|
Thanks for uploading Image:Hampton 009.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 22:17, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to wikipedia. If you need help, don't be shy to ask. You may ask me by leaving a message on my talk page. Bless sins ( talk) 21:19, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for your contribution. Just a small formatting point; comments on project and talk pages should be put at the bottom of the page rather than the top. HTH. TerriersFan ( talk) 16:41, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi! I'm not going to continue removing the POV template but I would appreciate an explanation of what needs to be corrected (in your opinion) in the article before it the tag can be removed. You may respond here, my talk page, or the article talk page. Thank you. Protonk ( talk) 13:17, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
There is no reason to make personal attacks on Wikipedia, as you have done here. Please refrain from attacking other editors. thank you. Protonk ( talk) 21:42, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia is the biggest boy on the block and many people use it without peeking under the hood to see how it's made. They should because underneath there are a bunch of privileged white boys bickering about articles. I think it's my duty to make changes that reflect the viewpoints of people who may agree with me. That means perhaps more 'criticism' of articles or articles that are counterpoints to ideas like 'Support Our Troops'. I've started a homelessness in Ottawa article. Why? Because these are the kind of articles that aren't' on Wikipedia and need to be. People write articles about their own city but even those are POV because they aren't willing to write about the social problems that occur there. Everyone has a bias. The problem is that Wikipedia is specifically written by people who have one particular bias. Many articles are removed because they aren't about things happening right this minute. That means there aren't articles like An injury to one is an injury to all from the IWW to pick one motto from the labour movement. There is a labour movement section but it's particularly crippled by the reactionary nerds on Wikipedia who just won't let things be and feel that they have to edit every article even if they don't know anything about its content. That's just part of the problem of Wikipedia. Everyone becomes an expert on something even though they probably aren't one.
I edit articles occasionally on Anarchopedia but besides being topics that aren't on Wikipedia getting hits (like Ottawa Panhandlers Union article) there is really no point. Everyone goes to Wikipedia so I would rather stay and fight here than run off and try to work somewhere else where the conditions and rules might be more fair. Although I create articles like Homeless in Ottawa and I'm thinking about other topics related to the labour movement, it won't be long before they're deleted. It's quite impossible to fight the Wikipedia admins who all have the privileged white boy bias. If they disagree with something they do delete your articles and as an ordinary user there is nothing you can do. This is probably the biggest problem in the cult of Wikipedia. MiltonP Ottawa ( talk) 07:47, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
No. I won't comply with that. It's bullshit and you know it. Consider it a political statement. If other people can make political statements on their user page then I believe I have every right to as well. I can call Wikipedians nerds, sociopaths and anything else I want on my talk page. I don't really consider it a threat to ban me either. You know as well as I do that it's quite easy to create another account. I think the goal is to create an encyclopedia but most encyclopedias aren't as biased and as poorly written as Wikipedia. Wikipedia in itself is an honourable idea but it's terribly run. The English version has a strong US bias and that needs to be removed. MiltonP Ottawa ( talk) 23:49, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Protonk ( talk) 00:04, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated An injury to one is an injury to all, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/An injury to one is an injury to all. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Arbiteroftruth ( talk) 00:49, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to
User talk:Sesshomaru. If your
vandalism continues, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Editors are at liberty to remove any comment or edit made to "their" userspace except certain templates. Reverting an editor at their talkpage is considered extremely uncivil, and is taken as deliberate vandalism. Do not make this mistake again.
LessHeard vanU (
talk)
19:08, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Please remember to
assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on
Denis Rancourt. A lack of
civility in discourse poisons the well, running the risk of damaging this entire project. --
Orange Mike |
Talk
13:29, 11 September 2008 (UTC)I.W.W. I.U. 660; Milw. G.O.B.; been a Wobbly since before you were born
I have posted a question at Wikipedia:Deletion review#Denis_Rancourt which you may be able to answer. Can you please return to that discussion to answer it? Stifle ( talk) 15:57, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
When you put up an article for PROD, please use {{ subst: prod}}. Please don't use {{ dated prod}} directly - there are details which you don't put in properly. For more information, please read Template:Dated prod/doc. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:32, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to
Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an
edit summary for your edits. Thank you.
DOUBLEBLUE (
talk)
18:24, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your work on this.
When proposing a merge, it is helpful to start the discussion on that article's Talk page. See Talk:Mort Goldman#Merge. I've taken the liberty of announcing this discussion in Wikipedia:Proposed mergers and Wikipedia:WikiProject Family Guy.
Neil Goldman (Family Guy), Joe Swanson and Pewterschmidt family could use the same treatment. / edg ☺ ☭ 15:11, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Denis Rancourt, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denis Rancourt. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TastyCakes ( talk) 17:26, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to
2009 has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the
sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thank you. --
IRP
☎
22:18, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution.
I don't care if you think it's useless. Discussing an alternate ending in Plot is not good writing. Btw, if you want to discuss it here then fine, don't duplicate it on my talk page. Alientraveller ( talk) 19:36, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Again? Please discuss on talk pages because as we all know, "Trivia" is such a generic term. An FA articles does not contain trivia lists. Alientraveller ( talk) 00:07, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Heads-up: You are a topic of discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive180#MiltonP Ottawa. — Erik ( talk • contrib) 01:07, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Please do not vandalize other user's pages, this includes moving their page to a different name. This will be your only warning in the matter. If you persist, you will be blocked from editing on Wikipedia. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 04:37, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
MiltonP Ottawa ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
CURE YOUR FUCKING ASPERGER'S. It's getting fucking annoying. Knock it off!
Decline reason:
Requests that swear are always declined. — J.delanoy gabs adds 02:21, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You have been accused of
sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the
notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at
Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/MiltonP Ottawa. Thank you.
EdJohnston (
talk)
17:18, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello,
I noticed that you edited a Kevin Smith or View Askew Productions related article. Wikipedia currently has a View Askew WikiProject which aims to improve all Kevin Smith and View Askew related articles. You are free to join or can explore what the project is about by clicking here. Here are some other good links to help you get started with Wikipedia:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
WikiGuy86 ( talk) 05:13, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:BlueseaQuebec.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:46, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Winner 42. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —the one you made with
this edit to
User:Fredmaack— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Winner 42
Talk to me!
23:13, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Hampton 009.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 22:17, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to wikipedia. If you need help, don't be shy to ask. You may ask me by leaving a message on my talk page. Bless sins ( talk) 21:19, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for your contribution. Just a small formatting point; comments on project and talk pages should be put at the bottom of the page rather than the top. HTH. TerriersFan ( talk) 16:41, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi! I'm not going to continue removing the POV template but I would appreciate an explanation of what needs to be corrected (in your opinion) in the article before it the tag can be removed. You may respond here, my talk page, or the article talk page. Thank you. Protonk ( talk) 13:17, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
There is no reason to make personal attacks on Wikipedia, as you have done here. Please refrain from attacking other editors. thank you. Protonk ( talk) 21:42, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia is the biggest boy on the block and many people use it without peeking under the hood to see how it's made. They should because underneath there are a bunch of privileged white boys bickering about articles. I think it's my duty to make changes that reflect the viewpoints of people who may agree with me. That means perhaps more 'criticism' of articles or articles that are counterpoints to ideas like 'Support Our Troops'. I've started a homelessness in Ottawa article. Why? Because these are the kind of articles that aren't' on Wikipedia and need to be. People write articles about their own city but even those are POV because they aren't willing to write about the social problems that occur there. Everyone has a bias. The problem is that Wikipedia is specifically written by people who have one particular bias. Many articles are removed because they aren't about things happening right this minute. That means there aren't articles like An injury to one is an injury to all from the IWW to pick one motto from the labour movement. There is a labour movement section but it's particularly crippled by the reactionary nerds on Wikipedia who just won't let things be and feel that they have to edit every article even if they don't know anything about its content. That's just part of the problem of Wikipedia. Everyone becomes an expert on something even though they probably aren't one.
I edit articles occasionally on Anarchopedia but besides being topics that aren't on Wikipedia getting hits (like Ottawa Panhandlers Union article) there is really no point. Everyone goes to Wikipedia so I would rather stay and fight here than run off and try to work somewhere else where the conditions and rules might be more fair. Although I create articles like Homeless in Ottawa and I'm thinking about other topics related to the labour movement, it won't be long before they're deleted. It's quite impossible to fight the Wikipedia admins who all have the privileged white boy bias. If they disagree with something they do delete your articles and as an ordinary user there is nothing you can do. This is probably the biggest problem in the cult of Wikipedia. MiltonP Ottawa ( talk) 07:47, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
No. I won't comply with that. It's bullshit and you know it. Consider it a political statement. If other people can make political statements on their user page then I believe I have every right to as well. I can call Wikipedians nerds, sociopaths and anything else I want on my talk page. I don't really consider it a threat to ban me either. You know as well as I do that it's quite easy to create another account. I think the goal is to create an encyclopedia but most encyclopedias aren't as biased and as poorly written as Wikipedia. Wikipedia in itself is an honourable idea but it's terribly run. The English version has a strong US bias and that needs to be removed. MiltonP Ottawa ( talk) 23:49, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Protonk ( talk) 00:04, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated An injury to one is an injury to all, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/An injury to one is an injury to all. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Arbiteroftruth ( talk) 00:49, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to
User talk:Sesshomaru. If your
vandalism continues, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Editors are at liberty to remove any comment or edit made to "their" userspace except certain templates. Reverting an editor at their talkpage is considered extremely uncivil, and is taken as deliberate vandalism. Do not make this mistake again.
LessHeard vanU (
talk)
19:08, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Please remember to
assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on
Denis Rancourt. A lack of
civility in discourse poisons the well, running the risk of damaging this entire project. --
Orange Mike |
Talk
13:29, 11 September 2008 (UTC)I.W.W. I.U. 660; Milw. G.O.B.; been a Wobbly since before you were born
I have posted a question at Wikipedia:Deletion review#Denis_Rancourt which you may be able to answer. Can you please return to that discussion to answer it? Stifle ( talk) 15:57, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
When you put up an article for PROD, please use {{ subst: prod}}. Please don't use {{ dated prod}} directly - there are details which you don't put in properly. For more information, please read Template:Dated prod/doc. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:32, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to
Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an
edit summary for your edits. Thank you.
DOUBLEBLUE (
talk)
18:24, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your work on this.
When proposing a merge, it is helpful to start the discussion on that article's Talk page. See Talk:Mort Goldman#Merge. I've taken the liberty of announcing this discussion in Wikipedia:Proposed mergers and Wikipedia:WikiProject Family Guy.
Neil Goldman (Family Guy), Joe Swanson and Pewterschmidt family could use the same treatment. / edg ☺ ☭ 15:11, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Denis Rancourt, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denis Rancourt. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TastyCakes ( talk) 17:26, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to
2009 has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the
sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thank you. --
IRP
☎
22:18, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution.
I don't care if you think it's useless. Discussing an alternate ending in Plot is not good writing. Btw, if you want to discuss it here then fine, don't duplicate it on my talk page. Alientraveller ( talk) 19:36, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Again? Please discuss on talk pages because as we all know, "Trivia" is such a generic term. An FA articles does not contain trivia lists. Alientraveller ( talk) 00:07, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Heads-up: You are a topic of discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive180#MiltonP Ottawa. — Erik ( talk • contrib) 01:07, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Please do not vandalize other user's pages, this includes moving their page to a different name. This will be your only warning in the matter. If you persist, you will be blocked from editing on Wikipedia. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 04:37, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
MiltonP Ottawa ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
CURE YOUR FUCKING ASPERGER'S. It's getting fucking annoying. Knock it off!
Decline reason:
Requests that swear are always declined. — J.delanoy gabs adds 02:21, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You have been accused of
sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the
notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at
Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/MiltonP Ottawa. Thank you.
EdJohnston (
talk)
17:18, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello,
I noticed that you edited a Kevin Smith or View Askew Productions related article. Wikipedia currently has a View Askew WikiProject which aims to improve all Kevin Smith and View Askew related articles. You are free to join or can explore what the project is about by clicking here. Here are some other good links to help you get started with Wikipedia:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
WikiGuy86 ( talk) 05:13, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:BlueseaQuebec.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:46, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Winner 42. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —the one you made with
this edit to
User:Fredmaack— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Winner 42
Talk to me!
23:13, 5 May 2015 (UTC)