![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Greetings, given your experience in WikiProject Finance articles and your interest in hedge funds, I wanted to flag a potential issue on the Kyle Bass page. The entire Fund Performance subsection contains speculative information about the performance of Hayman Capital that is not accurate, verifiable or necessarily relevant to a BLP page. The NY Post article cited as a source does not meet the NPOV standard for a BLP page and it does not share a source for its information.
I have flagged this on the Talk page for Kyle Bass and the BLP noticeboard but wanted to reach out to you, as well, given your stature in the community.
My name is Steele and I work at Hayman Capital Management, L.P., which was founded by J. Kyle Bass in 2005. My goal is to serve as a resource in support of Wikipedia’s three core content policies. I will not be making edits, but rather participating in the community discussions. SteeleatHaymanCapitalManagementLP ( talk) 19:19, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
I hope this list is helpful and I appreciate your help walking me through this process. Look forward to working together. SteeleatHaymanCapitalManagementLP ( talk) 17:24, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi Meatsgains,
I've removed the PROD you placed on the Peg's Place stub I created, but I'm certainly up for discussing whether this article is notable enough to be included in Wikipedia. I've been researching LGBT history in San Francisco, and kept running across the incident mentioned in various books and essays, so thought it at least warranted a stub that others could fill in if they want. As per the references, it seems to be historically significant. -- ABF99 ( talk) 00:34, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello. Can you please be more specific for the reasons for your tags on the Human Life International page so that those sections may be addressed? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.25.97.145 ( talk) 13:18, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for fixing Kevin Olusola's wiki page! Some users on Kirstin Maldonado's forum were trying to be funny...without realizing how bad vandalism is... Simsnet ( talk) 03:25, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello, you kindly weighed in on a previous RFC Talk:Antisemitism_in_the_United_States#RFC_-_Antisemitic_incidents which I am trying to use as precedent for a similar issue on another page where I am meeting resistance and an apparent lack of engagement with the relevant wikipedia policies. It would be helpful if you could weigh in on the issue at Talk:Antisemitism in 21st-century France#Don't just list incidents. Thanks. - Dan Eisenberg ( talk) 20:24, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
I have removed the {{ prod}} tag from Pydio, which you proposed for deletion. I am leaving this message here to notify you about it. Hello, I objected to your proposed deletion of the article about Pydio, because I thought your concerns were not quite accurate. Pydio / AjaXplorer is often presented on the web as one of the major open source software for sharing & syncing files, equivalent to solutions such as Owncloud or Seafile in terms of adoption and free software community support (both having wikipedia articles). These software are often compared to one another on forums, in press articles etc... and are presented across the web as Dropbox or Google Drive alternatives for users concerned about hosting their data on private storages. I am fully aware though that the article might need improvements, and I am going to work on it again and try to improve its sources. I will be happy to get any advice, as I am quite new to the Wikipedia community. Regards. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{ prod}} template back to it. Instead, feel free to list the article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks!
Since you were the nominator of the Clay Blaker AfD, and since all votes have been to keep, you could now close the discussion using the process detailed here under "Procedure for non-administrator close (nominator withdrawal)." I would really appreciate it if you did so, as I'd like to nominate the article for the " Did you know" feature, which is time-limited, but I don't want to do this with deletion tags still on the page. I would do a non-administrative closure, but involved editors are not allowed to do this. Thanks for your help. ubiquity ( talk) 17:33, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
OK, two days isn't going to kill me, but WP:CLOSEAFD says "The AfD nominator can withdraw the nomination and close a discussion as speedy keep reason #1, if all other viewpoints expressed were for Keep and doing so does not short-circuit an ongoing discussion." You have changed your vote to keep, and there is no other discussion, so you could do this if you wanted to. Do you really anticipate there will be delete votes at this stage? ubiquity ( talk) 19:30, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi, now that August 2016 is finished, I've written a draft 2016 section for the Ice Bucket Challenge page. You can view it at Talk:Ice Bucket Challenge#Draft Section. Your continued input would be appreciated, please feel free to leave any feedback as you have already been doing. If I do not hear back from you by 8 September 2016 (a week from now) I shall assume you are fine with the draft and will add it to the article. 62.190.148.115 ( talk) 10:33, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Good day, I have created the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Dan_Eisenberg case, of which you may be interested, since you were a participant in his RfC in the Antisemitism in the United States article. Please weigh your opinion in that COI case. Thank you! -- 178.121.228.214 ( talk) 19:14, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Back in June you PRODded this, and it was deleted. Undeletion has been requested at WP:REFUND, so per WP:DEL#Proposed deletion I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to consider AfD. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 21:42, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Given Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Asarudeenm91 and the current sourcing, would you object to a PROD of this article? Thanks! Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 23:42, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
I received your message from my account. Basically I created this article because in order to create awareness about Kongupirati because she is is most important in vaishnavism . I think if this article is not deleted soon people start to contribute more as well as improve this article because there may be many contributors who will definitely contribute this article, we do our best to improve it, But within a particular shortage of time if this article is deleted there will no article as well as views. so can you please help us to edit or improving this particular article.This article will definetly be helpful in future too. Due to lack of views within short period we couldnt see any improvements.If the article is maintained and improved surely it will help and act as agood reference in near future. i have links
Hi. You recently voted at this RfC. I had offered a compromise the day before with this edit, paraphrasing "generally lukewarm" to "generally mediocre", a characterization that isn't disputed by the majority of reviews for the album. Does this change your position at all? Dan56 ( talk) 19:40, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi, and thanks for fixing the bare URLs on Morgan Carroll. Since you recently edited the article, I'm wondering if you could weigh in on the article talk page. To give you some background, an intern on Carroll's campaign has disclosed a WP:COI and made some edit requests (they originally edited the article, and I rolled back their edits and asked them to only make edit requests from now on, which they've complied with). I've implemented some of the edit requests (the ones I found relatively innocuous, like election dates and results), but I'm more concerned about other edit requests that have been made regarding Carroll's sponsored legislation, endorsements, personal life, etc. Even if this information is sourced, it makes me uneasy that the campaign is directly requesting this. It just isn't feeling quite right and I'm not sure how to proceed. I would welcome your thoughts. Champaign Supernova ( talk) 04:14, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your help with page Francisco J. Ricardo! I don't know who this person is, he/she has no facts for this claim, but seems to hold a baseless grudge. How do we contact this person? Thanks!
Thank you! I just made the attempt. I don't know how someone can edit without creating an account, but maybe I can resolve this. Thank you again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adrie23 ( talk • contribs) 04:56, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Mathers Pacific Capital requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:56, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Why are you insisting on inserting auto-generated cite templates at Morse code again when they have already been reverted multiple times? They are overwriting human generated input, contain gross errors, and are losing important information. Spinning Spark 17:17, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
<ref>[http://earlyradiohistory.us/1963hw.htm History of Communications-Electronics in the United States Navy]</ref>
is not a bare url. Bare urls are ones that have only the url in the ref. Furthermore it gives the correct article title while you change gives the utterly stupid "Table of contents" as the title.<ref>[http://www.k2tqn.com/ 100 Years ago this airship sailed from Atlantic City]. Article is no longer on the page, from the page archives it appears the information was taken from [http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/10080192 this video]</ref>
is not a bare url. Again, your change lost the correct title of the original page. It also lost the url of the original page, and it lost the explanation of the status of the new link, all of which is important information for anyone trying to fix the deadlink.Thank you for your edit at Tom Brady's article. Unfortunately, your edit, and my information, have been removed. With that information removed the very first mention of Deflategate in Brady's article is after the 65th paragraph. That appears to not comply with WP:LEAD "It [the lead] should ... explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points, including any prominent controversies." Please see the Talk page for Tom Brady. Thanks again for your edit. Jerry Stockton ( talk) 20:32, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello Meatsgains, I appreciate your contributions to Gina Cephas, But the article is being nominated due to it fails WP:GNG and it is notable or verifiable.-- Historical Ben ( talk) 16:36, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
If you have the time, your input would be welcome at Joe Heck. Champaign Supernova ( talk) 16:48, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
It appears to me that you were WP:CANVASSed to Joe Heck by a WP:SPA who's working for the Republican cause. In this case, did you read my edit comment? The author of that piece is a WP:NOTABLE legal scholar speaking in an area related to her notability and expertise. This is a valid RS for this statement, and in my opinion your revert, repeating the same claim that was offered by the SPA's revert (and which my edit comment acknowledges and refutes) was unfortunate. Please have a look and consider undoing your reinsertion. We're not talking about a subjective opinion of a non-notable non-qualified blogger or the like here. Thanks. SPECIFICO talk 19:26, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello Meatsgains, Can you improve the article Black Magic (musician). Promotional tune need to be fixed.-- Historical Ben ( talk) 18:36, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Joe Clark. Legobot ( talk) 04:29, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello. I'd appreciate some help. Illusion87 has been adding biased information in the articles about Stan Kroenke and National Football League controversies violating Wikipedia policies of WP:SOAPBOX, WP:UNDUE AND WP:NOR. It's becoming an annoying WP:EDITWAR and while some random users and IPs are working on maintaining WP:NPOV, this user is re-adding the useless content more than once and I'm starting to be afraid of using a WP:Noticeboard. I'd like to consult it with so kind of expert in the topic, but probably I'd have to use a WP:RFC. Thanks for your time. Leo Bonilla ( talk) 10:16, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
A tag was recently added to the bio on Joe Heck, but no evidence or support for the tag was provided. This article indicates that such tags can be removed. I'd like your opinion on the matter since you've edited the article and have more experience here than I have. Thank you. BringthePaine ( talk) 20:50, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ValueWalk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ValueWalk until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Niteshift36 ( talk) 15:42, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Meatsgains,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello Meatsgains. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various
deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at
page reviewer talk.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 23:55, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Meatsgains. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello Meatsgains -- I deleted this as a recreation of an article previously deleted at AfD but it would not have been eligible under the A7 criteria -- products (or lists of products) are not covered. Regards, Espresso Addict ( talk) 11:45, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Greetings, given your experience in WikiProject Finance articles and your interest in hedge funds, I wanted to flag a potential issue on the Kyle Bass page. The entire Fund Performance subsection contains speculative information about the performance of Hayman Capital that is not accurate, verifiable or necessarily relevant to a BLP page. The NY Post article cited as a source does not meet the NPOV standard for a BLP page and it does not share a source for its information.
I have flagged this on the Talk page for Kyle Bass and the BLP noticeboard but wanted to reach out to you, as well, given your stature in the community.
My name is Steele and I work at Hayman Capital Management, L.P., which was founded by J. Kyle Bass in 2005. My goal is to serve as a resource in support of Wikipedia’s three core content policies. I will not be making edits, but rather participating in the community discussions. SteeleatHaymanCapitalManagementLP ( talk) 19:19, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
I hope this list is helpful and I appreciate your help walking me through this process. Look forward to working together. SteeleatHaymanCapitalManagementLP ( talk) 17:24, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi Meatsgains,
I've removed the PROD you placed on the Peg's Place stub I created, but I'm certainly up for discussing whether this article is notable enough to be included in Wikipedia. I've been researching LGBT history in San Francisco, and kept running across the incident mentioned in various books and essays, so thought it at least warranted a stub that others could fill in if they want. As per the references, it seems to be historically significant. -- ABF99 ( talk) 00:34, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello. Can you please be more specific for the reasons for your tags on the Human Life International page so that those sections may be addressed? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.25.97.145 ( talk) 13:18, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for fixing Kevin Olusola's wiki page! Some users on Kirstin Maldonado's forum were trying to be funny...without realizing how bad vandalism is... Simsnet ( talk) 03:25, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello, you kindly weighed in on a previous RFC Talk:Antisemitism_in_the_United_States#RFC_-_Antisemitic_incidents which I am trying to use as precedent for a similar issue on another page where I am meeting resistance and an apparent lack of engagement with the relevant wikipedia policies. It would be helpful if you could weigh in on the issue at Talk:Antisemitism in 21st-century France#Don't just list incidents. Thanks. - Dan Eisenberg ( talk) 20:24, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
I have removed the {{ prod}} tag from Pydio, which you proposed for deletion. I am leaving this message here to notify you about it. Hello, I objected to your proposed deletion of the article about Pydio, because I thought your concerns were not quite accurate. Pydio / AjaXplorer is often presented on the web as one of the major open source software for sharing & syncing files, equivalent to solutions such as Owncloud or Seafile in terms of adoption and free software community support (both having wikipedia articles). These software are often compared to one another on forums, in press articles etc... and are presented across the web as Dropbox or Google Drive alternatives for users concerned about hosting their data on private storages. I am fully aware though that the article might need improvements, and I am going to work on it again and try to improve its sources. I will be happy to get any advice, as I am quite new to the Wikipedia community. Regards. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{ prod}} template back to it. Instead, feel free to list the article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks!
Since you were the nominator of the Clay Blaker AfD, and since all votes have been to keep, you could now close the discussion using the process detailed here under "Procedure for non-administrator close (nominator withdrawal)." I would really appreciate it if you did so, as I'd like to nominate the article for the " Did you know" feature, which is time-limited, but I don't want to do this with deletion tags still on the page. I would do a non-administrative closure, but involved editors are not allowed to do this. Thanks for your help. ubiquity ( talk) 17:33, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
OK, two days isn't going to kill me, but WP:CLOSEAFD says "The AfD nominator can withdraw the nomination and close a discussion as speedy keep reason #1, if all other viewpoints expressed were for Keep and doing so does not short-circuit an ongoing discussion." You have changed your vote to keep, and there is no other discussion, so you could do this if you wanted to. Do you really anticipate there will be delete votes at this stage? ubiquity ( talk) 19:30, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi, now that August 2016 is finished, I've written a draft 2016 section for the Ice Bucket Challenge page. You can view it at Talk:Ice Bucket Challenge#Draft Section. Your continued input would be appreciated, please feel free to leave any feedback as you have already been doing. If I do not hear back from you by 8 September 2016 (a week from now) I shall assume you are fine with the draft and will add it to the article. 62.190.148.115 ( talk) 10:33, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Good day, I have created the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Dan_Eisenberg case, of which you may be interested, since you were a participant in his RfC in the Antisemitism in the United States article. Please weigh your opinion in that COI case. Thank you! -- 178.121.228.214 ( talk) 19:14, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Back in June you PRODded this, and it was deleted. Undeletion has been requested at WP:REFUND, so per WP:DEL#Proposed deletion I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to consider AfD. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 21:42, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Given Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Asarudeenm91 and the current sourcing, would you object to a PROD of this article? Thanks! Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 23:42, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
I received your message from my account. Basically I created this article because in order to create awareness about Kongupirati because she is is most important in vaishnavism . I think if this article is not deleted soon people start to contribute more as well as improve this article because there may be many contributors who will definitely contribute this article, we do our best to improve it, But within a particular shortage of time if this article is deleted there will no article as well as views. so can you please help us to edit or improving this particular article.This article will definetly be helpful in future too. Due to lack of views within short period we couldnt see any improvements.If the article is maintained and improved surely it will help and act as agood reference in near future. i have links
Hi. You recently voted at this RfC. I had offered a compromise the day before with this edit, paraphrasing "generally lukewarm" to "generally mediocre", a characterization that isn't disputed by the majority of reviews for the album. Does this change your position at all? Dan56 ( talk) 19:40, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi, and thanks for fixing the bare URLs on Morgan Carroll. Since you recently edited the article, I'm wondering if you could weigh in on the article talk page. To give you some background, an intern on Carroll's campaign has disclosed a WP:COI and made some edit requests (they originally edited the article, and I rolled back their edits and asked them to only make edit requests from now on, which they've complied with). I've implemented some of the edit requests (the ones I found relatively innocuous, like election dates and results), but I'm more concerned about other edit requests that have been made regarding Carroll's sponsored legislation, endorsements, personal life, etc. Even if this information is sourced, it makes me uneasy that the campaign is directly requesting this. It just isn't feeling quite right and I'm not sure how to proceed. I would welcome your thoughts. Champaign Supernova ( talk) 04:14, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your help with page Francisco J. Ricardo! I don't know who this person is, he/she has no facts for this claim, but seems to hold a baseless grudge. How do we contact this person? Thanks!
Thank you! I just made the attempt. I don't know how someone can edit without creating an account, but maybe I can resolve this. Thank you again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adrie23 ( talk • contribs) 04:56, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Mathers Pacific Capital requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:56, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Why are you insisting on inserting auto-generated cite templates at Morse code again when they have already been reverted multiple times? They are overwriting human generated input, contain gross errors, and are losing important information. Spinning Spark 17:17, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
<ref>[http://earlyradiohistory.us/1963hw.htm History of Communications-Electronics in the United States Navy]</ref>
is not a bare url. Bare urls are ones that have only the url in the ref. Furthermore it gives the correct article title while you change gives the utterly stupid "Table of contents" as the title.<ref>[http://www.k2tqn.com/ 100 Years ago this airship sailed from Atlantic City]. Article is no longer on the page, from the page archives it appears the information was taken from [http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/10080192 this video]</ref>
is not a bare url. Again, your change lost the correct title of the original page. It also lost the url of the original page, and it lost the explanation of the status of the new link, all of which is important information for anyone trying to fix the deadlink.Thank you for your edit at Tom Brady's article. Unfortunately, your edit, and my information, have been removed. With that information removed the very first mention of Deflategate in Brady's article is after the 65th paragraph. That appears to not comply with WP:LEAD "It [the lead] should ... explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points, including any prominent controversies." Please see the Talk page for Tom Brady. Thanks again for your edit. Jerry Stockton ( talk) 20:32, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello Meatsgains, I appreciate your contributions to Gina Cephas, But the article is being nominated due to it fails WP:GNG and it is notable or verifiable.-- Historical Ben ( talk) 16:36, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
If you have the time, your input would be welcome at Joe Heck. Champaign Supernova ( talk) 16:48, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
It appears to me that you were WP:CANVASSed to Joe Heck by a WP:SPA who's working for the Republican cause. In this case, did you read my edit comment? The author of that piece is a WP:NOTABLE legal scholar speaking in an area related to her notability and expertise. This is a valid RS for this statement, and in my opinion your revert, repeating the same claim that was offered by the SPA's revert (and which my edit comment acknowledges and refutes) was unfortunate. Please have a look and consider undoing your reinsertion. We're not talking about a subjective opinion of a non-notable non-qualified blogger or the like here. Thanks. SPECIFICO talk 19:26, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello Meatsgains, Can you improve the article Black Magic (musician). Promotional tune need to be fixed.-- Historical Ben ( talk) 18:36, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Joe Clark. Legobot ( talk) 04:29, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello. I'd appreciate some help. Illusion87 has been adding biased information in the articles about Stan Kroenke and National Football League controversies violating Wikipedia policies of WP:SOAPBOX, WP:UNDUE AND WP:NOR. It's becoming an annoying WP:EDITWAR and while some random users and IPs are working on maintaining WP:NPOV, this user is re-adding the useless content more than once and I'm starting to be afraid of using a WP:Noticeboard. I'd like to consult it with so kind of expert in the topic, but probably I'd have to use a WP:RFC. Thanks for your time. Leo Bonilla ( talk) 10:16, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
A tag was recently added to the bio on Joe Heck, but no evidence or support for the tag was provided. This article indicates that such tags can be removed. I'd like your opinion on the matter since you've edited the article and have more experience here than I have. Thank you. BringthePaine ( talk) 20:50, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ValueWalk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ValueWalk until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Niteshift36 ( talk) 15:42, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Meatsgains,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello Meatsgains. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various
deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at
page reviewer talk.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 23:55, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Meatsgains. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello Meatsgains -- I deleted this as a recreation of an article previously deleted at AfD but it would not have been eligible under the A7 criteria -- products (or lists of products) are not covered. Regards, Espresso Addict ( talk) 11:45, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |