|
What's shakin'? -- kaoskastle ( Talk) 03:57, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi, and thanks! I was using Huggle and eventually I just gave up on visiting any other pages and just sat on my page hitting revert! RainbowOfLight Talk 06:19, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
As I just explained to user:Sandahl I'm not renaming articles, simply sorting the capitalisation of bot-generated article per WP:MOS because they stick out like sore thumbs in the list of bats article. If that creates problems elsewhere that I'm not aware of then please let me know, it seemed like the right thing to do on a boring evening. -- Timberframe ( talk) 22:41, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
I invite you to discuss this at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_bats#Taxonomy_and_the_use_of_capital_letters_in_common_names -- Timberframe ( talk) 10:31, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Hey I was reverting back to what the anon user wrote because I had a tough time understanding if what he wrote was vandalism or not. Cheers! Maxis ftw ( talk) 06:07, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Not vandalism, correct. But not better than the original.-- Matt ( talk) 06:10, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
I decided to get a regular Wiki as well, because editing my profile kicks ass on wikis, ^_^ Thanks again for all the editing tips back on ZW, its helpful. Zapdemon ( talk) 17:26, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Hey man, I hate to sound so stupid but, could you give me a link to the userboxes? I can't seem to find them. Sage of Cosmos ( talk) 20:52, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Thank you. This site is a lot different from ZW. The recent changes page makes me dizzy. I seem to perfer our quiet wiki. Sage of Cosmos ( talk) 07:26, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{ User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
You're very close to personal attack territory with your comments about MelanieN. Please dial it back. Acroterion (talk) 02:54, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
|
What's shakin'? -- kaoskastle ( Talk) 03:57, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi, and thanks! I was using Huggle and eventually I just gave up on visiting any other pages and just sat on my page hitting revert! RainbowOfLight Talk 06:19, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
As I just explained to user:Sandahl I'm not renaming articles, simply sorting the capitalisation of bot-generated article per WP:MOS because they stick out like sore thumbs in the list of bats article. If that creates problems elsewhere that I'm not aware of then please let me know, it seemed like the right thing to do on a boring evening. -- Timberframe ( talk) 22:41, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
I invite you to discuss this at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_bats#Taxonomy_and_the_use_of_capital_letters_in_common_names -- Timberframe ( talk) 10:31, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Hey I was reverting back to what the anon user wrote because I had a tough time understanding if what he wrote was vandalism or not. Cheers! Maxis ftw ( talk) 06:07, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Not vandalism, correct. But not better than the original.-- Matt ( talk) 06:10, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
I decided to get a regular Wiki as well, because editing my profile kicks ass on wikis, ^_^ Thanks again for all the editing tips back on ZW, its helpful. Zapdemon ( talk) 17:26, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Hey man, I hate to sound so stupid but, could you give me a link to the userboxes? I can't seem to find them. Sage of Cosmos ( talk) 20:52, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Thank you. This site is a lot different from ZW. The recent changes page makes me dizzy. I seem to perfer our quiet wiki. Sage of Cosmos ( talk) 07:26, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{ User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
You're very close to personal attack territory with your comments about MelanieN. Please dial it back. Acroterion (talk) 02:54, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.