|
Hello, I'm
Sowlos. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
Religion because it appeared to be promotional.
Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "
soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. —
Sowlos
10:02, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
Apologies for that. That wasn't meant to be promotional but informational. I thought that the writer had a very good insight about religion, and I wasn't putting attention on him, but the passage that he wrote. Matipop ( talk) 21:14, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your contribution to the TM article. Note that that article is a broad general overview of all the topics associated with TM. Your contribution would probably be more suited to the Transcendental Meditation technique article. I've moved it to the Talk page of that article, pending placement in that article. TimidGuy ( talk) 15:20, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
You're welcome! I appreciate your consideration of my edit. What can I do to make sure it is incorporated in the Transcendental Meditation technique article? Matipop ( talk) 22:38, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
The change has been made. Please review and let me know if I need to make any further changes. Matipop ( talk) 22:49, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
|
Hi Matipop! Welcome to Wikipedia. I've responded to your message on the talk page of Transcendental Meditation technique. Cheers! — Keithbob • Talk • 13:49, 17 April 2013 (UTC) |
Thank you for the baklava and the service badge! Much appreciated! Matipop ( talk) 00:50, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Matipop, congrats on becoming a registered editor. You may display this badge on your user page if you like. These badges can be self awarded and the next level is Novice Editor after you reach the 200 edits level. Cheers!-- — Keithbob • Talk • 13:57, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in using the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. Unfortunately there was very little discussion on the talk pages. For this reason your DR/N request has been declined. It is suggested that both editors continue to discuss the issues to find common ground. Should you discuss this situation extensively and still find yourselves in a dispute, feel free to re-file after the extensive discussion. Thanks and happy editing.-- Amadscientist ( talk) 00:12, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Clarkcj12. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made with
this edit to
Crowdpower, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Clarkcj12 (
talk)
01:44, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own
personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Scientology. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Please do not insert promotional fluff into the article.
Binksternet (
talk)
00:57, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
I cited a reliable source for this edit, it is based on the reference, provides straightforward information on Scientology beliefs, and was in no way meant to be promotional. I simply paraphrased Melton's exact statements. I do not see how this is promotional fluff when it is based on a well-known scholar's perspective of Scientology. Will you cross-reference the cited book and see what I am referring to? I attest to the value of this addition - it further clarifies the importance of survival to Scientology to the reader. It is not original research but wholly based on Melton's book. Matipop ( talk) 01:16, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Gatundu south may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 22:46, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Kollam may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:33, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by misrepresenting sources, as you did at
Scientology beliefs and practices, you may be
blocked from editing. Don't misrepresent the source by relating its positive side even though its negative side was very damning.
Binksternet (
talk)
01:31, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
|
Hello, I'm
Sowlos. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
Religion because it appeared to be promotional.
Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "
soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. —
Sowlos
10:02, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
Apologies for that. That wasn't meant to be promotional but informational. I thought that the writer had a very good insight about religion, and I wasn't putting attention on him, but the passage that he wrote. Matipop ( talk) 21:14, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your contribution to the TM article. Note that that article is a broad general overview of all the topics associated with TM. Your contribution would probably be more suited to the Transcendental Meditation technique article. I've moved it to the Talk page of that article, pending placement in that article. TimidGuy ( talk) 15:20, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
You're welcome! I appreciate your consideration of my edit. What can I do to make sure it is incorporated in the Transcendental Meditation technique article? Matipop ( talk) 22:38, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
The change has been made. Please review and let me know if I need to make any further changes. Matipop ( talk) 22:49, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
|
Hi Matipop! Welcome to Wikipedia. I've responded to your message on the talk page of Transcendental Meditation technique. Cheers! — Keithbob • Talk • 13:49, 17 April 2013 (UTC) |
Thank you for the baklava and the service badge! Much appreciated! Matipop ( talk) 00:50, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Matipop, congrats on becoming a registered editor. You may display this badge on your user page if you like. These badges can be self awarded and the next level is Novice Editor after you reach the 200 edits level. Cheers!-- — Keithbob • Talk • 13:57, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in using the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. Unfortunately there was very little discussion on the talk pages. For this reason your DR/N request has been declined. It is suggested that both editors continue to discuss the issues to find common ground. Should you discuss this situation extensively and still find yourselves in a dispute, feel free to re-file after the extensive discussion. Thanks and happy editing.-- Amadscientist ( talk) 00:12, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Clarkcj12. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made with
this edit to
Crowdpower, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Clarkcj12 (
talk)
01:44, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own
personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Scientology. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Please do not insert promotional fluff into the article.
Binksternet (
talk)
00:57, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
I cited a reliable source for this edit, it is based on the reference, provides straightforward information on Scientology beliefs, and was in no way meant to be promotional. I simply paraphrased Melton's exact statements. I do not see how this is promotional fluff when it is based on a well-known scholar's perspective of Scientology. Will you cross-reference the cited book and see what I am referring to? I attest to the value of this addition - it further clarifies the importance of survival to Scientology to the reader. It is not original research but wholly based on Melton's book. Matipop ( talk) 01:16, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Gatundu south may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 22:46, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Kollam may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:33, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by misrepresenting sources, as you did at
Scientology beliefs and practices, you may be
blocked from editing. Don't misrepresent the source by relating its positive side even though its negative side was very damning.
Binksternet (
talk)
01:31, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)