದ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಮಾಹಿತಿ ಗೊತ್ತೇ? ಅದರಲ್ಲಿ ಕನ್ನಡದಲ್ಲೇ ಬರಿಯಬಹುದು. ವಿಕಿಪೀಡಿಯ ಸಂಸ್ಕ್ರುತದಲ್ಲಿಯೂ ಇದೆ. Kannada Wikipedia Sanskrit Wikipedia
Lynch
7
19:21, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Hey Ramajois, since your new out here, would like to let you know that you should not make changes to anothers user's page as you did here. Please go through WP:UP. — Abhishek Talk to me 16:39, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello.
This is a message to let you know that I have declined your request at WP:AIV.
The reasons for the decline is that the IPs have been insufficiently warned. Normally IPs have to be warned 4 times before we'd consider blocking them unless there are exceptional circumstances ie lots of vandalism. In the cases you reported the IPs had only edited once each and a report from WHOIS does not show them to be connected. Secondly, you said that the IPs had just been released from a previous block, I checked their contributions and their deleted contributions and from what I can see they haven't edited before so couldn't have been previously blocked. Thank you.-- 5 albert square ( talk) 20:39, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
You really shouldn't have removed my edit.. it was pretty damn funny Television51 ( talk) 05:17, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello Ramajois. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:RICKYD55, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a test page. Thank you. Ϣere SpielChequers 06:16, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello Ramajois. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Horse Mad679, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Users are allowed considerable freedom on what to put on their own user pages. Thank you. JohnCD ( talk) 16:14, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
The link above is the link to the website I added which contains hundreds of informational pages on relocating to Rosarito and to Mexico. Yes it is a real estate website but some of the above links are retail sites as well. This website contains more useful information regarding Rosarito Mexico than most any other websites do about moving to and living in Rosarito beach for the English speaking world. I did not add this website for any type of SEO or Link building purpose it was meant as a source of information for the English speaking community looking into relocating to Rosarito or just wanting to have accurate information in English about Rosarito Mexico. I am curious to understand the reason for the removal of this link and not the other links. One of the links is a hotel and another is a spa. If such links are used to support this page than I believe the link I added is as or even more relevant. I believe this link and all of the above links should be left on the page for people to use that are referencing information about Rosarito Mexico. I have modified the written content in the link so it is not confused with an advertising link. please let me know if this would better meet the guidelines and would be allowed to be posted in the external link section.
Thank you
Kanoab ( talk) 18:51, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi Ramajois. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for
speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for
Jana Beller, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the
suggested tasks for patrollers and review the
criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering
non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with
proposed deletion,
proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate
deletion discussion. Not a test page.
Cind.
amuse
05:10, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi Ramajois. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY (TALK) 18:49, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Ta muchly for the cuppa. I hope you don't mind that I added a drop of something stronger to it... Peridon ( talk) 18:51, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Read the the article before and after my changes. Thanks 213.152.41.250 ( talk) 07:42, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Stop sending me rude messages im improving the wiki so dont be a tightass — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.161.31.192 ( talk) 10:20, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Ramajois, I suspect it is you who is adding crap to wikipedia's page about agarwals like they are Dravidian.. Dont add anything which you imagine in your mind.. You are propagating falsehood.. and what is this about genetic disease among agarwals.. you sound racist and disgusting man.. 210.212.20.75 ( talk) 10:47, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
“ | Never fight with pigs, you'll get all dirty and they just love it! | ” |
Would you please first explain "unconstructive" before reverting anything without proper explanation? I was undoing your edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.72.216.33 ( talk) 10:54, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
He is making personal attacks on me too. Will you be blocking him or are you his eock-pupoet? 109.150.32.113 ( talk) 08:21, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
please check the highest town list.... because in india there are some town name dong and wati in arunachal pradesh is higher than your list...
thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soham De ( talk • contribs) 16:39, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi there! I've just declined your requests at WP:RPP, because the IP involved has been blocked. In cases like this, where it's just one IP on a vandalism binge, it's usually quicker to report them to WP:AIV, than ask for the page to be protected. If it was more than one IP, then page protection is the way to go. Keep up the good work on the patrolling! Ged UK 13:58, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
Dear Ramajois,
I'm afraid you are completely wrong, my edits were not vandalism. As I've clicked on your profile, perhaps the problem is you're Indian and don't have full understanding of the nuances of the English language. If you watch the episode in question, you'll see that my revision is more accurate as to what occurred. I have a feeling you may have seen the word "sex" and got your knickers into a bind, but that's probably because you're Indian and are not fully qualified to edit English. This can be the only explanation. Why don't you just stick to Punjabi Wikipedia, or whatever language you truly understand, or take the time to watch the episode of "Wilfred" in question, and perhaps then you'll see the edit I did was not vandalism but a correct description of what the episode was actually about. A case can actually be made that your act of erasing my edit is the true vandal act here.
Regards... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.172.193.217 ( talk) 19:16, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Welcome!
Hello, Ramajois, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Lynch
7
14:20, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
ನಮಸ್ಕಾರ ಶ್ರೀರಾಮ್! ವಿಕಿಪೀಡಿಯಕ್ಕೆ ಸ್ವಾಗತ. ವಿಕಿಪೀಡಿಯಾದಲ್ಲಿ ನನ್ನ ಹೆಸರು ಮೈಕ್ ಲಿಂಚ್. ನಿಮ್ಮ ಕೆಲುವು edits ಗಳನ್ನು ನಾನು ಪರಿಶೀಲಿಸಿದೆನು. ಒಂದು ವಿಷಯವನ್ನು ಹೇಳಲು ಇಷ್ಟ ಪಡುತ್ತೇನೆ. ಬೇರೆಯವರ Userpage ಗಳನ್ನು edit ಮಾಡುವುದು ಕೆಲವರಿಗೆ ಇಷ್ಟವಾಗುವುದಿಲ್ಲ. ನಾನೆನೋ ಕನ್ನಡಿಗನೇ, ಅದಿಕ್ಕೆ ಆ userbox ಅನ್ನು ನನ್ನ userpage ಗೆ ಹಾಕಿದರಿಂದ ಹಾನಿ ಉಂಟಾಗಲಿಲ್ಲ. ಆದರೆ, ಕೆಲವು ಸಂಗತಿಗಳಲ್ಲಿ ಸದಸ್ಯರಿಗೆ ಅದು ಇಷ್ಟವಾಗುವುದಿಲ್ಲ.
ನಿಮಗೆ ಕನ್ನಡ ವಿಕಿಪೀಡಿಯದ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಮಾಹಿತಿ ಗೊತ್ತೇ? ಅದರಲ್ಲಿ ಕನ್ನಡದಲ್ಲೇ ಬರಿಯಬಹುದು. ವಿಕಿಪೀಡಿಯ ಸಂಸ್ಕ್ರುತದಲ್ಲಿಯೂ ಇದೆ. Kannada Wikipedia Sanskrit Wikipedia
Lynch
7
19:21, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Hey Ramajois, since your new out here, would like to let you know that you should not make changes to anothers user's page as you did here. Please go through WP:UP. — Abhishek Talk to me 16:39, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello.
This is a message to let you know that I have declined your request at WP:AIV.
The reasons for the decline is that the IPs have been insufficiently warned. Normally IPs have to be warned 4 times before we'd consider blocking them unless there are exceptional circumstances ie lots of vandalism. In the cases you reported the IPs had only edited once each and a report from WHOIS does not show them to be connected. Secondly, you said that the IPs had just been released from a previous block, I checked their contributions and their deleted contributions and from what I can see they haven't edited before so couldn't have been previously blocked. Thank you.-- 5 albert square ( talk) 20:39, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
You really shouldn't have removed my edit.. it was pretty damn funny Television51 ( talk) 05:17, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello Ramajois. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:RICKYD55, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a test page. Thank you. Ϣere SpielChequers 06:16, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello Ramajois. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Horse Mad679, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Users are allowed considerable freedom on what to put on their own user pages. Thank you. JohnCD ( talk) 16:14, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
The link above is the link to the website I added which contains hundreds of informational pages on relocating to Rosarito and to Mexico. Yes it is a real estate website but some of the above links are retail sites as well. This website contains more useful information regarding Rosarito Mexico than most any other websites do about moving to and living in Rosarito beach for the English speaking world. I did not add this website for any type of SEO or Link building purpose it was meant as a source of information for the English speaking community looking into relocating to Rosarito or just wanting to have accurate information in English about Rosarito Mexico. I am curious to understand the reason for the removal of this link and not the other links. One of the links is a hotel and another is a spa. If such links are used to support this page than I believe the link I added is as or even more relevant. I believe this link and all of the above links should be left on the page for people to use that are referencing information about Rosarito Mexico. I have modified the written content in the link so it is not confused with an advertising link. please let me know if this would better meet the guidelines and would be allowed to be posted in the external link section.
Thank you
Kanoab ( talk) 18:51, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi Ramajois. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for
speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for
Jana Beller, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the
suggested tasks for patrollers and review the
criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering
non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with
proposed deletion,
proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate
deletion discussion. Not a test page.
Cind.
amuse
05:10, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi Ramajois. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY (TALK) 18:49, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Ta muchly for the cuppa. I hope you don't mind that I added a drop of something stronger to it... Peridon ( talk) 18:51, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Read the the article before and after my changes. Thanks 213.152.41.250 ( talk) 07:42, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Stop sending me rude messages im improving the wiki so dont be a tightass — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.161.31.192 ( talk) 10:20, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Ramajois, I suspect it is you who is adding crap to wikipedia's page about agarwals like they are Dravidian.. Dont add anything which you imagine in your mind.. You are propagating falsehood.. and what is this about genetic disease among agarwals.. you sound racist and disgusting man.. 210.212.20.75 ( talk) 10:47, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
“ | Never fight with pigs, you'll get all dirty and they just love it! | ” |
Would you please first explain "unconstructive" before reverting anything without proper explanation? I was undoing your edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.72.216.33 ( talk) 10:54, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
He is making personal attacks on me too. Will you be blocking him or are you his eock-pupoet? 109.150.32.113 ( talk) 08:21, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
please check the highest town list.... because in india there are some town name dong and wati in arunachal pradesh is higher than your list...
thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soham De ( talk • contribs) 16:39, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi there! I've just declined your requests at WP:RPP, because the IP involved has been blocked. In cases like this, where it's just one IP on a vandalism binge, it's usually quicker to report them to WP:AIV, than ask for the page to be protected. If it was more than one IP, then page protection is the way to go. Keep up the good work on the patrolling! Ged UK 13:58, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
Dear Ramajois,
I'm afraid you are completely wrong, my edits were not vandalism. As I've clicked on your profile, perhaps the problem is you're Indian and don't have full understanding of the nuances of the English language. If you watch the episode in question, you'll see that my revision is more accurate as to what occurred. I have a feeling you may have seen the word "sex" and got your knickers into a bind, but that's probably because you're Indian and are not fully qualified to edit English. This can be the only explanation. Why don't you just stick to Punjabi Wikipedia, or whatever language you truly understand, or take the time to watch the episode of "Wilfred" in question, and perhaps then you'll see the edit I did was not vandalism but a correct description of what the episode was actually about. A case can actually be made that your act of erasing my edit is the true vandal act here.
Regards... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.172.193.217 ( talk) 19:16, 4 August 2011 (UTC)