I'm not sure what type of info you are looking for. I'd start at http://www.gov.mb.ca/tgs/map/index.html Hope that helps. Mersperto 23:47, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
--
TMF
Let's Go Mets -
Stats
21:04, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Please be aware that there's a discussion going on at WT:USRD right now about county highways. It looks like consensus is slowly forming that minor county routes are not notable. -- NORTH talk 21:45, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
-- howcheng { chat} 00:14, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Good work on the template. I've been cleaning up the naming conventions used in articles about Manitoba Highways. I applaud your additions to the article on Manitoba Provincial Trunk Highway 23. However, the accepted abbreviated naming convention for Provincial Trunk Highways is PTH and Provincial Roads is PR. I corrected the names in the Major Intersections table. If you have any questions, let me know. Mersperto 15:49, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
I also just noticed though that the template has two 21s in it... Mersperto 15:59, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
-- howcheng { chat} 21:57, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Per this tfd discussion, the user edit count boxes you have on your userpages are being removed and merged into {{ User contrib}}. I am unable to update yours due to how they're listed. Could you find a way to clean that up in a way that you'd like, yet would remove the transclusions to the templates we're removing? ^ demon [omg plz] 23:06, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
This form message is being sent to you either due to your membership with WikiProject Good Articles and/or your inclusion on the Wikipedia:Good article candidates/List of reviewers. A new drive has been started requesting that all members review at least one article (or more, if you wish!) within the next two weeks at GAC to help in removing the large backlog. This message is being sent to all members, and even members who have been recently reviewing articles. There are almost 130 members in this project and about 180 articles that currently need to be reviewed. If each member helps to review just one or two articles, the majority of the backlog will be cleared. Since the potential amount of reviewers may significantly increase, please make sure to add :{{ GAReview}} underneath the article you are reviewing to ensure that only one person is reviewing each article. Additionally, the GA criteria may have been modified since your last review, so look over the criteria again to help you to determine if a candidate is GA-worthy. If you have any questions about this drive or the review process, leave a message on the GAC talk page. -- Nehrams2020 00:55, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
![]()
The Pennsylvania State Highways Newsletter
| |
The first issue of the WP:PASH newsletter recognizes all of the good articles the project has produced. | |
To-do list
| |
|
![]() ![]() The Pennsylvania State Highways Newsletter | ||||||||||||
Issue 2 | 1 July 2007 | About the Newsletter | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
Job-related issues have forced me to change my mind; I won't be going. Sorry. -- Core desat 02:45, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
You might want to redirect or delete that, seeing as I created that article. Hurricanehink ( talk) 02:03, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
A new elimination drive of the backlog at Wikipedia:Good article candidates will take place from the month of July through August 12, 2007. There are currently about 130 articles that need to be reviewed right now. If you are interested in helping with the drive, then please visit Wikipedia:Good article candidates backlog elimination drive and record the articles that you have reviewed. Awards will be given based on the number of reviews completed. Since the potential amount of reviewers may significantly increase, please make sure to add :{{ GAReview}} underneath the article you are reviewing to ensure that only one person is reviewing each article. Additionally, the GA criteria may have been modified since your last review, so look over the criteria again to help you to determine if a candidate is GA-worthy. If you have any questions about this drive or the review process, leave a message on the drive's talk page. Please help to eradicate the backlog to cut down on the waiting time for articles to be reviewed.
You have received this message either due to your membership with WikiProject: Good Articles and/or your inclusion on the Wikipedia:Good article candidates/List of reviewers. -- Nehrams2020 03:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
I, Master son give you this TC barnstar for your hard work in maintaining and expanding WP:USRD and putting up with all the fun that goes along with it - staying strong through the best - and worst - of times |
master son
T -
C
02:55, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Few things:
I had no idea that was even you on my talk page; please fix your signature so we have some idea. As for a Cosme article, I really hope you would reconsider. If you must do something with the storm, could you just add the (little) impact to the season article? I didn't read what you and Chacor said, but the storm history has been menial, notability largely nonexistant, and impact very minor. If you really want to do a modern article, what about Man-yi? It's just that I doubt there's enough info out there, and (no offense) but I'm not sure you'd be able to write a good enough article with such little material. Hurricanehink ( talk) 16:31, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Are you so sure 1986 is a good idea? Why did you pick those four (random) hurricanes to have an article on? With only those, the nomination would automatically fail, per the first FT criterion. Wouldn't it make more sense to try and make the season a GA (or maybe, eventually FA)? Welcome back, though. Hope you had fun on your vacation (where'd you go, BTW). See you around. Hurricanehink ( talk) 22:56, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Perhaps start-up your IRC and join that way? master son T - C 03:17, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
What are your reasons and arguments for nominating Saskatchewan Highway 8 for deletion? Thank you. Ultraflame 23:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
I cannot find your talk page where I would look for newsletter subscribers, I am baffled today. I will remove it. I have no reason why you received it. Sorry about that. Most curious. SriMesh | talk 00:38, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
I need a complete dataset from the countries in question to create a map, including latitude/longitude of the sites. One would hope for enough to capture the distribution. I would think a couple dozen evenly dispersed around each country could be enough. Thegreatdr 01:45, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for reviewing the article- Geology of solar terrestrial planets. I was waiting for this moment for past few weeks. thanks again, Sushant gupta 16:09, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure what type of info you are looking for. I'd start at http://www.gov.mb.ca/tgs/map/index.html Hope that helps. Mersperto 23:47, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
--
TMF
Let's Go Mets -
Stats
21:04, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Please be aware that there's a discussion going on at WT:USRD right now about county highways. It looks like consensus is slowly forming that minor county routes are not notable. -- NORTH talk 21:45, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
-- howcheng { chat} 00:14, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Good work on the template. I've been cleaning up the naming conventions used in articles about Manitoba Highways. I applaud your additions to the article on Manitoba Provincial Trunk Highway 23. However, the accepted abbreviated naming convention for Provincial Trunk Highways is PTH and Provincial Roads is PR. I corrected the names in the Major Intersections table. If you have any questions, let me know. Mersperto 15:49, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
I also just noticed though that the template has two 21s in it... Mersperto 15:59, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
-- howcheng { chat} 21:57, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Per this tfd discussion, the user edit count boxes you have on your userpages are being removed and merged into {{ User contrib}}. I am unable to update yours due to how they're listed. Could you find a way to clean that up in a way that you'd like, yet would remove the transclusions to the templates we're removing? ^ demon [omg plz] 23:06, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
This form message is being sent to you either due to your membership with WikiProject Good Articles and/or your inclusion on the Wikipedia:Good article candidates/List of reviewers. A new drive has been started requesting that all members review at least one article (or more, if you wish!) within the next two weeks at GAC to help in removing the large backlog. This message is being sent to all members, and even members who have been recently reviewing articles. There are almost 130 members in this project and about 180 articles that currently need to be reviewed. If each member helps to review just one or two articles, the majority of the backlog will be cleared. Since the potential amount of reviewers may significantly increase, please make sure to add :{{ GAReview}} underneath the article you are reviewing to ensure that only one person is reviewing each article. Additionally, the GA criteria may have been modified since your last review, so look over the criteria again to help you to determine if a candidate is GA-worthy. If you have any questions about this drive or the review process, leave a message on the GAC talk page. -- Nehrams2020 00:55, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
![]()
The Pennsylvania State Highways Newsletter
| |
The first issue of the WP:PASH newsletter recognizes all of the good articles the project has produced. | |
To-do list
| |
|
![]() ![]() The Pennsylvania State Highways Newsletter | ||||||||||||
Issue 2 | 1 July 2007 | About the Newsletter | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
Job-related issues have forced me to change my mind; I won't be going. Sorry. -- Core desat 02:45, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
You might want to redirect or delete that, seeing as I created that article. Hurricanehink ( talk) 02:03, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
A new elimination drive of the backlog at Wikipedia:Good article candidates will take place from the month of July through August 12, 2007. There are currently about 130 articles that need to be reviewed right now. If you are interested in helping with the drive, then please visit Wikipedia:Good article candidates backlog elimination drive and record the articles that you have reviewed. Awards will be given based on the number of reviews completed. Since the potential amount of reviewers may significantly increase, please make sure to add :{{ GAReview}} underneath the article you are reviewing to ensure that only one person is reviewing each article. Additionally, the GA criteria may have been modified since your last review, so look over the criteria again to help you to determine if a candidate is GA-worthy. If you have any questions about this drive or the review process, leave a message on the drive's talk page. Please help to eradicate the backlog to cut down on the waiting time for articles to be reviewed.
You have received this message either due to your membership with WikiProject: Good Articles and/or your inclusion on the Wikipedia:Good article candidates/List of reviewers. -- Nehrams2020 03:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
I, Master son give you this TC barnstar for your hard work in maintaining and expanding WP:USRD and putting up with all the fun that goes along with it - staying strong through the best - and worst - of times |
master son
T -
C
02:55, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Few things:
I had no idea that was even you on my talk page; please fix your signature so we have some idea. As for a Cosme article, I really hope you would reconsider. If you must do something with the storm, could you just add the (little) impact to the season article? I didn't read what you and Chacor said, but the storm history has been menial, notability largely nonexistant, and impact very minor. If you really want to do a modern article, what about Man-yi? It's just that I doubt there's enough info out there, and (no offense) but I'm not sure you'd be able to write a good enough article with such little material. Hurricanehink ( talk) 16:31, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Are you so sure 1986 is a good idea? Why did you pick those four (random) hurricanes to have an article on? With only those, the nomination would automatically fail, per the first FT criterion. Wouldn't it make more sense to try and make the season a GA (or maybe, eventually FA)? Welcome back, though. Hope you had fun on your vacation (where'd you go, BTW). See you around. Hurricanehink ( talk) 22:56, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Perhaps start-up your IRC and join that way? master son T - C 03:17, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
What are your reasons and arguments for nominating Saskatchewan Highway 8 for deletion? Thank you. Ultraflame 23:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
I cannot find your talk page where I would look for newsletter subscribers, I am baffled today. I will remove it. I have no reason why you received it. Sorry about that. Most curious. SriMesh | talk 00:38, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
I need a complete dataset from the countries in question to create a map, including latitude/longitude of the sites. One would hope for enough to capture the distribution. I would think a couple dozen evenly dispersed around each country could be enough. Thegreatdr 01:45, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||||
Volume 1, Issue 11 | 18 August 2007 | About the Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Thanks a lot for reviewing the article- Geology of solar terrestrial planets. I was waiting for this moment for past few weeks. thanks again, Sushant gupta 16:09, 21 August 2007 (UTC)