Someone said welcome already but anyhays, I'm in the WikiProject Music too, and I just wanted to say you can ask me for advice if any is needed. ××× BrightBlackHeaven( talk)××× 19:57, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Regarding pending changes/feedback, see User talk:RickK#Heh. and here. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 03:22, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
1. I see you've been posting your "questions" on a lot of user talkpages lately (
Sonia and
BrightBlackHeaven, to name a few). Don't post too many of them, though, otherwise you might look like you're
Canvassing.
2. I'm not sure if this is intentional or not, but the last part of your sig links to
Special:Contributions/Mr_little_Irish (with a capital I), which doesn't exist, but your username is
Special:Contributions/Mr_little_irish.
:| TelCo
NaSp
Ve :|
01:21, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, I know the system, and it was a damned mistake that sometimes tends to happen. Usually I create new sections with months and so, but sometimes when creating a new talk page I tend to forget it. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ( Contact) 08:24, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Just in case you didn't get my message. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 14:02, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Your use of {{REVISIONUSER}} on the top of the page won't work, as it only applies to the one doing the "revising" (i.e. editing) and so since you last edited the page, it only shows your name. But anyway, did you create most of the userboxes yourself? If so, you can post them at Wikipedia talk:Userboxes/New Userboxes. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 14:44, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Beat me to the rollback punch enough to warrant such an award Achowat ( talk) 13:54, 19 December 2011 (UTC) |
Users are allowed to remove comments and warnings from their own talk pages, as that is an acknowledgement that they have read them (see WP:DRC). Please stop edit-warring them back on with rollback, or it may be removed. Thank you. Reaper Eternal ( talk) 13:47, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello Mr little irish,
I think you may have been a bit quick to judge & warn
118.208.78.180 (
talk ·
contribs). The text they removed seems to me to be an unsourced BLPvio, added by
64.130.151.41 (
talk ·
contribs) with
this edit. Perhaps you could 'strike' your warning to 118.208.78.180? Regards,
220
of
Borg
11:57, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
Keep up the good work in fighting vandalism. If you make a mistake just try to put it right and move on. I should know I've made plenty. Don't be discouraged. Vrenator talk 16:46, 22 December 2011 (UTC) |
...
Rich
Farmbrough,
10:14, 12 January 2012 (UTC).
Hello O Irishman, thank you for your views, I appreciate it. I have left a comment just below your !vote, kindly go through it if you wish. (Also what tends to happen is that, over here, the edit count for Jan 2011 is quite large, and it puts all the other edit counts into perspective, so what may be seen as smaller bars, in fact constitute something like 500 edits each on an average). Of course, its your call in the end! Thanks, Lynch 7 11:38, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Hey there, Diminutive Hibernian, Esq., there is a discussion that may interest you at Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Re-formatting/Discussion#CVU Guideline Proposal. As one of the hardest working Anti-vandals that I've run into, I'm sure the Project would love to hear your imput. Cheers! Achowat ( talk) 15:45, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
You may have noticed over the past few days that the MOTD that you link to on your user page has simply displayed a red link. This is due to the fact that not enough people are reviewing pending MOTDs here. Please help us keep the MOTD template alive and simply go and review a few of the MOTDs in the list. That way we can have a real MOTD in the future rather than re-using ( This space for rent). Any help would be appreciated! – pjoef ( talk • contribs) 12:07, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The MOTD Barnstar | |
The MOTD Barnstar is awarded to Mr little irish for his invaluable contribution to our project, which was experiencing a period of extreme scarcity. Thank you from Motto of the day. – pjoef ( talk • contribs) 10:59, 13 March 2012 (UTC) |
Additional note: Hoping that you feel comfortable with us, we hope and desire that you will want to continue contributing to
our/your project. I personally think that if many of us contribute, then about ten minutes per week, by
reviewing the existing nominations, and eventually adding new nominations, should be more than enough to get the
project going! Once again, thank you from your
Motto of the day. –
pjoef (
talk •
contribs)
10:59, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
I updated my computer with new memory and new OS. Windows 7 is working okay but I'm not up to speed on it. So I look at the differences (from XP) sceptically. But I will persist with libraries. Thanks, Wanderer57 ( talk) 19:22, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello there! Your input is request at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy. You had commented on the re-formatting discussion at WP:CVU but have yet to comment on the progress done to implement a major change discussed during the reformatting discussion, namely the training for new anti-vandals. Any input would be appreciated, thank you. Cheers! Achowat ( talk) 19:28, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low
to High
, while for quality the scale goes from Low
to High
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 03:54, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
or
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
16:07, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for picking up my strike error, missed that one. Cheers GimliDotNet ( Speak to me, Stuff I've done) 18:54, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Mr little irish, there is nothing to be gained from continuing to press Malleus for information which he is not obligated in any way to give. Thank you. Drmies ( talk) 15:16, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
File:Spam with cans.jpeg | Y'know, just some Spam |
What goes around comes around. Achowat ( talk) 15:53, 24 April 2012 (UTC) |
Nom! I had Spam for breakfast. With egg and mushrooms. In a sandwich Nom! MrLittleIrish (talk) © 15:57, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
My diminutive hibernian friend, I noticed that a second Enrollee has added their name to the list, but not one has contacted hir about being hir instructor. Do you feel comfortable taking on that role? Achowat ( talk) 14:58, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello. You have
a new message at Achowat's talk page.
Achowat (
talk)
15:46, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi - thanks so much for reaching out to me, I'd love to be your student. It sounds quite interesting, really.. Just let me know what next my (our, whatever) next steps should be. Thanks so much! Theopolisme TALK 20:28, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Hiya. I would like to enroll. I've been reverting and patrolling for vandalism for about 2 years, but I just sit in CVN and check new pages- if there is a better/more efficient way I would love to learn about it. Nightenbelle ( talk) 13:32, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
There is a problem as when we click on contributions button, this is appearing: [1] Now it is up to you that will you change your preferences or will give me your password so that I can fix it for you?
I hope that you'll do it yourself. Thanks! Yash t 101 10:54, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Please don't ask RFA candidates if they are open to recall. It is divisive and unhelpful. Hipocrite ( talk) 13:37, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello. You have
a new message at Wikipedia:Editor review/Mr little irish's talk page.
Yash
t
101
15:11, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low
to High
, while for quality the scale goes from Low
to High
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 14:37, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
I wish you had shot me a note about writing a nom statement for you before you ran. However, I would have cautioned you against it. Despite being knowledgable and clueful, you're going to get a lot of (misplace, IMO) WP:NOTNOW votes, just because you don't have the thousands of edits RFA generally demands. It's a shame, because if you did get your count up to 5-7,000, you'd have a real shot at it. You do good work, and it's a shame that your RFA (barring any serious-serious changes in heart) will be unsuccessful. You will have my support, however. Achowat ( talk) 15:39, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, Mr Little Irish. I'm sorry that you've experienced so much opposition at your RfA, but I would strongly advise that you withdraw. You are certainly a good editor - as I said in my neutral rationale, I am certain that you will make a good administrator candidate in the future. However, your lack of experience is a problem (even for those who do not count edits, less than 1000 is simply too few). I recommend that you withdraw and spend the next few months getting experience at Wikipedia and enjoying editing. Continue the good work you do (and it is good work - I do appreciate the useful comments you make at WP:PERM) and try to get some article work under your belt. Best of luck with whatever you decide to do, and please do ask me if you need any advice. ItsZippy ( talk • contributions) 19:57, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
I will more than likely withdraw but I am going to wait until tomorrow before I do so. Many editors are active overnight, from the US. I'm going to get as much feedback as I can from this experience, then I shall take all of it and use it to better my future within the project. Thank you guys for your wise words already. MrLittleIrish (talk) © 20:05, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for this. -- RA ( talk) 16:34, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
MLI, ol' buddy ol' chap! It seems as though a passing editor just left a message on Nightenbelle's talk page about inappropriate use of Rollback; seems like as good a time as any to drop in and do a little more work together. Achowat ( talk) 20:03, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
v/r - T P 12:51, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
v/r - T P 13:40, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
I have closed your RFA early as it was highly unlikely to succeed and I think you have received all the constructive feedback it was likely to generate. I hope you will not be too disheartened by the unsuccessful outcome and will consider reapplying once you have addressed the issues raised by those who opposed. I know the RFA process can be rather demoralising and trust you will keep in mind the positive comments that were made. Thank you for volunteering your time to help out on Wikipedia. WJBscribe (talk) 22:01, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 13:17, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Sorry to oppose in your RfA. Please take it opsitively. I saw your message on my tp. It is great to see that you havent given up... You are one of the few editors who have so less edits and have extraordinary grip on policies. You are the best of all in that. You'll be a great admin in future. I'd undoubtedly support you without even looking at your contributions if you go for it after good 10 months without coming in any disputes. Never let your spirits down my friend and all the best!
![]() |
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on User talk:Jasper Deng/IPv6. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 15:15, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Level Up episodes. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 16:16, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pittsburgh Passion. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 17:16, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Non-administrator observation. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 18:17, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 19:16, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Infobox film. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 20:15, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Hydraulic fracturing. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 21:15, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Public image of Mitt Romney. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 22:17, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Nathan2055 talk 22:45, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 23:15, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pakistan. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 00:15, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Someone said welcome already but anyhays, I'm in the WikiProject Music too, and I just wanted to say you can ask me for advice if any is needed. ××× BrightBlackHeaven( talk)××× 19:57, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Regarding pending changes/feedback, see User talk:RickK#Heh. and here. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 03:22, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
1. I see you've been posting your "questions" on a lot of user talkpages lately (
Sonia and
BrightBlackHeaven, to name a few). Don't post too many of them, though, otherwise you might look like you're
Canvassing.
2. I'm not sure if this is intentional or not, but the last part of your sig links to
Special:Contributions/Mr_little_Irish (with a capital I), which doesn't exist, but your username is
Special:Contributions/Mr_little_irish.
:| TelCo
NaSp
Ve :|
01:21, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, I know the system, and it was a damned mistake that sometimes tends to happen. Usually I create new sections with months and so, but sometimes when creating a new talk page I tend to forget it. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ( Contact) 08:24, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Just in case you didn't get my message. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 14:02, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Your use of {{REVISIONUSER}} on the top of the page won't work, as it only applies to the one doing the "revising" (i.e. editing) and so since you last edited the page, it only shows your name. But anyway, did you create most of the userboxes yourself? If so, you can post them at Wikipedia talk:Userboxes/New Userboxes. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 14:44, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Beat me to the rollback punch enough to warrant such an award Achowat ( talk) 13:54, 19 December 2011 (UTC) |
Users are allowed to remove comments and warnings from their own talk pages, as that is an acknowledgement that they have read them (see WP:DRC). Please stop edit-warring them back on with rollback, or it may be removed. Thank you. Reaper Eternal ( talk) 13:47, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello Mr little irish,
I think you may have been a bit quick to judge & warn
118.208.78.180 (
talk ·
contribs). The text they removed seems to me to be an unsourced BLPvio, added by
64.130.151.41 (
talk ·
contribs) with
this edit. Perhaps you could 'strike' your warning to 118.208.78.180? Regards,
220
of
Borg
11:57, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
Keep up the good work in fighting vandalism. If you make a mistake just try to put it right and move on. I should know I've made plenty. Don't be discouraged. Vrenator talk 16:46, 22 December 2011 (UTC) |
...
Rich
Farmbrough,
10:14, 12 January 2012 (UTC).
Hello O Irishman, thank you for your views, I appreciate it. I have left a comment just below your !vote, kindly go through it if you wish. (Also what tends to happen is that, over here, the edit count for Jan 2011 is quite large, and it puts all the other edit counts into perspective, so what may be seen as smaller bars, in fact constitute something like 500 edits each on an average). Of course, its your call in the end! Thanks, Lynch 7 11:38, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Hey there, Diminutive Hibernian, Esq., there is a discussion that may interest you at Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Re-formatting/Discussion#CVU Guideline Proposal. As one of the hardest working Anti-vandals that I've run into, I'm sure the Project would love to hear your imput. Cheers! Achowat ( talk) 15:45, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
You may have noticed over the past few days that the MOTD that you link to on your user page has simply displayed a red link. This is due to the fact that not enough people are reviewing pending MOTDs here. Please help us keep the MOTD template alive and simply go and review a few of the MOTDs in the list. That way we can have a real MOTD in the future rather than re-using ( This space for rent). Any help would be appreciated! – pjoef ( talk • contribs) 12:07, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The MOTD Barnstar | |
The MOTD Barnstar is awarded to Mr little irish for his invaluable contribution to our project, which was experiencing a period of extreme scarcity. Thank you from Motto of the day. – pjoef ( talk • contribs) 10:59, 13 March 2012 (UTC) |
Additional note: Hoping that you feel comfortable with us, we hope and desire that you will want to continue contributing to
our/your project. I personally think that if many of us contribute, then about ten minutes per week, by
reviewing the existing nominations, and eventually adding new nominations, should be more than enough to get the
project going! Once again, thank you from your
Motto of the day. –
pjoef (
talk •
contribs)
10:59, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
I updated my computer with new memory and new OS. Windows 7 is working okay but I'm not up to speed on it. So I look at the differences (from XP) sceptically. But I will persist with libraries. Thanks, Wanderer57 ( talk) 19:22, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello there! Your input is request at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy. You had commented on the re-formatting discussion at WP:CVU but have yet to comment on the progress done to implement a major change discussed during the reformatting discussion, namely the training for new anti-vandals. Any input would be appreciated, thank you. Cheers! Achowat ( talk) 19:28, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low
to High
, while for quality the scale goes from Low
to High
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 03:54, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
or
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
16:07, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for picking up my strike error, missed that one. Cheers GimliDotNet ( Speak to me, Stuff I've done) 18:54, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Mr little irish, there is nothing to be gained from continuing to press Malleus for information which he is not obligated in any way to give. Thank you. Drmies ( talk) 15:16, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
File:Spam with cans.jpeg | Y'know, just some Spam |
What goes around comes around. Achowat ( talk) 15:53, 24 April 2012 (UTC) |
Nom! I had Spam for breakfast. With egg and mushrooms. In a sandwich Nom! MrLittleIrish (talk) © 15:57, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
My diminutive hibernian friend, I noticed that a second Enrollee has added their name to the list, but not one has contacted hir about being hir instructor. Do you feel comfortable taking on that role? Achowat ( talk) 14:58, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello. You have
a new message at Achowat's talk page.
Achowat (
talk)
15:46, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi - thanks so much for reaching out to me, I'd love to be your student. It sounds quite interesting, really.. Just let me know what next my (our, whatever) next steps should be. Thanks so much! Theopolisme TALK 20:28, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Hiya. I would like to enroll. I've been reverting and patrolling for vandalism for about 2 years, but I just sit in CVN and check new pages- if there is a better/more efficient way I would love to learn about it. Nightenbelle ( talk) 13:32, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
There is a problem as when we click on contributions button, this is appearing: [1] Now it is up to you that will you change your preferences or will give me your password so that I can fix it for you?
I hope that you'll do it yourself. Thanks! Yash t 101 10:54, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Please don't ask RFA candidates if they are open to recall. It is divisive and unhelpful. Hipocrite ( talk) 13:37, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello. You have
a new message at Wikipedia:Editor review/Mr little irish's talk page.
Yash
t
101
15:11, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low
to High
, while for quality the scale goes from Low
to High
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 14:37, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
I wish you had shot me a note about writing a nom statement for you before you ran. However, I would have cautioned you against it. Despite being knowledgable and clueful, you're going to get a lot of (misplace, IMO) WP:NOTNOW votes, just because you don't have the thousands of edits RFA generally demands. It's a shame, because if you did get your count up to 5-7,000, you'd have a real shot at it. You do good work, and it's a shame that your RFA (barring any serious-serious changes in heart) will be unsuccessful. You will have my support, however. Achowat ( talk) 15:39, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, Mr Little Irish. I'm sorry that you've experienced so much opposition at your RfA, but I would strongly advise that you withdraw. You are certainly a good editor - as I said in my neutral rationale, I am certain that you will make a good administrator candidate in the future. However, your lack of experience is a problem (even for those who do not count edits, less than 1000 is simply too few). I recommend that you withdraw and spend the next few months getting experience at Wikipedia and enjoying editing. Continue the good work you do (and it is good work - I do appreciate the useful comments you make at WP:PERM) and try to get some article work under your belt. Best of luck with whatever you decide to do, and please do ask me if you need any advice. ItsZippy ( talk • contributions) 19:57, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
I will more than likely withdraw but I am going to wait until tomorrow before I do so. Many editors are active overnight, from the US. I'm going to get as much feedback as I can from this experience, then I shall take all of it and use it to better my future within the project. Thank you guys for your wise words already. MrLittleIrish (talk) © 20:05, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for this. -- RA ( talk) 16:34, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
MLI, ol' buddy ol' chap! It seems as though a passing editor just left a message on Nightenbelle's talk page about inappropriate use of Rollback; seems like as good a time as any to drop in and do a little more work together. Achowat ( talk) 20:03, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
v/r - T P 12:51, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
v/r - T P 13:40, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
I have closed your RFA early as it was highly unlikely to succeed and I think you have received all the constructive feedback it was likely to generate. I hope you will not be too disheartened by the unsuccessful outcome and will consider reapplying once you have addressed the issues raised by those who opposed. I know the RFA process can be rather demoralising and trust you will keep in mind the positive comments that were made. Thank you for volunteering your time to help out on Wikipedia. WJBscribe (talk) 22:01, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 13:17, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Sorry to oppose in your RfA. Please take it opsitively. I saw your message on my tp. It is great to see that you havent given up... You are one of the few editors who have so less edits and have extraordinary grip on policies. You are the best of all in that. You'll be a great admin in future. I'd undoubtedly support you without even looking at your contributions if you go for it after good 10 months without coming in any disputes. Never let your spirits down my friend and all the best!
![]() |
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on User talk:Jasper Deng/IPv6. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 15:15, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Level Up episodes. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 16:16, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pittsburgh Passion. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 17:16, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Non-administrator observation. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 18:17, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 19:16, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Infobox film. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 20:15, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Hydraulic fracturing. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 21:15, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Public image of Mitt Romney. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 22:17, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Nathan2055 talk 22:45, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 23:15, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pakistan. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 00:15, 3 May 2012 (UTC)