Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to MonoMetro has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at MonoMetro. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Widr ( talk) 09:14, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to MonoMetro has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Why are you removing the infobox and the photo from the article? - Mike Rosoft ( talk) 08:13, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
For cases like this, your content should be sourced. See WP:Verifiability and WP:Reliable sources. Flyer22 Reborn ( talk) 00:48, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63. I noticed that you recently removed some content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 01:21, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Monometro. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 01:21, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:British Contract.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 ( t • c) 01:22, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Monometro. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Mecca Metro, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID). An additional conflict of interest may be with the article MonoMetro. Thank you. -- papageno ( talk) 04:23, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to MonoMetro has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at MonoMetro. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Widr ( talk) 09:14, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to MonoMetro has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Why are you removing the infobox and the photo from the article? - Mike Rosoft ( talk) 08:13, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
For cases like this, your content should be sourced. See WP:Verifiability and WP:Reliable sources. Flyer22 Reborn ( talk) 00:48, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63. I noticed that you recently removed some content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 01:21, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Monometro. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 01:21, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:British Contract.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 ( t • c) 01:22, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Monometro. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Mecca Metro, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID). An additional conflict of interest may be with the article MonoMetro. Thank you. -- papageno ( talk) 04:23, 27 January 2018 (UTC)