Hi MikkelBerg1976! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Royal Autumn Crest ( talk) 16:00, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- thanks! MikkelBerg1976 ( talk) 16:01, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add inappropriate
external links to Wikipedia, as you did to
Door breaching.
Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See
the external links guideline and
spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the
nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.
Lord Belbury (
talk)
17:06, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Favonian (
talk)
14:00, 27 July 2022 (UTC)- Adding Sockpuppetry block
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
12:32, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, I would like to ask to reconsider my case. I apologies for violating Wikipedia policies and promise to read more carefully for next time the rules before editing any section. I think I can contribute a lot as a subject expert matter in my field. Please reconsider unblocking my user and www.santactical.com from your list. Thank you. MikkelBerg1976 ( talk) 09:35, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Favonian, I have written below my request but has yet to receive any reply, I would be grateful if you could review and reconsider my case. As indicated, I was not aware of Wikipedia policy as I am not an expert on this but anyway I promise to review guidelines and not add Spam, I am only trying to share my knowledge with the readers. I would be thankful if you could reconsider and remove my username and IP from the blacklist. thank you. MikkelBerg1976 ( talk) 20:56, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
MikkelBerg1976 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Hi Favonian, as I was watching the Door breaching page again today, I have seen that Jasonkwe has added the hydraulic breaching section and this edit was not blocked. As you can see he even cited an article about SAN's hydraulic breaching solution which might show the credibility of my request as it is coming from a different source. I would really appreciate if you could reinvestigate my request, I was not aware of Wikipedia policy as I am not an expert on this but I do know that I have not put any spam on it. I would be thankful if you could reconsider and remove my username and IP from the blacklist. thank you. MikkelBerg1976 ( talk) 07:44, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Since you don't think what you were doing was spam, there are no grounds to remove the block. 331dot ( talk) 08:16, 18 September 2022 (UTC) 331dot ( talk) 08:16, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, I would like to ask to reconsider my case. I apologies for violating Wikipedia policies and promise to read more carefully for next time the rules before editing any section. I think I can contribute a lot as a subject expert matter in my field. Please reconsider unblocking my user and www.santactical.com from your list. Thank you. MikkelBerg1976 ( talk) 09:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
MikkelBerg1976 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am new to Wikipedia but I have read the conditions and I still don't understand why I was blocked when I have only put a link to an article that is relevant to the topic. Hydraulic breaching is something I am very familiar with I think it can contribute to all readers under the door breaching article, I would like to request you to unblock me and also www.santactical.com website, thank you. MikkelBerg1976 ( talk) 09:03, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No. Buy an advertisement on a commercial website. You will not be allowed to continue spamming this free encyclopedia. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 17:02, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
User may be evading their block as OlisaOgwuad ( talk · contribs), who was active 15 minutes before this unblock request. SPI opened at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MikkelBerg1976. -- Lord Belbury ( talk) 09:35, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello, MikkelBerg1976, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:
- Policy on neutral point of view
- Guideline on spam
- Guideline on external links
- Guideline on conflict of interest
- FAQ for Organizations
If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can . You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and how to develop articles
- Help pages
- Tutorials
- Article wizard for creating new articles
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Deepfriedokra ( talk) 12:16, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Deepfriedokra, I have written below my request but has yet to receive any reply, I would be grateful if you could review and reconsider my case. As indicated, I was not aware of Wikipedia policy as I am not an expert on this but anyway I promise to review guidelines and not add Spam, I am only trying to share my knowledge with the readers. I would be thankful if you could reconsider and remove my username and IP from the blacklist. thank you MikkelBerg1976 ( talk) 20:58, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
is closed. Also, I'm not doing WP:SPI today, but the overlap is concerning. Deepfriedokra ( talk) 12:20, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, could you please explain what "is closed" mean? I would like to request you to unblock my account and IP so I can make the edits which I want without breaking any Wikipedia rules.
- It seems very suspicious to me that I have been blocked indefinitely without the ability to first respond to the accusations. thank you.
MikkelBerg1976 (
talk)
12:35, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Suspicious how? Closed means the UTRS ticket is closed as you must address your unblock request here. I went ahead and blocked your sock at the above referenced
WP:SPI.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
12:39, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Making edits not logged in to evade a block is very much breaking rules. Given your insistence in spamming Wikipedia, please read and heed
WP:COI and
WP:PAID. Spamming Wikipedia is against the rules whether you are logged in or not. And no matter how many accounts you use.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
12:43, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- but I haven't done any spam, what I have indicated is that id the administrators has taken the time to read what I have edited and the link which I have used, it can be seen very clearly that I have added information which is very much relevant to the subject.
- Hydraulic breaching is part of the methods used for door breaching hence it needs to indicate this method as well and what are the added values coming with it - those are things which were elaborated and cited from the article which I have indicated.
- I would really appreciate if you could reinvestigate this, I really don't understand all Wikipedia policy as I am not an expert on this but I do know that I have not put any spam on it.
- I would be thankful if you could reconsider and remove my username and IP from the blacklist. thank you.
MikkelBerg1976 (
talk)
12:50, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Welp, the blocking admin and I both saw what you added and I saw what your sock puppet added. You have an open unblock request on your talk. We'll see how the reviewing admin sees it.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
13:39, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- As I said at UTRS, the link is not a
WP:RS.( It is to a company selling a product.) The content from that source is also promotional.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
13:43, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for your feedback, I am not sure why you feel the content in the source which I used is promotional but if you feel that I can't use it I will not use it. SAN operators are invited all over the world as subject expert matter for the hydraulic breaching method of entry you can read more articles which were written on their capabilities and expertise which are published in many media sources.
- I request to reconsider my request and unblock my username, IP and Santactical.com website - I will not used those materials in my revisions but I would still like to add the hydraulic section for the breaching subject as I feel it is important and can contribute to the readers.
MikkelBerg1976 (
talk)
15:13, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- I have reconsidered and the answer is "no." I feel you have a
CONFLICTOFINTEREST, perhaps even a vested interest, in adding this content. If this is the only subject you would edit about, then I see no way forward. Please feel free to address my concerns and those of others in a new unblock request. Please bear in mind that I am not the blocking admin. That is Favonian, and
they must be consulted in any unblock discussion.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
15:21, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- I am only an expert in the hydraulic breaching domain I wouldn't like to write something about an issue which I don't 100% have the knowledge to expend on, it is very upsetting to know that a platform as Wikipedia which supposes to be a source for knowledge preventing from the experts in the field to share their knowledge.
- As mentioned, I am not a Wikipedia expert, I do apologize if I have broken any policy rules and I promise to try to stay in the guidelines for future reference, but if you choose to block me indefinitely that seems wrong in my view. wishing you all the best. MikkelBerg1976 ( talk) 19:10, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- I am trying here again as it seems I can't receive feedback.
- As indicated, I was not aware of Wikipedia policy as I am not an expert on this but anyway I promise to review guidelines and not add Spam, I am only trying to share my knowledge with the readers. I would be thankful if you could reconsider and remove my username and IP from the blacklist. thank you MikkelBerg1976 ( talk) 07:17, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- I have reconsidered and the answer is "no." I feel you have a
CONFLICTOFINTEREST, perhaps even a vested interest, in adding this content. If this is the only subject you would edit about, then I see no way forward. Please feel free to address my concerns and those of others in a new unblock request. Please bear in mind that I am not the blocking admin. That is Favonian, and
they must be consulted in any unblock discussion.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
15:21, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @ Deepfriedokra, I have written below my request but has yet to receive any reply, I would be grateful if you could review and reconsider my case. As indicated, I was not aware of Wikipedia policy as I am not an expert on this but anyway I promise to review guidelines and not add Spam, I am only trying to share my knowledge with the readers. I would be thankful if you could reconsider and remove my username and IP from the blacklist. thank you MikkelBerg1976 ( talk) 05:00, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- As I said at UTRS, the link is not a
WP:RS.( It is to a company selling a product.) The content from that source is also promotional.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
13:43, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Welp, the blocking admin and I both saw what you added and I saw what your sock puppet added. You have an open unblock request on your talk. We'll see how the reviewing admin sees it.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
13:39, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Making edits not logged in to evade a block is very much breaking rules. Given your insistence in spamming Wikipedia, please read and heed
WP:COI and
WP:PAID. Spamming Wikipedia is against the rules whether you are logged in or not. And no matter how many accounts you use.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
12:43, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Suspicious how? Closed means the UTRS ticket is closed as you must address your unblock request here. I went ahead and blocked your sock at the above referenced
WP:SPI.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
12:39, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi MikkelBerg1976! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Royal Autumn Crest ( talk) 16:00, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- thanks! MikkelBerg1976 ( talk) 16:01, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add inappropriate
external links to Wikipedia, as you did to
Door breaching.
Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See
the external links guideline and
spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the
nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.
Lord Belbury (
talk)
17:06, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Favonian (
talk)
14:00, 27 July 2022 (UTC)- Adding Sockpuppetry block
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
12:32, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, I would like to ask to reconsider my case. I apologies for violating Wikipedia policies and promise to read more carefully for next time the rules before editing any section. I think I can contribute a lot as a subject expert matter in my field. Please reconsider unblocking my user and www.santactical.com from your list. Thank you. MikkelBerg1976 ( talk) 09:35, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Favonian, I have written below my request but has yet to receive any reply, I would be grateful if you could review and reconsider my case. As indicated, I was not aware of Wikipedia policy as I am not an expert on this but anyway I promise to review guidelines and not add Spam, I am only trying to share my knowledge with the readers. I would be thankful if you could reconsider and remove my username and IP from the blacklist. thank you. MikkelBerg1976 ( talk) 20:56, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
MikkelBerg1976 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Hi Favonian, as I was watching the Door breaching page again today, I have seen that Jasonkwe has added the hydraulic breaching section and this edit was not blocked. As you can see he even cited an article about SAN's hydraulic breaching solution which might show the credibility of my request as it is coming from a different source. I would really appreciate if you could reinvestigate my request, I was not aware of Wikipedia policy as I am not an expert on this but I do know that I have not put any spam on it. I would be thankful if you could reconsider and remove my username and IP from the blacklist. thank you. MikkelBerg1976 ( talk) 07:44, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Since you don't think what you were doing was spam, there are no grounds to remove the block. 331dot ( talk) 08:16, 18 September 2022 (UTC) 331dot ( talk) 08:16, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, I would like to ask to reconsider my case. I apologies for violating Wikipedia policies and promise to read more carefully for next time the rules before editing any section. I think I can contribute a lot as a subject expert matter in my field. Please reconsider unblocking my user and www.santactical.com from your list. Thank you. MikkelBerg1976 ( talk) 09:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
MikkelBerg1976 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am new to Wikipedia but I have read the conditions and I still don't understand why I was blocked when I have only put a link to an article that is relevant to the topic. Hydraulic breaching is something I am very familiar with I think it can contribute to all readers under the door breaching article, I would like to request you to unblock me and also www.santactical.com website, thank you. MikkelBerg1976 ( talk) 09:03, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No. Buy an advertisement on a commercial website. You will not be allowed to continue spamming this free encyclopedia. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 17:02, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
User may be evading their block as OlisaOgwuad ( talk · contribs), who was active 15 minutes before this unblock request. SPI opened at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MikkelBerg1976. -- Lord Belbury ( talk) 09:35, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello, MikkelBerg1976, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:
- Policy on neutral point of view
- Guideline on spam
- Guideline on external links
- Guideline on conflict of interest
- FAQ for Organizations
If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can . You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and how to develop articles
- Help pages
- Tutorials
- Article wizard for creating new articles
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Deepfriedokra ( talk) 12:16, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Deepfriedokra, I have written below my request but has yet to receive any reply, I would be grateful if you could review and reconsider my case. As indicated, I was not aware of Wikipedia policy as I am not an expert on this but anyway I promise to review guidelines and not add Spam, I am only trying to share my knowledge with the readers. I would be thankful if you could reconsider and remove my username and IP from the blacklist. thank you MikkelBerg1976 ( talk) 20:58, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
is closed. Also, I'm not doing WP:SPI today, but the overlap is concerning. Deepfriedokra ( talk) 12:20, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, could you please explain what "is closed" mean? I would like to request you to unblock my account and IP so I can make the edits which I want without breaking any Wikipedia rules.
- It seems very suspicious to me that I have been blocked indefinitely without the ability to first respond to the accusations. thank you.
MikkelBerg1976 (
talk)
12:35, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Suspicious how? Closed means the UTRS ticket is closed as you must address your unblock request here. I went ahead and blocked your sock at the above referenced
WP:SPI.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
12:39, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Making edits not logged in to evade a block is very much breaking rules. Given your insistence in spamming Wikipedia, please read and heed
WP:COI and
WP:PAID. Spamming Wikipedia is against the rules whether you are logged in or not. And no matter how many accounts you use.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
12:43, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- but I haven't done any spam, what I have indicated is that id the administrators has taken the time to read what I have edited and the link which I have used, it can be seen very clearly that I have added information which is very much relevant to the subject.
- Hydraulic breaching is part of the methods used for door breaching hence it needs to indicate this method as well and what are the added values coming with it - those are things which were elaborated and cited from the article which I have indicated.
- I would really appreciate if you could reinvestigate this, I really don't understand all Wikipedia policy as I am not an expert on this but I do know that I have not put any spam on it.
- I would be thankful if you could reconsider and remove my username and IP from the blacklist. thank you.
MikkelBerg1976 (
talk)
12:50, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Welp, the blocking admin and I both saw what you added and I saw what your sock puppet added. You have an open unblock request on your talk. We'll see how the reviewing admin sees it.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
13:39, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- As I said at UTRS, the link is not a
WP:RS.( It is to a company selling a product.) The content from that source is also promotional.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
13:43, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for your feedback, I am not sure why you feel the content in the source which I used is promotional but if you feel that I can't use it I will not use it. SAN operators are invited all over the world as subject expert matter for the hydraulic breaching method of entry you can read more articles which were written on their capabilities and expertise which are published in many media sources.
- I request to reconsider my request and unblock my username, IP and Santactical.com website - I will not used those materials in my revisions but I would still like to add the hydraulic section for the breaching subject as I feel it is important and can contribute to the readers.
MikkelBerg1976 (
talk)
15:13, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- I have reconsidered and the answer is "no." I feel you have a
CONFLICTOFINTEREST, perhaps even a vested interest, in adding this content. If this is the only subject you would edit about, then I see no way forward. Please feel free to address my concerns and those of others in a new unblock request. Please bear in mind that I am not the blocking admin. That is Favonian, and
they must be consulted in any unblock discussion.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
15:21, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- I am only an expert in the hydraulic breaching domain I wouldn't like to write something about an issue which I don't 100% have the knowledge to expend on, it is very upsetting to know that a platform as Wikipedia which supposes to be a source for knowledge preventing from the experts in the field to share their knowledge.
- As mentioned, I am not a Wikipedia expert, I do apologize if I have broken any policy rules and I promise to try to stay in the guidelines for future reference, but if you choose to block me indefinitely that seems wrong in my view. wishing you all the best. MikkelBerg1976 ( talk) 19:10, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- I am trying here again as it seems I can't receive feedback.
- As indicated, I was not aware of Wikipedia policy as I am not an expert on this but anyway I promise to review guidelines and not add Spam, I am only trying to share my knowledge with the readers. I would be thankful if you could reconsider and remove my username and IP from the blacklist. thank you MikkelBerg1976 ( talk) 07:17, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- I have reconsidered and the answer is "no." I feel you have a
CONFLICTOFINTEREST, perhaps even a vested interest, in adding this content. If this is the only subject you would edit about, then I see no way forward. Please feel free to address my concerns and those of others in a new unblock request. Please bear in mind that I am not the blocking admin. That is Favonian, and
they must be consulted in any unblock discussion.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
15:21, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @ Deepfriedokra, I have written below my request but has yet to receive any reply, I would be grateful if you could review and reconsider my case. As indicated, I was not aware of Wikipedia policy as I am not an expert on this but anyway I promise to review guidelines and not add Spam, I am only trying to share my knowledge with the readers. I would be thankful if you could reconsider and remove my username and IP from the blacklist. thank you MikkelBerg1976 ( talk) 05:00, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- As I said at UTRS, the link is not a
WP:RS.( It is to a company selling a product.) The content from that source is also promotional.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
13:43, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Welp, the blocking admin and I both saw what you added and I saw what your sock puppet added. You have an open unblock request on your talk. We'll see how the reviewing admin sees it.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
13:39, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Making edits not logged in to evade a block is very much breaking rules. Given your insistence in spamming Wikipedia, please read and heed
WP:COI and
WP:PAID. Spamming Wikipedia is against the rules whether you are logged in or not. And no matter how many accounts you use.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
12:43, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Suspicious how? Closed means the UTRS ticket is closed as you must address your unblock request here. I went ahead and blocked your sock at the above referenced
WP:SPI.
Deepfriedokra (
talk)
12:39, 31 July 2022 (UTC)