Morefactswiki ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Wow, I'm replying to someone on /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Help_desk#Copyright for what i'm looking for and then some random person did a "blocked indefinitely" and made claims against me. This person is really an asshole. I'm editing an article and then there's a "copyright" problem and then we have all this trouble. I wanted to see where on wikipedia it specifically says copyright is any part of a work or text, and not the entire whole, and then someone out of nowhere "blocked indefinitely". What is this? This is terrible. Why can't any editors know where wikipedia specifically says that? How in the world can editors not ask to see that 'copyright' is any part of a work when that's the case for artwork, music and anything else. That's such a fair question, and then someone just "blocked indefinitely". This is so unreasonable "blocked indefinitely" for basically nothing, why is this even allowed Morefactswiki ( talk) 15:53, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Calling someone an asshole is enough to get you blocked in and of itself. That you chose to do that in an unblock request tells me that it would be a very bad idea to unblock you. Girth Summit (blether) 16:41, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Someone randomly changed the work I did when I was in the middle of editing??? Is that normal on wikipedia that no editors and improve anything?
![]() | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
Someone said some text was copyrighted. Copyright is usually the whole artwork or work, not a piece or portion of the text. Are there any copyright experts or anywhere to ask or anything?
Also they didnt even delete just the 'copyright' part, they deleted everything, and I was in the middle of editing and didn't even get to finish.
Hello, Morefactswiki. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on the page
Paula White, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. firefly ( t · c ) 14:12, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello Morefactswiki! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid
copyright and
plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. (copied from https://www.speakersassociates.com/speaker/paula-white/) Thank you. firefly ( t · c ) 14:21, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Jauerback
dude?/
dude.
15:38, 12 March 2022 (UTC)This is the worst person ever. Unbelievable.
If you want to import text that you have found elsewhere or that you have co-authored with others, you can only do so if it is available under terms that are compatible with the CC BY-SA license. You do not need to ensure or guarantee that the imported text is available under the GNU Free Documentation License, unless you are its sole author. Furthermore, please note that you cannot import information which is available only under the GFDL. In other words, you may only import text that is (a) single-licensed under terms compatible with the CC BY-SA license or (b) dual-licensed with the GFDL and another license with terms compatible with the CC BY-SA license. If you are the sole author of the material, you must license it under both CC BY-SA and GFDL.
— {{u| Bsoyka}} talk 16:24, 12 March 2022 (UTC)All creative works are copyrighted, by international agreement, unless either they fall into the public domain or their copyright is explicitly disclaimed. Generally, Wikipedia must have permission to use copyrighted works.
that is crazy this person just blocked indefinitely
for no good reason, and for everyone here, that is really crazy. how are ppl even allowed to do that on wikipedia thats unbelievable
Yes, you insulted multiple experienced Wikipedians just because you don’t quite understand how copyright works online. — {{u| Bsoyka}} talk 16:44, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Block message:
original block message
Decline reason: I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:11, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Morefactswiki ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Wow, I'm replying to someone on /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Help_desk#Copyright for what i'm looking for and then some random person did a "blocked indefinitely" and made claims against me. This person is really an asshole. I'm editing an article and then there's a "copyright" problem and then we have all this trouble. I wanted to see where on wikipedia it specifically says copyright is any part of a work or text, and not the entire whole, and then someone out of nowhere "blocked indefinitely". What is this? This is terrible. Why can't any editors know where wikipedia specifically says that? How in the world can editors not ask to see that 'copyright' is any part of a work when that's the case for artwork, music and anything else. That's such a fair question, and then someone just "blocked indefinitely". This is so unreasonable "blocked indefinitely" for basically nothing, why is this even allowed Morefactswiki ( talk) 15:53, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Calling someone an asshole is enough to get you blocked in and of itself. That you chose to do that in an unblock request tells me that it would be a very bad idea to unblock you. Girth Summit (blether) 16:41, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Someone randomly changed the work I did when I was in the middle of editing??? Is that normal on wikipedia that no editors and improve anything?
![]() | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
Someone said some text was copyrighted. Copyright is usually the whole artwork or work, not a piece or portion of the text. Are there any copyright experts or anywhere to ask or anything?
Also they didnt even delete just the 'copyright' part, they deleted everything, and I was in the middle of editing and didn't even get to finish.
Hello, Morefactswiki. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on the page
Paula White, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. firefly ( t · c ) 14:12, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello Morefactswiki! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid
copyright and
plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. (copied from https://www.speakersassociates.com/speaker/paula-white/) Thank you. firefly ( t · c ) 14:21, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Jauerback
dude?/
dude.
15:38, 12 March 2022 (UTC)This is the worst person ever. Unbelievable.
If you want to import text that you have found elsewhere or that you have co-authored with others, you can only do so if it is available under terms that are compatible with the CC BY-SA license. You do not need to ensure or guarantee that the imported text is available under the GNU Free Documentation License, unless you are its sole author. Furthermore, please note that you cannot import information which is available only under the GFDL. In other words, you may only import text that is (a) single-licensed under terms compatible with the CC BY-SA license or (b) dual-licensed with the GFDL and another license with terms compatible with the CC BY-SA license. If you are the sole author of the material, you must license it under both CC BY-SA and GFDL.
— {{u| Bsoyka}} talk 16:24, 12 March 2022 (UTC)All creative works are copyrighted, by international agreement, unless either they fall into the public domain or their copyright is explicitly disclaimed. Generally, Wikipedia must have permission to use copyrighted works.
that is crazy this person just blocked indefinitely
for no good reason, and for everyone here, that is really crazy. how are ppl even allowed to do that on wikipedia thats unbelievable
Yes, you insulted multiple experienced Wikipedians just because you don’t quite understand how copyright works online. — {{u| Bsoyka}} talk 16:44, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Block message:
original block message
Decline reason: I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:11, 12 March 2022 (UTC)