You're relatively new to editing here so let me explain how wikipedia works. Being bold with edits is fine but if you change a long-standing fact and it is reverted, you must stop re-reverting and bring it to the talk page to convince others your version is correct. Please self-revert your edit now and bring it to talk. Thanks. Fyunck(click) ( talk) 09:35, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Margaret Court, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. this was already explained to you by multiple editors
Fyunck(click) (
talk)
19:04, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Please stop
making disruptive edits, as you did at
Margaret Court.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Looks like the same type of removal that was done 5 years ago from the same editor. The info has been checked and confirmed per the Australian Open Fyunck(click) ( talk) 23:36, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at 2018 BNP Paribas Open – Women's Singles shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PrimeHunter ( talk) 16:18, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Mouchatm. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
You're relatively new to editing here so let me explain how wikipedia works. Being bold with edits is fine but if you change a long-standing fact and it is reverted, you must stop re-reverting and bring it to the talk page to convince others your version is correct. Please self-revert your edit now and bring it to talk. Thanks. Fyunck(click) ( talk) 09:35, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Margaret Court, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. this was already explained to you by multiple editors
Fyunck(click) (
talk)
19:04, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Please stop
making disruptive edits, as you did at
Margaret Court.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Looks like the same type of removal that was done 5 years ago from the same editor. The info has been checked and confirmed per the Australian Open Fyunck(click) ( talk) 23:36, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at 2018 BNP Paribas Open – Women's Singles shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PrimeHunter ( talk) 16:18, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Mouchatm. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)