![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
Please kindly advice what I could do now to save me from this query....thanks a million for all.... Address: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Hong_Lei Glorydust
Glorydust ( talk) 15:06, 24 November 2012 (UTC)Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bruno Weber (Mediziner), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rajsko ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 17:27, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi, when adding to an existing {{
multiple issues}}
, please note that it takes no more than one positional parameter. Thus, edits
like this (of which there are quite a lot) leave an orphaned date in the second positional parameter.
This edit was fine; but the one to the same page
just afterward put the correctly-constructed {{
cleanup}}
in the wrong place - it should have gone into positional parameter 1, just after the {{
underlinked}}
(
like this), and not directly onto the end of an existing date. I've been fixing up some of these, because the pages have been appearing in
Category:Pages using multiple issues with incorrect parameters. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
11:41, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
{{
refimprove|section|date=November 2012}}
, there are two paramaters: |date=November 2012
is a named parameter (the name is date
), and section
has no name, so it's a positional parameter. They're called positional parameters because the position is important. See
Help:Template#Handling parameters. For example, in the {{
multiple issues}}
which was modified with
this edit, there was previously three parameters, and all were named: |cleanup=March 2012
|unreferenced=March 2012
|wikify=April 2012
; but you added three positional parameters |{{Underlinked|date=November 2012}}| April 2012|{{notability|Companies|date=March 2012}}
- only the first is recognised as valid. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
12:03, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
Multiple discussions were initiated about this very topic. Whether or not to replace the template redirect.
Request: Keep your comments about this issue out of this thread. There are more important threads about this topic where more experienced editors are able refute/answer your claims/queries. Mrt3366 ( talk · contribs) 11:39, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi, me again... re edits like these: [1]; [2]; [3]; [4]; [5]; and several others. Please note that since all that you have done is to bypass some redirects (which itself contravenes WP:NOTBROKEN) and insert blank lines, this falls fouls of WP:AWB#Rules of use item 4, since they are both insignificant and inconsequential. -- Redrose64 ( talk) 18:01, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
While there are a limited number of cases where this is beneficial, it is generally an unhelpful exercise, and it can actually be detrimental. How is doing anything that can be detrimental not disruptive? Legoktm ( talk) 08:35, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
While there are a limited number of cases where this is beneficial, it is generally an unhelpful exercise, and it can actually be detrimental.
With a few limited exceptions, there are no good reasons to pipe links solely to avoid redirects. It is almost never helpful to replace [[redirect]] with [[target|redirect]].
P.S. I will initiate a discussion on the relevant talk page when I get a chance to put some time into the discussion. Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
if they continue, they can be blocked temporarily - This warning seems to be premature at best. I don't think there is any policy dictating that a diligent good-faith editor should be blocked just for bypassing template redirects, performing an inconsequential task as you guys put it, a certain number of times. Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 13:47, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
Look forward to your reply,
Glorydust
{{
subst:submit}}
. Any other method will probably break something.
Legoktm (
talk)
20:43, 25 November 2012 (UTC)Vacation nine 16:32, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your edit war on the Kashmir Conflict page. You have been warned before as you push one POV. You deleted the statement about civilian killings claim yet insist on keeping the other side of the story. You are known to push one side of the story that favors the Indian sentiment on this article. And on top of that you accuse others of edit warring.
Killbillsbrowser ( talk) 19:17, 25 November 2012 (UTC)I dislike the monologue-upon-monologue format on principle. Instead, when I'm replying to a particular idea covered by a particular paragraph, I answer directly below that paragraph so that it's clear what my reply is referring to exactly. I especially dislike the excess copying of other people's lines in green color, it's just wasteful. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 15:55, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi Mike, i add the article on Malaysia International Islamic Financial Centre (MIFC) in wikipedia, which have been deleted. For your kind information, the article is not copied from any other website, as the article belong to MIFC which i worked now. Thus, the copryright is belong to MIFC. You can check it in www.mifc.com .
Appreciate if you can help me on these. The article is belong to us, but we cant upload it in wikipedia. For now, i will upload it again. pls dont delete it again. Thanks ya.
Acongfikri ( talk) 03:42, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
By clicking the "Save Page" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Just wanted to say thanks for fixing some of my new articles of late, such as this one. I try my best to have articles written flawlessly before I submit, but often I leave a small typo somewhere that sneaks under my radar. Cheers :')
RubenSchade ( talk) 09:44, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
|
For your great work in Wikipedia. Especially, your work with AWB and your comments in the latest discussions. Magioladitis ( talk) 09:08, 29 November 2012 (UTC) |
not sure why you objected to the changes i made. they were simply ones of correct register. it seemed that a comment like "she has overcome all obstacles in her life" is not very encylopedic. rather than delete it, i thought adding "she claims" (as she wrote the page in the first place) was a reasonable compromise. do you disagree?
212.225.124.24 ( talk) 03:49, 1 December 2012 (UTC)Now, if you think that you have the right to say all these things because the major contributor seems to be the author herself, you have to understand that she might not be the real Kate Howarth insofar as we have no credible proof just yet to prove that it was kate howarth and not her neighbor or her cat. As far as I am concerned, she might not even be aware of all this.
I agree the article needs work. However, addition of unsourced allegation is not the way forward. If you have problems with the info published in the article, then correct them without breaching the policies and guidelines of wikipedia. You may have to discuss the changes, should you get reverted, on the talk page. Thank you, Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 07:56, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amit Phalke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Events ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:29, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
God your talk page is a mess. I know how to sign FFS. You would do well to ignore Killbillsbrowser as much as you can, I still think he is a sock of highstakes00, but alas he is quite clever. Stop the bitching on the NPOV board, let someone weigh in. Darkness Shines ( talk) 21:40, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Okay I will make it short. Thank you Anna and Legoktm. sometimes I wonder what I would do without such loyal and diligent stalkers like you guys. Thank you very much for the heads-up. Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 09:28, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your reviews of the Ripley Davenport and Roger Chao articles. I really appreciate it. :-) Gildir ( talk) 18:09, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
-- Vejvančický ( talk / contribs) 08:36, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice and links. I didn't mean to list 8 tags, and think I clicked a few of them accidentally. I checked the page, and realised there were several tags that I hadn't intended on adding. I'll try and be a bit more conservative in future. Thanks for the advice, Meeeeeeee39 ( talk) 11:46, 5 December 2012 (UTC).
I see you have been contributing to Sree kurumbakkav bhagavathy temple poickattussery, one of many new articles about Hindu temples in India, which have multiple problems. I find this particular article to be of doubtful notability. My intention is to mark the article as reviewed, and to tag it for notability. What do you think should be done about this article? You can respond right here, I am watching this talk page. -- DThomsen8 ( talk) 17:36, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello Mrt3366. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of John W. Berry, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. — Theo polisme 18:11, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Please, just let the BRFA to run. Better email me for more questions on the matter. Thanks. -- Magioladitis ( talk) 08:57, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
New snapshot is up. http://toolserver.org/~awb/snapshots/ -- Magioladitis ( talk) 10:10, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi Micheal, I have added inline citations and secondary sources to my page. Is this OK? (Articles for creation/Genomic epidemiological database for global identification of microorganisms) Best regards, Peter
Thank you so much for this. To be honest, I have been hinting that [[WP:RfA/Shiry58]]
WP:RfA/Shirt58 mifgt tutmd might turn from a red-link yo to a blue-kink in some subtle and bot not so subtel subtle ways for a while now. But in more immedate pronmes immediate promise, I reaaly dp really do need to find my reading glsoees glasses.--
Shirt58 (
talk)
11:32, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
See, you need to communicate in English in this wikipedia. Once you get nominated, your eloquence (i.e. how effectively you express yourself) will be a decisive factor in the outcome. Now I have taken the liberty to correct some of the typos to the best of my ability in order to make your comment sound somewhat coherent, please take care of the unfathomably broken typos (i underlined them for you). Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 12:09, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi MrT and WormTT,
Thanks to both of you for the nomination, and your patience about me taking so much time over making my mind up. I gratefully accept.
Though feel like I'm in the middle of dozens of things that should be tidied up before a nomination, that would be the case whenever the nomination period ran. With the (western) holiday season coming up, hopefully the 'strong opposes will all be on vacation. If that's OK, I'll make a start on the answers, just in case they give me last-minute cold feet, and will formally accept in a few hours. Let the ordeal begin!
Thanks again, --
Shirt58 (
talk)
08:00, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
or,
Thanks. I was going a bit fast and didn't notice. I'm also thinking PROD. Thoughts? Cheers, Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 14:41, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
Speedy is a choice too. The thing is I can't dig for refs because the GFC blocks me. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 14:47, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Naina Ashwin Kumar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asian ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:37, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi again Micheal, I've added new primary and secondary sources, and taken out all unsourced claims (I hope you agree). Are we on the right track and already at the finish line or would you recommend additional changes? Best regards, Peter -- PRW69 ( talk) 13:36, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
This article I created is not about the 2012 phenomenon, it's about all doomsday predictions in general. - Eduardo Sellan III ( talk) 20:10, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
For all you do!! Have a wonderful HOLIDAY!!
Sue Rangell
✍
✉ is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{ subst:Xmas5}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Hi mrt3366, I noticed that the above-mentioned user removed warnings on his talk page which were placed by you. I restored them and now he accuses me of trolling since you did not state which article he vandalised/disrupted. As you know, vandals should not remove warnings on their talk pages when they had done something wrong. So, please help me to explain to him what he done wrong. Thanks very much and cheers, Hop n hop (on the arctic ice) 01:58, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas dude! Enjoy!
![]() |
Hello Mr T. I have revised the draft article about ECLAIR taking into account your suggestions. Can you please have a look? Thanks, and best wishes for the new year.
Simply unnecessary because it didn't tell me which part exactly was copy-pasted from the website adduced. Mrt3366 12:09, 25 December 2012 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Human rights abuses in Kashmir, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.flonnet.com/fl1707/17070360.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing. If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Human rights abuses in Kashmir saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! MehrajMir (Talk) 10:15, 25 December 2012 (UTC) |
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
Please kindly advice what I could do now to save me from this query....thanks a million for all.... Address: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Hong_Lei Glorydust
Glorydust ( talk) 15:06, 24 November 2012 (UTC)Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bruno Weber (Mediziner), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rajsko ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 17:27, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi, when adding to an existing {{
multiple issues}}
, please note that it takes no more than one positional parameter. Thus, edits
like this (of which there are quite a lot) leave an orphaned date in the second positional parameter.
This edit was fine; but the one to the same page
just afterward put the correctly-constructed {{
cleanup}}
in the wrong place - it should have gone into positional parameter 1, just after the {{
underlinked}}
(
like this), and not directly onto the end of an existing date. I've been fixing up some of these, because the pages have been appearing in
Category:Pages using multiple issues with incorrect parameters. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
11:41, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
{{
refimprove|section|date=November 2012}}
, there are two paramaters: |date=November 2012
is a named parameter (the name is date
), and section
has no name, so it's a positional parameter. They're called positional parameters because the position is important. See
Help:Template#Handling parameters. For example, in the {{
multiple issues}}
which was modified with
this edit, there was previously three parameters, and all were named: |cleanup=March 2012
|unreferenced=March 2012
|wikify=April 2012
; but you added three positional parameters |{{Underlinked|date=November 2012}}| April 2012|{{notability|Companies|date=March 2012}}
- only the first is recognised as valid. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
12:03, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
Multiple discussions were initiated about this very topic. Whether or not to replace the template redirect.
Request: Keep your comments about this issue out of this thread. There are more important threads about this topic where more experienced editors are able refute/answer your claims/queries. Mrt3366 ( talk · contribs) 11:39, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi, me again... re edits like these: [1]; [2]; [3]; [4]; [5]; and several others. Please note that since all that you have done is to bypass some redirects (which itself contravenes WP:NOTBROKEN) and insert blank lines, this falls fouls of WP:AWB#Rules of use item 4, since they are both insignificant and inconsequential. -- Redrose64 ( talk) 18:01, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
While there are a limited number of cases where this is beneficial, it is generally an unhelpful exercise, and it can actually be detrimental. How is doing anything that can be detrimental not disruptive? Legoktm ( talk) 08:35, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
While there are a limited number of cases where this is beneficial, it is generally an unhelpful exercise, and it can actually be detrimental.
With a few limited exceptions, there are no good reasons to pipe links solely to avoid redirects. It is almost never helpful to replace [[redirect]] with [[target|redirect]].
P.S. I will initiate a discussion on the relevant talk page when I get a chance to put some time into the discussion. Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
if they continue, they can be blocked temporarily - This warning seems to be premature at best. I don't think there is any policy dictating that a diligent good-faith editor should be blocked just for bypassing template redirects, performing an inconsequential task as you guys put it, a certain number of times. Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 13:47, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
Look forward to your reply,
Glorydust
{{
subst:submit}}
. Any other method will probably break something.
Legoktm (
talk)
20:43, 25 November 2012 (UTC)Vacation nine 16:32, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your edit war on the Kashmir Conflict page. You have been warned before as you push one POV. You deleted the statement about civilian killings claim yet insist on keeping the other side of the story. You are known to push one side of the story that favors the Indian sentiment on this article. And on top of that you accuse others of edit warring.
Killbillsbrowser ( talk) 19:17, 25 November 2012 (UTC)I dislike the monologue-upon-monologue format on principle. Instead, when I'm replying to a particular idea covered by a particular paragraph, I answer directly below that paragraph so that it's clear what my reply is referring to exactly. I especially dislike the excess copying of other people's lines in green color, it's just wasteful. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 15:55, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi Mike, i add the article on Malaysia International Islamic Financial Centre (MIFC) in wikipedia, which have been deleted. For your kind information, the article is not copied from any other website, as the article belong to MIFC which i worked now. Thus, the copryright is belong to MIFC. You can check it in www.mifc.com .
Appreciate if you can help me on these. The article is belong to us, but we cant upload it in wikipedia. For now, i will upload it again. pls dont delete it again. Thanks ya.
Acongfikri ( talk) 03:42, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
By clicking the "Save Page" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Just wanted to say thanks for fixing some of my new articles of late, such as this one. I try my best to have articles written flawlessly before I submit, but often I leave a small typo somewhere that sneaks under my radar. Cheers :')
RubenSchade ( talk) 09:44, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
|
For your great work in Wikipedia. Especially, your work with AWB and your comments in the latest discussions. Magioladitis ( talk) 09:08, 29 November 2012 (UTC) |
not sure why you objected to the changes i made. they were simply ones of correct register. it seemed that a comment like "she has overcome all obstacles in her life" is not very encylopedic. rather than delete it, i thought adding "she claims" (as she wrote the page in the first place) was a reasonable compromise. do you disagree?
212.225.124.24 ( talk) 03:49, 1 December 2012 (UTC)Now, if you think that you have the right to say all these things because the major contributor seems to be the author herself, you have to understand that she might not be the real Kate Howarth insofar as we have no credible proof just yet to prove that it was kate howarth and not her neighbor or her cat. As far as I am concerned, she might not even be aware of all this.
I agree the article needs work. However, addition of unsourced allegation is not the way forward. If you have problems with the info published in the article, then correct them without breaching the policies and guidelines of wikipedia. You may have to discuss the changes, should you get reverted, on the talk page. Thank you, Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 07:56, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amit Phalke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Events ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:29, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
God your talk page is a mess. I know how to sign FFS. You would do well to ignore Killbillsbrowser as much as you can, I still think he is a sock of highstakes00, but alas he is quite clever. Stop the bitching on the NPOV board, let someone weigh in. Darkness Shines ( talk) 21:40, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Okay I will make it short. Thank you Anna and Legoktm. sometimes I wonder what I would do without such loyal and diligent stalkers like you guys. Thank you very much for the heads-up. Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 09:28, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your reviews of the Ripley Davenport and Roger Chao articles. I really appreciate it. :-) Gildir ( talk) 18:09, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
-- Vejvančický ( talk / contribs) 08:36, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice and links. I didn't mean to list 8 tags, and think I clicked a few of them accidentally. I checked the page, and realised there were several tags that I hadn't intended on adding. I'll try and be a bit more conservative in future. Thanks for the advice, Meeeeeeee39 ( talk) 11:46, 5 December 2012 (UTC).
I see you have been contributing to Sree kurumbakkav bhagavathy temple poickattussery, one of many new articles about Hindu temples in India, which have multiple problems. I find this particular article to be of doubtful notability. My intention is to mark the article as reviewed, and to tag it for notability. What do you think should be done about this article? You can respond right here, I am watching this talk page. -- DThomsen8 ( talk) 17:36, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello Mrt3366. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of John W. Berry, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. — Theo polisme 18:11, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Please, just let the BRFA to run. Better email me for more questions on the matter. Thanks. -- Magioladitis ( talk) 08:57, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
New snapshot is up. http://toolserver.org/~awb/snapshots/ -- Magioladitis ( talk) 10:10, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi Micheal, I have added inline citations and secondary sources to my page. Is this OK? (Articles for creation/Genomic epidemiological database for global identification of microorganisms) Best regards, Peter
Thank you so much for this. To be honest, I have been hinting that [[WP:RfA/Shiry58]]
WP:RfA/Shirt58 mifgt tutmd might turn from a red-link yo to a blue-kink in some subtle and bot not so subtel subtle ways for a while now. But in more immedate pronmes immediate promise, I reaaly dp really do need to find my reading glsoees glasses.--
Shirt58 (
talk)
11:32, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
See, you need to communicate in English in this wikipedia. Once you get nominated, your eloquence (i.e. how effectively you express yourself) will be a decisive factor in the outcome. Now I have taken the liberty to correct some of the typos to the best of my ability in order to make your comment sound somewhat coherent, please take care of the unfathomably broken typos (i underlined them for you). Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 12:09, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi MrT and WormTT,
Thanks to both of you for the nomination, and your patience about me taking so much time over making my mind up. I gratefully accept.
Though feel like I'm in the middle of dozens of things that should be tidied up before a nomination, that would be the case whenever the nomination period ran. With the (western) holiday season coming up, hopefully the 'strong opposes will all be on vacation. If that's OK, I'll make a start on the answers, just in case they give me last-minute cold feet, and will formally accept in a few hours. Let the ordeal begin!
Thanks again, --
Shirt58 (
talk)
08:00, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
or,
Thanks. I was going a bit fast and didn't notice. I'm also thinking PROD. Thoughts? Cheers, Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 14:41, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
Speedy is a choice too. The thing is I can't dig for refs because the GFC blocks me. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 14:47, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Naina Ashwin Kumar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asian ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:37, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi again Micheal, I've added new primary and secondary sources, and taken out all unsourced claims (I hope you agree). Are we on the right track and already at the finish line or would you recommend additional changes? Best regards, Peter -- PRW69 ( talk) 13:36, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
This article I created is not about the 2012 phenomenon, it's about all doomsday predictions in general. - Eduardo Sellan III ( talk) 20:10, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
For all you do!! Have a wonderful HOLIDAY!!
Sue Rangell
✍
✉ is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{ subst:Xmas5}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Hi mrt3366, I noticed that the above-mentioned user removed warnings on his talk page which were placed by you. I restored them and now he accuses me of trolling since you did not state which article he vandalised/disrupted. As you know, vandals should not remove warnings on their talk pages when they had done something wrong. So, please help me to explain to him what he done wrong. Thanks very much and cheers, Hop n hop (on the arctic ice) 01:58, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas dude! Enjoy!
![]() |
Hello Mr T. I have revised the draft article about ECLAIR taking into account your suggestions. Can you please have a look? Thanks, and best wishes for the new year.
Simply unnecessary because it didn't tell me which part exactly was copy-pasted from the website adduced. Mrt3366 12:09, 25 December 2012 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Human rights abuses in Kashmir, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.flonnet.com/fl1707/17070360.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing. If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Human rights abuses in Kashmir saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! MehrajMir (Talk) 10:15, 25 December 2012 (UTC) |