![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
![]() |
A kitten for you |
I'm so sorry you're feeling bad. Sometimes things just seem to go pear-shaped, and all we want to do is hide somewhere. Do remember you're welcome to chill out on my talk page; my stalkers and I will always try to do our best for you. Take heart; this place isn't as bad as it sometimes feels! Pesky ( talk) 12:42, 25 March 2012 (UTC) |
Ðℬig XЯaɣ 14:19, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
A cool Lassi to chill you |
Relax dude dont loose heart, I am glad to see that you have opened a discussion on the talk page, please check wp:DR , cheers Ðℬig XЯaɣ 14:23, 29 April 2012 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar |
Great image...of Agni-Vi missile range..keep it up...
![]() |
youll need to make some changes in the image. nice job Ðℬig XЯaɣ 16:45, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
you will find a lot more here at wp:The Devil's Wiktionary enjoy -- Ðℬig XЯaɣ 11:17, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Ðℬig XЯaɣ 20:30, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Great work on the image. But as you can see at Agni-VI, in the image File:Agni Missile Range comparison.png, i can barely makeout the outline/range of Agni 6 missile. Can you please do something to correct that. I will not suggest the color combinations as u'd be much better for that (my color sense isn't very good, you kno :P ). Anir1uph ( talk) 00:07, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Intercontinental Barnstar |
Thanks for the creation of the Agni-V and VI range projection image + for the discussion about the image!..:).. ƬheⱾtrike Ҿagle ™ 11:43, 11 June 2012 (UTC) |
Please do not misuse the RFC process, This is not a Dispute Please read WP:DR if you have not read it. you can discuss here with me first-- DBig Xray 12:02, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
( edit conflict)( edit conflict)( edit conflict)Please understand the Wikipedia:Consensus process, and how things are done. WP:RFC is not needed at this stage (I know what you are trying to say about RfC ). Just allow the talk page for a week and editors watching the page will comment. This is not a very drastic change that would need an RFC. People can see the discussion on the talk page. -- DBig Xray 12:10, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
I have changed my earlier comment over there. please check it again check out Ways of Wikipedia:Consensus#Achieving_consensus -- DBig Xray 12:18, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
If you really feel that an RfC is necessary..please go ahead with it.Don't continue your comment war with DBigXray.I agree it was a mistake of DBigXray..but..I advice you to cease it now.You are a great contributor and both of you have worked together in many instances.Please! Thanks! ϮheⱾtrike Σagle ™ 15:27, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Agree mistake--
DBig
Xray
15:55, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Done-Dispute(between users) Resolved Glad both of you came to a compromise.Looks like my useless diplomacy worked a bit.Have a good day ahead!
ϮheⱾtrike
Σagle
™
10:34, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
hi, i have moved the RFC section on top of the voting section so that others can vote.
I am out of this. I wont be participating any more. no hard thoughts. Please discuss and then decide. regrads-- DBig Xray 15:54, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Glad to see you have cooled down...eat this pie and have a good day ϮheⱾtrike Σagle ™ 10:37, 20 June 2012 (UTC) |
hmmmmm......yummmy. Wow I like it. Thanks dude. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 10:38, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
DBig Xray 11:41, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
please cool down dude...:)...... ϮheⱾtrike Σagle ™ 13:58, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
A kitten for you |
Hey there is no need to feel bad! Sometimes things just seem to go bad, but you are an awesome contributor and have done a lot of good work here! I hope i can count on you to come out smiling and willing to assist on improving the List of ICBM page, as a lot of work has to be done there! Anir1uph ( talk) 00:42, 20 June 2012 (UTC) |
You can count on me. I am not going to back down anytime soon. I have learnt how to become impervious to unavoidable issues with other editors while interacting with them. I see DBX as one of my net-buddies. Don't you worry. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 07:23, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Its preferable to copy content in your sandbox or a user subpage, and then work on it.
you should also post a link to your subpage/sandbox on the article talkpage discussion informing others to take a look at it and make changes if they desire -- DBig Xray 10:47, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Agree
ϮheⱾtrike
Σagle
™
10:49, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
thats also correct, just choose one and proceed. :) --
DBig
Xray
06:29, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
"But you disagreed and wanted to do it on article space" - No, I didn't "disagree" or argue with you. I simply asked you the reason behind your suggestion of using my User-space as opposed to article sub-space. That's all. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 15:11, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
DBig
Xray has given you a
dove! Doves promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers!
Spread the peace of doves by adding {{ subst:Peace dove}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
W. D. Graham 16:01, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
DBig Xray 11:11, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Have a beer on me :) Irondome ( talk) 06:48, 26 June 2012 (UTC) |
DBig Xray 07:56, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Very welcome! Irondome ( talk) 08:34, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
So that you can carry on your civil discussions. Just a note , please check WP:V WP:OR, WP:SYNTHESIS , WP:RS and wp:SPS . They will help you to improve your discussion and editing. cheers DBig Xray 15:12, 29 June 2012 (UTC) |
Anir1uph ( talk) 11:21, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Anir1uph ( talk) 16:00, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
DBig Xray 03:19, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
{{
talkback}}
template on
your talk page then your comment is more than welcome in this regard, Check out these two major edits and tell me if they are valid:
Mrt3366 (Talk?) 18:22, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Don't worry I will move this discussion to
TALK:National missile defense after we come to some sort of a conclusion here.
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Proposal:
I propose that the article be renamed to
National missile defense (United States) or
US National missile defense.
Reasons:
Hence, the claim that United states has Nation-wide Missile defense is only figuratively true. The system was declared "operational" by the US-administration. Plus there have been failures. Read
here. Besides,
here Russia claims to have tested a new type of intercontinental missile that can outwit the missile defenses.
As a side-note, if the claims of US scientist are credible enough then, ideally speaking, the claims by Israeli or Russian or Indian scientists should be regarded as sufficiently credible also.
US Secretary of Defense William Cohen acknowledged the centrality of European allies to the NMD system during a July 2000 Senate hearing. When asked if it was possible to build an effective NMD system without European support, he replied the answer at this point would be no. . . If you don’t have forward-deployed X-band radars, then you can’t see the missiles coming.” Read more here.
Regarding what we discussed on the talk page, i will make certain changes and show u. Little busy these days, so will do so in some time. :D Anir1uph | talk | contrib 16:34, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
BTW, what to do about the
Dmuc guy?
His edits are not properly
sourced and some even look like
disruptive speculations. Any suggestions?
Should we wait more?
Mrt3366
(Talk?)
16:41, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Wikipedia has a policy called "
Wikipedia is not a crystal ball", which discourages such edits. Please only add material about future events if it is
verifiable, based on a reference to a
reliable source. Thank you. [[User:
Opinedsenior (
talk) 10:33, 2 August 2012 (UTC)|
Opinedsenior (
talk)
10:33, 2 August 2012 (UTC)]] [[User talk:
Opinedsenior (
talk)|(Talk?)]] (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Dear Mrt I have removed your pov terms such as POK and your biased sources which you used on kashmir conflict article please be aware wikipedia is a neutral encyclopaedic source do not add biased statements and biased sources
Opinedsenior (
talk)
09:21, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
I can offer you some advice your edits are clear pov pushing bordering on vandalistic edits you will be reverted by me or other neutral editors since you actually try to justify using pov terms like "POK" and adding unreliable sources is baffling me funny how certain established users are actually sanctioning your pov pushing
Opinedsenior (
talk)
10:31, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
( User:Mrt3366 changed the heading after giving it a thought @ 16:32, 27 July 2012 (UTC))
This section of DF-21 article is at best an unreferenced hoax and at worst a conjectural prank which has crept its way into ABM article.
What to do? Should we delete it? Mrt3366 (Talk?) 15:28, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/world/china/asat.htm
Any other refs you need today? Hcobb ( talk) 10:59, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Now, I have gone through the Global-security page earlier and yes, it does look pretty impressive. It's all well and fine but,
So what do you think? Mrt3366 (Talk?) 16:29, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
China’s Cruise and Ballistic Missile Defence:
China does not have a strategic BMD system capable of intercepting an Inter-Continental Ballistic Missile (ICBM), let alone a Medium/Intermediate Range Ballistic Missile (IRBM/MRBM). The DF-21 [base model for KT-1 according to this page] is not suitable as the first stage of an Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) as it is too large and lacks acceleration."
— source
HQ-9 TEL using the Taian TAS-5380 chassis.. may have some ABM capability, but it is kinematically inferior to the imported Russian S-300PMU2 Favorit
— same as the previous
“China's ASAT test of 11 January involved a fairly primitive system. It is the sort of capability available to any country with a store of MRBMs/IRBMs (medium range/inter-continental ballistic missiles) or satellite launch vehicles, and a long-range radar system, such as Japan, India, Pakistan, Iran and even North Korea. American satellites are lucrative targets in the Chinese strategy of asymmetric warfare.”
— source
2007 Chinese anti-satellite missile test was kinetic kill and that's already a third generation technology. (1: Set off a nuke somewhere in the general area; 2: Set off a fragmentation charge nearby; 3: Hit a bullet with a bullet.) So the warhead is impressive, just not the launch vehicle. Hcobb ( talk) 17:02, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Teamwork Barnstar |
Awarded to Mrt3366 for the great spirit of Teamwork and collaboration he has shown in the extensive discussion on the ICBM articles. Hope you keep up this spirit and continue your valuable contributions here. DBig Xray 13:48, 1 August 2012 (UTC) |
Thanks for your comment however it would be appreciated if you could comment on Talk:Kashmir conflict on the thread which is more suitable place. thanks-- DBig Xray 08:54, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Mike ;) I have converted the Agni Range image to SVG and Uploaded it.Tell me if it was right.Cheers TheStrike Σagle 10:15, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
I have added more stars to your page! TheStrike Σagle 14:56, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
BTW, How does my editnotice look now? Mrt3366 (Talk?) 15:03, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
WoW!..Great to see I have helped you recover from depression.
TheStrike
Σagle
15:52, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for mentioning me in your edit notice. :D I am glad that i could be of some help! Best, Anir1uph | talk | contrib 18:02, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
DBig Xray 15:03, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence |
Keep going! Irondome ( talk) 00:06, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
You don't have an email set? I tried to mail one but it rejected.Mention some alternate one now. :) TheStrike Σagle 08:18, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Re your comments in your edits & at Elockid's talk page, one cannot defame a nation :o) And truth be told you would be best advised to drop that term from your wiki vocalabury lest someone think lets get him blocked Darkness Shines ( talk) 10:27, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
But, do clarify what exactly do I need to drop from my wiki-vocabulary? Mrt3366 (Talk?) 10:35, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi there! Please don't move my comments, I know where to place them. They are exactly there, where they are required. -- SMS Talk 09:00, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Really? --SMS Talk 20:15, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
But thank you anyway. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 09:26, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
It would seem to me to be useful in creating a table of active ABM systems, as in the excellent ICBM list, and seperate articles for each nation, an overview of development and ACTIVE deployment on each. Articles on nebulous concepts such as the American or European anti missile defense "concepts" should be avoided I think. The US one is viable but it needs a radical re-write. Any feedback welcome as always. Irondome ( talk) 01:28, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Besides, what is your definition the word serious or its relevance so that you can only name USA as the only country having serious program is frankly beyond me.
Do you mean others (i.e. scientists of other countries) are just not serious or dedicated enough, or do you mean that they are going out of their way to prodigally squander their crucial time and insane amount of taxpayers' money just for the sake of fun, that too in the face of imminent danger of a nuclear showdown? Come on, Mrt3366 (Talk?) 08:28, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
guys I am totally lost due to tangential discussions above. Can someone clearly write below what is the subject and aim of the discussion.-- DBig Xray 10:58, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
I think Irondome originally proposed that we change the content of the article
National missile defense (the name which, I guess, he misremembered, and thus my first response is asking for clarification). He later confirmed that “National Missile Defense yes”.
However, I don't think that a table like we have in the Comparison of ICBMs article would be the best idea in this case. But, that's just my opinion, I'll let others decide what would be best and see if we could reach some sort of consensus here. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 08:38, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
So, any new ideas? Mrt3366 (Talk?) 16:55, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
In this content you added the text sourced to [2] here is to closely paraphrased, should you restore the Politics section I will revert it as a copyright violation. Rewrite it before you consider restoring it. Darkness Shines ( talk) 09:26, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hello, following a review of your contributions, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please take note of the following:
{{
User wikipedia/rollback}}
userbox or the {{
Rollback}}
top icon on your user pageAs you might already know, I am a rollbacker now. I, however, wanted to know:
Thank you.
Mrt3366
(Talk?)
12:58, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Answers
Answers
Can I edit the article of my choice using Stiki? I can't seem to get a hold of what actually Stiki does and how it is useful. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 13:59, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
A bit more Always remember rollback is for genuine 100% vandalism only. Any suggestion of possibly real content dispute or any signs of good (but misguided) faith, do it by other means, and leave edit summaries and talkpage and user talkpage notes. I got rollback, and hardly used it as I preferred to comment. It's for use when speed is needed. I've never used Twinkle rollback, as I became an admin before getting Twinkle, so I can't comment on it. It is OK to use rollback on yourself when you get one of those 'Oh shit, I shouldn't have done that!' moments. Overall, use it as little as you can, and always have a good explanation handy... Good luck. Peridon ( talk) 13:42, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
These okay? They seemed like obvious vandalism to me. Are they not? Mrt3366 (Talk?) 17:18, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Talk:India and state sponsored terrorism I think you can remove your last comment about AIV content dispute are not referred to AIV. I agree that is extreme POV pushing bt even then not vandalism. -- DBig Xray 11:13, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
I noticed that you clarified my comment directed to Mar4d. Thanks for that. But I think that even if one word of that essay was read for everytime we linked to that article, the whole essay could have been read by now. Maybe we need WP:IWONTREADIDIDNTHEARTHAT :P. I just got tired of linking because I am fairly sure it won't be read. So I suggest we revert your edit. What you say? Suraj T 08:55, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Mrt3366, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and DBig Xray 17:31, 12 August 2012 (UTC) |
![]() |
Please do not edit the information further. Also, please identify yourself with regards to your relationship with Grace Assembly of God. Please provide us the basis of your original comments in the wikipedia write-up. As the owner of the Grace Assembly of God sites, church, domain, we reserve every rights to publish information as we deem fit. We do not understand your comment that the information we had published was "not constructive". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.185.168.195 ( talk • contribs)
I've declined your speedy deletion request on Grace (Singapore Chinese Christian) Church. Simply the fact that the article has existed for 5 years means that deletion will not be "uncontroversial", which is a requirement for speedy deletion. The article may be eligible for AfD, however, if you like. Qwyrxian ( talk) 10:47, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
And also let me tell this to you here and now, the rationale you have provided before almost instantly declining my nominations does not impress me. So what if it existed for 5 years or more? Many articles exist in wikipedia that probably should not.
Both the articles fulfilled at least one of the criteria for CSD, didn't they? Besides, Grace Assembly of God has only been edited 64 times (many are minor edits) and Grace (Singapore Chinese Christian) Church has been edited only 47 times in the past 5 years. I don't think I would call such a deletion "controversial". In any case, you could have left it alone for others to decide. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 12:28, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
I thought that the guideline exists lest people, knowingly or unknowingly, exhibit conflict of interest in their editing, am I missing something here?
To me at least, the account appeared to have been used for the purpose of telling the world about an organization that the editor considers worthwhile. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 19:10, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome. Your addition to Human rights abuses in Azad Kashmir has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to visit me at my talk page. Thank you. -- SMS Talk 04:12, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
But I couldn't help wondering why didn't you even try to help me by paraphrasing in the first place instead of rashly removing a big chunk of info? Mrt3366 (Talk?) 09:00, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
DBig Xray 11:51, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello there. A few things:
Many thanks for your time, Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 16:50, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
“If a text page is a likely copyright violation, replace the text..”
"I often don't know what's best." — exactly, me too. Mrt 3366 (Talk page?) (New section?) 07:59, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Can I also receive it? ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 16:30, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
I'd love too. TheSpecialUser TSU 16:32, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Missile defense systems of various nations, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages AAA and Interceptor ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:21, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kashmir conflict, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mustafa Kamal ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:13, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Category:Terrorism fuelled by Pakistan, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Facts, not fiction ( talk) 15:58, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Michael! If possible, can you provide me your email or just drop me a line here: thespecialuseronwikipedia@gmail.com. There are few points I'd like to share and you to know in a bit personal way :) TheSpecialUser TSU 00:57, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Look at the talk page of India and WMDs. The same ip whose edits you reverted, has left a message making it look like another user has said, yes it can be added. -- Anurag2k12 ( talk) 12:33, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
For the "Did you know" section on my talk page! :) Anir1uph | talk | contrib 19:34, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Please discuss on the article talk page rather than edit warring. Please See WP:BURDEN and explain your edits.
Truth4all ( talk) 03:07, 2 September 2012 (UTC)"yet an individual's opinion from rediff or a person's comments on a news report" - links please, specificity is something I value verily. Be specific as to what pages/edits you are referring to. Mrt 3366 (Talk page?) 14:12, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
It is so good to see an editor, quickly regain composure, stay "unaffected" and resume work, despite setbacks. That's the spirit...it is inspiring! - Ekabhishek talk 08:17, 3 September 2012 (UTC) |
Like, GDP (nominal) and Constitutional proscription against Untouchability? Is that so? Mrt 3366 (Talk page?) 09:53, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
"Your edits have stirred activity in two articles."- I apologize if it's causing trouble. You know, no matter how cautiously I avoid these articles, I always get drawn towards controversy and biased articles. Mrt 3366 (Talk page?) 17:32, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Why don't you edit the template and help my cause? Mrt 3366 (Talk page?) 14:58, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Your id please. (Leaving for a long journey. Hope tommorrow I could make it.) AshLey Msg 10:41, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
You said that it doesn't mention the Agni III, actually it does mention, as such:
".....more than Rs 10,000 crore worth of missile systems have been delivered, or are on order for, the five missile groups already in service: two holding Prithvi missiles; a third holding Agni-I missiles; a fourth holding Agni-II missiles; and a fifth now being raised with Agni-III missiles."
I am not saying that the info he added is necessarily correct, since the article clearly states the regiment is going to be raised, not raised already, but just thought I'd give a heads-up regarding the line you probably missed. -- Anurag2k12 ( talk) 02:23, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
The article states the five missile groups already in service and a fifth now being raised with Agni-III missiles. As per my understanding even if a single missile is with missile group, it is operational. At the end, these are to increases deterrence (which is enhanced even with single digit missile numbers). It is a free world, there is a report today that Agni-I and II are not operational. So India has maximum range anywhere between 150 - 5000 KM. It is always good to have ambiguity. (
Rkb76in (
talk)
10:09, 6 September 2012 (UTC))
How do I send u the screenshot?
"before my PL assigns me any new work" - what do you mean? I simply don't understand.
Mrt
3366
(Talk page?)
10:37, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
... is a direct violation of WP:SIG#NoTemplates. They're explicitly forbidden. You need to remove that and clean up the mess you've been leaving in your wake.
Also, that decoration at the top of this talk, isn't Mark's work, it's mine; he got it from me. Br'er Rabbit ( talk) 11:01, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:29, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
![]() |
A kitten for you |
I'm so sorry you're feeling bad. Sometimes things just seem to go pear-shaped, and all we want to do is hide somewhere. Do remember you're welcome to chill out on my talk page; my stalkers and I will always try to do our best for you. Take heart; this place isn't as bad as it sometimes feels! Pesky ( talk) 12:42, 25 March 2012 (UTC) |
Ðℬig XЯaɣ 14:19, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
A cool Lassi to chill you |
Relax dude dont loose heart, I am glad to see that you have opened a discussion on the talk page, please check wp:DR , cheers Ðℬig XЯaɣ 14:23, 29 April 2012 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar |
Great image...of Agni-Vi missile range..keep it up...
![]() |
youll need to make some changes in the image. nice job Ðℬig XЯaɣ 16:45, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
you will find a lot more here at wp:The Devil's Wiktionary enjoy -- Ðℬig XЯaɣ 11:17, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Ðℬig XЯaɣ 20:30, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Great work on the image. But as you can see at Agni-VI, in the image File:Agni Missile Range comparison.png, i can barely makeout the outline/range of Agni 6 missile. Can you please do something to correct that. I will not suggest the color combinations as u'd be much better for that (my color sense isn't very good, you kno :P ). Anir1uph ( talk) 00:07, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Intercontinental Barnstar |
Thanks for the creation of the Agni-V and VI range projection image + for the discussion about the image!..:).. ƬheⱾtrike Ҿagle ™ 11:43, 11 June 2012 (UTC) |
Please do not misuse the RFC process, This is not a Dispute Please read WP:DR if you have not read it. you can discuss here with me first-- DBig Xray 12:02, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
( edit conflict)( edit conflict)( edit conflict)Please understand the Wikipedia:Consensus process, and how things are done. WP:RFC is not needed at this stage (I know what you are trying to say about RfC ). Just allow the talk page for a week and editors watching the page will comment. This is not a very drastic change that would need an RFC. People can see the discussion on the talk page. -- DBig Xray 12:10, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
I have changed my earlier comment over there. please check it again check out Ways of Wikipedia:Consensus#Achieving_consensus -- DBig Xray 12:18, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
If you really feel that an RfC is necessary..please go ahead with it.Don't continue your comment war with DBigXray.I agree it was a mistake of DBigXray..but..I advice you to cease it now.You are a great contributor and both of you have worked together in many instances.Please! Thanks! ϮheⱾtrike Σagle ™ 15:27, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Agree mistake--
DBig
Xray
15:55, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Done-Dispute(between users) Resolved Glad both of you came to a compromise.Looks like my useless diplomacy worked a bit.Have a good day ahead!
ϮheⱾtrike
Σagle
™
10:34, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
hi, i have moved the RFC section on top of the voting section so that others can vote.
I am out of this. I wont be participating any more. no hard thoughts. Please discuss and then decide. regrads-- DBig Xray 15:54, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Glad to see you have cooled down...eat this pie and have a good day ϮheⱾtrike Σagle ™ 10:37, 20 June 2012 (UTC) |
hmmmmm......yummmy. Wow I like it. Thanks dude. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 10:38, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
DBig Xray 11:41, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
please cool down dude...:)...... ϮheⱾtrike Σagle ™ 13:58, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
A kitten for you |
Hey there is no need to feel bad! Sometimes things just seem to go bad, but you are an awesome contributor and have done a lot of good work here! I hope i can count on you to come out smiling and willing to assist on improving the List of ICBM page, as a lot of work has to be done there! Anir1uph ( talk) 00:42, 20 June 2012 (UTC) |
You can count on me. I am not going to back down anytime soon. I have learnt how to become impervious to unavoidable issues with other editors while interacting with them. I see DBX as one of my net-buddies. Don't you worry. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 07:23, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Its preferable to copy content in your sandbox or a user subpage, and then work on it.
you should also post a link to your subpage/sandbox on the article talkpage discussion informing others to take a look at it and make changes if they desire -- DBig Xray 10:47, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Agree
ϮheⱾtrike
Σagle
™
10:49, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
thats also correct, just choose one and proceed. :) --
DBig
Xray
06:29, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
"But you disagreed and wanted to do it on article space" - No, I didn't "disagree" or argue with you. I simply asked you the reason behind your suggestion of using my User-space as opposed to article sub-space. That's all. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 15:11, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
DBig
Xray has given you a
dove! Doves promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers!
Spread the peace of doves by adding {{ subst:Peace dove}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
W. D. Graham 16:01, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
DBig Xray 11:11, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Have a beer on me :) Irondome ( talk) 06:48, 26 June 2012 (UTC) |
DBig Xray 07:56, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Very welcome! Irondome ( talk) 08:34, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
So that you can carry on your civil discussions. Just a note , please check WP:V WP:OR, WP:SYNTHESIS , WP:RS and wp:SPS . They will help you to improve your discussion and editing. cheers DBig Xray 15:12, 29 June 2012 (UTC) |
Anir1uph ( talk) 11:21, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Anir1uph ( talk) 16:00, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
DBig Xray 03:19, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
{{
talkback}}
template on
your talk page then your comment is more than welcome in this regard, Check out these two major edits and tell me if they are valid:
Mrt3366 (Talk?) 18:22, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Don't worry I will move this discussion to
TALK:National missile defense after we come to some sort of a conclusion here.
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Proposal:
I propose that the article be renamed to
National missile defense (United States) or
US National missile defense.
Reasons:
Hence, the claim that United states has Nation-wide Missile defense is only figuratively true. The system was declared "operational" by the US-administration. Plus there have been failures. Read
here. Besides,
here Russia claims to have tested a new type of intercontinental missile that can outwit the missile defenses.
As a side-note, if the claims of US scientist are credible enough then, ideally speaking, the claims by Israeli or Russian or Indian scientists should be regarded as sufficiently credible also.
US Secretary of Defense William Cohen acknowledged the centrality of European allies to the NMD system during a July 2000 Senate hearing. When asked if it was possible to build an effective NMD system without European support, he replied the answer at this point would be no. . . If you don’t have forward-deployed X-band radars, then you can’t see the missiles coming.” Read more here.
Regarding what we discussed on the talk page, i will make certain changes and show u. Little busy these days, so will do so in some time. :D Anir1uph | talk | contrib 16:34, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
BTW, what to do about the
Dmuc guy?
His edits are not properly
sourced and some even look like
disruptive speculations. Any suggestions?
Should we wait more?
Mrt3366
(Talk?)
16:41, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Wikipedia has a policy called "
Wikipedia is not a crystal ball", which discourages such edits. Please only add material about future events if it is
verifiable, based on a reference to a
reliable source. Thank you. [[User:
Opinedsenior (
talk) 10:33, 2 August 2012 (UTC)|
Opinedsenior (
talk)
10:33, 2 August 2012 (UTC)]] [[User talk:
Opinedsenior (
talk)|(Talk?)]] (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Dear Mrt I have removed your pov terms such as POK and your biased sources which you used on kashmir conflict article please be aware wikipedia is a neutral encyclopaedic source do not add biased statements and biased sources
Opinedsenior (
talk)
09:21, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
I can offer you some advice your edits are clear pov pushing bordering on vandalistic edits you will be reverted by me or other neutral editors since you actually try to justify using pov terms like "POK" and adding unreliable sources is baffling me funny how certain established users are actually sanctioning your pov pushing
Opinedsenior (
talk)
10:31, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
( User:Mrt3366 changed the heading after giving it a thought @ 16:32, 27 July 2012 (UTC))
This section of DF-21 article is at best an unreferenced hoax and at worst a conjectural prank which has crept its way into ABM article.
What to do? Should we delete it? Mrt3366 (Talk?) 15:28, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/world/china/asat.htm
Any other refs you need today? Hcobb ( talk) 10:59, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Now, I have gone through the Global-security page earlier and yes, it does look pretty impressive. It's all well and fine but,
So what do you think? Mrt3366 (Talk?) 16:29, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
China’s Cruise and Ballistic Missile Defence:
China does not have a strategic BMD system capable of intercepting an Inter-Continental Ballistic Missile (ICBM), let alone a Medium/Intermediate Range Ballistic Missile (IRBM/MRBM). The DF-21 [base model for KT-1 according to this page] is not suitable as the first stage of an Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) as it is too large and lacks acceleration."
— source
HQ-9 TEL using the Taian TAS-5380 chassis.. may have some ABM capability, but it is kinematically inferior to the imported Russian S-300PMU2 Favorit
— same as the previous
“China's ASAT test of 11 January involved a fairly primitive system. It is the sort of capability available to any country with a store of MRBMs/IRBMs (medium range/inter-continental ballistic missiles) or satellite launch vehicles, and a long-range radar system, such as Japan, India, Pakistan, Iran and even North Korea. American satellites are lucrative targets in the Chinese strategy of asymmetric warfare.”
— source
2007 Chinese anti-satellite missile test was kinetic kill and that's already a third generation technology. (1: Set off a nuke somewhere in the general area; 2: Set off a fragmentation charge nearby; 3: Hit a bullet with a bullet.) So the warhead is impressive, just not the launch vehicle. Hcobb ( talk) 17:02, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Teamwork Barnstar |
Awarded to Mrt3366 for the great spirit of Teamwork and collaboration he has shown in the extensive discussion on the ICBM articles. Hope you keep up this spirit and continue your valuable contributions here. DBig Xray 13:48, 1 August 2012 (UTC) |
Thanks for your comment however it would be appreciated if you could comment on Talk:Kashmir conflict on the thread which is more suitable place. thanks-- DBig Xray 08:54, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Mike ;) I have converted the Agni Range image to SVG and Uploaded it.Tell me if it was right.Cheers TheStrike Σagle 10:15, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
I have added more stars to your page! TheStrike Σagle 14:56, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
BTW, How does my editnotice look now? Mrt3366 (Talk?) 15:03, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
WoW!..Great to see I have helped you recover from depression.
TheStrike
Σagle
15:52, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for mentioning me in your edit notice. :D I am glad that i could be of some help! Best, Anir1uph | talk | contrib 18:02, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
DBig Xray 15:03, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence |
Keep going! Irondome ( talk) 00:06, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
You don't have an email set? I tried to mail one but it rejected.Mention some alternate one now. :) TheStrike Σagle 08:18, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Re your comments in your edits & at Elockid's talk page, one cannot defame a nation :o) And truth be told you would be best advised to drop that term from your wiki vocalabury lest someone think lets get him blocked Darkness Shines ( talk) 10:27, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
But, do clarify what exactly do I need to drop from my wiki-vocabulary? Mrt3366 (Talk?) 10:35, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi there! Please don't move my comments, I know where to place them. They are exactly there, where they are required. -- SMS Talk 09:00, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Really? --SMS Talk 20:15, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
But thank you anyway. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 09:26, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
It would seem to me to be useful in creating a table of active ABM systems, as in the excellent ICBM list, and seperate articles for each nation, an overview of development and ACTIVE deployment on each. Articles on nebulous concepts such as the American or European anti missile defense "concepts" should be avoided I think. The US one is viable but it needs a radical re-write. Any feedback welcome as always. Irondome ( talk) 01:28, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Besides, what is your definition the word serious or its relevance so that you can only name USA as the only country having serious program is frankly beyond me.
Do you mean others (i.e. scientists of other countries) are just not serious or dedicated enough, or do you mean that they are going out of their way to prodigally squander their crucial time and insane amount of taxpayers' money just for the sake of fun, that too in the face of imminent danger of a nuclear showdown? Come on, Mrt3366 (Talk?) 08:28, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
guys I am totally lost due to tangential discussions above. Can someone clearly write below what is the subject and aim of the discussion.-- DBig Xray 10:58, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
I think Irondome originally proposed that we change the content of the article
National missile defense (the name which, I guess, he misremembered, and thus my first response is asking for clarification). He later confirmed that “National Missile Defense yes”.
However, I don't think that a table like we have in the Comparison of ICBMs article would be the best idea in this case. But, that's just my opinion, I'll let others decide what would be best and see if we could reach some sort of consensus here. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 08:38, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
So, any new ideas? Mrt3366 (Talk?) 16:55, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
In this content you added the text sourced to [2] here is to closely paraphrased, should you restore the Politics section I will revert it as a copyright violation. Rewrite it before you consider restoring it. Darkness Shines ( talk) 09:26, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hello, following a review of your contributions, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please take note of the following:
{{
User wikipedia/rollback}}
userbox or the {{
Rollback}}
top icon on your user pageAs you might already know, I am a rollbacker now. I, however, wanted to know:
Thank you.
Mrt3366
(Talk?)
12:58, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Answers
Answers
Can I edit the article of my choice using Stiki? I can't seem to get a hold of what actually Stiki does and how it is useful. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 13:59, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
A bit more Always remember rollback is for genuine 100% vandalism only. Any suggestion of possibly real content dispute or any signs of good (but misguided) faith, do it by other means, and leave edit summaries and talkpage and user talkpage notes. I got rollback, and hardly used it as I preferred to comment. It's for use when speed is needed. I've never used Twinkle rollback, as I became an admin before getting Twinkle, so I can't comment on it. It is OK to use rollback on yourself when you get one of those 'Oh shit, I shouldn't have done that!' moments. Overall, use it as little as you can, and always have a good explanation handy... Good luck. Peridon ( talk) 13:42, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
These okay? They seemed like obvious vandalism to me. Are they not? Mrt3366 (Talk?) 17:18, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Talk:India and state sponsored terrorism I think you can remove your last comment about AIV content dispute are not referred to AIV. I agree that is extreme POV pushing bt even then not vandalism. -- DBig Xray 11:13, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
I noticed that you clarified my comment directed to Mar4d. Thanks for that. But I think that even if one word of that essay was read for everytime we linked to that article, the whole essay could have been read by now. Maybe we need WP:IWONTREADIDIDNTHEARTHAT :P. I just got tired of linking because I am fairly sure it won't be read. So I suggest we revert your edit. What you say? Suraj T 08:55, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Mrt3366, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and DBig Xray 17:31, 12 August 2012 (UTC) |
![]() |
Please do not edit the information further. Also, please identify yourself with regards to your relationship with Grace Assembly of God. Please provide us the basis of your original comments in the wikipedia write-up. As the owner of the Grace Assembly of God sites, church, domain, we reserve every rights to publish information as we deem fit. We do not understand your comment that the information we had published was "not constructive". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.185.168.195 ( talk • contribs)
I've declined your speedy deletion request on Grace (Singapore Chinese Christian) Church. Simply the fact that the article has existed for 5 years means that deletion will not be "uncontroversial", which is a requirement for speedy deletion. The article may be eligible for AfD, however, if you like. Qwyrxian ( talk) 10:47, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
And also let me tell this to you here and now, the rationale you have provided before almost instantly declining my nominations does not impress me. So what if it existed for 5 years or more? Many articles exist in wikipedia that probably should not.
Both the articles fulfilled at least one of the criteria for CSD, didn't they? Besides, Grace Assembly of God has only been edited 64 times (many are minor edits) and Grace (Singapore Chinese Christian) Church has been edited only 47 times in the past 5 years. I don't think I would call such a deletion "controversial". In any case, you could have left it alone for others to decide. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 12:28, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
I thought that the guideline exists lest people, knowingly or unknowingly, exhibit conflict of interest in their editing, am I missing something here?
To me at least, the account appeared to have been used for the purpose of telling the world about an organization that the editor considers worthwhile. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 19:10, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome. Your addition to Human rights abuses in Azad Kashmir has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to visit me at my talk page. Thank you. -- SMS Talk 04:12, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
But I couldn't help wondering why didn't you even try to help me by paraphrasing in the first place instead of rashly removing a big chunk of info? Mrt3366 (Talk?) 09:00, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
DBig Xray 11:51, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello there. A few things:
Many thanks for your time, Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 16:50, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
“If a text page is a likely copyright violation, replace the text..”
"I often don't know what's best." — exactly, me too. Mrt 3366 (Talk page?) (New section?) 07:59, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Can I also receive it? ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 16:30, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
I'd love too. TheSpecialUser TSU 16:32, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Missile defense systems of various nations, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages AAA and Interceptor ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:21, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kashmir conflict, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mustafa Kamal ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:13, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Category:Terrorism fuelled by Pakistan, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Facts, not fiction ( talk) 15:58, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Michael! If possible, can you provide me your email or just drop me a line here: thespecialuseronwikipedia@gmail.com. There are few points I'd like to share and you to know in a bit personal way :) TheSpecialUser TSU 00:57, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Look at the talk page of India and WMDs. The same ip whose edits you reverted, has left a message making it look like another user has said, yes it can be added. -- Anurag2k12 ( talk) 12:33, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
For the "Did you know" section on my talk page! :) Anir1uph | talk | contrib 19:34, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Please discuss on the article talk page rather than edit warring. Please See WP:BURDEN and explain your edits.
Truth4all ( talk) 03:07, 2 September 2012 (UTC)"yet an individual's opinion from rediff or a person's comments on a news report" - links please, specificity is something I value verily. Be specific as to what pages/edits you are referring to. Mrt 3366 (Talk page?) 14:12, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
It is so good to see an editor, quickly regain composure, stay "unaffected" and resume work, despite setbacks. That's the spirit...it is inspiring! - Ekabhishek talk 08:17, 3 September 2012 (UTC) |
Like, GDP (nominal) and Constitutional proscription against Untouchability? Is that so? Mrt 3366 (Talk page?) 09:53, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
"Your edits have stirred activity in two articles."- I apologize if it's causing trouble. You know, no matter how cautiously I avoid these articles, I always get drawn towards controversy and biased articles. Mrt 3366 (Talk page?) 17:32, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Why don't you edit the template and help my cause? Mrt 3366 (Talk page?) 14:58, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Your id please. (Leaving for a long journey. Hope tommorrow I could make it.) AshLey Msg 10:41, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
You said that it doesn't mention the Agni III, actually it does mention, as such:
".....more than Rs 10,000 crore worth of missile systems have been delivered, or are on order for, the five missile groups already in service: two holding Prithvi missiles; a third holding Agni-I missiles; a fourth holding Agni-II missiles; and a fifth now being raised with Agni-III missiles."
I am not saying that the info he added is necessarily correct, since the article clearly states the regiment is going to be raised, not raised already, but just thought I'd give a heads-up regarding the line you probably missed. -- Anurag2k12 ( talk) 02:23, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
The article states the five missile groups already in service and a fifth now being raised with Agni-III missiles. As per my understanding even if a single missile is with missile group, it is operational. At the end, these are to increases deterrence (which is enhanced even with single digit missile numbers). It is a free world, there is a report today that Agni-I and II are not operational. So India has maximum range anywhere between 150 - 5000 KM. It is always good to have ambiguity. (
Rkb76in (
talk)
10:09, 6 September 2012 (UTC))
How do I send u the screenshot?
"before my PL assigns me any new work" - what do you mean? I simply don't understand.
Mrt
3366
(Talk page?)
10:37, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
... is a direct violation of WP:SIG#NoTemplates. They're explicitly forbidden. You need to remove that and clean up the mess you've been leaving in your wake.
Also, that decoration at the top of this talk, isn't Mark's work, it's mine; he got it from me. Br'er Rabbit ( talk) 11:01, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:29, 6 September 2012 (UTC)