Hi, I restored the item about assigning patents to Ceravision. This appears to be a matter of fact, not sure why you deleted it?
The Panasonic TV doesn't seem to have been available for some time - please correct if I'm wrong. Teulon3000
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from
Luxim. When removing text, please specify a reason in the
edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Zhang He (
talk)
01:46, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Luxim. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing.
Zhang He (
talk)
18:28, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
As noted above, if you want to delete a section of text, especially one supported by citations, you have to explain why you are deleting it in your edit summary. If you don't stop repeatedly deleting text without explanation, you are going to find yourself blocked from editing.-- Srleffler ( talk) 04:57, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you.-- Srleffler ( talk) 04:59, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I restored the item about assigning patents to Ceravision. This appears to be a matter of fact, not sure why you deleted it?
The Panasonic TV doesn't seem to have been available for some time - please correct if I'm wrong. Teulon3000
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from
Luxim. When removing text, please specify a reason in the
edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Zhang He (
talk)
01:46, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Luxim. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing.
Zhang He (
talk)
18:28, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
As noted above, if you want to delete a section of text, especially one supported by citations, you have to explain why you are deleting it in your edit summary. If you don't stop repeatedly deleting text without explanation, you are going to find yourself blocked from editing.-- Srleffler ( talk) 04:57, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you.-- Srleffler ( talk) 04:59, 10 November 2009 (UTC)