|
Frankly, I agree with you that your edit to the University of Dhaka page apparently sourced material which may belong in the encyclopaedia. However, I would discuss it with User:Drmies since that editor originally removed the material. Let me know if you have any questions! :) - zfJames Please ping me in your reply on this page ( chat page , contribs) 20:47, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Mizan Al Mim. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:49, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
One of your recent additions has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. --
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
20:49, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Many of the sentences and paragraphs you continue to restore to
University of Dhaka are taken verbatim from other websites. This is in direct violation of Wikipedia's
copyright policy and cannot continue. You clearly have a conflict of interest with regard to the topic and should not be editing the article directly. Your inability to see how your edits are promotional is exactly why we have
policies and guidelines with regard to such conflicts. Please take the time to review the information provided to you here; if you continue to restore the disputed material you will likely be blocked from editing.--
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
21:16, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
21:27, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
|
Frankly, I agree with you that your edit to the University of Dhaka page apparently sourced material which may belong in the encyclopaedia. However, I would discuss it with User:Drmies since that editor originally removed the material. Let me know if you have any questions! :) - zfJames Please ping me in your reply on this page ( chat page , contribs) 20:47, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Mizan Al Mim. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:49, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
One of your recent additions has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. --
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
20:49, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Many of the sentences and paragraphs you continue to restore to
University of Dhaka are taken verbatim from other websites. This is in direct violation of Wikipedia's
copyright policy and cannot continue. You clearly have a conflict of interest with regard to the topic and should not be editing the article directly. Your inability to see how your edits are promotional is exactly why we have
policies and guidelines with regard to such conflicts. Please take the time to review the information provided to you here; if you continue to restore the disputed material you will likely be blocked from editing.--
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
21:16, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
21:27, 8 May 2018 (UTC)