No edit summary |
|||
Line 315: | Line 315: | ||
Hi, as you edit some articles about buses in leicester i though you could take a look at [[Haymarket Bus Station, Leicester]] and see if there are any areas for improvement? thank you [[User:Fatty2k10|Fatty2k10]] ([[User talk:Fatty2k10|talk]]) 18:30, 13 May 2011 (UTC) |
Hi, as you edit some articles about buses in leicester i though you could take a look at [[Haymarket Bus Station, Leicester]] and see if there are any areas for improvement? thank you [[User:Fatty2k10|Fatty2k10]] ([[User talk:Fatty2k10|talk]]) 18:30, 13 May 2011 (UTC) |
||
:I wasn't planning to edit it but I can do if you want me to (I have had a look and some of the services are departing from the wrong stands eg. Kinch 21 runs from Humberstone Gate)--[[User:Msalmon|MSalmon]] ([[User talk:Msalmon#top|talk]]) 21:22, 13 May 2011 (UTC) |
:I wasn't planning to edit it but I can do if you want me to (I have had a look and some of the services are departing from the wrong stands eg. Kinch 21 runs from Humberstone Gate)--[[User:Msalmon|MSalmon]] ([[User talk:Msalmon#top|talk]]) 21:22, 13 May 2011 (UTC) |
||
== Beaten XD == |
|||
Damn, you beat me to undoing my edit on the US X Factor article. Was going to change it back to 2011 like you wanted after I saw your note in the article. I still don't see what the problem with saying she's a former judge is though. Because she is, she's a former judge because she was at the first two auditions, but won't be at anymore. The fact the show hasn't aired yet doesn't mean anything. But atlas, it's whatever you and the other edits think. |
|||
I do want to ask though, can we list Nicole after Paula at least? Before when editing the article I was always told the judges should be listed in the order that they were announced; and since Nicole was ''technically'' announced last I thought we should put her last to reflect such. [[User:1Dbad|1Dbad]] ([[User talk:1Dbad|talk]]) 17:09, 6 June 2011 (UTC) |
Welcome!
Hello, Msalmon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for joining our community. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. First thing: be bold! Editors are always happy to correct or revert mistakes and discuss changes with which they disagree. Here are some links you might find useful:
And for more detailed information:
You can also check out the community portal, which has lots of ideas on how you can help Wikipedia.
All of this information can be daunting, but if you have a question and can't find the answer, you can always ask me on my talk page or go to Wikipedia:Where to ask a question. One last thing: please sign your name when leaving messages for others on article and user talk pages using (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. I hope you enjoy editing! -- Sam Blanning (formerly Malthusian) (talk) 22:53, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Leicester Haymarket Busstat.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:05, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi there, do you know for sure that she is exempt from nominating? If you are speculating, it shouldn't be added. Thanks. -- Alex 9891 15:48, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. Thank you. — FireFox ( talk) 16:06, 7 August '06
Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. Thank you. — FireFox ( talk) 17:51, 9 August '06
You are in danger of violating the three revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. — FireFox ( talk) 17:56, 9 August '06
Before I started butchering it :P -- talk to JD wants e-mail 10:27, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for changing the position of the table of contents yet again, with total disregard to the comment I made on the article's talk page. talk to JD wants e-mail 09:17, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
I didn't do anything to it, someone else did it while I was editing talk to Mslamon wants e-mail 10:18, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
This diff says you moved the TOC back to where it is now. I'm not here to start an argument about it, but if you have a good reason for it not being where it was, could you please bring it up on the article's talk page? talk to JD wants e-mail 09:23, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Look, I just left it where it was I only moved it once and that was it. I don't mind it being where it was talk to Mslamon wants e-mail 10:24, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm moving it back then, that's okay with you? talk to JD wants e-mail 09:29, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Yes, fine but don't blame me for something I didn't do. talk to Mslamon wants e-mail 10:29, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm only saying you did it because the diff says you did it, and as somebody once said, "The diff doesn't lie". If you take offence to that, I'm sorry. talk to JD wants e-mail 09:31, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
I know that but someone else moved it while I was editing something else. talk to Mslamon wants e-mail 10:29, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
It would have appeared as a separate revision in the article's edit history had that been the case. In all honesty, I'd have dropped this ages ago, and still will, if you're willing to do the same. There's really no need to drag it out as far as it is going. talk to JD wants e-mail 09:44, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Lets just forget about it. talk to Mslamon wants e-mail 10:46, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Fine by me. talk to JD wants e-mail 09:50, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi, do you have a source for the Celebrity Big Brother 5 info? -- Alex (talk here) 22:28, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Please stop going against consensus, and read the talk pages. If you have a problem, comment before you take action, as moving all the pages to where they are now took a lot of effort from a lot of people. jd || talk || 09:24, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
If you want to change it (which I don't see why you need to) please rewrite the intro or change the name back to what it was, otherwise it looks wrong. User:Msalmon 10:38, 23 October 2006
No, on CBB5 (oops I meant 3) it say "CBB5 was the third season of Celebrity Big Brother". Does that look rewritten to you? Msalmon 10:46, 23 October 2006
Hi! I'm sorry to bother you, but do you, by any chance, know where I can find screencaps and/or videos of the episode Out of our Minds? I really want to see it! I hope you can help me! Thanks. Miss.Hazelnut 25 October 2006
Sorry, I can't help you but y did u come 2 me? Msalmon 21:03 25 Oct 06
Hey Msalmon! Thanxs for all your work in moving the episodes in order or air date. However, the talk page reached a consensus and all episodes were organized according to production code. Check the talk page before making major edits, in case the issue was already discussed before. I had to revert back to the original version. Sorry about that. Keep up the good work and have fun editing! =)
Jumping cheese
Cont
@
ct
23:45, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Shouldn't episodes be ordered in list of episode number because 'Bueno Nacho' wasn't the first episoded aired it was 'Crush'. See [1] for episode order. Msalmon 19 Dec 2006 09:30am
As various sources have confirmed, Chanelle has asked to leave. Despite the fact that she has to stay for a while longer, she can no longer be regarded as a HM as she has techincally left. Futher reverting could break WP:3RR and could be classed as vandalism. Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK)'s FA plea-please have your say! 17:45, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
She hasn't left yet so she is still a housemate
I agree with you reverting the edits as she has not left :) Babygurl1853 18:58, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
It's polite to discuss the matter first (but from seeing your talkpage i can see this isn't always the case) on the articles talk page. You revert the article (to a bad version i may add) when so far you are the only person to disagree with it. -- Halo2 Talk 19:33, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an
edit summary. Thank you. ~~
[Jam]
[talk]
10:30, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Msalmon, you recently removed a citation needed tag I added to the Celebrity Big Brother 2009 (UK) article. The reason why I added a citation needed tag, is because information about when an upcoming show will begin should be cited. I realise that you said in your edit summary when you removed my citation needed tag that C4 has confirmed that that is when the show will start, but a citation is needed to prove that. I am not suggesting you made up the date, but unfortunately your word is not enough. I hope you understand why I therefore reverted your removal of the citation needed tag, and I hope you will be able to replace the tag with a citation. Thanks for reading. Terrakyte ( talk) 23:06, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Hope that is ok Msalmon ( talk) 23:11, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi there, it might be better for you to leave messages on the talk page and discuss with us whether to include rumours, before wiping it out. Like I've said, there's a precendent for listing the possible contestants, and whether or not I agree with it (which I don't, entirely), you could've left a note. I won't change what you've put, but I think you were a little hasty. Best wishes. Sky83 ( talk) 13:45, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to
Strictly Come Dancing (Series 6). Your edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's
talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the
sandbox. Thank you. ~~
[ジャム][
t -
c
17:11, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
You only needed to correct the relevant section in the first place rather than get into an unnecessary edit war with the whole table! Jenuk1985 | Talk 21:47, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Ok, I will leave it like it is but personally I liked it the way before Msalmon ( talk) 21:54, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Channel 4 have confirmed that launch date of the series. A consensus has been reached on the article's talk page; there you can find sources that confirm this. Your constant reverting is distruptive and could be seen as vandalism. If you continue to edit obstructively, you will be reported to an administrator and most likely blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thanks, DJ 15:15, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
RE: If information is interesting and has no citation should insert a fact ( citation needed). In this case the information is completely unnecessary; Google cars we could find in almost all countries in Europe. When Poland and Czech Rep will be released must be mentioned. In future (2015 I hope) all streets over the world will be available (possible exception Iraq and Afganistan). TouLouse ( talk) 16:09, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
After an afternoon of intense edit wars (too long to go into, you'll have to check the article talk page) the article has been fully protected until we can come to an agreement on the Housemates section. If you'd like to place your vote here, it would solve the issue quickly. I was under the impression that we had already reached consensus for "Option 2", but I must have been mistaken. Thanks, DJ 18:29, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
As a member of the WP:BIGBROUK task force, you may be interested in the aforementioned discussion. DJ 14:58, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
I was just thinking this morning that this would happen soon. I'll AFD it now, thanks for the notice :) DJ 22:54, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
You'll probably be interested in this discussion here. DJ 21:15, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
I'm sort of inclined to keep and improve this. I'm doing a "Cancellation" section on the BB10 article and there seems to be enough sources to merit notability. Dale is supporting Lisa Wallace to win Big Brother 2009 12:44, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
As a regular editor to Big Brother 2009 (UK), I am writing to inform you about this discussion on the aforementioned issue. Dale 20:15, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. Leaky Caldron 21:00, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Under results summary in this article: The_X_Factor_(UK_series_4)#20_October_2007, it states that Simon's reason was to state that it was a "singing competition". I don't see why that cannot be applied here: The_X_Factor_(UK_series_6)#Week_7_.2821.2F22_November.29 to Dannii's comment. Whilst it may not be in your opinion to be a valid reason, she did actually say something, so "gave no comment" is a bit inaccurate? We could write it as "Commented that it was a singing competition" perhaps, showing that it's not a reason? Thanks, -- Ictl ( talk) 21:32, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
I don't understand your comment:
-- Smjg ( talk) 22:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I've been following the article above (I added the image of Lady Gaga) and I though that unregistered users were banned from editing this article, seeing most of the time they just vandalise it. Can we block them from this article because it maybe small now but in a few years it will be a featured article. Thank You-- David ( talk) 10:02, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
I replied to you in the discussion about the 1+2 deal. If the chart is the way you have it, the sortability of it is messed up and you can only sort that column by the week 1 scores, not the final scores. For seasons 4, 6, and 8 where the judges combined scores from Week 1 and Week 2, the "1+2" part is just left off completely and so I think we should either do it that way or my way so the sortability of it is not messed up. (Sortability probably isn't a word, but you get my point.) Onesmallnote ( talk) 20:24, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
As you are one of the top contributors of this article, I thought you ought to know that it has reached Good Article status. Congratulations on your efforts, no matter how big, small, minor or major they were! KingOfTheMedia ( talk) 18:07, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Under the Results Summary section - Katie is still in the competition as of now ( AdamD123 ( talk) 21:34, 6 November 2010 (UTC))
Hi. Why did you revert my edit at The X Factor (UK series 7)? It was supported by a WP:RS. Mhiji ( talk) 18:12, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
The jungle prison was in effect a big trial to avoid having to leave the camp. The dentist was the same sort of trial, yet that is included. It was a trial as they had to put their hands into the boxes to retrieve keys. Therefore, it should be included as a trial. Thomas888b ( talk) 16:15, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Well, the dentist should be deleted as that was not for stars then. Thomas888b ( talk) 21:32, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
please explain why you keep undoing ALL of my edits ? I created the Thurmaston bus article and was editing the article. now it feels like i can't contribute coz YOU will undo my contributions it is becoming really annoying now please stop changing my edits. thank you Fatty2k10 ( talk) 14:41, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
For send a warning message to
this message! If you have an answer, please put
this template to
this page.
Slovakia remains stay! I don't think that'll not withdraw after christmas.<s\> Correction:I'm glad to compete after Slovakia confirms!
81.215.239.22 (
talk)
19:02, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello! I see a source but not from EBU [2]. It seems Slovakia withdrawn. But not yet to decided if EBU confirms that Slovakia withdrawn. We are waiting news later. 81.215.239.22 ( talk) 19:45, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi! Slovakia has been withdrawn officially [3]. I received first. You can see the map below.
Thanks.
81.215.239.22 (
talk)
20:42, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
What's going on behind This! confirmed or not! 81.215.239.22 ( talk) 23:25, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
I have reverted your edits to the 2011 Formula One season page, wherein you changed the flag icon for the European Grand Prix to be the flag of the European Union. It has been a consensus for some time now that although the title of the race is "European Grand Prix", the flag icon for the event should be the Spanish flag because the event is held in Spain. Please respect this consensus and refrain from editing the page to restore the EU flags. Prisonermonkeys ( talk) 01:00, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
In the average chart, if we include the guest judge scores in the points counted for the week 7 scores, those dances are out of 40 points instead of 30 like the others. Thus, they become worth more (1 and 1/3 dances instead of just 1) than all the other dances and greatly elevate the averages. We had a similar discussion last season. Am I making sense? (Not being snarky, honestly want to know if you understand what I'm saying) Onesmallnote ( talk) 18:10, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi, as you edit some articles about buses in leicester i though you could take a look at Haymarket Bus Station, Leicester and see if there are any areas for improvement? thank you Fatty2k10 ( talk) 18:30, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Damn, you beat me to undoing my edit on the US X Factor article. Was going to change it back to 2011 like you wanted after I saw your note in the article. I still don't see what the problem with saying she's a former judge is though. Because she is, she's a former judge because she was at the first two auditions, but won't be at anymore. The fact the show hasn't aired yet doesn't mean anything. But atlas, it's whatever you and the other edits think.
I do want to ask though, can we list Nicole after Paula at least? Before when editing the article I was always told the judges should be listed in the order that they were announced; and since Nicole was technically announced last I thought we should put her last to reflect such. 1Dbad ( talk) 17:09, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
No edit summary |
|||
Line 315: | Line 315: | ||
Hi, as you edit some articles about buses in leicester i though you could take a look at [[Haymarket Bus Station, Leicester]] and see if there are any areas for improvement? thank you [[User:Fatty2k10|Fatty2k10]] ([[User talk:Fatty2k10|talk]]) 18:30, 13 May 2011 (UTC) |
Hi, as you edit some articles about buses in leicester i though you could take a look at [[Haymarket Bus Station, Leicester]] and see if there are any areas for improvement? thank you [[User:Fatty2k10|Fatty2k10]] ([[User talk:Fatty2k10|talk]]) 18:30, 13 May 2011 (UTC) |
||
:I wasn't planning to edit it but I can do if you want me to (I have had a look and some of the services are departing from the wrong stands eg. Kinch 21 runs from Humberstone Gate)--[[User:Msalmon|MSalmon]] ([[User talk:Msalmon#top|talk]]) 21:22, 13 May 2011 (UTC) |
:I wasn't planning to edit it but I can do if you want me to (I have had a look and some of the services are departing from the wrong stands eg. Kinch 21 runs from Humberstone Gate)--[[User:Msalmon|MSalmon]] ([[User talk:Msalmon#top|talk]]) 21:22, 13 May 2011 (UTC) |
||
== Beaten XD == |
|||
Damn, you beat me to undoing my edit on the US X Factor article. Was going to change it back to 2011 like you wanted after I saw your note in the article. I still don't see what the problem with saying she's a former judge is though. Because she is, she's a former judge because she was at the first two auditions, but won't be at anymore. The fact the show hasn't aired yet doesn't mean anything. But atlas, it's whatever you and the other edits think. |
|||
I do want to ask though, can we list Nicole after Paula at least? Before when editing the article I was always told the judges should be listed in the order that they were announced; and since Nicole was ''technically'' announced last I thought we should put her last to reflect such. [[User:1Dbad|1Dbad]] ([[User talk:1Dbad|talk]]) 17:09, 6 June 2011 (UTC) |
Welcome!
Hello, Msalmon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for joining our community. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. First thing: be bold! Editors are always happy to correct or revert mistakes and discuss changes with which they disagree. Here are some links you might find useful:
And for more detailed information:
You can also check out the community portal, which has lots of ideas on how you can help Wikipedia.
All of this information can be daunting, but if you have a question and can't find the answer, you can always ask me on my talk page or go to Wikipedia:Where to ask a question. One last thing: please sign your name when leaving messages for others on article and user talk pages using (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. I hope you enjoy editing! -- Sam Blanning (formerly Malthusian) (talk) 22:53, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Leicester Haymarket Busstat.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:05, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi there, do you know for sure that she is exempt from nominating? If you are speculating, it shouldn't be added. Thanks. -- Alex 9891 15:48, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. Thank you. — FireFox ( talk) 16:06, 7 August '06
Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. Thank you. — FireFox ( talk) 17:51, 9 August '06
You are in danger of violating the three revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. — FireFox ( talk) 17:56, 9 August '06
Before I started butchering it :P -- talk to JD wants e-mail 10:27, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for changing the position of the table of contents yet again, with total disregard to the comment I made on the article's talk page. talk to JD wants e-mail 09:17, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
I didn't do anything to it, someone else did it while I was editing talk to Mslamon wants e-mail 10:18, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
This diff says you moved the TOC back to where it is now. I'm not here to start an argument about it, but if you have a good reason for it not being where it was, could you please bring it up on the article's talk page? talk to JD wants e-mail 09:23, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Look, I just left it where it was I only moved it once and that was it. I don't mind it being where it was talk to Mslamon wants e-mail 10:24, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm moving it back then, that's okay with you? talk to JD wants e-mail 09:29, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Yes, fine but don't blame me for something I didn't do. talk to Mslamon wants e-mail 10:29, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm only saying you did it because the diff says you did it, and as somebody once said, "The diff doesn't lie". If you take offence to that, I'm sorry. talk to JD wants e-mail 09:31, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
I know that but someone else moved it while I was editing something else. talk to Mslamon wants e-mail 10:29, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
It would have appeared as a separate revision in the article's edit history had that been the case. In all honesty, I'd have dropped this ages ago, and still will, if you're willing to do the same. There's really no need to drag it out as far as it is going. talk to JD wants e-mail 09:44, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Lets just forget about it. talk to Mslamon wants e-mail 10:46, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Fine by me. talk to JD wants e-mail 09:50, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi, do you have a source for the Celebrity Big Brother 5 info? -- Alex (talk here) 22:28, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Please stop going against consensus, and read the talk pages. If you have a problem, comment before you take action, as moving all the pages to where they are now took a lot of effort from a lot of people. jd || talk || 09:24, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
If you want to change it (which I don't see why you need to) please rewrite the intro or change the name back to what it was, otherwise it looks wrong. User:Msalmon 10:38, 23 October 2006
No, on CBB5 (oops I meant 3) it say "CBB5 was the third season of Celebrity Big Brother". Does that look rewritten to you? Msalmon 10:46, 23 October 2006
Hi! I'm sorry to bother you, but do you, by any chance, know where I can find screencaps and/or videos of the episode Out of our Minds? I really want to see it! I hope you can help me! Thanks. Miss.Hazelnut 25 October 2006
Sorry, I can't help you but y did u come 2 me? Msalmon 21:03 25 Oct 06
Hey Msalmon! Thanxs for all your work in moving the episodes in order or air date. However, the talk page reached a consensus and all episodes were organized according to production code. Check the talk page before making major edits, in case the issue was already discussed before. I had to revert back to the original version. Sorry about that. Keep up the good work and have fun editing! =)
Jumping cheese
Cont
@
ct
23:45, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Shouldn't episodes be ordered in list of episode number because 'Bueno Nacho' wasn't the first episoded aired it was 'Crush'. See [1] for episode order. Msalmon 19 Dec 2006 09:30am
As various sources have confirmed, Chanelle has asked to leave. Despite the fact that she has to stay for a while longer, she can no longer be regarded as a HM as she has techincally left. Futher reverting could break WP:3RR and could be classed as vandalism. Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK)'s FA plea-please have your say! 17:45, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
She hasn't left yet so she is still a housemate
I agree with you reverting the edits as she has not left :) Babygurl1853 18:58, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
It's polite to discuss the matter first (but from seeing your talkpage i can see this isn't always the case) on the articles talk page. You revert the article (to a bad version i may add) when so far you are the only person to disagree with it. -- Halo2 Talk 19:33, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an
edit summary. Thank you. ~~
[Jam]
[talk]
10:30, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Msalmon, you recently removed a citation needed tag I added to the Celebrity Big Brother 2009 (UK) article. The reason why I added a citation needed tag, is because information about when an upcoming show will begin should be cited. I realise that you said in your edit summary when you removed my citation needed tag that C4 has confirmed that that is when the show will start, but a citation is needed to prove that. I am not suggesting you made up the date, but unfortunately your word is not enough. I hope you understand why I therefore reverted your removal of the citation needed tag, and I hope you will be able to replace the tag with a citation. Thanks for reading. Terrakyte ( talk) 23:06, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Hope that is ok Msalmon ( talk) 23:11, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi there, it might be better for you to leave messages on the talk page and discuss with us whether to include rumours, before wiping it out. Like I've said, there's a precendent for listing the possible contestants, and whether or not I agree with it (which I don't, entirely), you could've left a note. I won't change what you've put, but I think you were a little hasty. Best wishes. Sky83 ( talk) 13:45, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to
Strictly Come Dancing (Series 6). Your edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's
talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the
sandbox. Thank you. ~~
[ジャム][
t -
c
17:11, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
You only needed to correct the relevant section in the first place rather than get into an unnecessary edit war with the whole table! Jenuk1985 | Talk 21:47, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Ok, I will leave it like it is but personally I liked it the way before Msalmon ( talk) 21:54, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Channel 4 have confirmed that launch date of the series. A consensus has been reached on the article's talk page; there you can find sources that confirm this. Your constant reverting is distruptive and could be seen as vandalism. If you continue to edit obstructively, you will be reported to an administrator and most likely blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thanks, DJ 15:15, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
RE: If information is interesting and has no citation should insert a fact ( citation needed). In this case the information is completely unnecessary; Google cars we could find in almost all countries in Europe. When Poland and Czech Rep will be released must be mentioned. In future (2015 I hope) all streets over the world will be available (possible exception Iraq and Afganistan). TouLouse ( talk) 16:09, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
After an afternoon of intense edit wars (too long to go into, you'll have to check the article talk page) the article has been fully protected until we can come to an agreement on the Housemates section. If you'd like to place your vote here, it would solve the issue quickly. I was under the impression that we had already reached consensus for "Option 2", but I must have been mistaken. Thanks, DJ 18:29, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
As a member of the WP:BIGBROUK task force, you may be interested in the aforementioned discussion. DJ 14:58, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
I was just thinking this morning that this would happen soon. I'll AFD it now, thanks for the notice :) DJ 22:54, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
You'll probably be interested in this discussion here. DJ 21:15, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
I'm sort of inclined to keep and improve this. I'm doing a "Cancellation" section on the BB10 article and there seems to be enough sources to merit notability. Dale is supporting Lisa Wallace to win Big Brother 2009 12:44, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
As a regular editor to Big Brother 2009 (UK), I am writing to inform you about this discussion on the aforementioned issue. Dale 20:15, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. Leaky Caldron 21:00, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Under results summary in this article: The_X_Factor_(UK_series_4)#20_October_2007, it states that Simon's reason was to state that it was a "singing competition". I don't see why that cannot be applied here: The_X_Factor_(UK_series_6)#Week_7_.2821.2F22_November.29 to Dannii's comment. Whilst it may not be in your opinion to be a valid reason, she did actually say something, so "gave no comment" is a bit inaccurate? We could write it as "Commented that it was a singing competition" perhaps, showing that it's not a reason? Thanks, -- Ictl ( talk) 21:32, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
I don't understand your comment:
-- Smjg ( talk) 22:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I've been following the article above (I added the image of Lady Gaga) and I though that unregistered users were banned from editing this article, seeing most of the time they just vandalise it. Can we block them from this article because it maybe small now but in a few years it will be a featured article. Thank You-- David ( talk) 10:02, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
I replied to you in the discussion about the 1+2 deal. If the chart is the way you have it, the sortability of it is messed up and you can only sort that column by the week 1 scores, not the final scores. For seasons 4, 6, and 8 where the judges combined scores from Week 1 and Week 2, the "1+2" part is just left off completely and so I think we should either do it that way or my way so the sortability of it is not messed up. (Sortability probably isn't a word, but you get my point.) Onesmallnote ( talk) 20:24, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
As you are one of the top contributors of this article, I thought you ought to know that it has reached Good Article status. Congratulations on your efforts, no matter how big, small, minor or major they were! KingOfTheMedia ( talk) 18:07, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Under the Results Summary section - Katie is still in the competition as of now ( AdamD123 ( talk) 21:34, 6 November 2010 (UTC))
Hi. Why did you revert my edit at The X Factor (UK series 7)? It was supported by a WP:RS. Mhiji ( talk) 18:12, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
The jungle prison was in effect a big trial to avoid having to leave the camp. The dentist was the same sort of trial, yet that is included. It was a trial as they had to put their hands into the boxes to retrieve keys. Therefore, it should be included as a trial. Thomas888b ( talk) 16:15, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Well, the dentist should be deleted as that was not for stars then. Thomas888b ( talk) 21:32, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
please explain why you keep undoing ALL of my edits ? I created the Thurmaston bus article and was editing the article. now it feels like i can't contribute coz YOU will undo my contributions it is becoming really annoying now please stop changing my edits. thank you Fatty2k10 ( talk) 14:41, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
For send a warning message to
this message! If you have an answer, please put
this template to
this page.
Slovakia remains stay! I don't think that'll not withdraw after christmas.<s\> Correction:I'm glad to compete after Slovakia confirms!
81.215.239.22 (
talk)
19:02, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello! I see a source but not from EBU [2]. It seems Slovakia withdrawn. But not yet to decided if EBU confirms that Slovakia withdrawn. We are waiting news later. 81.215.239.22 ( talk) 19:45, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi! Slovakia has been withdrawn officially [3]. I received first. You can see the map below.
Thanks.
81.215.239.22 (
talk)
20:42, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
What's going on behind This! confirmed or not! 81.215.239.22 ( talk) 23:25, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
I have reverted your edits to the 2011 Formula One season page, wherein you changed the flag icon for the European Grand Prix to be the flag of the European Union. It has been a consensus for some time now that although the title of the race is "European Grand Prix", the flag icon for the event should be the Spanish flag because the event is held in Spain. Please respect this consensus and refrain from editing the page to restore the EU flags. Prisonermonkeys ( talk) 01:00, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
In the average chart, if we include the guest judge scores in the points counted for the week 7 scores, those dances are out of 40 points instead of 30 like the others. Thus, they become worth more (1 and 1/3 dances instead of just 1) than all the other dances and greatly elevate the averages. We had a similar discussion last season. Am I making sense? (Not being snarky, honestly want to know if you understand what I'm saying) Onesmallnote ( talk) 18:10, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi, as you edit some articles about buses in leicester i though you could take a look at Haymarket Bus Station, Leicester and see if there are any areas for improvement? thank you Fatty2k10 ( talk) 18:30, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Damn, you beat me to undoing my edit on the US X Factor article. Was going to change it back to 2011 like you wanted after I saw your note in the article. I still don't see what the problem with saying she's a former judge is though. Because she is, she's a former judge because she was at the first two auditions, but won't be at anymore. The fact the show hasn't aired yet doesn't mean anything. But atlas, it's whatever you and the other edits think.
I do want to ask though, can we list Nicole after Paula at least? Before when editing the article I was always told the judges should be listed in the order that they were announced; and since Nicole was technically announced last I thought we should put her last to reflect such. 1Dbad ( talk) 17:09, 6 June 2011 (UTC)