From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Speedy deletion of Real Life Ministries

A tag has been placed on Real Life Ministries, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Martijn Hoekstra ( talk) 23:57, 4 March 2008 (UTC) reply

April 2008

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Latter Rain Movement. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Mike Doughney ( talk) 18:25, 8 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to New Apostolic Reformation. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mike Doughney ( talk) 05:13, 10 April 2008 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Speedy deletion of Real Life Ministries

A tag has been placed on Real Life Ministries, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Martijn Hoekstra ( talk) 23:57, 4 March 2008 (UTC) reply

April 2008

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Latter Rain Movement. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Mike Doughney ( talk) 18:25, 8 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to New Apostolic Reformation. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mike Doughney ( talk) 05:13, 10 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook