You cannot simply erase it and redirect empty page to "Czech Republic" (it is incredibly arrogant !!!!!!), it is the article about the NAME with many references and description of objective reality. On that article cooperated many specialists Neewi ( talk) 10:32, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Your behaviour is not only incorrect, but really stupid, deleting facts is unacceptable (now all particular information word by wor in Names of the Czech Republic and because you are hidden and unable to discuss about it, you do it apparently from some personal reasons. You have started this war, so you will have it. Because you are under strange protection of some other persons from Wikipedia, I handed this problem over to other media and my article about the "democratic" system of Wikipedia, where your arrogant behaviour reigns, will be published in newspapers. Neewi ( talk) 07:41, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
For the record, I agree with you that "Czechia" should not be mentioned in the lead- I just want to discuss it on the talk page and reach a consensus because there doesn't seem to be a clear one at the moment. Please use the talk page before making edits like that please (or at least after you are reverted the first time). Once again, I agree with you completely. The Dominator Talk Edits 04:46, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the good work you're doing picking up unreferenced birth dates! I noticed you doing it on a couple of pages I'd edited. Best, Dsp13 ( talk) 00:38, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
This is much better, thank you. DVdm ( talk) 19:31, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Daily Times is a reliable source, please discuss before reverting. Thanks!--- Managerarc talk 17:23, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
All the previous Egytian Prime Ministers bios infoboxes use the numbering. If you don't stop now, I'll report you to the 'Edit warring noticeboard'. GoodDay ( talk) 17:50, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
He's the 7th Prime Minister of Barbados, which is sourced
[1] in that article. Next time, check the article over before you 'automatically revert' me & claim OR. Also, knock-off the stalking.
GoodDay (
talk) 05:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Rather than editwarring and undoing without explanation, please go to the talk page and discuss why the birthdate doesn't belong. GB fan ( talk) 15:08, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Could you please explain this edit? What makes the source that I provided for the year of death "ridiculous" exactly? As I pointed out in my edit summary, the source is an acceptable one to use according the list of resources at WikiProject Unreferenced articles. Even without this, however, your accusation that the site merely copied from Wikipedia is baseless (again). If this site merely copies from Wikipedia, how do you rectify the fact that for Sein Win (Brigadier General), another DOD that you removed as unsourced that was around for much longer than Pithey's, the same site not only lacks the date of death that Wikipedia claimed, but doesn't even have the same year of birth? Canadian Paul 01:37, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi Mewulwe, just wondering why you are deleting "also Plzen or Pilsen," from
this page? Pilsen and Plzen are both commonly used in the English-language press (Google "Plzen" and site:.guardian.co.uk, for example) and by the City of Pilsen itself (i.e.
http://www.pilsen.eu/en/).
The
wiki page about Cracow/Krakow/Kraków is worded similarly and recognises the local spelling and alternate English spellings for the city. Why would it be inadmissible to do the same for Pilsen, especially when the other two spellings are so widely used?
Bezzemek (
talk) 00:14, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
I cited an article clearly stating his date of birth as 7 June 1942. Is there a reason that this should be considered not true? Jeancey ( talk) 21:49, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
I strongly disagree with this edit, so I have raised the issue at WP:BLPN. You may follow and/or comment on the discussion there. Canadian Paul 22:03, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Mewulwe, Please stop your mass changing of "Czechia" to "Czech Republic". Both terms are official and acceptable English and, AFAIK, "Czechia" is not deprecated on Wikipedia. I have held off reverting your changes until I have sounded out WikiProject Czech Republic. Feel free to argue your case there. -- Bermicourt ( talk) 13:37, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
The first two are numbered, so why not the next two. GoodDay ( talk) 20:19, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
See BLPN. Your reasoning is unsupported by facts and therefore should not be used to remove reliable sources and information. Stop edit warring. – Connormah ( talk) 01:49, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
hI, there is a thread opened at the BLP noticeboard to discuss J Banda;s date of birth, Please join in the discussion there, - thanks - Youreally can 07:52, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi - sometimes here at Wiki you can be right but still have to let things go - I am in a bit of agreement with you, that there is clearly no official release of her date of birth = however consensus and the usually acceptable sourcing is against you/us = please don't remove it again as there is a call for you to be blocked if you do - regards Youreally can 08:29, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Mewulwe, before seeking action on a dispute resolution notice board, I thought I would address my concerns to you first. I have been directed away from the Joyce Banda article to accomplish this. Since we have only recently interacted, it seems appropriate for us to come to an understanding before asking others to get involved. In my opinion, you need to quit reverting the work of other editors and start a discussion on the appropriate talk page; in this case the Joyce Banda talk page. Let's talk. It is time. drs ( talk) 22:18, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | |
You've been around for some time, and it's high time your editing skill was recognized. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 23:07, 16 April 2012 (UTC) |
Just for context: I was looking a list of people who recently passed 1,000 edits in the mainspace, and it looks like that happened recently for you. Thanks for sticking around. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 23:08, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Please be advised of 3RR on Joyce Banda. Nomoskedasticity ( talk) 18:10, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
I was coming here to start a new section about your behavior on Joyce Banda, but it actually seems more relevant to put it here. The shortest explanation is that your editing is textbook tendentious editing. You are twisting around the meaning of consensus in such a way that it seems like any action you take is automatically correct, and it's up to others to somehow prove the impossible. You've made it such that no one can ever "prove" to your satisfaction that that number goes into the infobox, and thus somehow your version is automatically better. Your position in other sections of that talk page is also concerning. Finally, you are edit warring on the article. So, stop. Or I will block you. I know that Steven Walling means well above, but having been involved with tendentious editors on other articles, I know that simply having a high edit count does not mean one is a good editor. Qwyrxian ( talk) 21:32, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Mewulwe, we have interacted several days now and I have developed an appreciation for your determination as an editor. We have actually worked through an issue or two. I like the collaboration. Regarding the ordinal numbering edit war, I don't see why it is such a big concern. There is no stated WP policy on it. The soundness of your logic does not resolve the situation. We need a WP rule, or leave it alone, IMO. Let's put our efforts into developing the Joyce Banda article. With her newly acquired role as president comes reliable news reports with new information. The article provides a BLP of an important person helping to shape Africa and the world. drs ( talk) 02:18, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
As there's many Presidents of Venzeula, I've opened a discussion at the Hugo Chavez article - concerning whether or not he is the 61st President of that country. GoodDay ( talk) 20:43, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
You're invited to be a part of Wikipedia:WikiProject University of Belgrade, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to the University of Belgrade. To accept this invitation, click here! Articles related to other universities in Belgrade, Serbia and Southeast Europe may be discussed as well. This helps share information and foster knowledge about higher education in the region. |
I was thinking you could add something about Czech universities, as we are seeking to share information. -- Comparativist1 ( talk) 19:19, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
I will revert your edit to the above mentioned article because your opinion of the Kenyan media is highly irrelevant and also because the source I had cited was verifiable. The source met the established wikipedia criteria for identifying reliable sources. Please remember wikipedia encourages constructive factual dialogue when it comes to editing conflicts. Thuralt ( talk) 16:14, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
I noted that you removed the date and month of birth from George Saitoti article. it is uncouth and non-wikipedia behaviour. If you have a question about that, you can engage the editor or start a discussion at the appropriate discussion page for clarity or any other comments.Kindly desist from that.-- stephenWanjau Talk to Me. Email Me. 16:36, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Which other sources say Cambridge City? Just curious. – Connormah ( talk) 04:01, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Mewulwe. FYI, this revert and many similar by over a dozen other editors are under discussion at WP:ANI. Cheers. In ictu oculi ( talk) 13:32, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
"Me-wulwa", pls stop vandalising the entry for CommonDreams.org by deleting the referenced section on legitimate criticism of the article-site. Your deletions appear blatantly politically biased. 85.166.121.208 ( talk) 20:54, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
( talk page stalker)I've semi-protected the article for 3 days. 85*, that is not reliably sourced information. Comments on forums are never reliable sources. And I will tell you directly that not only am I not related to the company, I've never even heard of it. If you can find reliable sources that discuss the issue, then perhaps it could be included (though you have to follow WP:UNDUE and other policies). I recommend discussing the issue on the article's talk page. Qwyrxian ( talk) 05:30, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
I've thought the advice from the other editors, as to if I should take the numbering dispute to DRN. GoodDay ( talk) 19:11, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello. Please reverse your recent deletions of references to the scholarly work "China in European Encyclopaedias." It is an excellent study of how European encyclopedias portrayed China in the 19th century. Its inclusion in relevant Wikipedia articles is helpful in giving readers interpretive context. M2545 ( talk) 15:02, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. I'm just letting you know that I have temporarily reverted the edit you made here. This is because as far as I can see, there has been no recent discussion for such a change since Talk:East Germany/Archive 5#East Germany was a satellite state of the Soviet Union, saying it is ''not is a revisionist interpretation of history not backed up by facts, which appeared to be left unresolved. Please note that I have absolutely no personal opinion in this content issue, but I think the best solution would be for the editors to start a new discussion aimed at finally reaching a consensus. Regards, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 20:56, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello Mewulwe. "it is explained elsewhere", you wrote. Where? The English term Czechia is not so rarely used. [2] [3]. -- Vejvančický ( talk / contribs) 06:40, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
So you think that Cesko is Czech Republic? Our country needs a short name and Czechia is the only logical alternative like Croatia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Latvia, Austria. Helveticus96 ( talk) 13:35, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
The Czech Republic is a political name ("republic" is not name, but denomination of concrete political system in the country) , CZECHIA is an informal (geographic, short-form, one-worn, etc.) name. An informal name is politically neutral, therefore can be used in any connotation. Using only political name limits the country historically only to the period of the existence of actual political formation in the country (in this case since 1993 until now). The state with long history and the row of changes of political systems and also with many changes in denominations (the case of almost every European country) should denominate itself in historical context using informal name, which role cannot be ever substituted by political denomination and representatives of every European country are fully aware of it, excl.Czechs. Therefore the need of using an informal name also for the Czech state with history more than 1100 years old is comprehensible, logical and axiomatic. In addition (however obvious), using political name also in historical context leads to improper connotations (e.g. here somewhere "Charles IV was the king of the Czech Republic". Jan Blanický 19:45, 7 June 2014 (UTC) Blanicky ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 19:52, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
See Talk:Czech_Republic#Czechia_.28again.29. -- Vejvančický ( talk / contribs) 15:26, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Greetings. Because you have already cast a vote for the 2013 Arbitration Committee Elections, I regret to inform you that due to a misconfiguration of the SecurePoll we've been forced to strike all votes and reset voting. This notice is to inform you that you will need to vote again if you want to be counted in the poll. The new poll is located at this link. You do not have to perform any additional actions other than voting again. If you have any questions, please direct them at the election commissioners. --For the Election Commissioners, v/r, TParis
The Original Barnstar | |
dear friend , i can see you're a weathered editor .great ! i just wonder why u changed my KH entry on his birth and I also am surprised that it happened so quickly, how do you do it? there are SO many pages?? An honest Q, just wanting to learn! greetings RICTF Rictf ( talk) 20:46, 14 December 2014 (UTC) |
I have an Encyclopedia Britannica from the 1990s that says Mali's legislature removed limits on how much time a president can stay in office in 1985 ... I read that as making Traoré president for life. Am I missing something?
Not you again? GoodDay ( talk) 20:47, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi User Mewulwe. You recently undo my edition on Hossein Ghods-Nakhai article. The edition was accurate and correct. This person was born in 1894 instead 1911 in Mazanderan province in Northern Iran and died in 1977 in Shiraz on Fras Province in Southern Iran. I use Reliable sources for this correction. World Cup 2010 ( talk) 17:23, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Mewulwe. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
For some reason has been listed as foreign minister of Bangladesh- since Shahriar Alam (Politician) has been listed sin|ce January 2014 according to the article.
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Mewulwe reported by User:Lalichii (Result: ). Thank you. Lalichii ( talk) 00:33, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Note: I've opened a discussion at Template:Infobox officeholder, concerning numbering of office holders in their infoboxes. TBH, I'd have less problems with your anti-numbering stance, if you'd apply it evenly. Removing the numbering at Joyce Banda, while leaving the numbering in place for her predecessors & successor, causes inconsistency. GoodDay ( talk) 17:36, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Any comments Talk:Abdul_Sattar_Edhi#Date_of_birth.3F? -- Saqib ( talk) 09:08, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
My article #is# original research (with information from others) - and the references are as stated. There is also [4] and various other sources. Jackiespeel ( talk) 17:57, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
I have put a link against my previous comment on the article talk page - which may solve the issue of people adding the link on the actual page in good faith (and there are always going to be some cases like this, where there are valid arguments on both sides). Jackiespeel ( talk) 09:45, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
I apologize if that edit-war got out of hand, that user you were arguing with happens to be my brother, he often watches the Current Events Portal, which he has frequently commented on several times in the past, and gets very, very patriotic and defensive if someone puts something negative about the United States. I don't know how he was able to infiltrate my account during the first edits he made, but I will have a talk with him about it later. I happened to come across his edits after noticing that the page that he was edit-warring was on my watchlist. Hornetzilla78 ( talk) 12:32, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Pardon my ignorance, but can you tell me why a pre-2006 source is required for Sonia Gandhi's real name? Thanks. Numerounovedant Talk 08:24, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Mewulwe. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
We at Wikiproject Sri Lanka have a hard enough job updating and curating our relatively small list of articles with limited manpower without people starting POV edit wars over whether or not Sri Lankan governors merit counting. I will concede that a lot of the lists concerning the governors are not sourced entirely reliably, but I myself have only started editing these pages to update and standardize them quite recently, and I seem to be one of two editors trying to maintain these articles at the moment. The solution in the meantime isn't to try and start an edit war (which seems to be your thing, judging by this talk page) or arbitrarily remove material with snide edit summaries, but to try and bring this to someone's attention so we can fix the issue at hand. You'll find many wikiprojects don't appreciate people coming in from outside, removing material and then belittling their country all at the same time. - ක - ( talk) 10:15, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
P.S.- also, " good lord" and " cut the crap" are neither helpful nor edit summaries. Please, just stop.
People read & write articles about members of deposed royal families because they care genealogically,regardless of what the republican governments of the various countries have to say on the matter.Take it up with the various project editors if you feel a need to advocate for the republics. 12.144.5.2 ( talk) 19:01, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Mewulwe
Why are you ignoring the list?— Bukhari (Talk!) 06:09, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Mewulwe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello,
I am interested in why are you insisting on erasing the numbers beside the persons former political title? I checked all other Croatian PMs and presidents and they ALL have their respective numbers except one (I also checked the U.S. and Italian presidents/PMs just in case). I never heard of this rule you mentioned even though I'm a Croatian citizen.
Regards, Luke CroGamer 1 ( talk) 00:11, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! CroGamer 1 ( talk) 17:07, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! CroGamer 1 ( talk) 22:15, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
I am having difficulty understanding your change to Laurie Morgan, replacing the citation request that I just removed. The inline citation from the Guernsey Press includes his year of birth as 1930. Can you help me with this article? Perhaps the removal was not the best approach.-- Dthomsen8 ( talk) 20:25, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Do you remember the case of Jack William Pithey, on whose talk page you participated in a discussion some years ago? I've found a new source (of dubious value, but still). DS ( talk) 20:52, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Hey there. Any thoughts why the three sources cited for Charles Michel's full name is WP:CIRCULAR?
I had citogenesis in mind as well, that's why I quoted three sources, spanning eight months, each of a different discipline: de Volkskrant, Dutch newspaper 11/2019; Daily Express, UK tabloid (may be shady) 7/2019; and a photograph caption (via Getty) 3/2019.
My rationale is that none of these sources are Wikipedia mirrors. The fact that they did not mention it came from Wikipedia means that the original authors are confident of its accuracy by their own research. Furthermore, the {{ citation needed}} tag has been present long before the Volkskrant article was published -- no reasonable journalist would take that "as is" without independently verifying it.
Is it your opinion that only published sources before the 22:06, February 17, 2017 revision (where the full name was put in) are non-circular beyond doubt? -- Nemoschool ( talk) 22:55, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Just a brief message to thank you for highlighting the discrepancies in the Robert Abela article, regarding his place of birth. Have removed your tag and replaced with a citation to substantiate. Very clearly stated, and not alluded to at all! Thanks for checking it out. Kilbosh talk 14:52, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
With gratitude for your attention to detail on the Robert Abela article. Kilbosh talk 14:52, 15 January 2020 (UTC) |
I'm working for Ethiopian Prime Minister chronological order. Although Fikre Sellassie is the first in newly formed Ethiopia, he is the sixth prime minister in general. Give your reason for your reversion. The Supermind ( talk) 16:03, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
I have noted you have repeatedly been reverting edits without providing good reason in the edit summaries at List of heads of state of Panama. Please clarify your actions. Ed6767 ( talk) 01:07, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Mewulwe. I hope all is well. I see that you removed some citations from the Boris Skossyreff article - the citiations that were added were different, and each precisely referenced the action. One example is:
The same applies for the other citations :) Thanks! SerAntoniDeMiloni ( talk) 08:56, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Mewulwe. I request that you immediately cease your non-constructive edits on the Boris Skossyreff page. The page is currently up for GA nomination, and it is not for you to destructively remove relevant & cited detail with relatively aggressive summaries. If you do not desist this destructive editing, I will launch a complaint with the Wikipedia Arbitration Committee. I kindly ask you to stop. Thank you. SerAntoniDeMiloni ( talk) 09:07, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I am Diannaa and I am a Wikipedia administrator. I noticed that you made several comments in your edit summaries on Boris Skossyreff that didn't seem very civil. For example this one. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. Please discuss your concerns about sourcing on the article talk page and comment on the content, not the contributor. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. — Diannaa ( talk) 17:33, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
I suggest that we start on a fresh page. Improving Wikipedia is what we're both here for, and I believe that a dispute will have no good outcome for either as it will simply serve to be a waste of time for us both. Time that we could spend on contributing to Wikipedia. I propose a couple of things:
I think this would save significant amounts of time, and would help ensure that Wikipedia keeps improving. Any thoughts? Thanks, SerAntoniDeMiloni ( talk) 17:58, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Boris Skossyreff. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 11:31, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
― Tartan357 Talk 22:01, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
You're so determined to be an irritant towards me, you even mistakenly undid one of your own edits. GoodDay ( talk) 17:08, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi Mewulwe, are you aware of the edit warring policy, the three revert rule and the availability of Talk:Mike Hurst (politician) and Talk:Mamady Doumbouya for discussing content disputes? ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 17:10, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
I'm confused why your summary says I have no source when I'm the one that added the source. And no, it wasn't taken from another Wikipedia page considering this source wasn't ued at the Estenssoro page or elsewhere. Please refer to WP:CIVIL before you start throwing around baseless accusations. Snickers2686 ( talk) 00:36, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Please, see Category:Pretenders. Here are lots of pretenders, not only for Württemberg. Why you decided to remove for these two files, only because it's your decision? -- Noel baran ( talk) 19:22, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Was the citation not adequate? An edit summary wouldn't be a bad idea when you revert a good-faith-edit... MattSucci ( talk) 02:12, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Dear User, you are perfectly right on principles: because Internet didn’t exist then and because most Kiribati things are oral (and rarely written), you will not find easily the place of birth of Rota Onorio which is Arorae but in Cinderellas of the Empire of Barrie Macdonald (2001) or the more comprehensive essay of Michael Walsh (2020), A History of Kiribati: From the Earliest Times to the 40th Anniversary of the Republic. But any publication on Kiribati is always hard to find, even in good libraries, if you are not close to ANU, Canberra or nearby. Try just to consider that some info are good faith (the names of the siblings of the Tiito family were all exact even if we do not need to give each name). By the way, Koru was a good friend, only one year ahead of me. And even it is not a source, look at my User name. Arorae ( talk) 11:28, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Deaths in 2023 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Renewal6 ( talk) 10:25, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
With regard to this tag: I'm not sure I fully understand the issue. If you think that the word "ever" is misleading and OR, then you're welcome to remove it, if not, please explain where the issue is and how you think it should be addressed. M.Bitton ( talk) 09:42, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Jkaharper ( talk) 09:49, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Davit Ishkhanyan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 119.56.108.152 ( talk) 12:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
your last edit IS A CLEAR VANDALISM, you edit existing quote NOT IN SYNC WITH reference link WITHIN THE SAME reference tag, disrupting existing reference tag 119.56.108.152 ( talk) 12:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
You had reverted my edition in Carl, Duke of Württemberg because, according to you: "he is neither duke nor (even titular) king". Well, he was Duke like the title of the article says and he was titular king like you could see in the article of her grandfather: Philipp Albrecht, Duke of Württemberg. If you think I'm right, please reverse the review. Sirslayercort ( talk) 09:01, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Mindaur ( talk) 20:24, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Well spotted. This may in fact be an error - and, if so, it's regrettably been on Wikipedia long enough to have potentially affected sources that would otherwise be considered reliable. If I can't find a source that pre-dates 2003, I'll remove it. DS ( talk) 17:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
You cannot simply erase it and redirect empty page to "Czech Republic" (it is incredibly arrogant !!!!!!), it is the article about the NAME with many references and description of objective reality. On that article cooperated many specialists Neewi ( talk) 10:32, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Your behaviour is not only incorrect, but really stupid, deleting facts is unacceptable (now all particular information word by wor in Names of the Czech Republic and because you are hidden and unable to discuss about it, you do it apparently from some personal reasons. You have started this war, so you will have it. Because you are under strange protection of some other persons from Wikipedia, I handed this problem over to other media and my article about the "democratic" system of Wikipedia, where your arrogant behaviour reigns, will be published in newspapers. Neewi ( talk) 07:41, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
For the record, I agree with you that "Czechia" should not be mentioned in the lead- I just want to discuss it on the talk page and reach a consensus because there doesn't seem to be a clear one at the moment. Please use the talk page before making edits like that please (or at least after you are reverted the first time). Once again, I agree with you completely. The Dominator Talk Edits 04:46, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the good work you're doing picking up unreferenced birth dates! I noticed you doing it on a couple of pages I'd edited. Best, Dsp13 ( talk) 00:38, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
This is much better, thank you. DVdm ( talk) 19:31, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Daily Times is a reliable source, please discuss before reverting. Thanks!--- Managerarc talk 17:23, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
All the previous Egytian Prime Ministers bios infoboxes use the numbering. If you don't stop now, I'll report you to the 'Edit warring noticeboard'. GoodDay ( talk) 17:50, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
He's the 7th Prime Minister of Barbados, which is sourced
[1] in that article. Next time, check the article over before you 'automatically revert' me & claim OR. Also, knock-off the stalking.
GoodDay (
talk) 05:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Rather than editwarring and undoing without explanation, please go to the talk page and discuss why the birthdate doesn't belong. GB fan ( talk) 15:08, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Could you please explain this edit? What makes the source that I provided for the year of death "ridiculous" exactly? As I pointed out in my edit summary, the source is an acceptable one to use according the list of resources at WikiProject Unreferenced articles. Even without this, however, your accusation that the site merely copied from Wikipedia is baseless (again). If this site merely copies from Wikipedia, how do you rectify the fact that for Sein Win (Brigadier General), another DOD that you removed as unsourced that was around for much longer than Pithey's, the same site not only lacks the date of death that Wikipedia claimed, but doesn't even have the same year of birth? Canadian Paul 01:37, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi Mewulwe, just wondering why you are deleting "also Plzen or Pilsen," from
this page? Pilsen and Plzen are both commonly used in the English-language press (Google "Plzen" and site:.guardian.co.uk, for example) and by the City of Pilsen itself (i.e.
http://www.pilsen.eu/en/).
The
wiki page about Cracow/Krakow/Kraków is worded similarly and recognises the local spelling and alternate English spellings for the city. Why would it be inadmissible to do the same for Pilsen, especially when the other two spellings are so widely used?
Bezzemek (
talk) 00:14, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
I cited an article clearly stating his date of birth as 7 June 1942. Is there a reason that this should be considered not true? Jeancey ( talk) 21:49, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
I strongly disagree with this edit, so I have raised the issue at WP:BLPN. You may follow and/or comment on the discussion there. Canadian Paul 22:03, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Mewulwe, Please stop your mass changing of "Czechia" to "Czech Republic". Both terms are official and acceptable English and, AFAIK, "Czechia" is not deprecated on Wikipedia. I have held off reverting your changes until I have sounded out WikiProject Czech Republic. Feel free to argue your case there. -- Bermicourt ( talk) 13:37, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
The first two are numbered, so why not the next two. GoodDay ( talk) 20:19, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
See BLPN. Your reasoning is unsupported by facts and therefore should not be used to remove reliable sources and information. Stop edit warring. – Connormah ( talk) 01:49, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
hI, there is a thread opened at the BLP noticeboard to discuss J Banda;s date of birth, Please join in the discussion there, - thanks - Youreally can 07:52, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi - sometimes here at Wiki you can be right but still have to let things go - I am in a bit of agreement with you, that there is clearly no official release of her date of birth = however consensus and the usually acceptable sourcing is against you/us = please don't remove it again as there is a call for you to be blocked if you do - regards Youreally can 08:29, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Mewulwe, before seeking action on a dispute resolution notice board, I thought I would address my concerns to you first. I have been directed away from the Joyce Banda article to accomplish this. Since we have only recently interacted, it seems appropriate for us to come to an understanding before asking others to get involved. In my opinion, you need to quit reverting the work of other editors and start a discussion on the appropriate talk page; in this case the Joyce Banda talk page. Let's talk. It is time. drs ( talk) 22:18, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | |
You've been around for some time, and it's high time your editing skill was recognized. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 23:07, 16 April 2012 (UTC) |
Just for context: I was looking a list of people who recently passed 1,000 edits in the mainspace, and it looks like that happened recently for you. Thanks for sticking around. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 23:08, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Please be advised of 3RR on Joyce Banda. Nomoskedasticity ( talk) 18:10, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
I was coming here to start a new section about your behavior on Joyce Banda, but it actually seems more relevant to put it here. The shortest explanation is that your editing is textbook tendentious editing. You are twisting around the meaning of consensus in such a way that it seems like any action you take is automatically correct, and it's up to others to somehow prove the impossible. You've made it such that no one can ever "prove" to your satisfaction that that number goes into the infobox, and thus somehow your version is automatically better. Your position in other sections of that talk page is also concerning. Finally, you are edit warring on the article. So, stop. Or I will block you. I know that Steven Walling means well above, but having been involved with tendentious editors on other articles, I know that simply having a high edit count does not mean one is a good editor. Qwyrxian ( talk) 21:32, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Mewulwe, we have interacted several days now and I have developed an appreciation for your determination as an editor. We have actually worked through an issue or two. I like the collaboration. Regarding the ordinal numbering edit war, I don't see why it is such a big concern. There is no stated WP policy on it. The soundness of your logic does not resolve the situation. We need a WP rule, or leave it alone, IMO. Let's put our efforts into developing the Joyce Banda article. With her newly acquired role as president comes reliable news reports with new information. The article provides a BLP of an important person helping to shape Africa and the world. drs ( talk) 02:18, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
As there's many Presidents of Venzeula, I've opened a discussion at the Hugo Chavez article - concerning whether or not he is the 61st President of that country. GoodDay ( talk) 20:43, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
You're invited to be a part of Wikipedia:WikiProject University of Belgrade, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to the University of Belgrade. To accept this invitation, click here! Articles related to other universities in Belgrade, Serbia and Southeast Europe may be discussed as well. This helps share information and foster knowledge about higher education in the region. |
I was thinking you could add something about Czech universities, as we are seeking to share information. -- Comparativist1 ( talk) 19:19, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
I will revert your edit to the above mentioned article because your opinion of the Kenyan media is highly irrelevant and also because the source I had cited was verifiable. The source met the established wikipedia criteria for identifying reliable sources. Please remember wikipedia encourages constructive factual dialogue when it comes to editing conflicts. Thuralt ( talk) 16:14, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
I noted that you removed the date and month of birth from George Saitoti article. it is uncouth and non-wikipedia behaviour. If you have a question about that, you can engage the editor or start a discussion at the appropriate discussion page for clarity or any other comments.Kindly desist from that.-- stephenWanjau Talk to Me. Email Me. 16:36, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Which other sources say Cambridge City? Just curious. – Connormah ( talk) 04:01, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Mewulwe. FYI, this revert and many similar by over a dozen other editors are under discussion at WP:ANI. Cheers. In ictu oculi ( talk) 13:32, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
"Me-wulwa", pls stop vandalising the entry for CommonDreams.org by deleting the referenced section on legitimate criticism of the article-site. Your deletions appear blatantly politically biased. 85.166.121.208 ( talk) 20:54, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
( talk page stalker)I've semi-protected the article for 3 days. 85*, that is not reliably sourced information. Comments on forums are never reliable sources. And I will tell you directly that not only am I not related to the company, I've never even heard of it. If you can find reliable sources that discuss the issue, then perhaps it could be included (though you have to follow WP:UNDUE and other policies). I recommend discussing the issue on the article's talk page. Qwyrxian ( talk) 05:30, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
I've thought the advice from the other editors, as to if I should take the numbering dispute to DRN. GoodDay ( talk) 19:11, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello. Please reverse your recent deletions of references to the scholarly work "China in European Encyclopaedias." It is an excellent study of how European encyclopedias portrayed China in the 19th century. Its inclusion in relevant Wikipedia articles is helpful in giving readers interpretive context. M2545 ( talk) 15:02, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. I'm just letting you know that I have temporarily reverted the edit you made here. This is because as far as I can see, there has been no recent discussion for such a change since Talk:East Germany/Archive 5#East Germany was a satellite state of the Soviet Union, saying it is ''not is a revisionist interpretation of history not backed up by facts, which appeared to be left unresolved. Please note that I have absolutely no personal opinion in this content issue, but I think the best solution would be for the editors to start a new discussion aimed at finally reaching a consensus. Regards, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 20:56, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello Mewulwe. "it is explained elsewhere", you wrote. Where? The English term Czechia is not so rarely used. [2] [3]. -- Vejvančický ( talk / contribs) 06:40, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
So you think that Cesko is Czech Republic? Our country needs a short name and Czechia is the only logical alternative like Croatia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Latvia, Austria. Helveticus96 ( talk) 13:35, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
The Czech Republic is a political name ("republic" is not name, but denomination of concrete political system in the country) , CZECHIA is an informal (geographic, short-form, one-worn, etc.) name. An informal name is politically neutral, therefore can be used in any connotation. Using only political name limits the country historically only to the period of the existence of actual political formation in the country (in this case since 1993 until now). The state with long history and the row of changes of political systems and also with many changes in denominations (the case of almost every European country) should denominate itself in historical context using informal name, which role cannot be ever substituted by political denomination and representatives of every European country are fully aware of it, excl.Czechs. Therefore the need of using an informal name also for the Czech state with history more than 1100 years old is comprehensible, logical and axiomatic. In addition (however obvious), using political name also in historical context leads to improper connotations (e.g. here somewhere "Charles IV was the king of the Czech Republic". Jan Blanický 19:45, 7 June 2014 (UTC) Blanicky ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 19:52, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
See Talk:Czech_Republic#Czechia_.28again.29. -- Vejvančický ( talk / contribs) 15:26, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Greetings. Because you have already cast a vote for the 2013 Arbitration Committee Elections, I regret to inform you that due to a misconfiguration of the SecurePoll we've been forced to strike all votes and reset voting. This notice is to inform you that you will need to vote again if you want to be counted in the poll. The new poll is located at this link. You do not have to perform any additional actions other than voting again. If you have any questions, please direct them at the election commissioners. --For the Election Commissioners, v/r, TParis
The Original Barnstar | |
dear friend , i can see you're a weathered editor .great ! i just wonder why u changed my KH entry on his birth and I also am surprised that it happened so quickly, how do you do it? there are SO many pages?? An honest Q, just wanting to learn! greetings RICTF Rictf ( talk) 20:46, 14 December 2014 (UTC) |
I have an Encyclopedia Britannica from the 1990s that says Mali's legislature removed limits on how much time a president can stay in office in 1985 ... I read that as making Traoré president for life. Am I missing something?
Not you again? GoodDay ( talk) 20:47, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi User Mewulwe. You recently undo my edition on Hossein Ghods-Nakhai article. The edition was accurate and correct. This person was born in 1894 instead 1911 in Mazanderan province in Northern Iran and died in 1977 in Shiraz on Fras Province in Southern Iran. I use Reliable sources for this correction. World Cup 2010 ( talk) 17:23, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Mewulwe. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
For some reason has been listed as foreign minister of Bangladesh- since Shahriar Alam (Politician) has been listed sin|ce January 2014 according to the article.
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Mewulwe reported by User:Lalichii (Result: ). Thank you. Lalichii ( talk) 00:33, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Note: I've opened a discussion at Template:Infobox officeholder, concerning numbering of office holders in their infoboxes. TBH, I'd have less problems with your anti-numbering stance, if you'd apply it evenly. Removing the numbering at Joyce Banda, while leaving the numbering in place for her predecessors & successor, causes inconsistency. GoodDay ( talk) 17:36, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Any comments Talk:Abdul_Sattar_Edhi#Date_of_birth.3F? -- Saqib ( talk) 09:08, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
My article #is# original research (with information from others) - and the references are as stated. There is also [4] and various other sources. Jackiespeel ( talk) 17:57, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
I have put a link against my previous comment on the article talk page - which may solve the issue of people adding the link on the actual page in good faith (and there are always going to be some cases like this, where there are valid arguments on both sides). Jackiespeel ( talk) 09:45, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
I apologize if that edit-war got out of hand, that user you were arguing with happens to be my brother, he often watches the Current Events Portal, which he has frequently commented on several times in the past, and gets very, very patriotic and defensive if someone puts something negative about the United States. I don't know how he was able to infiltrate my account during the first edits he made, but I will have a talk with him about it later. I happened to come across his edits after noticing that the page that he was edit-warring was on my watchlist. Hornetzilla78 ( talk) 12:32, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Pardon my ignorance, but can you tell me why a pre-2006 source is required for Sonia Gandhi's real name? Thanks. Numerounovedant Talk 08:24, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Mewulwe. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
We at Wikiproject Sri Lanka have a hard enough job updating and curating our relatively small list of articles with limited manpower without people starting POV edit wars over whether or not Sri Lankan governors merit counting. I will concede that a lot of the lists concerning the governors are not sourced entirely reliably, but I myself have only started editing these pages to update and standardize them quite recently, and I seem to be one of two editors trying to maintain these articles at the moment. The solution in the meantime isn't to try and start an edit war (which seems to be your thing, judging by this talk page) or arbitrarily remove material with snide edit summaries, but to try and bring this to someone's attention so we can fix the issue at hand. You'll find many wikiprojects don't appreciate people coming in from outside, removing material and then belittling their country all at the same time. - ක - ( talk) 10:15, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
P.S.- also, " good lord" and " cut the crap" are neither helpful nor edit summaries. Please, just stop.
People read & write articles about members of deposed royal families because they care genealogically,regardless of what the republican governments of the various countries have to say on the matter.Take it up with the various project editors if you feel a need to advocate for the republics. 12.144.5.2 ( talk) 19:01, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Mewulwe
Why are you ignoring the list?— Bukhari (Talk!) 06:09, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Mewulwe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello,
I am interested in why are you insisting on erasing the numbers beside the persons former political title? I checked all other Croatian PMs and presidents and they ALL have their respective numbers except one (I also checked the U.S. and Italian presidents/PMs just in case). I never heard of this rule you mentioned even though I'm a Croatian citizen.
Regards, Luke CroGamer 1 ( talk) 00:11, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! CroGamer 1 ( talk) 17:07, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! CroGamer 1 ( talk) 22:15, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
I am having difficulty understanding your change to Laurie Morgan, replacing the citation request that I just removed. The inline citation from the Guernsey Press includes his year of birth as 1930. Can you help me with this article? Perhaps the removal was not the best approach.-- Dthomsen8 ( talk) 20:25, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Do you remember the case of Jack William Pithey, on whose talk page you participated in a discussion some years ago? I've found a new source (of dubious value, but still). DS ( talk) 20:52, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Hey there. Any thoughts why the three sources cited for Charles Michel's full name is WP:CIRCULAR?
I had citogenesis in mind as well, that's why I quoted three sources, spanning eight months, each of a different discipline: de Volkskrant, Dutch newspaper 11/2019; Daily Express, UK tabloid (may be shady) 7/2019; and a photograph caption (via Getty) 3/2019.
My rationale is that none of these sources are Wikipedia mirrors. The fact that they did not mention it came from Wikipedia means that the original authors are confident of its accuracy by their own research. Furthermore, the {{ citation needed}} tag has been present long before the Volkskrant article was published -- no reasonable journalist would take that "as is" without independently verifying it.
Is it your opinion that only published sources before the 22:06, February 17, 2017 revision (where the full name was put in) are non-circular beyond doubt? -- Nemoschool ( talk) 22:55, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Just a brief message to thank you for highlighting the discrepancies in the Robert Abela article, regarding his place of birth. Have removed your tag and replaced with a citation to substantiate. Very clearly stated, and not alluded to at all! Thanks for checking it out. Kilbosh talk 14:52, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
With gratitude for your attention to detail on the Robert Abela article. Kilbosh talk 14:52, 15 January 2020 (UTC) |
I'm working for Ethiopian Prime Minister chronological order. Although Fikre Sellassie is the first in newly formed Ethiopia, he is the sixth prime minister in general. Give your reason for your reversion. The Supermind ( talk) 16:03, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
I have noted you have repeatedly been reverting edits without providing good reason in the edit summaries at List of heads of state of Panama. Please clarify your actions. Ed6767 ( talk) 01:07, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Mewulwe. I hope all is well. I see that you removed some citations from the Boris Skossyreff article - the citiations that were added were different, and each precisely referenced the action. One example is:
The same applies for the other citations :) Thanks! SerAntoniDeMiloni ( talk) 08:56, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Mewulwe. I request that you immediately cease your non-constructive edits on the Boris Skossyreff page. The page is currently up for GA nomination, and it is not for you to destructively remove relevant & cited detail with relatively aggressive summaries. If you do not desist this destructive editing, I will launch a complaint with the Wikipedia Arbitration Committee. I kindly ask you to stop. Thank you. SerAntoniDeMiloni ( talk) 09:07, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I am Diannaa and I am a Wikipedia administrator. I noticed that you made several comments in your edit summaries on Boris Skossyreff that didn't seem very civil. For example this one. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. Please discuss your concerns about sourcing on the article talk page and comment on the content, not the contributor. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. — Diannaa ( talk) 17:33, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
I suggest that we start on a fresh page. Improving Wikipedia is what we're both here for, and I believe that a dispute will have no good outcome for either as it will simply serve to be a waste of time for us both. Time that we could spend on contributing to Wikipedia. I propose a couple of things:
I think this would save significant amounts of time, and would help ensure that Wikipedia keeps improving. Any thoughts? Thanks, SerAntoniDeMiloni ( talk) 17:58, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Boris Skossyreff. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 11:31, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
― Tartan357 Talk 22:01, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
You're so determined to be an irritant towards me, you even mistakenly undid one of your own edits. GoodDay ( talk) 17:08, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi Mewulwe, are you aware of the edit warring policy, the three revert rule and the availability of Talk:Mike Hurst (politician) and Talk:Mamady Doumbouya for discussing content disputes? ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 17:10, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
I'm confused why your summary says I have no source when I'm the one that added the source. And no, it wasn't taken from another Wikipedia page considering this source wasn't ued at the Estenssoro page or elsewhere. Please refer to WP:CIVIL before you start throwing around baseless accusations. Snickers2686 ( talk) 00:36, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Please, see Category:Pretenders. Here are lots of pretenders, not only for Württemberg. Why you decided to remove for these two files, only because it's your decision? -- Noel baran ( talk) 19:22, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Was the citation not adequate? An edit summary wouldn't be a bad idea when you revert a good-faith-edit... MattSucci ( talk) 02:12, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Dear User, you are perfectly right on principles: because Internet didn’t exist then and because most Kiribati things are oral (and rarely written), you will not find easily the place of birth of Rota Onorio which is Arorae but in Cinderellas of the Empire of Barrie Macdonald (2001) or the more comprehensive essay of Michael Walsh (2020), A History of Kiribati: From the Earliest Times to the 40th Anniversary of the Republic. But any publication on Kiribati is always hard to find, even in good libraries, if you are not close to ANU, Canberra or nearby. Try just to consider that some info are good faith (the names of the siblings of the Tiito family were all exact even if we do not need to give each name). By the way, Koru was a good friend, only one year ahead of me. And even it is not a source, look at my User name. Arorae ( talk) 11:28, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Deaths in 2023 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Renewal6 ( talk) 10:25, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
With regard to this tag: I'm not sure I fully understand the issue. If you think that the word "ever" is misleading and OR, then you're welcome to remove it, if not, please explain where the issue is and how you think it should be addressed. M.Bitton ( talk) 09:42, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Jkaharper ( talk) 09:49, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Davit Ishkhanyan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 119.56.108.152 ( talk) 12:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
your last edit IS A CLEAR VANDALISM, you edit existing quote NOT IN SYNC WITH reference link WITHIN THE SAME reference tag, disrupting existing reference tag 119.56.108.152 ( talk) 12:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
You had reverted my edition in Carl, Duke of Württemberg because, according to you: "he is neither duke nor (even titular) king". Well, he was Duke like the title of the article says and he was titular king like you could see in the article of her grandfather: Philipp Albrecht, Duke of Württemberg. If you think I'm right, please reverse the review. Sirslayercort ( talk) 09:01, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Mindaur ( talk) 20:24, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Well spotted. This may in fact be an error - and, if so, it's regrettably been on Wikipedia long enough to have potentially affected sources that would otherwise be considered reliable. If I can't find a source that pre-dates 2003, I'll remove it. DS ( talk) 17:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)