![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
As salam o alekum wa rehmatullahe wa barkarthu. i am just here to have a word with you. You have been here on wikipedia for a long time, i am very new here. i had just uploaded my first article and everybody pounced on the article. You might have experienced the feeling. Just see how many times my article was deleted again and again. On their official website they had put up a link to nominate this article for deletion. i am not an editor like you are but i just wanted to put up a decent article based on factual information. i think i might have hurt somebody , but i didn't mean to. i didn't even think there would be a fight over it. i am still learning posting in wikipedia, for during all this deleting and reverting nobody told me the flaws in the article. so when You pointed it out to me i rectified it and if You tell me i will further improve it. i am still at a loss as to how to make the article neutral. because all that i have mentioned is the truth as of date and i have used the best words to my ability to describe it. i have more, much more information about this topic but it would not fit the Wikipedia criteria. further more this article is about a sect that is kept as a secret, so how is it possible to get references about it. So the references i have placed from newspapers, though on another topic but my intention was to focus on the mention of Qutbi Bohra and not the article in question. Because Qutbi Bohra is not connected to the succession issue that i will prove it to you when this link goes live. i am in the process of writing my second article, that will make it clear that Qutbi Bohra is not connected to the succession issue. merging the article for just the newspaper information will not make any sense as i have used these reference to prove the exsistence of Qutbi Bohra and not for the content of the said articles.You can say that i have been forced to write my second article just to prove that Qutbi Bohra is not connected to the succession issue or for that matter with Dawoodi Bohra sect. i am just getting my second article ready to be published on wikipedia according to the terms of wikipedia. i have made the necessary changes as mentioned by you in Qutbi Bohra article. i request you to please not consider it for deletion before reading the second article. Furthermore i would like to state again that i would not have written the second article if the difference between Qutbi Bohra and succession issue was not so ambigious. and trust me all these people who were deleting my article again and again know what i am going to say in the second article because they are going to do what i am going to write. for a person new to this issue it may feel strange. But for the people who have planned it and are executing it is just a money game to bend religion according to their wishes. i am sorry i am telling you all this, but once you read my second article you too will have strong feelings towards all this that is happening. Shukran. i took too much of your time. i apologise. take care and thank you very much for your valuable time.
note: i hope i have written this explaination on the right side of the talk page, where you can see it. if not i am sorry this is my first time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Araz5152 ( talk • contribs) 12:43, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Greetings.... |
Salam! How are you? And how had your Eid been? Hope you were completely fine and had a really splendid Eid... Please accept my greetings too! The Moon has been sighted here, too and we will be celebrating Eid tomorrow, In sha Allah... — Шαмıq ☪ тαʟκ✍ @ 17:30, 8 August 2013 (UTC) |
Good day,
since you are apparently willing to translate Arabic texts for hapless Wikipedians I thought I'd ask, if you would help me out. It's not a lot, just a couple of words, so here we go:
Thanks in advance. ( Lord Gøn ( talk) 20:32, 23 August 2013 (UTC))
Hello. You have
a new message at Anna Frodesiak's talk page.
Anna Frodesiak (
talk)
11:17, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Assalamu alaykum, I hope you are well. Any chance you could look at this page: Abu Yusuf Riyadh ul Haq ? One editor seems intent on making it into a fan page and adding unreferenced, or poorly referenced, material. My regards, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 19:38, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I saw your deletion template on the article Waris Ali Shah, since you put it there I had done some additions based on RS and think that the deletion template should be removed. Please have a look on the article and if you agree with me then we can have deletion template removed from there. Thanks.-- Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider t c s 22:07, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:35, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
I'm a little concerned that all of your recent AfD nominations appear to be for topics with connections to the Barelvi movement. Is there any particular reason for this, or is it just coincidence? Phil Bridger ( talk) 10:58, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Yesterday I said to Adjwilley:
He replied:
Thanks for the positive attitude
Pass a Method
talk
11:16, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks-- Ashashyou ( talk) 05:03, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
I see you have commented on this issue before, and I have opened a new discussion about how to resolve the fact that the page name and the name in the article do not agree with each other. I encourage you to add your voice. -- Jprg1966 (talk) 08:58, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
This discussion may interest you. Pass a Method talk 09:39, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Please could you add List of casualties in Hussain's army at the Battle of Karbala to your watch list. There is an editor who keeps deleting mention that Hussain ibn Ali's father was 4th Caliph. The editor gives different explanations for the deletion. You may wish to express an opinion on the subject on the talk page.-- Toddy1 ( talk) 20:03, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Please help these articles Template talk:First Fitna and Talk:Riyadh As-Saaliheen. Thank you. Ibensis ( talk) 01:45, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
or better if you may insert those (Name, Nasab, Kunya anda Nisbah) into infobox muslim scolar. Sorry for bad english. Ibensis ( talk) 02:21, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Also, please help these articles, all related with Salat : Salat , Rakat , Witr , Tarawih , Wudu , Adhan -
Verycuriousboy (
talk)
14:59, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
I was wondering whether you thought such removals were appropriate: [1], [2], [3], or how about hierarchichal orders such as this ? Pass a Method talk 20:54, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi MezzoMezzo. As one of the main contributors to the Islam-related pages, I was wondering if you would mind taking a look at the Religion in Somalia article to confirm the Pew Research Forum's figures for the various religions practiced therein. According to it, the country is 99.8% Muslim, with the remaining 0.2% of the population adhering to other belief systems. Islam is also the state religion. Best regards, Middayexpress ( talk) 17:06, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
A month ago you expressed the view that a returning editor who was editing as an IP-editor was probably a sockpuppet of a blocked editor. [5] You said that you had "notified the admin who blocked the first IP," and that you were "hoping they will agree to reblock as an executive decision but if not I am ready to put together a formall sockpuppet investigation." I have not heard anything since then. The IP editor got him/herself a new account and continues to edit the same page and its talk page.-- Toddy1 ( talk) 18:24, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
(talk)
(talk)
User:RookTaker (talk)
User:BobbyDavro1 (account creation and self-identification only)
68.100.166.227 ( talk) 00:54, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
to be a sock. Vizier loki in his/her one and only edit to Wikipedia cites a wikipedia policy complete with wikilink. [7]-- Toddy1 ( talk) 00:16, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello MezzoMezzo. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Muslim Students Organization of India MSO, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article is not substantially the same as the deleted version. A new deletion discussion is required. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 22:20, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muslim Students Organization of India MSO is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muslim Students Organization of India MSO until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 23:44, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
, who made this edit putting the obscure student organisation top of the list on MSO. It has since been deleted as non-notable.-- Toddy1 ( talk) 00:00, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi MezzoMezzo. There's a user on the Somali people page who has claimed that Somalis are "predominantly Sunni Muslim, with a christian minority and an unknown number of agnostics and atheists", and added these other religions to the infobox alongside Islam. He has attributed this statement to Mohamed Diriye Abdullahi, who actually indicates that ethnic Somalis are pretty much all Muslim, and that "Somali identity is intertwined with Islam" [8]. The user has also tried to add an image of Hirsi Ali to a section of the page reserved for everyday Somalis. I've explained to him that she is a controversial, disliked figure, and that other controversial figures were omitted as well, as per convention on other pages (e.g. at Syrian people). As a knowledgeable contributor to the religion topics, would you mind taking a look? Best, Middayexpress ( talk) 21:29, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing it up. I've been really busy as of late. I didn't realize the user involved was being problematic. The article should stand as a stub, notable subject, just bad execution at the moment. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 01:21, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Since you are officially the only person I have ever had contact with on Wikipedia (you thanked me for some tweaks I made to the Shafi'i article), I figured I'd start here and see where I land. On the talk page of Al-Risala (book) I indicated I was beginning to write up some notes on my reading of Shafi'i's Risala (in the Khadduri translation). I've been adding them to my sandbox in the meantime. Would you mind either: (1) glancing at them yourself or (2) directing me to someone else I should be talking to about it? I'm wondering if I should continue doing this at all, if this kind of note-taking and/or level of detail is appropriate for Wikipedia or what. I'm making the notes for myself, of course, but figured I'd share. Why not? Dmvjjvmd ( talk) 12:48, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Do you have any idea why the Wiki v. 1.0 assessment bot is basically reassessing the same three or four articles every day, and nothing else? See here to see what I mean. Technology: confusing to a humanities nerd like me. :P Dmvjjvmd ( talk) 18:29, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello MezzMezzo I removed it because I thought the sources were rather unreliable: a children's book and a murder mystery. Perhaps you could quote some more reliable academic or statistical sources. Thanks. Erasmus1536
January 2014
Information icon Hello, I'm MezzoMezzo. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Sunni Islam without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:53, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi MezzMezzo- Sorry for not adding a note that was a mistake I had forgot to add something. Reason for the change is that it is an un-substantiated comment without any specific estimates. Currently there are no reliable estimates for the current Sunni population therefore it cannot accurately be described as being the largest single religious denomination. For example estimates range from between 70%-90% of world Islam adherents which again depending on estimate's of population it can range from 1.12 billion to 1.4 billion. At 1.12 it would not be the largest denomination as that would be Roman Catholic at roughly 1.22 billion. At 1.4 billion it definitely would be however I believe that unless there is a qualified number this claim should not and cannot be accurately made. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.152.85.45 ( talk) 15:37, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello. :) I saw on AN/I that you considered the F.Tromble issue solved with my outside mediation and explanation. I'm glad to hear so, as I believe that although some of his behaviour was problematic, he did and does intend to be a constructive contributor.
I sincerely hope that next time he needs some advice or help, he'll ask me, but should you notice that he's getting into trouble again, please let me know and I'll see if I can't explain to him how to handle things.
AddWittyNameHere (
talk)
10:30, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته Please tell me how i could get a discussion about the titles of some articles more open because if I only do it on the article talk page, maybe not as many people would view it. عمر چودھری 08:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Omar Choudhry ( talk • contribs)
on the Oman articles. I found them interesting to research. I hope I did not make too many errors in the names, which I find quite confusing. Thanks again, Aymatth2 ( talk) 14:51, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi MezzoMezzo I added some content into the Succession to Muhammad page but Kazemita1 keeps on removing it citing copy right violation even though I gave the references and the whole page is already full of quotes from various books. I want to avoid an edit war. I want to improve Wikipedia so that it contains researched scholarly content, that is useful to the readers. This whole article is full of people pushing their opinions. There needs to be a critical analysis of the content on this page. Various books have been written on this issues through out the ages and this content needs to be put into a table so that people could compare what was said when and by whom and why. Thanks -- Johnleeds1 ( talk) 21:03, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sulaym ibn Qays, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hasan ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:53, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
7&6=thirteen (
☎) has given you a
Dobos Torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
To give a Dobos Torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{ subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. |
7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 12:53, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Since the article
Names of God in Islam already notes that the names are not all found in the Qur'an and that the sources include both Qur'an and hadith, would you consider re-entering the names you've deleted, including a note in the "Qur'anic Usage" column like "not found in Qur'an" or "Hadith only"? If you're interested in doing so, I would be more than happy to help by tracking down the hadith sources for the names not found in the Qur'an. مع خالص الشكر والتقدير.
--
أخوها (
talk)
21:50, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Civility Barnstar |
For maintaining a cool head in the face of incivility and for seeking advice and assistance from an uninvolved party. We need more Wikipedians like you! — Keithbob • Talk • 22:52, 9 April 2014 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ahmed bin Hamad al-Khalili, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Muscat ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:54, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Hallo MezzoMezzo
a fellow wikipedian changed the religious affiliation of
Omar Mukhtar from Ibadi Islam to Sunni Islam, the first time without sources, the second time substituting a Turkish source with one in Arabic. Since my knowledge of arabic is = 0 :-), and I saw that you contributed to the Ibadi Islam article, could you please check that his edit is correct? Many thanks,
Alex2006 (
talk)
09:58, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
assalamu alaykum jazakllah khair for your efforts, i do not really how to use wiki and editing however some changes to the page regarding the bio of Shaikh Badi ud din are incorrect and need changing, i can do this myself very poorly but i thought first i must speak to you. my email is abukhuzaimahansaari@hotmail.co.uk. thereafter we can move to the other pages. May Allaah bless you, ameen — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbuKhuzaimahAnsaari ( talk • contribs) 12:40, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Please acquaint yourself with what is and isn't vandalism. Vandalism, as defined on Wikipedia, is an intentional action to harm Wikipedia. That does not include edits that are done to push a particular POV, or that you simply disagree with. Examples of vandalism can be seen here. Note that this edit incorrectly labels what Naeemkareem did as "vandalism", which can be considered a personal attack. Don't be so loose about using that term. You were correct in that it did appear to be pushing a positive POV.
I've also closed your request at SPI for the editor. You didn't provide any examples of sockpuppetry, you just stated that an IP created an account, and then said you wanted a "check" for sockpuppets. CheckUser doesn't go on fishing expeditions to look for sockpuppets when there is no evidence of it, nor do administrators check for sockpuppet behavior without evidence. Just keep this in mind in the future. -- Atama 頭 19:04, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Fai zan 13:48, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
NorthAmerica 1000 15:56, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the " Final decision" section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This is a non administrator notification, and will be logged as such on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.
-- Calypsomusic ( talk) 11:39, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding , a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.Hi. You contributed to a recent RFC about this topic area. This message is to notify you that the arbitration proceedings at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics are underway, and evidence about all disruptive edits to articles within this topic is being accepted at the relevant case page. If you wish to submit evidence for the committee to consider in reaching its decision, please do so now. The evidence phase of the case ends soon, and evidence submitted after the deadline may not be considered. Further advice on submitting evidence, and what evidence the committee will accept, is linked at the top of the evidence page. Please contact me or the other drafting arbitrator if you require more time to submit evidence. Thank you. For the Arbitration Committee, AGK [•] 14:13, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
by Omar Choudhry ( talk · contribs). Brought them up at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Islam. Dougweller ( talk) 15:36, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Salam Alaykum, how are you bro.
Unfortunately, I do not remember it. You can search Google book due to the fact that I used online sources. Some points which may help you to complete this article:
Best.-- Seyyed( t- c) 07:12, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Supernerd11 Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 11:32, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Salam Alaykum,
Do you remember our old friends in 2008:
and ...
Has any one of them been active yet?-- Seyyed( t- c) 12:35, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Assalamu alaykum dear brother. I hope you are well. I’m bothered by the inadequate evidence repeatedly provided by User:Ermejoso that Abdul Qayum (scholar) has a PhD from the SOAS in London. If you have time, please can you have a look. Thanks, and regards, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 15:48, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Single source publishing, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Indexing, Source language and Target language ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:53, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Assalamu 3Alaikum, Mezzo-mezzo. I would like to ask you for help. There is an Iranian user, name BoogaLouie who has done many editing with bad intentions and tendentious for a prolonged period and structured manner on articles relating to Sunni and Saudi arabia. Can you monitor it, or fix it. His edit based on source that can not be accountable or books from the opponent. See [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], and many more. Thank You. Allah bless you. 36.73.105.154 ( talk) 15:35, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Salam Alaykum. Nice attempt. You made an excellent article and I propose to nominate it for GA.
![]() |
The Barnstar of Iran's Merit of Excellence | |
I think you really deserve this barnstar for your wonderful attempt in developing Abbasid Revolution article. Seyyed( t- c) 01:37, 18 July 2014 (UTC) |
Salam Alaykum,
I think deletion of the article is the easiest way to encounter the problem.not the best one. I found several books which may help us to improve it: Tafsir Ibn Kathir and the other Sunni Tafsirs. Best.-- Seyyed( t- c) 18:58, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
sorry for the late. EID MUBARAK! I have a request, can you write anything about what is happening in Palestine? Thanks 109.154.0.121 ( talk) 14:31, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Came across this "... Salafi and Wahhabi are not synonyms, Baboon. That's the point. We've been through this before; ... " from a post by you and had an idea.
Why not make an article along the lines of Distinction between Wahhabism, Salafism and Islamism and putting lots of different definitions from different scholars, clerics, knowledgeable journalists. What do you think? -- BoogaLouie ( talk) 15:28, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I have recently expanded and rewritten the Polandball article at Draft:Polandball. I have also requested undeletion of the original article (that should never have been deleted in the first place) at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2014_August_6. I am leaving you this message as you left a message at User_talk:Supernerd11#Polandball_project_team in relation to resurrecting the article. 185.49.15.25 ( talk) 07:20, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Got another question since you seem to be a sort of senior editor on things Islamic. If you have time could you look at the Khidr article. Somebody (probably Tarasyani. he/she has no user page) seems to have crammed it full of poorly organized/written and (I think) very tangential stuff on Khidr's association with Gilgamesh and other non-Islamic issues. I put some tags on it but do you have any other ideas on how to improve it? -- BoogaLouie ( talk) 22:58, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Dear MezzoMezzo, assalamu alaykum. I hope you are fine. Sorry to ask, but could you please have a look at the page Asad Q. Ahmed and its talk page. Editor Ashwak786 seems to want to consider this very imperfect page to be perfect and edit-proof. Maybe he's connected to the subject. I don't know. He writes stupid stuff on my user page too. Thanks so much. Regards, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 06:27, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Glad to hear you're back -- BoogaLouie ( talk) 16:49, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
I corrected the section on Judaism, but there are non-Jews who insist they know better. Can you inject yourself?
Jaim Harlow 20:27, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Mezzo. I have copied our exchange from my Talk page as it is now archived and thought it would be simpler to deal with on your page. Have you had time to look at the translation yet? -- P123ct1 ( talk) 07:45, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Greetings,
All the best. MezzoMezzo ( talk) 11:46, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Salaam MezzoMezzo, you were great in editing & improving Waqar Azmi page. I'm not an expert like you but just a learner. I've seen your work and really respect and admire you for your fairness and impartiality. Could you please help by looking at Waqar Azmi page. It seems User Akbar Baig is intent on pushing his own agenda without any source. I've messaged on his Talk page but he is not responding. Grateful for your help. (EcoMaster 13:26, 22 October 2014 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecomaster ( talk • contribs)
Dear MezzoMezzo, assalamu alaykum. I hope you are well. Another editor (RookTaker) and I are feeling a bit frustrated that our efforts to keep the iERA article neutral, balanced and reliable are being thwarted by an anonymous editor who changes his editor name (sometimes to mimic ours) and seems to want to whitewash the article. I don't have an view as to whether iERA is good or bad, but it is a controversial entity. That's not just my opinion. Neutral and reliable sources show that. Hiding the controversial nature of this entity will therefore prevent an accurate account being presented. I'm not out to paint the iERA as despicable. I truly don't have an axe to grind. I don't believe that RookTaker has either. Can you please take a look at the article and the edit history and see what you think? Thanks and regards, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 05:33, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Salam Alaykum, I think this article can be nominated for WP:GA. There are few improvement such as completing the lead which should be done prior to nomination. Best. Seyyed( t- c) 11:53, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Dear MezzoMezzo, assalamu alaykum. I hope life is good. I've nominated the article on Umar Vadillo for deletion. It seems to be one of those poorly sourced pages created by a fan or by someone connected by Vadillo himself. I'd be grateful if you would take a look at the page and share your views at this article's entry on the Articles for deletion page. Thanks and best regards, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 04:05, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
it's wrong to delete what I had written about tawhid. It's Islam. Islamic11111 ( talk) 09:25, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
"I really don't care about your personal opinions of religions at all" What does this mean? Was that his personal opinion? I don't think so. Let me ask a question. Do you care more about "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" or "Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala"? 31.52.139.225 ( talk) 17:17, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
I wanna introduced you Muhammad Arshad ul Qadri. I wrote a small http://afkaremuslim.blogspot.com/2013/04/arshadul-qadri.html of the personality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.178.243.74 ( talk) 11:06, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Dear MezzoMezzo, assalamu alaykum. I hope life is good. Please can you take a look at the edits on the Junaid Jamshed page, and then at its talk page. One strident editor seems hell-bent on branding him a blasphemer even though no judicial finding has stated that. Thanks and regards, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 06:46, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mrashid364#05_January_2015. Regards, kashmiri TALK 21:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
For all your words and actions when dealing with an aggressive sock farm. !شكرا kashmiri TALK 22:42, 6 January 2015 (UTC) |
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Lockmaster1 (
talk)
14:03, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Lockmaster1 (
talk)
14:06, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Salafi movement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mohammed Hassan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:02, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
... in this: Articles for deletion/Sultan-ul-Faqr Monthly Magazine. I wonder how many more such "gems" have been spread around the Wikipedia by the group. Regards, kashmiri TALK 10:24, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
You might be interested this article is up for deletion again: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Targeted Individual (2nd nomination)
Hello,
Thanks for taking your time off to help hapless Wikipedians and otherwise stucked-up articles find their way to the forefront of other non-English speaking readers. I would hope that I have approached you the right way.
Nonetheless, I humbly seeks your intervention to translate the following pages, since I gathered that it may mean something to Wiki readers in Arabic.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ten_Letters_to_Obama
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Adonis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webwatchergy ( talk • contribs) 15:21, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks in anticipation for facilitating this request. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webwatchergy ( talk • contribs) 15:18, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello MezzoMezzo, I moved the page we discussed as best as I could from the wiki link that was posted. I hope the move was satisfactory. Now to the issue for which I am here for; I am currently working on the Ibn Taymiyyah article. The work is going all right, there is a lot to be done but there is one thing I am absolutely stuck on. That being the naming of sections and subsections. The names I have come up with, for some reason do not sound encyclopaedic but that could just be me. Your help in this regard will be gratefully appreciated. If you do have time and have a look, please bear in mind that the work is not yet completed as I am waiting to get my hand on sources and I am only upto when he was 45 years old. Regards. Mbcap ( talk) 18:41, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Salam Alaykum. Can you please check your mail. Best.-- Seyyed( t- c) 03:17, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello friend, reason why I edited Salafi movement is provided here Talk:Salafi movement Ejaz92 ( talk) 05:49, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Greetings Mr MezzoMezzo :
I only got here by accident . I innocently went to Wikpedia to look for a quote from Al-Jahiz and stumbled on the Talk:Al-Jahiz page. I am gobsmacked at what I found. I realize that lots of people with dishonest intentions meddle in Wikpedia articles and play fast and loose with the truth to promote their own agendas but I naively assumed that an article on someone as obscure to a native English speaker as Al-Jahiz would be safe from that sort of BS . Not only that but that people are attacking each other rather unkindly over differences in such minutiae . I have a book I bought in the 70's with some of his writings in it I was just too lazy to dig it out . At least with a book right or wrong no one can come in in the dead of night and change the information in it. The way forward is dark enough , to intentionally meddle with the past is a great crime , a sin "thou shalt not bear false witness".
I linked to your page just out of curiosity and I see that your page has been vandalized a dozen times . Jesus , don't people have anything better to do with their time ?
I also see that on your page you say you are " actually a subject matter expert on topics related to technical writing, technical translation and general topics related to technical documentation." I just want to say that you should never assume any technical knowledge on the part of the users of your translations unless they are meant for specialists . I can't tell you how many times I have thrown a tech manual down in frustration because the writer wasn't specific enough . If I knew that stuff I wouldn't be using a tech manual in the first place . — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Camel regulars (
talk •
contribs)
21:30, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
I only got here by accident . I innocently went to Wikpedia to look for a quote from Al-Jahiz and stumbled on the Talk:Al-Jahiz page. I am gobsmacked at what I found. I realize that lots of people with dishonest intentions meddle in Wikpedia articles and play fast and loose with the truth to promote their own agendas but I naively assumed that an article on someone as obscure to a native English speaker as Al-Jahiz would be safe from that sort of BS . Not only that but that people are attacking each other rather unkindly over differences in such minutiae . I have a book I bought in the 70's with some of his writings in it I was just too lazy to dig it out . At least with a book right or wrong no one can come in in the dead of night and change the information in it. The way forward is dark enough , to intentionally meddle with the past is a great crime , a sin "thou shalt not bear false witness".
I only got here by accident . I innocently went to Wikpedia to look for a quote from Al-Jahiz and stumbled on the Talk:Al-Jahiz page. I am gobsmacked at what I found. I realize that lots of people with dishonest intentions meddle in Wikpedia articles and play fast and loose with the truth to promote their own agendas but I naively assumed that an article on someone as obscure to a native English speaker as Al-Jahiz would be safe from that sort of BS . Not only that but that people are attacking each other rather unkindly over differences in such minutiae . I have a book I bought in the 70's with some of his writings in it I was just too lazy to dig it out . At least with a book right or wrong no one can come in in the dead of night and change the information in it. The way forward is dark enough , to intentionally meddle with the past is a great crime , a sin "thou shalt not bear false witness".
I linked to your page just out of curiosity and I see that your page has been vandalized a dozen times . Jesus , don't people have anything better to do with their time ?
I linked to your page just out of curiosity and I see that your page has been vandalized a dozen times . Jesus , don't people have anything better to do with their time ? − I also see that on your page you say you are " actually a subject matter expert on topics related to technical writing, technical translation and general topics related to technical documentation." I just want to say that you should never assume any technical knowledge on the part of the users of your translations unless they are meant for specialists . I can't tell you how many times I have thrown a tech manual down in frustration because the writer wasn't specific enough . If I knew that stuff I wouldn't be using a tech manual in the first place — Preceding unsigned comment added by Camel regulars ( talk • contribs) 21:41, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Thank you so much for the barnstar you gave me for my work on Maliki scholarship. Wa Bi Allahi at Tawfeeq. I pray you are rewarded for your act of kindness. Jaw101ie ( talk) 17:25, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Salam Alaykum,
What is your suggestion for "بعثت"?-- Seyyed( t- c) 06:13, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Assalamu alaykum MezzoMezzo,
At the moment I am preparing an article that merges Mid-Sha'ban and Barat Night. In these two articles, I have come across a myriad of translations of the word bara'at as in ليلة البراءة: Night of Records, Night of Assignment, Night of Deliverance, Night of Innocence, Night of Forgiveness, Day(?) of Atonement, Night of Freedom, Night of Salvation. The laylat-part is easy, but could you please shed some light on what you think might be the best translation of bara'at? Thanks! HyperGaruda ( talk) 20:51, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Wasila is definition. I read the talk page discussions. If you can take a look at this it might be clearer [23] Khanyusufkhalil ( talk) 09:09, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
You are very late. Khanyusufkhalil ( talk) 06:38, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Dear MezzoMezzo, can you please look at the recent edit history of Birmingham Central Mosque. It's not nice to be called a religious hypocrite by User:AHLM13 -- again -- merely because I asked for evidence for his addition. Thanks and salam, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 05:39, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
A Barnstar! | Please participate
There's a voting going on here. It needs to close, but consensus is not certain. We need more participation. The issues can't remain without a resolution. Please, check it out. Closure of the discussion has started. ( refresh) Please, hurry. 78.149.193.255 ( talk) 16:29, 10 April 2015 (UTC) |
Hello MezzoMezzo, How have you been? My latest question.
The title of
Islamic economics was
changed to
Islamic economic jurisprudence back in 2007.
It has always bothered me. Some thoughts:
What would you think of either changing the name back to Islamic economics, or making a separate article for Islamic economics? -- BoogaLouie ( talk) 16:11, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Khanyusufkhalil (
talk)
23:18, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Dear MezzoMezzo. Assalamu alaykum. I hope you are well. Can you please look at List of converts to Islam from Christianity . One editor, User:Xtremedood, adds excessive bio details for a Wikipedia list (which I guess I could live with), but, far worse, adds non-notable people and tries to claim that the website http://www.muslimconverts.com/ is a reliable source for them. I don't want to violate edit-war or 3-revert policies. Thanks and regards, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 17:24, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Check this out. Its more trouble than I thought! -- BoogaLouie ( talk) 14:20, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello MezzoMezzo. I was hoping you could assist me in a matter relating to the articles on individual Sura's of the Qur'an. Is it allowed to use Ibn Kathir or Maududi or two Jalal's tafsirs to build content on the aforementioned pages. Please ping me in you reply. Regards Mbcap ( talk) 06:49, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Asalamualeikum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh,
Akhi how have you been!? MashaAllah I had a quick peek out of retirement to see the old typical edit-war articles and saw you've maintained much of them alhamdulilah! I'm very happy to see that and I really appreciate your work. May Allah fill your effort with barakah and grant you success in this life and the hereafter! JazakAllahu khair!! Ws, Sakimonk talk 23:20, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Let me respond to your accusations. User page indicates to me to that your a revert. Unless of course you are from a long line of native Scottish muslims. Ibn khaldun has made it clear, the Zahiri school is followed by worthless people, deviants, and others. Phase 1 will see the Salafi burnout look it up. Vigorously defending Zahirism means you are a proponent. Zahiri are not accepted by the Sunni. A consensus was formed to eliminate the school of thought. It is for this reason unclassified and does not belong in Sunni category. The group is rare as you said but you insist it being in the Sunni category, which is suspicious to anyone. Ibn khaldun acknowledges its existence but made sure to note it is shunned by the muslim community. Fringe groups like this are only highlighted by people who have a dog in this fight. Do you have a dog in this fight? Calling my edits disruptive is misrepresentation. I did not add my personal opinion on said subject. Dont get upset about facts. People who are unfamiliar with Islamic articles might be fooled but not for long. I know the religion can be confusing for you especially when deviants lead you to a narrow path, but you only have yourself to blame if you are hard headed. If you continue to over represent Zahirism you will eventually be caught. DianeJR ( talk) 19:21, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Sad you should be!! for those snarky edit summaries. Wikipedia is not reliable because of deranged editors with an agenda like yourself. 8 years on wikipedia? You must be a lowlife. Let me guess you met a pompous Saudi Arabian in your college days and now your hell bent on spreading zahiri belief to the world. YOU’VE BEEN WARNED!! says the keyboard warrior. Have fun attempting to keep wikipedia narrow and skewed shrek. Sincerely, someone who has a life. DianeJR ( talk) 21:16, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
R RFD e SahabAliwadia ( talk) 10:45, 21 May 2015 (UTC) |
It is to keep in mind that Wikipedia is not anyone's father's property... a wiki page should contain criticism of a certain person if provided from genuine sources and links... i see you've deleted the vital information that i mention in the page Nasiruddin Albani... I've also provided references there especially the name of Albani's books and those books plus links where he has his refutation from mainstream Sunni Muslims... If you are so keen to highlight Albani in positive way and according to your own fancy and linking, then perhaps you should choose some other websites or to create a website of your own! so please don't try to conceal the truth or violate wiki policy anymore... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahirdyan ( talk • contribs) 01:35, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
These contributions cannot have been by accident. -- Orduin Discuss 21:24, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
I've come out of retirement for a bit, I was wondering if you could help me keep an eye on Hadith of Najd as there are many users wrecking it. Also, there are quite a few other articles we could discuss later possibly inshaAllah. JazakAllahu khair for your work. Sakimonk talk 07:08, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Madhhab may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 04:00, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi! Do you do short translation requests? WhisperToMe ( talk) 11:25, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
A new account has been speaking of you in rather non AGF terms in regard to the Barelvi page. See here. 220 of Borg 13:26, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Al-Ghariyah al-Gharbiyah (town in Syria) was originally copied and translated (poorly) from the article in Arabic. I have done some cleanup, but I don't read Arabic. If you have the time, could you please check the English article in case I have made mistakes. I have added some specific notes to Talk:Al-Ghariyah al-Gharbiyah#Check translation from Arabic. I also asked Al Ameer son, who I thought might read Arabic, but doesn't, it turns out. thanks. Nurg ( talk) 04:22, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Dear MezzoMezzo, assalamu alaykum. I hope you are well. Please see the Ismail ibn Musa Menk page, its talk page, and its edits log. I'm having difficulty with one editor who repeatedly adds unreferenced (or weakly referenced) material and seems to want to create a fan page. Can you please keep an eye on the page for a day or two? Thanks and regards, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 06:16, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Brother MezzoMezzo, I would also be grateful for your thoughts on the notability of this page. I've nominated it for deletion. Thanks and salam, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 07:09, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Salam Alaykum, I guess you'd like to participate in this Merger proposal. best wishes. -- Seyyed( t- c) 04:52, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Assalamu alaykum MezzoMezzo, I saw that you had a troll who was following your edits and reverting them. I changed them back. Now he's gone crazy reverting all my own edits maliciously. How do we bring this to the attention of an administrator? Regards, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 05:49, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Dear MezzoMezzo, assalamu alaykum. I hope you are well. I am wondering whether you could take a look at the Hridayananda Dasa Goswami page and help me to keep it neutral. I know the subject might not interest you, but one editor seems to want to make it a silly fan page, but not even by including references. Thanks and regards, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 11:18, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Dear MezzoMezzo, assalamu alaykum. thank you for your interest in Oman's culture and history. yes there are sources and references pertaining to ibadhism and the history of oman on our governmental websites here, but they are in Arabic mostly, sorry...what kind of info exactly are you looking for? I will try my best to help you inshAllah Grandia01 ( talk) 07:05, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
There is mention of you on the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard, over here [24]. Xtremedood ( talk) 11:48, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
I suspect you find the whole topic disgusting and depressing but hope you will offer an opinion. /info/en/?search=Talk:Islamic_views_on_slavery#Update_on_dispute_on_ISIS_and_jihadist_section -- BoogaLouie ( talk) 16:48, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Misdemenor. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Thank you.
Misdemenor (
talk)
07:23, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi MezzoMezzo! I'm having trouble verifying a source and it might help if I knew what the title meant: Kitab wal-ta'tiyya (by Salman Farooq if that helps, unless the ref is WP:CB). Thanks! - HyperGaruda ( talk) 05:30, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Can you review my draft? It has been pending for 2 month because of the biased reviewers. Ejaz92 ( talk) 10:19, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
I think you don't read these articles. He was not from Salafi Jihadism or Salafi Movement. But your article salafi tells he was. Salafi Movement. and Salafiyyah are different concepts you should read and learn
68.100.166.227 ( talk) 00:44, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Stick to eating snakes. Malaylampur ( talk) 13:38, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. It involves this particular section on your talk page. -
HyperGaruda (
talk)
01:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Are you an islamic scholar? How do you know which sect is right or wrong? Malaylampur ( talk) 16:52, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Please stop. Articles on Wikipedia do not give
fringe material equal weight to majority viewpoints; content in articles are given representation
in proportion to their prominence. If you continue in this manner, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Misdemenor (
talk)
06:25, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be
blocked from editing.
Misdemenor (
talk)
09:09, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, MezzoMezzo. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Misdemenor ( talk) 03:03, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi MezzoMezzo,
As a followup on last year's efforts against a sock farm [27], I see the group is still active. After failing to purge Hamza Makhdoom off WP (just because the guy is known locally as Sultan ul-Arifeen, the title which the group claims for their venerated Sultan Bahoo), the folks are now trying to delete Hari Parbat because of Hamza Mahkdoom's shrine there [28] and Makhdoom [29] - is it because it links to "Hamza Makhdoom"? This is so that you are up to date with the group's funny activity. Best, kashmiri TALK 19:53, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Salam Alaykum Eid al-Milad al-Nabi Mubarak.
There are many Islamic-related articles which may become controversial between Muslims and non-Muslims or different Islamic Madhabs. Following our succesful attempts to improve the lead of Ali and current effort in Taqiya, I suggest forming a "technical group for dispute resolution" in WP:Islam. I hope this effort pave the road to solve more severe controversies such as Islamic terrorism.-- Seyyed( t- c) 07:24, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
Have you already read this:
by Saadi Shirazi-- Seyyed( t- c) 08:16, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! ==
Misdemenor ( talk) 05:46, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello - Salam
Othmanebenjelloun (
talk)
09:38, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, an IP editor recently attempted to move Madhhab and Talk:Madhhab to "Madhab" by copy-and-paste (!). I have now reverted the changes (someone may carry out move in a proper way if consensus is there) but in the meantime you wrote a few paragraphs on Talk:Madhab. So that your comments don't get lost, will you mind re-adding them to the now restored Talk:Madhhab? — kashmiri TALK 23:53, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
I will be away due to a personal issue. I'll return in a few months. Sorry for the inconvenience. Misdemenor ( talk) 05:54, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Dear MezzoMezzo, assalamu alaykum. I hope you are well. I know you are busy but I'll be very glad and grateful if you'll please look at the Yousuf Gabriel page and in particular at the deletion recommendation page. I believe the page clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO and may have been created by a fan (the only editor aside from me) to promote the sale of a book. In any event, the article relies on unacceptable or weak sources and says almost nothing that can be considered encyclopedic. Thanks and best regards, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 16:59, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
How are you these days-- Johnleeds1 ( talk) 22:04, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
At the risk of betraying my ignorance is this right? - BoogaLouie ( talk) 21:27, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
I just copied what was on another article [31] Therefore revert your edit back unless your now claiming athari is kalam. Misdemenor ( talk) 03:36, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
I have submitted the DR here: Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Talk:Mawlid#Consensus doesn't exist concerning falsehood. -- Mawlidman ( talk) 03:39, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
I have removed part of your addition to the above article, as it appears to have been copied directly from http://www.abraronline.net/en/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=129&Itemid=301, a copyright web page. I had to download the document to view the material. It is on page 4. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions or if you think I may have made a mistake. — Diannaa ( talk) 16:36, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
36.81.88.250 ( talk) 03:41, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Dear MezzoMezzo, assalamu alaykum. I hope you are fine. Can you please look at recent edits on this page - Abu Ammaar Yasir Qadhi - and see what you think of the sources used. One editor wants to use a blog and youtube, and I disagree. Thanks and regards, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 09:44, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Salam Alaykum. Have you seen this [32]. Do you know the other users who may vote for it? Best, -- Seyyed( t- c) 06:31, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
"Walaikum as salam User:Sa.vakilian, though I'm not sure how to inform people of this. I literally didn't know about it until you just told me, and I don't know much about the rules between Commons and here. Are we allowed to post about it at Wikiproject talk pages and stuff? MezzoMezzo ( talk) 03:40, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
As salam o alekum wa rehmatullahe wa barkarthu. i am just here to have a word with you. You have been here on wikipedia for a long time, i am very new here. i had just uploaded my first article and everybody pounced on the article. You might have experienced the feeling. Just see how many times my article was deleted again and again. On their official website they had put up a link to nominate this article for deletion. i am not an editor like you are but i just wanted to put up a decent article based on factual information. i think i might have hurt somebody , but i didn't mean to. i didn't even think there would be a fight over it. i am still learning posting in wikipedia, for during all this deleting and reverting nobody told me the flaws in the article. so when You pointed it out to me i rectified it and if You tell me i will further improve it. i am still at a loss as to how to make the article neutral. because all that i have mentioned is the truth as of date and i have used the best words to my ability to describe it. i have more, much more information about this topic but it would not fit the Wikipedia criteria. further more this article is about a sect that is kept as a secret, so how is it possible to get references about it. So the references i have placed from newspapers, though on another topic but my intention was to focus on the mention of Qutbi Bohra and not the article in question. Because Qutbi Bohra is not connected to the succession issue that i will prove it to you when this link goes live. i am in the process of writing my second article, that will make it clear that Qutbi Bohra is not connected to the succession issue. merging the article for just the newspaper information will not make any sense as i have used these reference to prove the exsistence of Qutbi Bohra and not for the content of the said articles.You can say that i have been forced to write my second article just to prove that Qutbi Bohra is not connected to the succession issue or for that matter with Dawoodi Bohra sect. i am just getting my second article ready to be published on wikipedia according to the terms of wikipedia. i have made the necessary changes as mentioned by you in Qutbi Bohra article. i request you to please not consider it for deletion before reading the second article. Furthermore i would like to state again that i would not have written the second article if the difference between Qutbi Bohra and succession issue was not so ambigious. and trust me all these people who were deleting my article again and again know what i am going to say in the second article because they are going to do what i am going to write. for a person new to this issue it may feel strange. But for the people who have planned it and are executing it is just a money game to bend religion according to their wishes. i am sorry i am telling you all this, but once you read my second article you too will have strong feelings towards all this that is happening. Shukran. i took too much of your time. i apologise. take care and thank you very much for your valuable time.
note: i hope i have written this explaination on the right side of the talk page, where you can see it. if not i am sorry this is my first time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Araz5152 ( talk • contribs) 12:43, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Greetings.... |
Salam! How are you? And how had your Eid been? Hope you were completely fine and had a really splendid Eid... Please accept my greetings too! The Moon has been sighted here, too and we will be celebrating Eid tomorrow, In sha Allah... — Шαмıq ☪ тαʟκ✍ @ 17:30, 8 August 2013 (UTC) |
Good day,
since you are apparently willing to translate Arabic texts for hapless Wikipedians I thought I'd ask, if you would help me out. It's not a lot, just a couple of words, so here we go:
Thanks in advance. ( Lord Gøn ( talk) 20:32, 23 August 2013 (UTC))
Hello. You have
a new message at Anna Frodesiak's talk page.
Anna Frodesiak (
talk)
11:17, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Assalamu alaykum, I hope you are well. Any chance you could look at this page: Abu Yusuf Riyadh ul Haq ? One editor seems intent on making it into a fan page and adding unreferenced, or poorly referenced, material. My regards, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 19:38, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I saw your deletion template on the article Waris Ali Shah, since you put it there I had done some additions based on RS and think that the deletion template should be removed. Please have a look on the article and if you agree with me then we can have deletion template removed from there. Thanks.-- Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider t c s 22:07, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:35, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
I'm a little concerned that all of your recent AfD nominations appear to be for topics with connections to the Barelvi movement. Is there any particular reason for this, or is it just coincidence? Phil Bridger ( talk) 10:58, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Yesterday I said to Adjwilley:
He replied:
Thanks for the positive attitude
Pass a Method
talk
11:16, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks-- Ashashyou ( talk) 05:03, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
I see you have commented on this issue before, and I have opened a new discussion about how to resolve the fact that the page name and the name in the article do not agree with each other. I encourage you to add your voice. -- Jprg1966 (talk) 08:58, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
This discussion may interest you. Pass a Method talk 09:39, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Please could you add List of casualties in Hussain's army at the Battle of Karbala to your watch list. There is an editor who keeps deleting mention that Hussain ibn Ali's father was 4th Caliph. The editor gives different explanations for the deletion. You may wish to express an opinion on the subject on the talk page.-- Toddy1 ( talk) 20:03, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Please help these articles Template talk:First Fitna and Talk:Riyadh As-Saaliheen. Thank you. Ibensis ( talk) 01:45, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
or better if you may insert those (Name, Nasab, Kunya anda Nisbah) into infobox muslim scolar. Sorry for bad english. Ibensis ( talk) 02:21, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Also, please help these articles, all related with Salat : Salat , Rakat , Witr , Tarawih , Wudu , Adhan -
Verycuriousboy (
talk)
14:59, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
I was wondering whether you thought such removals were appropriate: [1], [2], [3], or how about hierarchichal orders such as this ? Pass a Method talk 20:54, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi MezzoMezzo. As one of the main contributors to the Islam-related pages, I was wondering if you would mind taking a look at the Religion in Somalia article to confirm the Pew Research Forum's figures for the various religions practiced therein. According to it, the country is 99.8% Muslim, with the remaining 0.2% of the population adhering to other belief systems. Islam is also the state religion. Best regards, Middayexpress ( talk) 17:06, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
A month ago you expressed the view that a returning editor who was editing as an IP-editor was probably a sockpuppet of a blocked editor. [5] You said that you had "notified the admin who blocked the first IP," and that you were "hoping they will agree to reblock as an executive decision but if not I am ready to put together a formall sockpuppet investigation." I have not heard anything since then. The IP editor got him/herself a new account and continues to edit the same page and its talk page.-- Toddy1 ( talk) 18:24, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
(talk)
(talk)
User:RookTaker (talk)
User:BobbyDavro1 (account creation and self-identification only)
68.100.166.227 ( talk) 00:54, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
to be a sock. Vizier loki in his/her one and only edit to Wikipedia cites a wikipedia policy complete with wikilink. [7]-- Toddy1 ( talk) 00:16, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello MezzoMezzo. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Muslim Students Organization of India MSO, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article is not substantially the same as the deleted version. A new deletion discussion is required. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 22:20, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muslim Students Organization of India MSO is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muslim Students Organization of India MSO until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 23:44, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
, who made this edit putting the obscure student organisation top of the list on MSO. It has since been deleted as non-notable.-- Toddy1 ( talk) 00:00, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi MezzoMezzo. There's a user on the Somali people page who has claimed that Somalis are "predominantly Sunni Muslim, with a christian minority and an unknown number of agnostics and atheists", and added these other religions to the infobox alongside Islam. He has attributed this statement to Mohamed Diriye Abdullahi, who actually indicates that ethnic Somalis are pretty much all Muslim, and that "Somali identity is intertwined with Islam" [8]. The user has also tried to add an image of Hirsi Ali to a section of the page reserved for everyday Somalis. I've explained to him that she is a controversial, disliked figure, and that other controversial figures were omitted as well, as per convention on other pages (e.g. at Syrian people). As a knowledgeable contributor to the religion topics, would you mind taking a look? Best, Middayexpress ( talk) 21:29, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing it up. I've been really busy as of late. I didn't realize the user involved was being problematic. The article should stand as a stub, notable subject, just bad execution at the moment. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 01:21, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Since you are officially the only person I have ever had contact with on Wikipedia (you thanked me for some tweaks I made to the Shafi'i article), I figured I'd start here and see where I land. On the talk page of Al-Risala (book) I indicated I was beginning to write up some notes on my reading of Shafi'i's Risala (in the Khadduri translation). I've been adding them to my sandbox in the meantime. Would you mind either: (1) glancing at them yourself or (2) directing me to someone else I should be talking to about it? I'm wondering if I should continue doing this at all, if this kind of note-taking and/or level of detail is appropriate for Wikipedia or what. I'm making the notes for myself, of course, but figured I'd share. Why not? Dmvjjvmd ( talk) 12:48, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Do you have any idea why the Wiki v. 1.0 assessment bot is basically reassessing the same three or four articles every day, and nothing else? See here to see what I mean. Technology: confusing to a humanities nerd like me. :P Dmvjjvmd ( talk) 18:29, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello MezzMezzo I removed it because I thought the sources were rather unreliable: a children's book and a murder mystery. Perhaps you could quote some more reliable academic or statistical sources. Thanks. Erasmus1536
January 2014
Information icon Hello, I'm MezzoMezzo. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Sunni Islam without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:53, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi MezzMezzo- Sorry for not adding a note that was a mistake I had forgot to add something. Reason for the change is that it is an un-substantiated comment without any specific estimates. Currently there are no reliable estimates for the current Sunni population therefore it cannot accurately be described as being the largest single religious denomination. For example estimates range from between 70%-90% of world Islam adherents which again depending on estimate's of population it can range from 1.12 billion to 1.4 billion. At 1.12 it would not be the largest denomination as that would be Roman Catholic at roughly 1.22 billion. At 1.4 billion it definitely would be however I believe that unless there is a qualified number this claim should not and cannot be accurately made. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.152.85.45 ( talk) 15:37, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello. :) I saw on AN/I that you considered the F.Tromble issue solved with my outside mediation and explanation. I'm glad to hear so, as I believe that although some of his behaviour was problematic, he did and does intend to be a constructive contributor.
I sincerely hope that next time he needs some advice or help, he'll ask me, but should you notice that he's getting into trouble again, please let me know and I'll see if I can't explain to him how to handle things.
AddWittyNameHere (
talk)
10:30, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته Please tell me how i could get a discussion about the titles of some articles more open because if I only do it on the article talk page, maybe not as many people would view it. عمر چودھری 08:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Omar Choudhry ( talk • contribs)
on the Oman articles. I found them interesting to research. I hope I did not make too many errors in the names, which I find quite confusing. Thanks again, Aymatth2 ( talk) 14:51, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi MezzoMezzo I added some content into the Succession to Muhammad page but Kazemita1 keeps on removing it citing copy right violation even though I gave the references and the whole page is already full of quotes from various books. I want to avoid an edit war. I want to improve Wikipedia so that it contains researched scholarly content, that is useful to the readers. This whole article is full of people pushing their opinions. There needs to be a critical analysis of the content on this page. Various books have been written on this issues through out the ages and this content needs to be put into a table so that people could compare what was said when and by whom and why. Thanks -- Johnleeds1 ( talk) 21:03, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sulaym ibn Qays, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hasan ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:53, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
7&6=thirteen (
☎) has given you a
Dobos Torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
To give a Dobos Torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{ subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. |
7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 12:53, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Since the article
Names of God in Islam already notes that the names are not all found in the Qur'an and that the sources include both Qur'an and hadith, would you consider re-entering the names you've deleted, including a note in the "Qur'anic Usage" column like "not found in Qur'an" or "Hadith only"? If you're interested in doing so, I would be more than happy to help by tracking down the hadith sources for the names not found in the Qur'an. مع خالص الشكر والتقدير.
--
أخوها (
talk)
21:50, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Civility Barnstar |
For maintaining a cool head in the face of incivility and for seeking advice and assistance from an uninvolved party. We need more Wikipedians like you! — Keithbob • Talk • 22:52, 9 April 2014 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ahmed bin Hamad al-Khalili, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Muscat ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:54, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Hallo MezzoMezzo
a fellow wikipedian changed the religious affiliation of
Omar Mukhtar from Ibadi Islam to Sunni Islam, the first time without sources, the second time substituting a Turkish source with one in Arabic. Since my knowledge of arabic is = 0 :-), and I saw that you contributed to the Ibadi Islam article, could you please check that his edit is correct? Many thanks,
Alex2006 (
talk)
09:58, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
assalamu alaykum jazakllah khair for your efforts, i do not really how to use wiki and editing however some changes to the page regarding the bio of Shaikh Badi ud din are incorrect and need changing, i can do this myself very poorly but i thought first i must speak to you. my email is abukhuzaimahansaari@hotmail.co.uk. thereafter we can move to the other pages. May Allaah bless you, ameen — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbuKhuzaimahAnsaari ( talk • contribs) 12:40, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Please acquaint yourself with what is and isn't vandalism. Vandalism, as defined on Wikipedia, is an intentional action to harm Wikipedia. That does not include edits that are done to push a particular POV, or that you simply disagree with. Examples of vandalism can be seen here. Note that this edit incorrectly labels what Naeemkareem did as "vandalism", which can be considered a personal attack. Don't be so loose about using that term. You were correct in that it did appear to be pushing a positive POV.
I've also closed your request at SPI for the editor. You didn't provide any examples of sockpuppetry, you just stated that an IP created an account, and then said you wanted a "check" for sockpuppets. CheckUser doesn't go on fishing expeditions to look for sockpuppets when there is no evidence of it, nor do administrators check for sockpuppet behavior without evidence. Just keep this in mind in the future. -- Atama 頭 19:04, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Fai zan 13:48, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
NorthAmerica 1000 15:56, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the " Final decision" section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This is a non administrator notification, and will be logged as such on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.
-- Calypsomusic ( talk) 11:39, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding , a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.Hi. You contributed to a recent RFC about this topic area. This message is to notify you that the arbitration proceedings at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics are underway, and evidence about all disruptive edits to articles within this topic is being accepted at the relevant case page. If you wish to submit evidence for the committee to consider in reaching its decision, please do so now. The evidence phase of the case ends soon, and evidence submitted after the deadline may not be considered. Further advice on submitting evidence, and what evidence the committee will accept, is linked at the top of the evidence page. Please contact me or the other drafting arbitrator if you require more time to submit evidence. Thank you. For the Arbitration Committee, AGK [•] 14:13, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
by Omar Choudhry ( talk · contribs). Brought them up at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Islam. Dougweller ( talk) 15:36, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Salam Alaykum, how are you bro.
Unfortunately, I do not remember it. You can search Google book due to the fact that I used online sources. Some points which may help you to complete this article:
Best.-- Seyyed( t- c) 07:12, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Supernerd11 Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 11:32, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Salam Alaykum,
Do you remember our old friends in 2008:
and ...
Has any one of them been active yet?-- Seyyed( t- c) 12:35, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Assalamu alaykum dear brother. I hope you are well. I’m bothered by the inadequate evidence repeatedly provided by User:Ermejoso that Abdul Qayum (scholar) has a PhD from the SOAS in London. If you have time, please can you have a look. Thanks, and regards, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 15:48, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Single source publishing, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Indexing, Source language and Target language ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:53, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Assalamu 3Alaikum, Mezzo-mezzo. I would like to ask you for help. There is an Iranian user, name BoogaLouie who has done many editing with bad intentions and tendentious for a prolonged period and structured manner on articles relating to Sunni and Saudi arabia. Can you monitor it, or fix it. His edit based on source that can not be accountable or books from the opponent. See [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], and many more. Thank You. Allah bless you. 36.73.105.154 ( talk) 15:35, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Salam Alaykum. Nice attempt. You made an excellent article and I propose to nominate it for GA.
![]() |
The Barnstar of Iran's Merit of Excellence | |
I think you really deserve this barnstar for your wonderful attempt in developing Abbasid Revolution article. Seyyed( t- c) 01:37, 18 July 2014 (UTC) |
Salam Alaykum,
I think deletion of the article is the easiest way to encounter the problem.not the best one. I found several books which may help us to improve it: Tafsir Ibn Kathir and the other Sunni Tafsirs. Best.-- Seyyed( t- c) 18:58, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
sorry for the late. EID MUBARAK! I have a request, can you write anything about what is happening in Palestine? Thanks 109.154.0.121 ( talk) 14:31, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Came across this "... Salafi and Wahhabi are not synonyms, Baboon. That's the point. We've been through this before; ... " from a post by you and had an idea.
Why not make an article along the lines of Distinction between Wahhabism, Salafism and Islamism and putting lots of different definitions from different scholars, clerics, knowledgeable journalists. What do you think? -- BoogaLouie ( talk) 15:28, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I have recently expanded and rewritten the Polandball article at Draft:Polandball. I have also requested undeletion of the original article (that should never have been deleted in the first place) at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2014_August_6. I am leaving you this message as you left a message at User_talk:Supernerd11#Polandball_project_team in relation to resurrecting the article. 185.49.15.25 ( talk) 07:20, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Got another question since you seem to be a sort of senior editor on things Islamic. If you have time could you look at the Khidr article. Somebody (probably Tarasyani. he/she has no user page) seems to have crammed it full of poorly organized/written and (I think) very tangential stuff on Khidr's association with Gilgamesh and other non-Islamic issues. I put some tags on it but do you have any other ideas on how to improve it? -- BoogaLouie ( talk) 22:58, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Dear MezzoMezzo, assalamu alaykum. I hope you are fine. Sorry to ask, but could you please have a look at the page Asad Q. Ahmed and its talk page. Editor Ashwak786 seems to want to consider this very imperfect page to be perfect and edit-proof. Maybe he's connected to the subject. I don't know. He writes stupid stuff on my user page too. Thanks so much. Regards, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 06:27, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Glad to hear you're back -- BoogaLouie ( talk) 16:49, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
I corrected the section on Judaism, but there are non-Jews who insist they know better. Can you inject yourself?
Jaim Harlow 20:27, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Mezzo. I have copied our exchange from my Talk page as it is now archived and thought it would be simpler to deal with on your page. Have you had time to look at the translation yet? -- P123ct1 ( talk) 07:45, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Greetings,
All the best. MezzoMezzo ( talk) 11:46, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Salaam MezzoMezzo, you were great in editing & improving Waqar Azmi page. I'm not an expert like you but just a learner. I've seen your work and really respect and admire you for your fairness and impartiality. Could you please help by looking at Waqar Azmi page. It seems User Akbar Baig is intent on pushing his own agenda without any source. I've messaged on his Talk page but he is not responding. Grateful for your help. (EcoMaster 13:26, 22 October 2014 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecomaster ( talk • contribs)
Dear MezzoMezzo, assalamu alaykum. I hope you are well. Another editor (RookTaker) and I are feeling a bit frustrated that our efforts to keep the iERA article neutral, balanced and reliable are being thwarted by an anonymous editor who changes his editor name (sometimes to mimic ours) and seems to want to whitewash the article. I don't have an view as to whether iERA is good or bad, but it is a controversial entity. That's not just my opinion. Neutral and reliable sources show that. Hiding the controversial nature of this entity will therefore prevent an accurate account being presented. I'm not out to paint the iERA as despicable. I truly don't have an axe to grind. I don't believe that RookTaker has either. Can you please take a look at the article and the edit history and see what you think? Thanks and regards, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 05:33, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Salam Alaykum, I think this article can be nominated for WP:GA. There are few improvement such as completing the lead which should be done prior to nomination. Best. Seyyed( t- c) 11:53, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Dear MezzoMezzo, assalamu alaykum. I hope life is good. I've nominated the article on Umar Vadillo for deletion. It seems to be one of those poorly sourced pages created by a fan or by someone connected by Vadillo himself. I'd be grateful if you would take a look at the page and share your views at this article's entry on the Articles for deletion page. Thanks and best regards, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 04:05, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
it's wrong to delete what I had written about tawhid. It's Islam. Islamic11111 ( talk) 09:25, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
"I really don't care about your personal opinions of religions at all" What does this mean? Was that his personal opinion? I don't think so. Let me ask a question. Do you care more about "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" or "Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala"? 31.52.139.225 ( talk) 17:17, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
I wanna introduced you Muhammad Arshad ul Qadri. I wrote a small http://afkaremuslim.blogspot.com/2013/04/arshadul-qadri.html of the personality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.178.243.74 ( talk) 11:06, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Dear MezzoMezzo, assalamu alaykum. I hope life is good. Please can you take a look at the edits on the Junaid Jamshed page, and then at its talk page. One strident editor seems hell-bent on branding him a blasphemer even though no judicial finding has stated that. Thanks and regards, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 06:46, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mrashid364#05_January_2015. Regards, kashmiri TALK 21:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
For all your words and actions when dealing with an aggressive sock farm. !شكرا kashmiri TALK 22:42, 6 January 2015 (UTC) |
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Lockmaster1 (
talk)
14:03, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Lockmaster1 (
talk)
14:06, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Salafi movement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mohammed Hassan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:02, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
... in this: Articles for deletion/Sultan-ul-Faqr Monthly Magazine. I wonder how many more such "gems" have been spread around the Wikipedia by the group. Regards, kashmiri TALK 10:24, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
You might be interested this article is up for deletion again: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Targeted Individual (2nd nomination)
Hello,
Thanks for taking your time off to help hapless Wikipedians and otherwise stucked-up articles find their way to the forefront of other non-English speaking readers. I would hope that I have approached you the right way.
Nonetheless, I humbly seeks your intervention to translate the following pages, since I gathered that it may mean something to Wiki readers in Arabic.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ten_Letters_to_Obama
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Adonis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webwatchergy ( talk • contribs) 15:21, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks in anticipation for facilitating this request. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webwatchergy ( talk • contribs) 15:18, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello MezzoMezzo, I moved the page we discussed as best as I could from the wiki link that was posted. I hope the move was satisfactory. Now to the issue for which I am here for; I am currently working on the Ibn Taymiyyah article. The work is going all right, there is a lot to be done but there is one thing I am absolutely stuck on. That being the naming of sections and subsections. The names I have come up with, for some reason do not sound encyclopaedic but that could just be me. Your help in this regard will be gratefully appreciated. If you do have time and have a look, please bear in mind that the work is not yet completed as I am waiting to get my hand on sources and I am only upto when he was 45 years old. Regards. Mbcap ( talk) 18:41, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Salam Alaykum. Can you please check your mail. Best.-- Seyyed( t- c) 03:17, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello friend, reason why I edited Salafi movement is provided here Talk:Salafi movement Ejaz92 ( talk) 05:49, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Greetings Mr MezzoMezzo :
I only got here by accident . I innocently went to Wikpedia to look for a quote from Al-Jahiz and stumbled on the Talk:Al-Jahiz page. I am gobsmacked at what I found. I realize that lots of people with dishonest intentions meddle in Wikpedia articles and play fast and loose with the truth to promote their own agendas but I naively assumed that an article on someone as obscure to a native English speaker as Al-Jahiz would be safe from that sort of BS . Not only that but that people are attacking each other rather unkindly over differences in such minutiae . I have a book I bought in the 70's with some of his writings in it I was just too lazy to dig it out . At least with a book right or wrong no one can come in in the dead of night and change the information in it. The way forward is dark enough , to intentionally meddle with the past is a great crime , a sin "thou shalt not bear false witness".
I linked to your page just out of curiosity and I see that your page has been vandalized a dozen times . Jesus , don't people have anything better to do with their time ?
I also see that on your page you say you are " actually a subject matter expert on topics related to technical writing, technical translation and general topics related to technical documentation." I just want to say that you should never assume any technical knowledge on the part of the users of your translations unless they are meant for specialists . I can't tell you how many times I have thrown a tech manual down in frustration because the writer wasn't specific enough . If I knew that stuff I wouldn't be using a tech manual in the first place . — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Camel regulars (
talk •
contribs)
21:30, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
I only got here by accident . I innocently went to Wikpedia to look for a quote from Al-Jahiz and stumbled on the Talk:Al-Jahiz page. I am gobsmacked at what I found. I realize that lots of people with dishonest intentions meddle in Wikpedia articles and play fast and loose with the truth to promote their own agendas but I naively assumed that an article on someone as obscure to a native English speaker as Al-Jahiz would be safe from that sort of BS . Not only that but that people are attacking each other rather unkindly over differences in such minutiae . I have a book I bought in the 70's with some of his writings in it I was just too lazy to dig it out . At least with a book right or wrong no one can come in in the dead of night and change the information in it. The way forward is dark enough , to intentionally meddle with the past is a great crime , a sin "thou shalt not bear false witness".
I only got here by accident . I innocently went to Wikpedia to look for a quote from Al-Jahiz and stumbled on the Talk:Al-Jahiz page. I am gobsmacked at what I found. I realize that lots of people with dishonest intentions meddle in Wikpedia articles and play fast and loose with the truth to promote their own agendas but I naively assumed that an article on someone as obscure to a native English speaker as Al-Jahiz would be safe from that sort of BS . Not only that but that people are attacking each other rather unkindly over differences in such minutiae . I have a book I bought in the 70's with some of his writings in it I was just too lazy to dig it out . At least with a book right or wrong no one can come in in the dead of night and change the information in it. The way forward is dark enough , to intentionally meddle with the past is a great crime , a sin "thou shalt not bear false witness".
I linked to your page just out of curiosity and I see that your page has been vandalized a dozen times . Jesus , don't people have anything better to do with their time ?
I linked to your page just out of curiosity and I see that your page has been vandalized a dozen times . Jesus , don't people have anything better to do with their time ? − I also see that on your page you say you are " actually a subject matter expert on topics related to technical writing, technical translation and general topics related to technical documentation." I just want to say that you should never assume any technical knowledge on the part of the users of your translations unless they are meant for specialists . I can't tell you how many times I have thrown a tech manual down in frustration because the writer wasn't specific enough . If I knew that stuff I wouldn't be using a tech manual in the first place — Preceding unsigned comment added by Camel regulars ( talk • contribs) 21:41, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Thank you so much for the barnstar you gave me for my work on Maliki scholarship. Wa Bi Allahi at Tawfeeq. I pray you are rewarded for your act of kindness. Jaw101ie ( talk) 17:25, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Salam Alaykum,
What is your suggestion for "بعثت"?-- Seyyed( t- c) 06:13, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Assalamu alaykum MezzoMezzo,
At the moment I am preparing an article that merges Mid-Sha'ban and Barat Night. In these two articles, I have come across a myriad of translations of the word bara'at as in ليلة البراءة: Night of Records, Night of Assignment, Night of Deliverance, Night of Innocence, Night of Forgiveness, Day(?) of Atonement, Night of Freedom, Night of Salvation. The laylat-part is easy, but could you please shed some light on what you think might be the best translation of bara'at? Thanks! HyperGaruda ( talk) 20:51, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Wasila is definition. I read the talk page discussions. If you can take a look at this it might be clearer [23] Khanyusufkhalil ( talk) 09:09, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
You are very late. Khanyusufkhalil ( talk) 06:38, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Dear MezzoMezzo, can you please look at the recent edit history of Birmingham Central Mosque. It's not nice to be called a religious hypocrite by User:AHLM13 -- again -- merely because I asked for evidence for his addition. Thanks and salam, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 05:39, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
A Barnstar! | Please participate
There's a voting going on here. It needs to close, but consensus is not certain. We need more participation. The issues can't remain without a resolution. Please, check it out. Closure of the discussion has started. ( refresh) Please, hurry. 78.149.193.255 ( talk) 16:29, 10 April 2015 (UTC) |
Hello MezzoMezzo, How have you been? My latest question.
The title of
Islamic economics was
changed to
Islamic economic jurisprudence back in 2007.
It has always bothered me. Some thoughts:
What would you think of either changing the name back to Islamic economics, or making a separate article for Islamic economics? -- BoogaLouie ( talk) 16:11, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Khanyusufkhalil (
talk)
23:18, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Dear MezzoMezzo. Assalamu alaykum. I hope you are well. Can you please look at List of converts to Islam from Christianity . One editor, User:Xtremedood, adds excessive bio details for a Wikipedia list (which I guess I could live with), but, far worse, adds non-notable people and tries to claim that the website http://www.muslimconverts.com/ is a reliable source for them. I don't want to violate edit-war or 3-revert policies. Thanks and regards, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 17:24, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Check this out. Its more trouble than I thought! -- BoogaLouie ( talk) 14:20, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello MezzoMezzo. I was hoping you could assist me in a matter relating to the articles on individual Sura's of the Qur'an. Is it allowed to use Ibn Kathir or Maududi or two Jalal's tafsirs to build content on the aforementioned pages. Please ping me in you reply. Regards Mbcap ( talk) 06:49, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Asalamualeikum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh,
Akhi how have you been!? MashaAllah I had a quick peek out of retirement to see the old typical edit-war articles and saw you've maintained much of them alhamdulilah! I'm very happy to see that and I really appreciate your work. May Allah fill your effort with barakah and grant you success in this life and the hereafter! JazakAllahu khair!! Ws, Sakimonk talk 23:20, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Let me respond to your accusations. User page indicates to me to that your a revert. Unless of course you are from a long line of native Scottish muslims. Ibn khaldun has made it clear, the Zahiri school is followed by worthless people, deviants, and others. Phase 1 will see the Salafi burnout look it up. Vigorously defending Zahirism means you are a proponent. Zahiri are not accepted by the Sunni. A consensus was formed to eliminate the school of thought. It is for this reason unclassified and does not belong in Sunni category. The group is rare as you said but you insist it being in the Sunni category, which is suspicious to anyone. Ibn khaldun acknowledges its existence but made sure to note it is shunned by the muslim community. Fringe groups like this are only highlighted by people who have a dog in this fight. Do you have a dog in this fight? Calling my edits disruptive is misrepresentation. I did not add my personal opinion on said subject. Dont get upset about facts. People who are unfamiliar with Islamic articles might be fooled but not for long. I know the religion can be confusing for you especially when deviants lead you to a narrow path, but you only have yourself to blame if you are hard headed. If you continue to over represent Zahirism you will eventually be caught. DianeJR ( talk) 19:21, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Sad you should be!! for those snarky edit summaries. Wikipedia is not reliable because of deranged editors with an agenda like yourself. 8 years on wikipedia? You must be a lowlife. Let me guess you met a pompous Saudi Arabian in your college days and now your hell bent on spreading zahiri belief to the world. YOU’VE BEEN WARNED!! says the keyboard warrior. Have fun attempting to keep wikipedia narrow and skewed shrek. Sincerely, someone who has a life. DianeJR ( talk) 21:16, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
R RFD e SahabAliwadia ( talk) 10:45, 21 May 2015 (UTC) |
It is to keep in mind that Wikipedia is not anyone's father's property... a wiki page should contain criticism of a certain person if provided from genuine sources and links... i see you've deleted the vital information that i mention in the page Nasiruddin Albani... I've also provided references there especially the name of Albani's books and those books plus links where he has his refutation from mainstream Sunni Muslims... If you are so keen to highlight Albani in positive way and according to your own fancy and linking, then perhaps you should choose some other websites or to create a website of your own! so please don't try to conceal the truth or violate wiki policy anymore... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahirdyan ( talk • contribs) 01:35, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
These contributions cannot have been by accident. -- Orduin Discuss 21:24, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
I've come out of retirement for a bit, I was wondering if you could help me keep an eye on Hadith of Najd as there are many users wrecking it. Also, there are quite a few other articles we could discuss later possibly inshaAllah. JazakAllahu khair for your work. Sakimonk talk 07:08, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Madhhab may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 04:00, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi! Do you do short translation requests? WhisperToMe ( talk) 11:25, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
A new account has been speaking of you in rather non AGF terms in regard to the Barelvi page. See here. 220 of Borg 13:26, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Al-Ghariyah al-Gharbiyah (town in Syria) was originally copied and translated (poorly) from the article in Arabic. I have done some cleanup, but I don't read Arabic. If you have the time, could you please check the English article in case I have made mistakes. I have added some specific notes to Talk:Al-Ghariyah al-Gharbiyah#Check translation from Arabic. I also asked Al Ameer son, who I thought might read Arabic, but doesn't, it turns out. thanks. Nurg ( talk) 04:22, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Dear MezzoMezzo, assalamu alaykum. I hope you are well. Please see the Ismail ibn Musa Menk page, its talk page, and its edits log. I'm having difficulty with one editor who repeatedly adds unreferenced (or weakly referenced) material and seems to want to create a fan page. Can you please keep an eye on the page for a day or two? Thanks and regards, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 06:16, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Brother MezzoMezzo, I would also be grateful for your thoughts on the notability of this page. I've nominated it for deletion. Thanks and salam, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 07:09, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Salam Alaykum, I guess you'd like to participate in this Merger proposal. best wishes. -- Seyyed( t- c) 04:52, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Assalamu alaykum MezzoMezzo, I saw that you had a troll who was following your edits and reverting them. I changed them back. Now he's gone crazy reverting all my own edits maliciously. How do we bring this to the attention of an administrator? Regards, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 05:49, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Dear MezzoMezzo, assalamu alaykum. I hope you are well. I am wondering whether you could take a look at the Hridayananda Dasa Goswami page and help me to keep it neutral. I know the subject might not interest you, but one editor seems to want to make it a silly fan page, but not even by including references. Thanks and regards, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 11:18, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Dear MezzoMezzo, assalamu alaykum. thank you for your interest in Oman's culture and history. yes there are sources and references pertaining to ibadhism and the history of oman on our governmental websites here, but they are in Arabic mostly, sorry...what kind of info exactly are you looking for? I will try my best to help you inshAllah Grandia01 ( talk) 07:05, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
There is mention of you on the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard, over here [24]. Xtremedood ( talk) 11:48, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
I suspect you find the whole topic disgusting and depressing but hope you will offer an opinion. /info/en/?search=Talk:Islamic_views_on_slavery#Update_on_dispute_on_ISIS_and_jihadist_section -- BoogaLouie ( talk) 16:48, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Misdemenor. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Thank you.
Misdemenor (
talk)
07:23, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi MezzoMezzo! I'm having trouble verifying a source and it might help if I knew what the title meant: Kitab wal-ta'tiyya (by Salman Farooq if that helps, unless the ref is WP:CB). Thanks! - HyperGaruda ( talk) 05:30, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Can you review my draft? It has been pending for 2 month because of the biased reviewers. Ejaz92 ( talk) 10:19, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
I think you don't read these articles. He was not from Salafi Jihadism or Salafi Movement. But your article salafi tells he was. Salafi Movement. and Salafiyyah are different concepts you should read and learn
68.100.166.227 ( talk) 00:44, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Stick to eating snakes. Malaylampur ( talk) 13:38, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. It involves this particular section on your talk page. -
HyperGaruda (
talk)
01:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Are you an islamic scholar? How do you know which sect is right or wrong? Malaylampur ( talk) 16:52, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Please stop. Articles on Wikipedia do not give
fringe material equal weight to majority viewpoints; content in articles are given representation
in proportion to their prominence. If you continue in this manner, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Misdemenor (
talk)
06:25, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be
blocked from editing.
Misdemenor (
talk)
09:09, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, MezzoMezzo. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Misdemenor ( talk) 03:03, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi MezzoMezzo,
As a followup on last year's efforts against a sock farm [27], I see the group is still active. After failing to purge Hamza Makhdoom off WP (just because the guy is known locally as Sultan ul-Arifeen, the title which the group claims for their venerated Sultan Bahoo), the folks are now trying to delete Hari Parbat because of Hamza Mahkdoom's shrine there [28] and Makhdoom [29] - is it because it links to "Hamza Makhdoom"? This is so that you are up to date with the group's funny activity. Best, kashmiri TALK 19:53, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Salam Alaykum Eid al-Milad al-Nabi Mubarak.
There are many Islamic-related articles which may become controversial between Muslims and non-Muslims or different Islamic Madhabs. Following our succesful attempts to improve the lead of Ali and current effort in Taqiya, I suggest forming a "technical group for dispute resolution" in WP:Islam. I hope this effort pave the road to solve more severe controversies such as Islamic terrorism.-- Seyyed( t- c) 07:24, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
Have you already read this:
by Saadi Shirazi-- Seyyed( t- c) 08:16, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! ==
Misdemenor ( talk) 05:46, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello - Salam
Othmanebenjelloun (
talk)
09:38, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, an IP editor recently attempted to move Madhhab and Talk:Madhhab to "Madhab" by copy-and-paste (!). I have now reverted the changes (someone may carry out move in a proper way if consensus is there) but in the meantime you wrote a few paragraphs on Talk:Madhab. So that your comments don't get lost, will you mind re-adding them to the now restored Talk:Madhhab? — kashmiri TALK 23:53, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
I will be away due to a personal issue. I'll return in a few months. Sorry for the inconvenience. Misdemenor ( talk) 05:54, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Dear MezzoMezzo, assalamu alaykum. I hope you are well. I know you are busy but I'll be very glad and grateful if you'll please look at the Yousuf Gabriel page and in particular at the deletion recommendation page. I believe the page clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO and may have been created by a fan (the only editor aside from me) to promote the sale of a book. In any event, the article relies on unacceptable or weak sources and says almost nothing that can be considered encyclopedic. Thanks and best regards, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 16:59, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
How are you these days-- Johnleeds1 ( talk) 22:04, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
At the risk of betraying my ignorance is this right? - BoogaLouie ( talk) 21:27, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
I just copied what was on another article [31] Therefore revert your edit back unless your now claiming athari is kalam. Misdemenor ( talk) 03:36, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
I have submitted the DR here: Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Talk:Mawlid#Consensus doesn't exist concerning falsehood. -- Mawlidman ( talk) 03:39, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
I have removed part of your addition to the above article, as it appears to have been copied directly from http://www.abraronline.net/en/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=129&Itemid=301, a copyright web page. I had to download the document to view the material. It is on page 4. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions or if you think I may have made a mistake. — Diannaa ( talk) 16:36, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
36.81.88.250 ( talk) 03:41, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Dear MezzoMezzo, assalamu alaykum. I hope you are fine. Can you please look at recent edits on this page - Abu Ammaar Yasir Qadhi - and see what you think of the sources used. One editor wants to use a blog and youtube, and I disagree. Thanks and regards, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 09:44, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Salam Alaykum. Have you seen this [32]. Do you know the other users who may vote for it? Best, -- Seyyed( t- c) 06:31, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
"Walaikum as salam User:Sa.vakilian, though I'm not sure how to inform people of this. I literally didn't know about it until you just told me, and I don't know much about the rules between Commons and here. Are we allowed to post about it at Wikiproject talk pages and stuff? MezzoMezzo ( talk) 03:40, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |