This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
Thanks a lot for helping me....also i send love req to build a relationship with u :) dont mind............can also please tell me what to do when unregisterd people create vandalism?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anandravi Striker18 ( talk • contribs) 10:55, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
( talk page stalker) Unfortunate not to have met you in the last meetup. :-( Nivu next meetupku barthira?- Ravi My Tea Kadai 16:13, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Will need your help in Ra.One Peer review, there are certain issues difficult for me to understand. -- Karthik Nadar ( talk) 11:07, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. In P.E.S. Institute of Technology, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Mint ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:24, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Hey Mike, can you please tell how to become members of the various "groups" on Wikipedia. For example, there people who welcome new editors on Wikipedia, there are people who monitor recent changes. I want to become a member who deletes inactive users on Wikipedia, delete pages that do not comply with the requirements on Wikipedia, and some more. Jobin ( talk) 15:28, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Of course, we should assume good faith for a new user, who has not been given any warning. But look at that guy's contributions and decide whether he should be given a warning or not. In this edit, the guy has removed my warning post without a summary. Earlier, he had created an article called Singam 2 which was nominated for deletion by me and redirected. Do you know how many times the guy removed the deletion notice from the page? He has also been given several warnings in the past, which he has just removed from his talk page without any summary. For instance, see this. He removed an edit warring warning and a deletion notice warning, put up by me and User:Johannes003. Again, I apologize if I had not assumed good faith but seriously do you continuously keep assuming good faith without any limit? Not only that, he is the first guy to make an non-constructive edit to my user page. See, how many undo's he has made without any summary, some of them being edits of experienced editors. I'm done with this, if wiki tolerates vandalism, then it's not long before the world comes to an end, so best enjoy your life till the last moment instead of wasting time for such things like this. X.One SOS 15:10, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Again, its not about how he nicely he responds to a particular user's messages. Rather, it is about how he heeds the warnings given to him. "why give templated warnings that we know he will not take heed" I beg your pardon? He has to take heed, he just cannot ignore such messages at his own will. As Wp:REMOVED says "The removal of material from a user page is normally taken to mean that the user has read and is aware of its contents." He has to respond accordingly. See my talk for his replies. I hope he won't indulge in any more of this. Cheers. X.One SOS 11:57, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Happy to be helped! | |
Thanks for pitching in at Offline Wikipedia for Indian Schools! You are going to make a lot of children very happy :) AshLin ( talk) 05:33, 10 December 2011 (UTC) |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SAE Aerodesign is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SAE Aerodesign until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Night of the Big Wind talk 14:18, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi can you reassess this article. — Commander (Ping me) 15:09, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Fanny White. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot ( talk) 15:15, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi! I saw some of the changes you made to the OWIS-math page and am excited to keep working on it together! So, I saw a comment on AshLin's talk page, which recommended we move all the "articles to be removed" into a separate section, rather than just deleting them from the full list of articles. I created a section on the page for "Articles to be removed", so shall we just make it the norm to move the irrelevant articles into that section rather than deleting them from the list? Thanks again! Looking forward to interacting more! Jwild ( talk) 19:14, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi MikeLynch. Hope you're doing great. Just wanted to let you know about this current dispute where, in a nutshell, some comparatively new editors are insistent on using official data (which ain't preferable regarding box office numbers anywhere), but according to the general consensus on this article and others, BOI is used (as it's an independent, third-party source). You can read the discussion here and the previous consensus here. I could care less and ignore everything, but then again, what's fair and fair, and proper policies must be followed. I don't want to cross a 3RR. Thanks. Scieberking ( talk) 21:51, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi Mike, if you had visited the Ra.One talk, you would have come across new editors debating with experienced editors regarding the gross figure. I wish to start an RFC process regarding the dispute which is happening here. Can you please tell me how to do it and give your opinion? X.One SOS 09:35, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
Regarding your edit at Gustav Mahler, which I reverted, you may be interested in my thoughts on the matter at sa:योजकसम्भाषणम्:Vibhijain#Gustav Mahler (गुस्तावः मालेरः) and on my talk page. -- Michael Bednarek ( talk) 12:29, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛
Talk
Email is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{ subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
-- ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 13:31, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
I have posted the RFC here. Please state your thoughts. Thank you. X.One SOS 13:52, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Please comment here and put up your opinion regarding this issue. Your help will be much appreciated. Thank You. AnkitBhatt WDF 15:20, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
The Indian Barnstar of National Merit | ||
Awarded to MikeLynch, one of the most prolific editors from India. We are proud of you ! — Commander (Ping me) 15:29, 14 December 2011 (UTC) |
But how can you let all those derogatory comments against me be still here and delete mine ? Do you call all those comments against me related to the topic or civil ? Moreover , this conversation looks rather pointless without my comments . You should take notice that those comments have been far more abusive and off-topic than mine . So , i request you Lynch , to either put my comments back or delete the whole of the comments section that refers to my name again n again ....and that too with abusive comments against me
Seeta mayya ( talk) 03:26, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the help Lynch . Cheers . Seeta mayya ( talk) 18:41, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Hey I'm getting some ideas in mind that Seeta Maaya is an another account by Guru coolguy. The later was earlier involved in dispute in the same article. I doubt that such an account by Seeta Maaya with hardly few contributions know very well about talk pages and all. That seems impossible as far as my concern because it takes some time to learn about talk page and discussion pages. -- Karthik Nadar ( talk) 14:25, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
How do you hide the infobox table of contents in an article?
X.One
SOS 08:57, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
Thanks a lot for helping me....also i send love req to build a relationship with u :) dont mind............can also please tell me what to do when unregisterd people create vandalism?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anandravi Striker18 ( talk • contribs) 10:55, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
( talk page stalker) Unfortunate not to have met you in the last meetup. :-( Nivu next meetupku barthira?- Ravi My Tea Kadai 16:13, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Will need your help in Ra.One Peer review, there are certain issues difficult for me to understand. -- Karthik Nadar ( talk) 11:07, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. In P.E.S. Institute of Technology, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Mint ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:24, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Hey Mike, can you please tell how to become members of the various "groups" on Wikipedia. For example, there people who welcome new editors on Wikipedia, there are people who monitor recent changes. I want to become a member who deletes inactive users on Wikipedia, delete pages that do not comply with the requirements on Wikipedia, and some more. Jobin ( talk) 15:28, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Of course, we should assume good faith for a new user, who has not been given any warning. But look at that guy's contributions and decide whether he should be given a warning or not. In this edit, the guy has removed my warning post without a summary. Earlier, he had created an article called Singam 2 which was nominated for deletion by me and redirected. Do you know how many times the guy removed the deletion notice from the page? He has also been given several warnings in the past, which he has just removed from his talk page without any summary. For instance, see this. He removed an edit warring warning and a deletion notice warning, put up by me and User:Johannes003. Again, I apologize if I had not assumed good faith but seriously do you continuously keep assuming good faith without any limit? Not only that, he is the first guy to make an non-constructive edit to my user page. See, how many undo's he has made without any summary, some of them being edits of experienced editors. I'm done with this, if wiki tolerates vandalism, then it's not long before the world comes to an end, so best enjoy your life till the last moment instead of wasting time for such things like this. X.One SOS 15:10, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Again, its not about how he nicely he responds to a particular user's messages. Rather, it is about how he heeds the warnings given to him. "why give templated warnings that we know he will not take heed" I beg your pardon? He has to take heed, he just cannot ignore such messages at his own will. As Wp:REMOVED says "The removal of material from a user page is normally taken to mean that the user has read and is aware of its contents." He has to respond accordingly. See my talk for his replies. I hope he won't indulge in any more of this. Cheers. X.One SOS 11:57, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Happy to be helped! | |
Thanks for pitching in at Offline Wikipedia for Indian Schools! You are going to make a lot of children very happy :) AshLin ( talk) 05:33, 10 December 2011 (UTC) |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SAE Aerodesign is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SAE Aerodesign until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Night of the Big Wind talk 14:18, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi can you reassess this article. — Commander (Ping me) 15:09, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Fanny White. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot ( talk) 15:15, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi! I saw some of the changes you made to the OWIS-math page and am excited to keep working on it together! So, I saw a comment on AshLin's talk page, which recommended we move all the "articles to be removed" into a separate section, rather than just deleting them from the full list of articles. I created a section on the page for "Articles to be removed", so shall we just make it the norm to move the irrelevant articles into that section rather than deleting them from the list? Thanks again! Looking forward to interacting more! Jwild ( talk) 19:14, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi MikeLynch. Hope you're doing great. Just wanted to let you know about this current dispute where, in a nutshell, some comparatively new editors are insistent on using official data (which ain't preferable regarding box office numbers anywhere), but according to the general consensus on this article and others, BOI is used (as it's an independent, third-party source). You can read the discussion here and the previous consensus here. I could care less and ignore everything, but then again, what's fair and fair, and proper policies must be followed. I don't want to cross a 3RR. Thanks. Scieberking ( talk) 21:51, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi Mike, if you had visited the Ra.One talk, you would have come across new editors debating with experienced editors regarding the gross figure. I wish to start an RFC process regarding the dispute which is happening here. Can you please tell me how to do it and give your opinion? X.One SOS 09:35, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
Regarding your edit at Gustav Mahler, which I reverted, you may be interested in my thoughts on the matter at sa:योजकसम्भाषणम्:Vibhijain#Gustav Mahler (गुस्तावः मालेरः) and on my talk page. -- Michael Bednarek ( talk) 12:29, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛
Talk
Email is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{ subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
-- ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 13:31, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
I have posted the RFC here. Please state your thoughts. Thank you. X.One SOS 13:52, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Please comment here and put up your opinion regarding this issue. Your help will be much appreciated. Thank You. AnkitBhatt WDF 15:20, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
The Indian Barnstar of National Merit | ||
Awarded to MikeLynch, one of the most prolific editors from India. We are proud of you ! — Commander (Ping me) 15:29, 14 December 2011 (UTC) |
But how can you let all those derogatory comments against me be still here and delete mine ? Do you call all those comments against me related to the topic or civil ? Moreover , this conversation looks rather pointless without my comments . You should take notice that those comments have been far more abusive and off-topic than mine . So , i request you Lynch , to either put my comments back or delete the whole of the comments section that refers to my name again n again ....and that too with abusive comments against me
Seeta mayya ( talk) 03:26, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the help Lynch . Cheers . Seeta mayya ( talk) 18:41, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Hey I'm getting some ideas in mind that Seeta Maaya is an another account by Guru coolguy. The later was earlier involved in dispute in the same article. I doubt that such an account by Seeta Maaya with hardly few contributions know very well about talk pages and all. That seems impossible as far as my concern because it takes some time to learn about talk page and discussion pages. -- Karthik Nadar ( talk) 14:25, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
How do you hide the infobox table of contents in an article?
X.One
SOS 08:57, 15 December 2011 (UTC)