![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
Good to see you around a bit, even if still on Wikibreak; you've been missed. Hesperian 11:36, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Heads up twenty days early? Wow a lots happened in the time youve been off - the test for a start! Trust all is well - I've got through non AWB 10,000 edits now - mainly tagging Indonesian stubs of dubious quality :) SatuSuro 02:07, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Zetasport.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{ Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:29, 7 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. cohesion 17:29, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Zeta.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{ Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:29, 7 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. cohesion 17:29, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm back. — Moondyne 07:51, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Grateful if you could cast you eyes over this. Some fauna articles are named with common names and other scientific. Flora seems more consistent, but not always so. Is there a convention on this?
PS: I'm easing my way back in. Cheers. — Moondyne 07:47, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
I saw this on your front page and commented (and rated) on its talk. I see now it has at least one peer review. Agree wtih Hesp on exceptional quality of single edit p. But I'm here to get a new image for WP:WA. Regards Fred 17:56, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
If you did that to bellevue railway station (hmmm) - there are a large number of railway stations you might have to consider... you might check where order and I have been with rebecca earlier today - it might or might not interest you! SatuSuro 08:48, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
My rationale for doing this is that all of the other school are relevant to Aquinas College in that they are part of the PSA. And that they are a significant part of the sport article. If you wish to delete them, then do so, but i think the Trinity one needs to stay for sure. Thanks =) Smbarnzy 09:03, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey Moondyne =) you seem to be pretty with it, so i was wondering if you could review my article on Aquinas College, Perth at Wikipedia:Peer review/Aquinas College, Perth/archive4 , I have spent a considerable amount of time on this article and have been lacking in the feedback dept. Thanks =) Smbarnzy 12:53, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Yes, they are on the college website under "Enrolments" and then "Fees", i have all info - where am i going to put such information? this given the new article sections. Thanks Smbarnzy 14:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
I have just posted this on the WP Western Australia project talk page -
An editor has just ran into the railway station xxxx. Perth naming system - and started converting only to find the whole metro area station names have this moniker ( even the freo one which reads weird to say the least) - after the rather awkard re-name from a sock (which bothers me that such can happen) regarding all Perth arts - the issue that arises - what do we do with a whole heap of Perth railway stations? Are they in Perth? Western Australia? or are they stand alone unless the need to disambiguate occcurs? I eagerly await responses SatuSuro 13:29, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
SatuSuro 13:33, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Stop it; I'm blushing.
Would it be a violation of POINT if I re-rooted the entire lattice at Category:Aquinas College, Perth just to see what it looked like?
Hesperian 04:20, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Wesley recent edit has removed a tag and done nothing about it - could you please do the honours? SatuSuro 09:40, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
FYI :
I also added comment above and at dryandra. Fred 19:11, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
A few wishlists for your new year! Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 02:24, 12 January 2007 (UTC) User:Blnguyen/CWC Advert
Is a team an "it" or a "they" [1]? — Moondyne 11:12, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
The image [ | Justice_Day_Picture.jpg]you markes as a possible unfree image could very well be a photo taken by sm barnzy as him and myself are both students attending the school. Students such as myself and possibly him are often taking pictures on behalf of the school. One example is in the 2006 school annual which includes pictures taken by myself. I cannot at all confirm that this image is smbarnzy's own work however I beleive there is an extremely high chance of the image genuinely being his.
I would appreciate your understanding and would ask you to rethink your descition and possibly remove the tag if you belive this would be appropriate.
sincerely
symode09 06:29, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
I seem to have memories of previous and the footwork both creating cats to do with wa govt - I might have confused the users - but I think there is a need for something on the wa project talk to nut out the possibility of dupe cats re govt. I could be wrong. SatuSuro 09:37, 13 January 2007 (UTC) Also I think soundbloke needs to be on an admins watch :) SatuSuro 10:34, 13 January 2007 (UTC) Symodes and Fancyfootworks contrib pages should have clues both within the last two months i think SatuSuro 10:39, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2007/January/12 thank god rebeccas around - shes been maintaining a strong and steady stance on the delete/absorb railway station stubs issue as well SatuSuro 04:02, 14 January 2007 (UTC) There in lies the rub - its the heat that brings in the shakespearian mode of speech while the tv and ac are running fast in the background - you never know! Eternal vigilance in this is not enough, sigh.... SatuSuro 04:19, 14 January 2007 (UTC) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Places_of_local_interest#Railway_Stations is the other one - slow drawn out and wordy SatuSuro 04:25, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Ta. My problem is if that it goes through the hundreds of indonesia geography stubs that are tagged as such with the damned category notice - I think I'd need a lot of counselling!!!! SatuSuro 10:02, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
I am sure liam was at wait/curtin doing an english course (or at least part of it when he was v young - ie straight from school - but I might be wrong... SatuSuro 13:30, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
I realise some names can aggravate - please accept my apology - this might be amisfire but:
Most of these were very average quality but it might be worth trawling henrietta - this was quick grab SatuSuro 14:11, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 3 | 15 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:59, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
First let me apologize to my lateness in response. I assure you, I do not run from confrontations and this is necessary to be resolved.
SatuSuro, what you need to do to and where you need to go to have an argument about this is to come on to my talk page, which you have done. Perhaps it was not still going, just running faster than your list could be updated. The machine is not to blame, I am. However, I would never choose disrupt and annoy. I only seek to edit for improvement.
Thankyou for your time, patience and concern. If there is any more that must be said or done, show no hesitations in contacting me. Regards, Dfrg.ms c 1 . 2 . Editor Review 06:02, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
You may be interested in the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Template:Admin_100b_and_others, as it refers to one of your userboxes. Proto:: ► 14:14, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Glenn robbins.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Tragic Baboon 18:32, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey moondyne,
Do you beleive that the image on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Aquinas_Blazer.jpeg is appropriate? I do not see the use of it and how wikipedia has to advantage from having it symode09 01:16, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Yet another good article idea; Pearling in Western Australia.
I read this the other day in an ABC book citing Reynolds and Stannage about the missing history of pearling.
Can some of thiss work its way into article? Thanks moondyne. Fred 17:45, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
I will have a go if you don't think the ref is 'secondary source'? He is usually Ok, but the prose is a bit heavy handed sometimes, but not as much as Pilger, say. Ta for encouragement, such an important industry has probably sought to suppress the shameful aspects of history. I think Diamonds suffered from bad press at one stage. Lives per carat and all that. Fred 10:19, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Happens to the best of us. Have a look at my edits around midnight. Orderinchaos78 08:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Welcome back BTW :) I'm working on Hamersley atm - see my comments/questions on Hesperian's talk page (to avoid talk spamming :) Orderinchaos78 04:27, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
I suppose I should say welcome, but to what I am not very sure... SatuSuro 11:31, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
I was wondering if you could remove this Aquinas College Perth management structure article, as i have merged the salvagaable info into the main article of Aquinas College, Perth as per the AfD debate etc etc? Thanks Smbarnzy 12:01, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
i appears that i have screwed up this page Aquinas College, Perth badly, if you go to edit the page - you can see all of the info including stuff on middle, senior school, sports, and all that stuff in the Student life section, and then on the article, you cant see it? all i have done is added loads of references and that sort of stuff, can you help? thanks Smbarnzy 15:28, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Extract from Talk Page of ACP:
I think you were right the first time, regarding the cost of town hall. Converted to when? A bargain, if current prices?! Fred 12:39, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 4 | 22 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
Wikipedia modifies handling of "nofollow" tag | WikiWorld comic: "Truthiness" |
News and notes: Talk page template, milestones | Wikipedia in the News |
Features and admins | The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:37, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
To save you $1.20 :) Orderinchaos78 15:22, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for helping make sure everything is done properly :) . - BMan1113VR 19:06, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
I have removed the {{ prod}} tag from George Brand, which you proposed for deletion. I am leaving this message here to notify you about it.
The article does describe Brand as rising above the convict class, which was very unusual for the time. Convictism was a highly significant part of the social, financial and political development of the state and individuals like Brand were quite unusual and notable because of this. A student of Western Australian history would describe the class separation as important when just under 10,000 convicts were transported to the colony during a 18 year period when the total population increased five fold. I certainly wouldn't argue for bio's on every convict, but as said, Brand was unusual. If you still feel the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{ prod}} template back to it. Instead, feel free to list the article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Moondyne ( talk • contribs) 01:42, 25 January 2007 (UTC).
Does that mean someone should welcome you to the australian project? .... :) SatuSuro 09:39, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Definitely not a locality - should be merged into Forrestfield (it is a significant facility but probably not worthy of an article - see [2]) - On checking Forrestfield I note it's in fact already there. Orderinchaos78 04:06, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
-- Yomangani talk 08:39, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Been on too long again today - answered on my own talk page again - It was Bunbury and a very very quick trip to just short of Cape Leeuwin - I now have digital images for St Allouarn Islands/Cape Leeuwin Islands - at Bunb ury a huge number of town shots from the hills - and a whole range of the old harbour and the new harbour and the lechenault cut taken from the boat - from the swimming with the dolphins cruise in koombana bay (it was so nice and cold in the water even with wetsuits on) as well as a whole lot of rushed shots of parts of the bunbury to augusta highway - as well as the flinders bay railway station site where I copied the whole of the historical society display about flinders bay jetty and In the deli/cafe on the wall there is, wait for it - a photo of me at about 1 year old in a pram in front of the post office bei ng pushed by the post mistress of 1952 - but thats a longer off wiki story.... go on which number is your DYK? SatuSuro 12:16, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for adding wa=yes to batavia. Is it protected, I was having problems. I invited (the) Mike Dash to have another look. You can raid my wine cellar anytime, Moondyne. Fred 12:33, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey just followed your fixing it - I think we need to let the others know too...:) SatuSuro 01:15, 29 January 2007 (UTC) Ta - I think section 7 and 12.2 should be cross referenced in some way what do you think? SatuSuro 01:34, 29 January 2007 (UTC) Glad to see at least one vegemite is not fessed about anything - have been in the demilitarised (ironic) zone for a few days - enough flak for a years editing it feels like, anyways one plods on into real life :) Maybe I hadnt properly explained the issue from yesterday - I thought if an author of a book that writes up a summary of the book on the wikipedia page or article with the same name that that consititutes conflict of interest? SatuSuro 01:46, 29 January 2007 (UTC) Also youre not shy - there is as the meaning of life on your user page! (dyk number that is) SatuSuro 01:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
and so on (probably gone to sleep by now eh? SatuSuro 05:34, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
The new WA map is fascinating. I vaguely recall something of this proposal. I never knew of a map. On the subject of libraries and images, have any major australian collections been released with a suitable copyright. Do you know if it worth asking LISWA for images or generally a waste of time. Fred 09:51, 29 January 2007 (UTC) So can I upload pre'55 photos and paintings of Rischbieth I have found? I am starting draft. - Fred
All my hard work wasted! (not really) Thanks for the guidance :) — Moondyne 14:00, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 5 | 29 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 18:10, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
379. Hesperian 00:42, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
I notice some of these things turn up at wikispecies, are links there ok. Come across any tucker out here. - Fred
<-
The interest is definitely there. Maybe I need to read a primer of taxonomical conventions because it's just about Japanese to me at this time. —
Moondyne 04:31, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Like,
— Moondyne 04:47, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Good to catch up again - I realised I had a number of conversations I had wanted to have - didnt get around to it - will try email later in weekend SatuSuro 07:24, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Adding to list - it looks like a dubious list to me - but i suppose its to gather in ones that wont have separate articles about them... another dubious is the forrest place and chase separate arts - what do you think? I just asked gnang As welll Satu Suro 14:21, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
I have placed the talk page items on the subject talk page - Satu Suro 09:15, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Ta - out now - buzzers quieter - gotts be dads taxi off for a few hours at least. Thanks for help Satu Suro 07:06, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
[discussion moved to Template talk:Independent schools in Perth, Western Australia] — Moondyne 12:13, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 6 | 5 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:19, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
I gotta get off now - but I think the distinction is clear that we have either the phone book or the government website to distinguish between the two types - cheers Satu Suro 01:56, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Any resolution to the issues anywhere I might have missed at all re the template? Satu Suro 04:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
That you are not buying into the different uses of the word, - however at that indicated 'to do' item - the people who work at that 'to do' had me laughing - I used to share a house with one, have the low down on two earlier partners of another, and have been employed by another.... sigh - I wouldnt even share on email of what I think of one of them - but the other two - well thats another story.... Satu Suro 04:13, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
I tagged all the new categories and updated the watchlist. Right now, tagging can't happen automatically (and I don't think it really should, since there are sometimes mistakes). Anytime you want me to retag though, just leave a note on my talk page, and I'll take care of it. Ingrid 16:24, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Rot. Will need to reverse engineer your table format - have some issues in some of my west coast tas arts would improve if I could get the hang... Satu Suro 00:44, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 7 | 12 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:23, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your pointing out! However, It was according to the map from the sunset coast official website, they ran the same ways just be drawn in different orientations, just let me know it you've any further subjection.-- Alfeewusy 08:47, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Munda Biddie Trail ... sigh, not with the enviro groups yet...
Satu
Suro 13:57, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, and welcome to the Biography WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of biographies.
A few features that you might find helpful:
There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Mocko13 22:19, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Where have you been? Are you not aware that there's an effort to ban me?
Hi Moondyne ... Thanks so much for your kind comments and support on the GWN AfD page. They were much appreciated. Kind regards, -- Greatwalk 00:22, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
has some good refs on the bold park area - not the reservoir specifically - will doyble check the most relevant later - gott go... Satu Suro 01:30, 16 February 2007 (UTC) delayed - will try to get a handle later on about the cite thing - please feel free to move/edit my pickings - just getting them during this short extra time ive got... Satu Suro 02:01, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks; it was. It is nice to know that people are finally starting to believe me when I say they are welcome to edit in my user subspace. It makes my ongoing inability to get this draft finished slightly more forgiveable. Hesperian 02:45, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Thankyou for this. It was very much appreciated. :) Sarah 09:43, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Kind sir indeed! didja see - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Australian_Collaboration_of_the_Fortnight#Cricket_in_Australia ? Satu Suro 23:41, 16 February 2007 (UTC) OOps! well made point - um, err Satu Suro 04:08, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Good to see you come and check things out at this early hour.. ) Satu Suro 16:02, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
I half expected to see you here. She gave a terrific lecture and I bought her book which is full of juicy biographical stuff. — Moondyne 16:16, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Well that was good night from him, and good night from him, - nup had never heard of it before you mentioned it but all is solved at - henrietta - she has this intriguing take... http://henrietta.liswa.wa.gov.au/search/Xthomas+street+school&searchscope=1&Da=&Db=&p=&SORT=A/Xthomas+street+school&searchscope=1&Da=&Db=&p=&SORT=A/13%2C21%2C21%2CB/frameset&FF=Xthomas+street+school&searchscope=1&Da=&Db=&p=&SORT=A&19%2C19%2C Satu Suro 12:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Tricky - give me half an hour i have an idea... Satu Suro 12:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC) http://www.slwa.wa.gov.au/pdf/battye/pods/1949/0064.pdf i thought it would solve it - but no sign - so it must have had a postal address that wasnt actually thomas... nah have many things other than wikipedia to think about tommorow might be tues... Satu Suro 12:55, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. That would have to be the most blatant puff piece in the history of the universe. How can you write an encyclopaedia article about Bondy and fail to mention that he was convicted of fraud and sent to jail after presiding over the biggest corporate collapse in Australian history?! Absolutely astonishing. Hesperian 03:06, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
I put my comments on both talk pages after putting in the talk page header... i reckon a lot depends on whether the diocesan article is well expanded beyond what it is - otherwise either untouched - yes... Satu Suro 06:08, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Bomberphone - I have alerted longhair anmd hesp to this one - not sure whether who might be first to it - suspect it needs to be put down as hoax and rubbish Satu Suro 23:48, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 8 | 19 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:24, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
When you've got a spare five, can I trouble you to check your access to the external links in the references at Banksia epica, and remove any that you can't get to? I have online access to papers that are restricted to the general populace, so may have unknowingly linked to material that is generally inaccessible. Hesperian 22:57, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
looks like the clever little bunny needs to be invited into the hereafter of the ether - Satu Suro 01:54, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:100 most influential western australians.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok ☠ 02:25, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
I have an article for AfD - Guildford Grammar School Chapel - this is appears to be a joke of some sort? Smbarnzy 02:29, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
That is a rather disturbing message. My take on this is:
Hesperian 04:22, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
I must this is an unusual place to have a discussion about the deletion on an article or whether its sufficiently notiable. Even more remarkable is that Moondyne has been able to watch this occur without participating. Anyhow I'm closing this WP:AFD discussion with the result being keep as heritage listing is sufficient to establish notiability. Gnan garra 11:36, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
By the way, Moondyne, (using your talk page to talk to you - fancy that) I don't agree that not all heritage listed buildings are notable. What is the heritage assessment process if not a rigorous assessment of a building's notability? Hesperian 10:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Indeed - at the level that Daniel is talking about - that may be the case - but:-
My post above was made very specifically about the level of listing which the GGS chapel achieved - a state heritage listing.
There are up to 5 levels of heritage - what daniel is talking about is municipal heritage listings - at the bottom of the scale and I would never consider that level as having an criteria with equating to V or N anyways.
Wikipedia has insufficient information about the distinction for what it all means, and no article that delineates these distinctions and links issues between states of australia - a sad lack for a busy place... Satu Suro 07:59, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
If you're still interested. Hesperian 10:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
To be honest, i would like to see the PSA articles some upto a higher standard, i am a huge lover of the PSA, my reasoning was that it has been suggested that it be merged for an extremely long time (i cannot remember a time when it wasnt suggested to be merged) and i thought it was time someone did something, maybe i shouldnt take the wiki-law into my own hands =P apologies - but ive put my 3c on the talk page =) thanks for the pointer Smbarnzy 12:34, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Seeing that you are an active member of the WikiBiography Project, I was wondering if you would help lend a hand in helping us clear out the amount of [ unassessed articles] tagged with {{WPBiography}}. Many of them are of stub and start class, but a few are of B or A caliber. Getting a simple assessment rating can help us start moving many of these biographies to a higher quality article. Thank you! -- Ozgod 21:30, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Could you please do a once over of my work in 'swill' my second sandbox? I would really appreciate any suggestions/copyedits - as its opened more rabbit holes for me than i can cope with so i want to get it out before it fouls its nest :) Satu Suro 03:08, 24 February 2007 (UTC) funny I am sure i have known offspring of both the subjects of the unfinished premier articles - perth was small- no one ever realises... sigh Satu Suro 03:10, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Thank you very much - as a stub (!) planning to find more later about both the manjimup and bauxite thingsies - appreciate the tick ! Satu Suro 03:36, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Of course, but Sats wants an email 'to and fro' re. this. I will put you on cc. Cheers - Fred 13:36, 24 February 2007 (UTC) P.S. I will look at your contrib in a mo. - Fred
Dear Moondyne, You have blocked me from editing. I was the person (IP address) who inserted the phrase "reference needed" because the list of common German surnames, when I viewed it, had the surname "Hitler" in the number one spot (with a percentage of 0.95). I even clicked on the name as it linked to the Hitler Wikipediea entry. It has since been changed to "Muller". Since I have been blocked, please (presumably you have some sort of power to do this -it's quite simple I'm told) remove my comment as I don't doubt Mueller is the most common name; and please don't call me a vandal.
Thanking you R—Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.50.143.20 ( talk • contribs)
I wanted you to weigh into the debate on Talk:Aquinas College, Perth about the establishment of the college. Thanks Smbarnzy 07:07, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
I have been to AUDA's website to find information in regards to why there domain names were removed. However there is no information there. An article and promotion of Renai Lemai is irrelevant and unless you can provide a reference from AUDA i'd suggest you stop adding spam links AustralianTraveller 21:46, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion of ZDNet. Where's the information from AUDA.org.au? If this actually happened as stated there should be an AUDA release on this? AustralianTraveller 22:06, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
So you are saying that the press and the stories in it are reliable? Come off it mate. Find a reference to the information from AUDA.. I'm looking for one and can't find one. I don't care if the information stays there. ZDNET promotion and unverifiable content is a breech of policy. Encyclopedic content must be verifiable.. AustralianTraveller 22:10, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
That's because I fixed it, but lacked the courtesy to let you know.
Apologies to you, Gnangarra, Fred, SatuSuro and others for not acknowledging your recent messages. It feels like everyone wants a piece of me lately, so I've started ignoring/deferring people. Ironically, the people I start to ignore first, are those whom I can trust not to take offence, who invariably are the people most deserving of a response. Hesperian 02:04, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
I am sure there is a candidate for the 3rr rule just wanting attention there - -if youre about! Satu Suro 03:40, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
To your reply on Logo page;
I understand Wikipedia's policy. However, that link was suitable and relevant to the page (Logo) on which it was placed. I think some spammer had deleted that link as it was listed on that page for 4 months (I think). It would be useful for Wikipedia readers to get further information about Logos through this website, which is directly related with the topic. Flaminia 07:40, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
When blocking primary and secondary schools, don't hesitate to anon-block them for up to 6 months at a time. Please also use {{ schoolblock}} as your block reason or else you'll waste our time at unblock-en-l having to deal with confused and/or irate school staff. Thanks. -- Netsnipe ► 13:43, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
11pm tues email - if you can creep into my talkpage at this time of night - i need to share an issue quickly... 14:04, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
On B. i. last night while I was offline (indulging my other hobby). Nice to check in this morning and discover you stepping into the breach. Hesperian 23:13, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
I replaced the warnings. There was some issues with my reversion. After I unblocked them, they blanked the page. I reverted it but wanted to assume good faith on there part so just replaced A.B. identification of the IP address. It was apparently a msitake and I have replaced the warnings. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 00:30, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
I wish to dispute the validity of your claims with a higher level moderator.
I'm not sure if you are aware, but the current conversation has moved from iGames to the validity of the articles only current external link DMOZ which is of very poor quality. I have tried twice now to replace the link with a high quality categorized list of lan gaming centers and had it removed for what seems to be no reason at all other then yourself being bent on a warpath.
Please explain your reasoning as to why DMOZ should be linked in the article and why LanAtomic.com should not be linked in the article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mwarhead ( talk • contribs) 01:26, 28 February 2007 (UTC).
Perhaps you could lend a hand. I'm laughing too hard since I was searching google for info about non-cricket stuff for Harbhhajan and found that the Times of India has plagiarised mine and many other wiki cricket bios! It imported POV and OR from whoever wrote the article as well. Particularly amused that my newbie violations of OR on Irfan Pathan have resulted in tens and perhaps hundreds of millions of Indians thinking that he will captain India in the future. Hey I could become the new sensationalist Robert Craddock! Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 08:18, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi Moondyne
Just a question...
When I sign my posts with the four tidles, I do not have a link for Auroranorth. It appears as Auroranorth 11:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC), note no link. I took a look at Wikipedia:Sign_your_posts_on_talk_pages and that confirmed that there was something wrong. When you sign your reply, it'll have a link included to your username. Thanks - Auroranorth 11:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
If you cast your eyes over to this page, you'll notice that we've got around 100,000 articles to assess - so it's kind of a cut and paste job. Since the = no parameter does not show up, what is the harm in doing this? Aurora north 12:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
The March 2007 issue of the Biography WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Mocko13 21:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your comment. It's really lovely to hear that! You don't know how warm it makes me feel. Aurora north 11:57, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Template:Campaignbox al-Qaeda attacks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --— Indon ( reply) — 15:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
My apologies for soiling you work of art... there maybe those few who visit the page who need the obvious to be explained? Satu Suro 11:41, 2 March 2007 (UTC) OK - hey I'll take it offf. Hey sounds like I should find you some humour (I'll neede it picking number one from the mercedes post ball partey at 3e abloodym) Satu Suro 12:18, 2 March 2007 (UTC) We've been sprung! Satu Suro 12:24, 2 March 2007 (UTC) Reality (heheh your comments heheh) is a little more complex - he seems to be going to at least 5 balls this year, and he hasnt got around to getting his own suit yet... Satu Suro 12:37, 2 March 2007 (UTC) You got it Satu Suro 12:41, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Dryandra is no longer a current taxon. Every former Dryandra species is now a Banksia species, and should be referred to by its new name... except for Dryandra prionotes, which Mast and Thiele forgot to give a new name, so in the short term its current name is invalid :-(
There's a hell of a lot of work involved in this. I'll be p*ssed if Alex George overturns the transfer in a month or so.
The publication is largely a nomenclatural rather than taxonomic work. e.g. they've published Banksia ser. Spathulatae but haven't bothered to give a canonical list of the species that are in it. The taxonomy of Banksia is likely to be completely up in the air for a year or so, until someone gets around to publishing an updated arrangement. That's just fine with me, except that it makes it bloody hard to write about.
Hesperian 12:53, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
on gmail Satu Suro 13:31, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Richard Court has been edited by two diff redlink isps which have put rubbish in - the second has summarised my rvv as blatant vandalism - trust you can see we are dealing with red linkers who cotton on how to make it look like white is black Satu Suro 14:41, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks :) I'm now actively looking for my next target to get up there, although I'm going to spend a bit of time collaborating with DanielT5 on Wheatbelt articles in the near future - with me doing the facts and figures side of it and him doing the social and historical bits. We're still trying to decide what should go in shire and what in town though as the shires are actually more important than the towns out there - have had some ideas but am still thinking about it. Orderinchaos78 16:00, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi Moondyne - do you have any suggestions on a stub or non-existent article I could bring to FA without months of extensive research? Thanks, Aurora north 08:56, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
Good to see you around a bit, even if still on Wikibreak; you've been missed. Hesperian 11:36, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Heads up twenty days early? Wow a lots happened in the time youve been off - the test for a start! Trust all is well - I've got through non AWB 10,000 edits now - mainly tagging Indonesian stubs of dubious quality :) SatuSuro 02:07, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Zetasport.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{ Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:29, 7 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. cohesion 17:29, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Zeta.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{ Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:29, 7 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. cohesion 17:29, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm back. — Moondyne 07:51, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Grateful if you could cast you eyes over this. Some fauna articles are named with common names and other scientific. Flora seems more consistent, but not always so. Is there a convention on this?
PS: I'm easing my way back in. Cheers. — Moondyne 07:47, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
I saw this on your front page and commented (and rated) on its talk. I see now it has at least one peer review. Agree wtih Hesp on exceptional quality of single edit p. But I'm here to get a new image for WP:WA. Regards Fred 17:56, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
If you did that to bellevue railway station (hmmm) - there are a large number of railway stations you might have to consider... you might check where order and I have been with rebecca earlier today - it might or might not interest you! SatuSuro 08:48, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
My rationale for doing this is that all of the other school are relevant to Aquinas College in that they are part of the PSA. And that they are a significant part of the sport article. If you wish to delete them, then do so, but i think the Trinity one needs to stay for sure. Thanks =) Smbarnzy 09:03, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey Moondyne =) you seem to be pretty with it, so i was wondering if you could review my article on Aquinas College, Perth at Wikipedia:Peer review/Aquinas College, Perth/archive4 , I have spent a considerable amount of time on this article and have been lacking in the feedback dept. Thanks =) Smbarnzy 12:53, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Yes, they are on the college website under "Enrolments" and then "Fees", i have all info - where am i going to put such information? this given the new article sections. Thanks Smbarnzy 14:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
I have just posted this on the WP Western Australia project talk page -
An editor has just ran into the railway station xxxx. Perth naming system - and started converting only to find the whole metro area station names have this moniker ( even the freo one which reads weird to say the least) - after the rather awkard re-name from a sock (which bothers me that such can happen) regarding all Perth arts - the issue that arises - what do we do with a whole heap of Perth railway stations? Are they in Perth? Western Australia? or are they stand alone unless the need to disambiguate occcurs? I eagerly await responses SatuSuro 13:29, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
SatuSuro 13:33, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Stop it; I'm blushing.
Would it be a violation of POINT if I re-rooted the entire lattice at Category:Aquinas College, Perth just to see what it looked like?
Hesperian 04:20, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Wesley recent edit has removed a tag and done nothing about it - could you please do the honours? SatuSuro 09:40, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
FYI :
I also added comment above and at dryandra. Fred 19:11, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
A few wishlists for your new year! Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 02:24, 12 January 2007 (UTC) User:Blnguyen/CWC Advert
Is a team an "it" or a "they" [1]? — Moondyne 11:12, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
The image [ | Justice_Day_Picture.jpg]you markes as a possible unfree image could very well be a photo taken by sm barnzy as him and myself are both students attending the school. Students such as myself and possibly him are often taking pictures on behalf of the school. One example is in the 2006 school annual which includes pictures taken by myself. I cannot at all confirm that this image is smbarnzy's own work however I beleive there is an extremely high chance of the image genuinely being his.
I would appreciate your understanding and would ask you to rethink your descition and possibly remove the tag if you belive this would be appropriate.
sincerely
symode09 06:29, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
I seem to have memories of previous and the footwork both creating cats to do with wa govt - I might have confused the users - but I think there is a need for something on the wa project talk to nut out the possibility of dupe cats re govt. I could be wrong. SatuSuro 09:37, 13 January 2007 (UTC) Also I think soundbloke needs to be on an admins watch :) SatuSuro 10:34, 13 January 2007 (UTC) Symodes and Fancyfootworks contrib pages should have clues both within the last two months i think SatuSuro 10:39, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2007/January/12 thank god rebeccas around - shes been maintaining a strong and steady stance on the delete/absorb railway station stubs issue as well SatuSuro 04:02, 14 January 2007 (UTC) There in lies the rub - its the heat that brings in the shakespearian mode of speech while the tv and ac are running fast in the background - you never know! Eternal vigilance in this is not enough, sigh.... SatuSuro 04:19, 14 January 2007 (UTC) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Places_of_local_interest#Railway_Stations is the other one - slow drawn out and wordy SatuSuro 04:25, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Ta. My problem is if that it goes through the hundreds of indonesia geography stubs that are tagged as such with the damned category notice - I think I'd need a lot of counselling!!!! SatuSuro 10:02, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
I am sure liam was at wait/curtin doing an english course (or at least part of it when he was v young - ie straight from school - but I might be wrong... SatuSuro 13:30, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
I realise some names can aggravate - please accept my apology - this might be amisfire but:
Most of these were very average quality but it might be worth trawling henrietta - this was quick grab SatuSuro 14:11, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 3 | 15 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:59, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
First let me apologize to my lateness in response. I assure you, I do not run from confrontations and this is necessary to be resolved.
SatuSuro, what you need to do to and where you need to go to have an argument about this is to come on to my talk page, which you have done. Perhaps it was not still going, just running faster than your list could be updated. The machine is not to blame, I am. However, I would never choose disrupt and annoy. I only seek to edit for improvement.
Thankyou for your time, patience and concern. If there is any more that must be said or done, show no hesitations in contacting me. Regards, Dfrg.ms c 1 . 2 . Editor Review 06:02, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
You may be interested in the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Template:Admin_100b_and_others, as it refers to one of your userboxes. Proto:: ► 14:14, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Glenn robbins.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Tragic Baboon 18:32, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey moondyne,
Do you beleive that the image on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Aquinas_Blazer.jpeg is appropriate? I do not see the use of it and how wikipedia has to advantage from having it symode09 01:16, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Yet another good article idea; Pearling in Western Australia.
I read this the other day in an ABC book citing Reynolds and Stannage about the missing history of pearling.
Can some of thiss work its way into article? Thanks moondyne. Fred 17:45, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
I will have a go if you don't think the ref is 'secondary source'? He is usually Ok, but the prose is a bit heavy handed sometimes, but not as much as Pilger, say. Ta for encouragement, such an important industry has probably sought to suppress the shameful aspects of history. I think Diamonds suffered from bad press at one stage. Lives per carat and all that. Fred 10:19, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Happens to the best of us. Have a look at my edits around midnight. Orderinchaos78 08:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Welcome back BTW :) I'm working on Hamersley atm - see my comments/questions on Hesperian's talk page (to avoid talk spamming :) Orderinchaos78 04:27, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
I suppose I should say welcome, but to what I am not very sure... SatuSuro 11:31, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
I was wondering if you could remove this Aquinas College Perth management structure article, as i have merged the salvagaable info into the main article of Aquinas College, Perth as per the AfD debate etc etc? Thanks Smbarnzy 12:01, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
i appears that i have screwed up this page Aquinas College, Perth badly, if you go to edit the page - you can see all of the info including stuff on middle, senior school, sports, and all that stuff in the Student life section, and then on the article, you cant see it? all i have done is added loads of references and that sort of stuff, can you help? thanks Smbarnzy 15:28, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Extract from Talk Page of ACP:
I think you were right the first time, regarding the cost of town hall. Converted to when? A bargain, if current prices?! Fred 12:39, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 4 | 22 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
Wikipedia modifies handling of "nofollow" tag | WikiWorld comic: "Truthiness" |
News and notes: Talk page template, milestones | Wikipedia in the News |
Features and admins | The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:37, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
To save you $1.20 :) Orderinchaos78 15:22, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for helping make sure everything is done properly :) . - BMan1113VR 19:06, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
I have removed the {{ prod}} tag from George Brand, which you proposed for deletion. I am leaving this message here to notify you about it.
The article does describe Brand as rising above the convict class, which was very unusual for the time. Convictism was a highly significant part of the social, financial and political development of the state and individuals like Brand were quite unusual and notable because of this. A student of Western Australian history would describe the class separation as important when just under 10,000 convicts were transported to the colony during a 18 year period when the total population increased five fold. I certainly wouldn't argue for bio's on every convict, but as said, Brand was unusual. If you still feel the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{ prod}} template back to it. Instead, feel free to list the article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Moondyne ( talk • contribs) 01:42, 25 January 2007 (UTC).
Does that mean someone should welcome you to the australian project? .... :) SatuSuro 09:39, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Definitely not a locality - should be merged into Forrestfield (it is a significant facility but probably not worthy of an article - see [2]) - On checking Forrestfield I note it's in fact already there. Orderinchaos78 04:06, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
-- Yomangani talk 08:39, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Been on too long again today - answered on my own talk page again - It was Bunbury and a very very quick trip to just short of Cape Leeuwin - I now have digital images for St Allouarn Islands/Cape Leeuwin Islands - at Bunb ury a huge number of town shots from the hills - and a whole range of the old harbour and the new harbour and the lechenault cut taken from the boat - from the swimming with the dolphins cruise in koombana bay (it was so nice and cold in the water even with wetsuits on) as well as a whole lot of rushed shots of parts of the bunbury to augusta highway - as well as the flinders bay railway station site where I copied the whole of the historical society display about flinders bay jetty and In the deli/cafe on the wall there is, wait for it - a photo of me at about 1 year old in a pram in front of the post office bei ng pushed by the post mistress of 1952 - but thats a longer off wiki story.... go on which number is your DYK? SatuSuro 12:16, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for adding wa=yes to batavia. Is it protected, I was having problems. I invited (the) Mike Dash to have another look. You can raid my wine cellar anytime, Moondyne. Fred 12:33, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey just followed your fixing it - I think we need to let the others know too...:) SatuSuro 01:15, 29 January 2007 (UTC) Ta - I think section 7 and 12.2 should be cross referenced in some way what do you think? SatuSuro 01:34, 29 January 2007 (UTC) Glad to see at least one vegemite is not fessed about anything - have been in the demilitarised (ironic) zone for a few days - enough flak for a years editing it feels like, anyways one plods on into real life :) Maybe I hadnt properly explained the issue from yesterday - I thought if an author of a book that writes up a summary of the book on the wikipedia page or article with the same name that that consititutes conflict of interest? SatuSuro 01:46, 29 January 2007 (UTC) Also youre not shy - there is as the meaning of life on your user page! (dyk number that is) SatuSuro 01:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
and so on (probably gone to sleep by now eh? SatuSuro 05:34, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
The new WA map is fascinating. I vaguely recall something of this proposal. I never knew of a map. On the subject of libraries and images, have any major australian collections been released with a suitable copyright. Do you know if it worth asking LISWA for images or generally a waste of time. Fred 09:51, 29 January 2007 (UTC) So can I upload pre'55 photos and paintings of Rischbieth I have found? I am starting draft. - Fred
All my hard work wasted! (not really) Thanks for the guidance :) — Moondyne 14:00, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 5 | 29 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 18:10, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
379. Hesperian 00:42, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
I notice some of these things turn up at wikispecies, are links there ok. Come across any tucker out here. - Fred
<-
The interest is definitely there. Maybe I need to read a primer of taxonomical conventions because it's just about Japanese to me at this time. —
Moondyne 04:31, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Like,
— Moondyne 04:47, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Good to catch up again - I realised I had a number of conversations I had wanted to have - didnt get around to it - will try email later in weekend SatuSuro 07:24, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Adding to list - it looks like a dubious list to me - but i suppose its to gather in ones that wont have separate articles about them... another dubious is the forrest place and chase separate arts - what do you think? I just asked gnang As welll Satu Suro 14:21, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
I have placed the talk page items on the subject talk page - Satu Suro 09:15, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Ta - out now - buzzers quieter - gotts be dads taxi off for a few hours at least. Thanks for help Satu Suro 07:06, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
[discussion moved to Template talk:Independent schools in Perth, Western Australia] — Moondyne 12:13, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 6 | 5 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:19, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
I gotta get off now - but I think the distinction is clear that we have either the phone book or the government website to distinguish between the two types - cheers Satu Suro 01:56, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Any resolution to the issues anywhere I might have missed at all re the template? Satu Suro 04:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
That you are not buying into the different uses of the word, - however at that indicated 'to do' item - the people who work at that 'to do' had me laughing - I used to share a house with one, have the low down on two earlier partners of another, and have been employed by another.... sigh - I wouldnt even share on email of what I think of one of them - but the other two - well thats another story.... Satu Suro 04:13, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
I tagged all the new categories and updated the watchlist. Right now, tagging can't happen automatically (and I don't think it really should, since there are sometimes mistakes). Anytime you want me to retag though, just leave a note on my talk page, and I'll take care of it. Ingrid 16:24, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Rot. Will need to reverse engineer your table format - have some issues in some of my west coast tas arts would improve if I could get the hang... Satu Suro 00:44, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 7 | 12 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:23, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your pointing out! However, It was according to the map from the sunset coast official website, they ran the same ways just be drawn in different orientations, just let me know it you've any further subjection.-- Alfeewusy 08:47, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Munda Biddie Trail ... sigh, not with the enviro groups yet...
Satu
Suro 13:57, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, and welcome to the Biography WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of biographies.
A few features that you might find helpful:
There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Mocko13 22:19, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Where have you been? Are you not aware that there's an effort to ban me?
Hi Moondyne ... Thanks so much for your kind comments and support on the GWN AfD page. They were much appreciated. Kind regards, -- Greatwalk 00:22, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
has some good refs on the bold park area - not the reservoir specifically - will doyble check the most relevant later - gott go... Satu Suro 01:30, 16 February 2007 (UTC) delayed - will try to get a handle later on about the cite thing - please feel free to move/edit my pickings - just getting them during this short extra time ive got... Satu Suro 02:01, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks; it was. It is nice to know that people are finally starting to believe me when I say they are welcome to edit in my user subspace. It makes my ongoing inability to get this draft finished slightly more forgiveable. Hesperian 02:45, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Thankyou for this. It was very much appreciated. :) Sarah 09:43, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Kind sir indeed! didja see - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Australian_Collaboration_of_the_Fortnight#Cricket_in_Australia ? Satu Suro 23:41, 16 February 2007 (UTC) OOps! well made point - um, err Satu Suro 04:08, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Good to see you come and check things out at this early hour.. ) Satu Suro 16:02, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
I half expected to see you here. She gave a terrific lecture and I bought her book which is full of juicy biographical stuff. — Moondyne 16:16, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Well that was good night from him, and good night from him, - nup had never heard of it before you mentioned it but all is solved at - henrietta - she has this intriguing take... http://henrietta.liswa.wa.gov.au/search/Xthomas+street+school&searchscope=1&Da=&Db=&p=&SORT=A/Xthomas+street+school&searchscope=1&Da=&Db=&p=&SORT=A/13%2C21%2C21%2CB/frameset&FF=Xthomas+street+school&searchscope=1&Da=&Db=&p=&SORT=A&19%2C19%2C Satu Suro 12:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Tricky - give me half an hour i have an idea... Satu Suro 12:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC) http://www.slwa.wa.gov.au/pdf/battye/pods/1949/0064.pdf i thought it would solve it - but no sign - so it must have had a postal address that wasnt actually thomas... nah have many things other than wikipedia to think about tommorow might be tues... Satu Suro 12:55, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. That would have to be the most blatant puff piece in the history of the universe. How can you write an encyclopaedia article about Bondy and fail to mention that he was convicted of fraud and sent to jail after presiding over the biggest corporate collapse in Australian history?! Absolutely astonishing. Hesperian 03:06, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
I put my comments on both talk pages after putting in the talk page header... i reckon a lot depends on whether the diocesan article is well expanded beyond what it is - otherwise either untouched - yes... Satu Suro 06:08, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Bomberphone - I have alerted longhair anmd hesp to this one - not sure whether who might be first to it - suspect it needs to be put down as hoax and rubbish Satu Suro 23:48, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 8 | 19 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:24, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
When you've got a spare five, can I trouble you to check your access to the external links in the references at Banksia epica, and remove any that you can't get to? I have online access to papers that are restricted to the general populace, so may have unknowingly linked to material that is generally inaccessible. Hesperian 22:57, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
looks like the clever little bunny needs to be invited into the hereafter of the ether - Satu Suro 01:54, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:100 most influential western australians.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok ☠ 02:25, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
I have an article for AfD - Guildford Grammar School Chapel - this is appears to be a joke of some sort? Smbarnzy 02:29, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
That is a rather disturbing message. My take on this is:
Hesperian 04:22, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
I must this is an unusual place to have a discussion about the deletion on an article or whether its sufficiently notiable. Even more remarkable is that Moondyne has been able to watch this occur without participating. Anyhow I'm closing this WP:AFD discussion with the result being keep as heritage listing is sufficient to establish notiability. Gnan garra 11:36, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
By the way, Moondyne, (using your talk page to talk to you - fancy that) I don't agree that not all heritage listed buildings are notable. What is the heritage assessment process if not a rigorous assessment of a building's notability? Hesperian 10:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Indeed - at the level that Daniel is talking about - that may be the case - but:-
My post above was made very specifically about the level of listing which the GGS chapel achieved - a state heritage listing.
There are up to 5 levels of heritage - what daniel is talking about is municipal heritage listings - at the bottom of the scale and I would never consider that level as having an criteria with equating to V or N anyways.
Wikipedia has insufficient information about the distinction for what it all means, and no article that delineates these distinctions and links issues between states of australia - a sad lack for a busy place... Satu Suro 07:59, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
If you're still interested. Hesperian 10:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
To be honest, i would like to see the PSA articles some upto a higher standard, i am a huge lover of the PSA, my reasoning was that it has been suggested that it be merged for an extremely long time (i cannot remember a time when it wasnt suggested to be merged) and i thought it was time someone did something, maybe i shouldnt take the wiki-law into my own hands =P apologies - but ive put my 3c on the talk page =) thanks for the pointer Smbarnzy 12:34, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Seeing that you are an active member of the WikiBiography Project, I was wondering if you would help lend a hand in helping us clear out the amount of [ unassessed articles] tagged with {{WPBiography}}. Many of them are of stub and start class, but a few are of B or A caliber. Getting a simple assessment rating can help us start moving many of these biographies to a higher quality article. Thank you! -- Ozgod 21:30, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Could you please do a once over of my work in 'swill' my second sandbox? I would really appreciate any suggestions/copyedits - as its opened more rabbit holes for me than i can cope with so i want to get it out before it fouls its nest :) Satu Suro 03:08, 24 February 2007 (UTC) funny I am sure i have known offspring of both the subjects of the unfinished premier articles - perth was small- no one ever realises... sigh Satu Suro 03:10, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Thank you very much - as a stub (!) planning to find more later about both the manjimup and bauxite thingsies - appreciate the tick ! Satu Suro 03:36, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Of course, but Sats wants an email 'to and fro' re. this. I will put you on cc. Cheers - Fred 13:36, 24 February 2007 (UTC) P.S. I will look at your contrib in a mo. - Fred
Dear Moondyne, You have blocked me from editing. I was the person (IP address) who inserted the phrase "reference needed" because the list of common German surnames, when I viewed it, had the surname "Hitler" in the number one spot (with a percentage of 0.95). I even clicked on the name as it linked to the Hitler Wikipediea entry. It has since been changed to "Muller". Since I have been blocked, please (presumably you have some sort of power to do this -it's quite simple I'm told) remove my comment as I don't doubt Mueller is the most common name; and please don't call me a vandal.
Thanking you R—Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.50.143.20 ( talk • contribs)
I wanted you to weigh into the debate on Talk:Aquinas College, Perth about the establishment of the college. Thanks Smbarnzy 07:07, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
I have been to AUDA's website to find information in regards to why there domain names were removed. However there is no information there. An article and promotion of Renai Lemai is irrelevant and unless you can provide a reference from AUDA i'd suggest you stop adding spam links AustralianTraveller 21:46, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion of ZDNet. Where's the information from AUDA.org.au? If this actually happened as stated there should be an AUDA release on this? AustralianTraveller 22:06, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
So you are saying that the press and the stories in it are reliable? Come off it mate. Find a reference to the information from AUDA.. I'm looking for one and can't find one. I don't care if the information stays there. ZDNET promotion and unverifiable content is a breech of policy. Encyclopedic content must be verifiable.. AustralianTraveller 22:10, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
That's because I fixed it, but lacked the courtesy to let you know.
Apologies to you, Gnangarra, Fred, SatuSuro and others for not acknowledging your recent messages. It feels like everyone wants a piece of me lately, so I've started ignoring/deferring people. Ironically, the people I start to ignore first, are those whom I can trust not to take offence, who invariably are the people most deserving of a response. Hesperian 02:04, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
I am sure there is a candidate for the 3rr rule just wanting attention there - -if youre about! Satu Suro 03:40, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
To your reply on Logo page;
I understand Wikipedia's policy. However, that link was suitable and relevant to the page (Logo) on which it was placed. I think some spammer had deleted that link as it was listed on that page for 4 months (I think). It would be useful for Wikipedia readers to get further information about Logos through this website, which is directly related with the topic. Flaminia 07:40, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
When blocking primary and secondary schools, don't hesitate to anon-block them for up to 6 months at a time. Please also use {{ schoolblock}} as your block reason or else you'll waste our time at unblock-en-l having to deal with confused and/or irate school staff. Thanks. -- Netsnipe ► 13:43, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
11pm tues email - if you can creep into my talkpage at this time of night - i need to share an issue quickly... 14:04, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
On B. i. last night while I was offline (indulging my other hobby). Nice to check in this morning and discover you stepping into the breach. Hesperian 23:13, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
I replaced the warnings. There was some issues with my reversion. After I unblocked them, they blanked the page. I reverted it but wanted to assume good faith on there part so just replaced A.B. identification of the IP address. It was apparently a msitake and I have replaced the warnings. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 00:30, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
I wish to dispute the validity of your claims with a higher level moderator.
I'm not sure if you are aware, but the current conversation has moved from iGames to the validity of the articles only current external link DMOZ which is of very poor quality. I have tried twice now to replace the link with a high quality categorized list of lan gaming centers and had it removed for what seems to be no reason at all other then yourself being bent on a warpath.
Please explain your reasoning as to why DMOZ should be linked in the article and why LanAtomic.com should not be linked in the article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mwarhead ( talk • contribs) 01:26, 28 February 2007 (UTC).
Perhaps you could lend a hand. I'm laughing too hard since I was searching google for info about non-cricket stuff for Harbhhajan and found that the Times of India has plagiarised mine and many other wiki cricket bios! It imported POV and OR from whoever wrote the article as well. Particularly amused that my newbie violations of OR on Irfan Pathan have resulted in tens and perhaps hundreds of millions of Indians thinking that he will captain India in the future. Hey I could become the new sensationalist Robert Craddock! Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 08:18, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi Moondyne
Just a question...
When I sign my posts with the four tidles, I do not have a link for Auroranorth. It appears as Auroranorth 11:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC), note no link. I took a look at Wikipedia:Sign_your_posts_on_talk_pages and that confirmed that there was something wrong. When you sign your reply, it'll have a link included to your username. Thanks - Auroranorth 11:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
If you cast your eyes over to this page, you'll notice that we've got around 100,000 articles to assess - so it's kind of a cut and paste job. Since the = no parameter does not show up, what is the harm in doing this? Aurora north 12:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
The March 2007 issue of the Biography WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Mocko13 21:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your comment. It's really lovely to hear that! You don't know how warm it makes me feel. Aurora north 11:57, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Template:Campaignbox al-Qaeda attacks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --— Indon ( reply) — 15:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
My apologies for soiling you work of art... there maybe those few who visit the page who need the obvious to be explained? Satu Suro 11:41, 2 March 2007 (UTC) OK - hey I'll take it offf. Hey sounds like I should find you some humour (I'll neede it picking number one from the mercedes post ball partey at 3e abloodym) Satu Suro 12:18, 2 March 2007 (UTC) We've been sprung! Satu Suro 12:24, 2 March 2007 (UTC) Reality (heheh your comments heheh) is a little more complex - he seems to be going to at least 5 balls this year, and he hasnt got around to getting his own suit yet... Satu Suro 12:37, 2 March 2007 (UTC) You got it Satu Suro 12:41, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Dryandra is no longer a current taxon. Every former Dryandra species is now a Banksia species, and should be referred to by its new name... except for Dryandra prionotes, which Mast and Thiele forgot to give a new name, so in the short term its current name is invalid :-(
There's a hell of a lot of work involved in this. I'll be p*ssed if Alex George overturns the transfer in a month or so.
The publication is largely a nomenclatural rather than taxonomic work. e.g. they've published Banksia ser. Spathulatae but haven't bothered to give a canonical list of the species that are in it. The taxonomy of Banksia is likely to be completely up in the air for a year or so, until someone gets around to publishing an updated arrangement. That's just fine with me, except that it makes it bloody hard to write about.
Hesperian 12:53, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
on gmail Satu Suro 13:31, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Richard Court has been edited by two diff redlink isps which have put rubbish in - the second has summarised my rvv as blatant vandalism - trust you can see we are dealing with red linkers who cotton on how to make it look like white is black Satu Suro 14:41, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks :) I'm now actively looking for my next target to get up there, although I'm going to spend a bit of time collaborating with DanielT5 on Wheatbelt articles in the near future - with me doing the facts and figures side of it and him doing the social and historical bits. We're still trying to decide what should go in shire and what in town though as the shires are actually more important than the towns out there - have had some ideas but am still thinking about it. Orderinchaos78 16:00, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi Moondyne - do you have any suggestions on a stub or non-existent article I could bring to FA without months of extensive research? Thanks, Aurora north 08:56, 4 March 2007 (UTC)