This user may have left Wikipedia. Martin H. has not edited Wikipedia since 2 January 2020. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Welcome!
Hello, Martin H., and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Khoi
khoi 23:07, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. Your edits in the List of Igbo people article do not adhere to wikipedia guidelines concerning lists: "Difficult or contentious subjects for which the definition of the topic itself is disputed should be discussed on the talk page in order to attain consensus". If you want to challenge the notability of a person who is already listed, please go to the main article and challenge the notability there (e.g. via Prod or AfD). Do not remove the entry of the person from the list as long as the person has a BLP article in Wikipedia. Thank you. Amsaim ( talk) 16:10, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
All of them are mine I took them by my camera.And if you do delete them I will just upload them back. Nascar1996 ( talk) 01:18, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
My commons page was created yesterday and the day before.Ohh my Gosh I just notice that i did have an old one when I was new to Wiki ohh now I know what you was talking about.Oppps. Nascar1996 ( talk) 22:14, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Ohh well I will upload another and if you block me I do have another computer so. Nascar1996 ( talk) 23:01, 18 February 2010 (UTC) The other one has got deleted too you beat me,ohhh pooo.LOL Nascar1996 ( talk) 23:08, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
If you know an administrator please let them deal with this vandaliser for typing this The Pacific Ring of Poo Tards (or sometimes just the Ring of Poo) is an area where large numbers of earthquakes and volcanic eruptions occur in the basin of a Pacific Ocean. In a 40,000 km horseshoe shape, it is associated with a nearly continuous series of oceanic trenches, volcanic arcs, and volcanic belts and/or plate movements. The Ring of Fire has 452 volcanoes and is home to over 75% of the world's active and dormant volcanoes.[1] It is sometimes called the circum-Pacific belt or the circum-Pacific seismic belt." on the Pacific Ring of Fire.His talk page is User talk:137.164.225.235.Thank You. - Nascar 1996 03:36, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Okay thank you Martin H. - Nascar 1996 21:41, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you left a message on User_talk:Ambrosius007 about the file File:Pacelli12.jpg. User Ambrosius007 was active on Wikipedia for about 2 years and I wrote several articles together with him. Then he suddenly stated that he was ill and stopped logging into Wikipedia. Based on various detailed he contributed to several articles, and what he said, I am almost certain that he personally knew Pius XII - and that is relevant because that was an indication of his age. I do fear that he is not active in Wikipedia because he is not active in the world, for he left some things he obviously cared about unfinished. Now, regarding the image, he specifically stated on the page and on his talk page I recall that he "owned" the original photo because it was given to him. So given that he owned, scanned it and uploaded it, there should be no problem with the copyright. Thanks. History2007 ( talk) 19:50, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
I have removed the Files for Deletion tag from File:OttoRehhagel1.jpg, because you didn't create a nomination for it at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 February 24. If you still think it should be deleted, feel free to renominate it. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:16, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
hi Martin
it's noticeable in the InternetArt article, for those of us who are involved, the vast removal of a lot of important links in this page modification:
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Internet_art&diff=339732986&oldid=336599556
there you removed a list which you are right to say included some spammy links, but also important references and i'm not just speaking for myself.
right now the InternetArt article looks like it's missing quite something, i hope you will find the time to run some researches online about those who are stated, maybe ask the intervention of an expert, and fix the problem
thanks for your attention to details jaromil ( talk) 13:16, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Restored. Is the transwiki incorrect because it should really be fair use? Doesn't look like it should be public domain and GFDL/CC at least (as commons version says). Peter 13:48, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Please take a look in this file and see if the licensing is correct. --Legolas (talk2me) 11:10, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
Would you care to explain why you reverted the license information for File:Idf_soldier_treated.png? It is properly licensed in Flickr. What do you exactly mean when you say "that account is bad"? -- 386-DX ( talk) 22:27, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. MBisanz talk 02:17, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
I think you may be mistaken Martin, my goal is to put images worthy of wikipedia pages because the pages in English in Brazil are much to be desired, and if I wait for her willingness to legalize images I will die earlier if materialize, then stop behaving like the terrible Adolf Hitler, deleting images that I had work to find, try and be more rational and try to help republish them according to law, because I do not know in which category I place the images, because I am not an employee of wikipedia, but a contributor, and has made great contributions to quality texts, which you should consider.
Summary: try to resolve the leadership instead of behaving like a dictator in Brazil hate this behavior typical of poorly educated, what we like and seek to resolve all based on reason. Then format the images as it should be rather clear.
What ended up happening here? Also, thoughts on this? Enigma msg 03:39, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your time.. Arab League User ( talk) 03:30, 4 March 2012 (UTC)--
The most recent version of the page had {{coord|18|5|30.22|S|21|40|10.1|E|display=title}} -- B ( talk) 00:55, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello Martin H.. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of File:Jc thong cu.jpg, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 03:11, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
The Melbourne, Florida article has an issue with an anon editor (Using the 97.102.12x.xx IP range) and looking back at the history it has been on going. The editor is also socking on Commons ( User:Drummerboy37 is one of them) so the only thing we can do there (Commons) is to block and delete the images (which are always copyvios and some even from other editors on Commons itself claimed as Own work). Not to sure what could be done with the Melbourne, FL article though. Bidgee ( talk) 13:56, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I've noticed you've redirected the Paulini article back to Paulini Curuenavuli. The reason why i changed it back to Paulini is because she's known just as Paulini in her career. For example, the singer Ciara doesn't have her full name on it's article title. ozurbanmusic ( talk)
I have tried the Move button a lot of times but I can't because the article, Paulini has already been created. If your an Administrator, can you please help me by moving the article to Paulini. ozurbanmusic ( talk)
What do you mean by consensus? Do you know any good administrator/s I could request this move to? ozurbanmusic ( talk)
Hi. I'm a sysadmin at the school where this IP Range is used and I'm trying to upload two images for a new article on the new school we've had built (from Filton High School to Abbeywood Community School) the school logo and a photo from the lobby area. I was going to upload it to Commons but you've blocked the IP (and fairly, too) so how would I go about getting these images online? I would have posted this on your commons page...but I'm not allowed :P Many Thanks, Tb2571989 ( talk) 08:50, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Martin,
In case you missed it, you got a mention here. – Moondyne 15:02, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, you just deleted a photo European Music Year 1985 depicting two stamps without discussing the matter first. Would you please explain your action to me why, these stamps were not relevant or rather "Unrelated" as you put it? Thanks a lot. Fusion is the future ( talk) 14:42, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
I noticed you called another user a liar. User talk:Martin H. - Image Uploads I kindly remind you, this is strictly against the principles of Wikipedia.
Agreed?
Having said that.
You reasoned in your edit summary exactly such as: "stamp, that's unrelated"
Sincerely best. Fusion is the future ( talk) 15:57, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi there, just a note, the article Binahian, which you proposed for deletion, has been restored after its deletion was contested. If the article still merits deletion, please initiate a discussion at WP:AFD. Thank you. — ξ xplicit 19:08, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Hey Martin H., I'd like to know why you keep on blocking me. Sorry, I do not speak english so well (I'm brazilian), but I'm working on article Cher in the portuguese wikipedia and I had so much headache to find pics that do not own any copyright, like the old ones, and I noticed that you deleted all pics, including the ones taken in the 1950s, 1960s and early 1970s that clearly do not own any copyright. Other pics were taken by the fans on live shows and posted on the Cher Gallery (I sent an OTRS permission and I was waiting for a reply until you deleted them).
I mean, last year I had another account named Djosci and I didn't know any of the Wikipedia rules, and I apologize for that, but now I know. And is devastating when some work that you spent so much time on it is simply deleted without any explanation. Please reply me, because it's impossible to talk to you on Commons. Thank you. Lordelliott ( talk) 17:15, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for definitively help me to upload files which can't be removed without pitiless and give me my first steps. Thanks and excuse me a thousand times. All forgotten by my side -- Raul-Reus ( talk) 19:27, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
About Ontthb.png. It was six years ago! I can't really remember, but I suspect that I copied it from Ontwel.png, just filling a different section in red. It was listed as GFDL. I say that it probably came from Ontwel.png because that is an image which highlights Waterloo Regional Municipality, Ontario, which is where I live and where I have done some editing. I can't say definitively where it came from though, because it was so long ago. -- timc talk 00:31, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I saw to put the Dacian helmet for deletion and removed it from Dacia stub. I think this is one of the best pictures on Dacia topic. Not sure who uploaded and I am not clear what are you suggesting and implying here. If there is a better one to use, I am for it. But it would be a pity to lose it altogether. Which copyright does it break and who do you think owns the picture? I can go ahead and try to contact the original author, if you think you know it. Also which copyright laws apply to pictures of ancient artifacts? Thanks! -- Codrin.B ( talk) 19:54, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Martin, I have a question since you are very experienced with these licenses. I am wondering if commons:Template:PD-RO-1956 applies to images and graphics from a Romanian book from 1929 as is Getica by Vasile Pârvan, made available by the Romanian government here: [4]. I hope this license or others apply to this content, as some of the archaeological artifacts depicted were destroyed during World War 2, are lost or maybe in some obscure museums or private collections, making it impossible to create newer photographs. Thanks a lot!-- Codrin.B ( talk) 20:42, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Martin H please upload eva Larue4.jpg please —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.236.134.144 ( talk) 12:31, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
UserFind12313143 Hi Martin H please Block User Gohe007 reason Vandalism —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.236.134.144 ( talk) 22:56, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
User Fark HI Martin H please Unblock me —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.236.135.179 ( talk) 07:20, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Martin H please unblock me —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.236.137.132 ( talk) 21:56, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello Martin, Take love and respect. My Wikipedia profile has been hacked and I can't fix it. And the hacker is continuously adding sexual materials into various articles. Sorry for your problem, I didn't know what he added into this article.
Thanks. Mohammadarafat ( talk) 14:06, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Just to be clear, I know Molly but I am not Molly. We do work together in the same computer lab though. Since you think I have a conflict of interest with the Cistulli page I'll leave it alone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seancasey00 ( talk • contribs) 15:51, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
Mr Martin H. I am one of the advisors of HE Ihsanoglu. We try to make H.E.'s article as perfect since 2 month. We looked and searched many websites to complete his bio and we gave many weblinks to find proper information about mentioning issues. But as far as I understand you delete many of them because of it is weblink spam. We check our page with this information and we also find there many link to erase. But not the weblinks. Thanks for your warning and your further helps. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mfoke ( talk • contribs) 11:40, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
User Orangesms Hello Martin H please Unblock me 94.236.141.153 ( talk) 13:23, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
Martin, thank you for your help in properly formatting these files for English Wikipedia. X4n6 ( talk) 22:43, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
Just a quick note to say I removed your speedy deletion tag from this image. There are two main reasons:
1. It is credible that the uploader might be the copyright holder. Actors typically own their own headshots, and the uploader may be the heir. Note - I'm not claiming that this is the case, but the fact that it is possible and credible means that the copyright infringment is not blatant, and so speedy deletion is not appropriate.
2. There is a viable fair use claim to be made, since the subject is deceased.
Cheers,
Thparkth ( talk) 01:27, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
User Guz23456 Hello Martin H please unblock me Guz23456 08:48, 25 April 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guz23456 ( talk • contribs)
User Guz23456 Hello Martin H Please Unblock me
BENJIECI (
talk) 15:03, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
Hey Martin, I wanted to consult you for some guidance before uploading another photo. I made mistakes on the previous attempts, but I truly just want the wikipedia article to look more appealing to read. After all, a wikipedia article full of just text is really boring. The artist, iamamiwhoami is playing in a concert, and it is her first live concert and a poster has been released by the official event website. How do I go about uploading the poster to the article? Please help me out, thank you! Borderings ( talk) 11:13, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Hey, great minds think alike. I just chanced across StryoFome ( talk · contribs) and blocked him here. Can you take care of the stuff on Commons? I'm pretty certain this is the same user as the Bialytock&Bloom account. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:18, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
Good catch. How upsetting that they've sat there like that for the best part of a year. J Milburn ( talk) 00:14, 22 June 2011 (UTC) |
Hi, I've been copying User:Firas1977's photos to Wikimedia Commons, I now wish I hadn't done so as you have uncovered that these are all likely copyright violations. see File:Ali Diab.jpg I'd appreciate it if you could make sure they are deleted from Wikimedia Commons as well. You can see what I've transferred here and here. Sorry and thanks. -- Kafuffle ( talk) 16:45, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
I've deleted the ones you tagged - I would suggest put all the rest up for Puf. I did the same yesterday for a different user here and I also added this report - but that's a bit academic as that user (like your one) has left. Well spotted. Ronhjones (Talk) 21:57, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello Martin: I use to work on Angola related articles and just discoveret you edit on "Economy of Angola". What I don't understand is your remark "datei umbenannt". NB: I do speak German - which is why I am puzzled. Aflis ( talk) 11:39, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I'm NimaFallah or You said AmirHossein7055. You're the only administrator in Wikipedia??? Why others don't have been do for me only you must delet my images and block me??? I said you please don't block me but you do no problem! I said please don't remove my images but you do no problem so! but why you deleted images that was free??????? What's problem in the image for Iranian rial. What was problem in . What??? PLEASE ANSWER. 80.191.41.225 ( talk) 10:52, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
UserSpray2132143242 Hello Martin H One question well why block me give reason
109.121.141.253 (
talk) 14:44, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Hey Martin, I noticed your removed several images from the Tegucigalpa article citing copyright violations. While I can't vouch for every image you removed, some images did have permission from their original creator to be distribute for amusement or instructional purposes. A couple of the images were in fact, windows paint-style graphs which I would venture to say were "hand drawn" for the purpose of illustrating the content on the article. Not sure if the Google terrain map with roads highlighted in color through some graphics painting program was permitted under fair use rationale. I have contacted some of the authors whose images appeared on the article to request permission, three have replied stating we may use the images on Wikipedia, I will attempt to replace these images (ones with confirmed permission from authors) onto the article. Thank you.-- Usfirstgov ( talk) 05:05, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
You may well be correct - however I do known Flickr is notorious for being incorrect and users putting up copies of other people's photos, claiming their own. Had User:Souvik.arko claimed it as his "own" - I would have deleted it on the spot. Maybe I assume too much WP:AGF as times - c'ést la vie - better than too little I suppose. Joel Chakma may well be fiction - and there are others with the same "author" - I've tagged them all as G11 - I doubt if we'll see any permission from Mr Joel Chakma, so they will be gone next week. I've checked all his uploads - and found another G9. :-) Ronhjones (Talk) 22:04, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Martin: You are indeed correct that I incorrectly listed myself as the source of the LeBlant images rather than the photographer. I work on Wikipedia in fits and spurts and don't always get things listed according to Hoyle. I am busy taking care of someone elderly, so feel free to change the source so it reads correctly. The derivative images are mine, but the source is the painter. Sorry I got that backward. Trying to give a biography to a neglected artist. ArtnHistory ( User talk:ArtnHistory)
Hi Martin, glad that it's all sorted. For future reference, it's impossible to import pages directly from the Wikimedia Commons to the English Wikipedia; one would need to import from Commons to Meta then from Meta to the English Wikipedia. Graham 87 13:53, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
hello,
the painting is in the infobox because the former picture ( File:John Coltrane 1960.jpg) was removed, see [5]. The painting is the only good picture, as it illustrates the adult Coltrane. The other available pictures are one when he was in the youth years, and the other one is an icon. The album covers must not be in the infobox, as it violates WP:NFCC. Regards.-- ♫GoP♫ T C N 21:17, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
I'm sorry to those embarrassing stuff but not all are stolen and im not actually sockpuppetried. Intentionally welled for wiki. Regards.-- Jonas T C N25 November 2011 (UTC)
Nice catch! Peridon ( talk) 17:42, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello can you please have a look at File:HelenaPaparizou002.jpg at commons. It is credited as an own work but all the editor did was photoshop the background. The photo is from a 2008 promo and actually the exact picture can be found on a tour poster on the article Vrisko To Logo Na Zo. It's been in commons so long it's hard to believe nobody commented yet. GreekStar12 ( talk) 18:53, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers nuff said? Gtwfan52 ( talk) 16:55, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
This article is complete advertising BS through and through. In case the PROD gets removed and you see it before I do, hit it with a speedy delete. I put some of the reasons on the talk page there. Sick of this crap. KarlM ( talk) 08:23, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Dear Karl I don't know who you are and I don't understand this anger, this product truly exists and it's the very first product. I asked you help to improve the article and change things which need to be changed why don't you answer me and try to help me ! I am open to suggestions. -- Annerella ( talk) 09:16, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi, you currently blocked me in Wikimedia and I requested for unblock appeal at this session. Reason: The multiple images I upload are taken from the site Flickr. It is uploaded with citations except my own work images which are also deleted in Wikimedia. I haven’t stolen any non-free content in the internet rather, it is from flickr wherein termed to be upload exceptional. It is not my fault that Flickr input to remix but not acceptable to Wikimedia. Whereof, I intend to contribute images not violate any of conditions. I’m sorry if the warning messages I haven’t read on my talk page, I don’t recognize it when I use to upload. Moreover, the accusation socking puppetry is already clarified. I have no any account in Wikipedia. I passed the appeal for socking lacking and indefinite. As a city informative editor of Cagayan de Oro, I’m looking forward to this unblock session for it is my reputation to clean and to contribute. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JonasEncyclopedia ( talk • contribs) 05:07, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Could you please provide a reason for proposing Paul Ankomah for deletion at the PROD template otherwise it will have to be contested on procedural grounds as per WP:PROD you must provide a clear and non-generic reason. Cheers ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 08:15, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi there. You have recently blocked me (User:Ale4115) and I requested for unblock appeal. I understand the reason, I have been a wikipedia editor since 2007, I think there has to be a way to sort this out, most of the images were taken by the same author which I know, from the Skyscrapercity argentine forum which I am full member. I find this block quite disapointing because I personally dedicate part of my time and passion to edit in wikipedia. It is quite a shame because most of the images were going to be part of a major improvement of both spanish and english argentine articles (if you take a look at my contributions at wikipedia spanish). This is really sad and I am really looking forward to hear from you.
Regards, -- Fercho85 ( talk) 21:09, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Ok, fine I assume all the responsability here I have no problem if all the images I uploaded are deleted, I had enough with uploading images and later have copyright issues, do what it needs to be done. Just for the record, my other existent accounts were created in base of good faith (I have lost the password of most of them) Some of them were part of my first edits here in Wikipedia and they had not been active for about five years. I still do not understand the paranoia by treating me as if I committed sock puppetry. Anyway relax it wont happen again.
Cheers, -- Fercho85 ( talk) 08:46, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for including the date of the source pages in the copyvio templates for these images; it made it a lot easier to ensure that the uploader copied from those source pages rather than vice versa. Nyttend ( talk) 02:50, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Arab League is now complete. Thank you for your assistance in the evaluation of this CCI. |
Thank you for uncovering and doing so much to address the problem. :) -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:45, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Can you provide any kind of proof or explanation? Bulwersator ( talk) 13:07, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
PHOTOS ARE NOT STOLEN and it is the proper own work of tech bro user who is uploading them through Wikicommons. He EXCLUSIVELY owns the copyrights as pictures are taken by him irrelevant if they are also shared by his own website blog. Please allow him to use them cause it is his own rights and has the permission to share them in Wikipedia also. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Findblogging ( talk • contribs) 13:39, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Now I see. You are one of the sockpuppets of User:Andreas2009. Wasnt you asked to please leave the project? -- Martin H. ( talk) 14:58, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, I wasn't sure I was doing it right, and I appreciate you pointing it out. I'm fairly new to Wikipedia, and still trying to figure things out here. In each case, the photos were given to me to post. Most of them were snapshots, taken with a personal camera that belonged to the subject of the photos. You say, "the photographer is the author and the copyright holder must give written agreement to the free license." Can you explain how exactly I do that? MartinMartin226 ( talk) 16:36, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello Martin H.. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of File:Jenniffer-gonzalez-28th-house-of-representatives-portrait.jpg, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Photo claims OTRS permission. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 11:53, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
Faizan - Let's talk! 12:44, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Please, note that in here => [6], the argument "self-created artwork spam" was used by you to prohibit display of image, and now the argument "we don't know who created the art-work" ( HERE => [7] )is being used to to prohibit display of image. Isn't that a cool observation about elimination OCD? Luizpuodzius ( talk) 20:33, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
I'm interested to learn how to locate original image sources, such as those taken from other websites, as well as screenshots taken from online videos. Thanks. 77.43.143.31 ( talk) 19:59, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Martin H.. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
This user may have left Wikipedia. Martin H. has not edited Wikipedia since 2 January 2020. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Welcome!
Hello, Martin H., and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Khoi
khoi 23:07, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. Your edits in the List of Igbo people article do not adhere to wikipedia guidelines concerning lists: "Difficult or contentious subjects for which the definition of the topic itself is disputed should be discussed on the talk page in order to attain consensus". If you want to challenge the notability of a person who is already listed, please go to the main article and challenge the notability there (e.g. via Prod or AfD). Do not remove the entry of the person from the list as long as the person has a BLP article in Wikipedia. Thank you. Amsaim ( talk) 16:10, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
All of them are mine I took them by my camera.And if you do delete them I will just upload them back. Nascar1996 ( talk) 01:18, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
My commons page was created yesterday and the day before.Ohh my Gosh I just notice that i did have an old one when I was new to Wiki ohh now I know what you was talking about.Oppps. Nascar1996 ( talk) 22:14, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Ohh well I will upload another and if you block me I do have another computer so. Nascar1996 ( talk) 23:01, 18 February 2010 (UTC) The other one has got deleted too you beat me,ohhh pooo.LOL Nascar1996 ( talk) 23:08, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
If you know an administrator please let them deal with this vandaliser for typing this The Pacific Ring of Poo Tards (or sometimes just the Ring of Poo) is an area where large numbers of earthquakes and volcanic eruptions occur in the basin of a Pacific Ocean. In a 40,000 km horseshoe shape, it is associated with a nearly continuous series of oceanic trenches, volcanic arcs, and volcanic belts and/or plate movements. The Ring of Fire has 452 volcanoes and is home to over 75% of the world's active and dormant volcanoes.[1] It is sometimes called the circum-Pacific belt or the circum-Pacific seismic belt." on the Pacific Ring of Fire.His talk page is User talk:137.164.225.235.Thank You. - Nascar 1996 03:36, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Okay thank you Martin H. - Nascar 1996 21:41, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you left a message on User_talk:Ambrosius007 about the file File:Pacelli12.jpg. User Ambrosius007 was active on Wikipedia for about 2 years and I wrote several articles together with him. Then he suddenly stated that he was ill and stopped logging into Wikipedia. Based on various detailed he contributed to several articles, and what he said, I am almost certain that he personally knew Pius XII - and that is relevant because that was an indication of his age. I do fear that he is not active in Wikipedia because he is not active in the world, for he left some things he obviously cared about unfinished. Now, regarding the image, he specifically stated on the page and on his talk page I recall that he "owned" the original photo because it was given to him. So given that he owned, scanned it and uploaded it, there should be no problem with the copyright. Thanks. History2007 ( talk) 19:50, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
I have removed the Files for Deletion tag from File:OttoRehhagel1.jpg, because you didn't create a nomination for it at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 February 24. If you still think it should be deleted, feel free to renominate it. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:16, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
hi Martin
it's noticeable in the InternetArt article, for those of us who are involved, the vast removal of a lot of important links in this page modification:
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Internet_art&diff=339732986&oldid=336599556
there you removed a list which you are right to say included some spammy links, but also important references and i'm not just speaking for myself.
right now the InternetArt article looks like it's missing quite something, i hope you will find the time to run some researches online about those who are stated, maybe ask the intervention of an expert, and fix the problem
thanks for your attention to details jaromil ( talk) 13:16, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Restored. Is the transwiki incorrect because it should really be fair use? Doesn't look like it should be public domain and GFDL/CC at least (as commons version says). Peter 13:48, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Please take a look in this file and see if the licensing is correct. --Legolas (talk2me) 11:10, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
Would you care to explain why you reverted the license information for File:Idf_soldier_treated.png? It is properly licensed in Flickr. What do you exactly mean when you say "that account is bad"? -- 386-DX ( talk) 22:27, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. MBisanz talk 02:17, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
I think you may be mistaken Martin, my goal is to put images worthy of wikipedia pages because the pages in English in Brazil are much to be desired, and if I wait for her willingness to legalize images I will die earlier if materialize, then stop behaving like the terrible Adolf Hitler, deleting images that I had work to find, try and be more rational and try to help republish them according to law, because I do not know in which category I place the images, because I am not an employee of wikipedia, but a contributor, and has made great contributions to quality texts, which you should consider.
Summary: try to resolve the leadership instead of behaving like a dictator in Brazil hate this behavior typical of poorly educated, what we like and seek to resolve all based on reason. Then format the images as it should be rather clear.
What ended up happening here? Also, thoughts on this? Enigma msg 03:39, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your time.. Arab League User ( talk) 03:30, 4 March 2012 (UTC)--
The most recent version of the page had {{coord|18|5|30.22|S|21|40|10.1|E|display=title}} -- B ( talk) 00:55, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello Martin H.. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of File:Jc thong cu.jpg, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 03:11, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
The Melbourne, Florida article has an issue with an anon editor (Using the 97.102.12x.xx IP range) and looking back at the history it has been on going. The editor is also socking on Commons ( User:Drummerboy37 is one of them) so the only thing we can do there (Commons) is to block and delete the images (which are always copyvios and some even from other editors on Commons itself claimed as Own work). Not to sure what could be done with the Melbourne, FL article though. Bidgee ( talk) 13:56, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I've noticed you've redirected the Paulini article back to Paulini Curuenavuli. The reason why i changed it back to Paulini is because she's known just as Paulini in her career. For example, the singer Ciara doesn't have her full name on it's article title. ozurbanmusic ( talk)
I have tried the Move button a lot of times but I can't because the article, Paulini has already been created. If your an Administrator, can you please help me by moving the article to Paulini. ozurbanmusic ( talk)
What do you mean by consensus? Do you know any good administrator/s I could request this move to? ozurbanmusic ( talk)
Hi. I'm a sysadmin at the school where this IP Range is used and I'm trying to upload two images for a new article on the new school we've had built (from Filton High School to Abbeywood Community School) the school logo and a photo from the lobby area. I was going to upload it to Commons but you've blocked the IP (and fairly, too) so how would I go about getting these images online? I would have posted this on your commons page...but I'm not allowed :P Many Thanks, Tb2571989 ( talk) 08:50, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Martin,
In case you missed it, you got a mention here. – Moondyne 15:02, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, you just deleted a photo European Music Year 1985 depicting two stamps without discussing the matter first. Would you please explain your action to me why, these stamps were not relevant or rather "Unrelated" as you put it? Thanks a lot. Fusion is the future ( talk) 14:42, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
I noticed you called another user a liar. User talk:Martin H. - Image Uploads I kindly remind you, this is strictly against the principles of Wikipedia.
Agreed?
Having said that.
You reasoned in your edit summary exactly such as: "stamp, that's unrelated"
Sincerely best. Fusion is the future ( talk) 15:57, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi there, just a note, the article Binahian, which you proposed for deletion, has been restored after its deletion was contested. If the article still merits deletion, please initiate a discussion at WP:AFD. Thank you. — ξ xplicit 19:08, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Hey Martin H., I'd like to know why you keep on blocking me. Sorry, I do not speak english so well (I'm brazilian), but I'm working on article Cher in the portuguese wikipedia and I had so much headache to find pics that do not own any copyright, like the old ones, and I noticed that you deleted all pics, including the ones taken in the 1950s, 1960s and early 1970s that clearly do not own any copyright. Other pics were taken by the fans on live shows and posted on the Cher Gallery (I sent an OTRS permission and I was waiting for a reply until you deleted them).
I mean, last year I had another account named Djosci and I didn't know any of the Wikipedia rules, and I apologize for that, but now I know. And is devastating when some work that you spent so much time on it is simply deleted without any explanation. Please reply me, because it's impossible to talk to you on Commons. Thank you. Lordelliott ( talk) 17:15, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for definitively help me to upload files which can't be removed without pitiless and give me my first steps. Thanks and excuse me a thousand times. All forgotten by my side -- Raul-Reus ( talk) 19:27, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
About Ontthb.png. It was six years ago! I can't really remember, but I suspect that I copied it from Ontwel.png, just filling a different section in red. It was listed as GFDL. I say that it probably came from Ontwel.png because that is an image which highlights Waterloo Regional Municipality, Ontario, which is where I live and where I have done some editing. I can't say definitively where it came from though, because it was so long ago. -- timc talk 00:31, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I saw to put the Dacian helmet for deletion and removed it from Dacia stub. I think this is one of the best pictures on Dacia topic. Not sure who uploaded and I am not clear what are you suggesting and implying here. If there is a better one to use, I am for it. But it would be a pity to lose it altogether. Which copyright does it break and who do you think owns the picture? I can go ahead and try to contact the original author, if you think you know it. Also which copyright laws apply to pictures of ancient artifacts? Thanks! -- Codrin.B ( talk) 19:54, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Martin, I have a question since you are very experienced with these licenses. I am wondering if commons:Template:PD-RO-1956 applies to images and graphics from a Romanian book from 1929 as is Getica by Vasile Pârvan, made available by the Romanian government here: [4]. I hope this license or others apply to this content, as some of the archaeological artifacts depicted were destroyed during World War 2, are lost or maybe in some obscure museums or private collections, making it impossible to create newer photographs. Thanks a lot!-- Codrin.B ( talk) 20:42, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Martin H please upload eva Larue4.jpg please —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.236.134.144 ( talk) 12:31, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
UserFind12313143 Hi Martin H please Block User Gohe007 reason Vandalism —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.236.134.144 ( talk) 22:56, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
User Fark HI Martin H please Unblock me —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.236.135.179 ( talk) 07:20, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Martin H please unblock me —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.236.137.132 ( talk) 21:56, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello Martin, Take love and respect. My Wikipedia profile has been hacked and I can't fix it. And the hacker is continuously adding sexual materials into various articles. Sorry for your problem, I didn't know what he added into this article.
Thanks. Mohammadarafat ( talk) 14:06, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Just to be clear, I know Molly but I am not Molly. We do work together in the same computer lab though. Since you think I have a conflict of interest with the Cistulli page I'll leave it alone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seancasey00 ( talk • contribs) 15:51, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
Mr Martin H. I am one of the advisors of HE Ihsanoglu. We try to make H.E.'s article as perfect since 2 month. We looked and searched many websites to complete his bio and we gave many weblinks to find proper information about mentioning issues. But as far as I understand you delete many of them because of it is weblink spam. We check our page with this information and we also find there many link to erase. But not the weblinks. Thanks for your warning and your further helps. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mfoke ( talk • contribs) 11:40, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
User Orangesms Hello Martin H please Unblock me 94.236.141.153 ( talk) 13:23, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
Martin, thank you for your help in properly formatting these files for English Wikipedia. X4n6 ( talk) 22:43, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
Just a quick note to say I removed your speedy deletion tag from this image. There are two main reasons:
1. It is credible that the uploader might be the copyright holder. Actors typically own their own headshots, and the uploader may be the heir. Note - I'm not claiming that this is the case, but the fact that it is possible and credible means that the copyright infringment is not blatant, and so speedy deletion is not appropriate.
2. There is a viable fair use claim to be made, since the subject is deceased.
Cheers,
Thparkth ( talk) 01:27, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
User Guz23456 Hello Martin H please unblock me Guz23456 08:48, 25 April 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guz23456 ( talk • contribs)
User Guz23456 Hello Martin H Please Unblock me
BENJIECI (
talk) 15:03, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
Hey Martin, I wanted to consult you for some guidance before uploading another photo. I made mistakes on the previous attempts, but I truly just want the wikipedia article to look more appealing to read. After all, a wikipedia article full of just text is really boring. The artist, iamamiwhoami is playing in a concert, and it is her first live concert and a poster has been released by the official event website. How do I go about uploading the poster to the article? Please help me out, thank you! Borderings ( talk) 11:13, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Hey, great minds think alike. I just chanced across StryoFome ( talk · contribs) and blocked him here. Can you take care of the stuff on Commons? I'm pretty certain this is the same user as the Bialytock&Bloom account. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:18, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
Good catch. How upsetting that they've sat there like that for the best part of a year. J Milburn ( talk) 00:14, 22 June 2011 (UTC) |
Hi, I've been copying User:Firas1977's photos to Wikimedia Commons, I now wish I hadn't done so as you have uncovered that these are all likely copyright violations. see File:Ali Diab.jpg I'd appreciate it if you could make sure they are deleted from Wikimedia Commons as well. You can see what I've transferred here and here. Sorry and thanks. -- Kafuffle ( talk) 16:45, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
I've deleted the ones you tagged - I would suggest put all the rest up for Puf. I did the same yesterday for a different user here and I also added this report - but that's a bit academic as that user (like your one) has left. Well spotted. Ronhjones (Talk) 21:57, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello Martin: I use to work on Angola related articles and just discoveret you edit on "Economy of Angola". What I don't understand is your remark "datei umbenannt". NB: I do speak German - which is why I am puzzled. Aflis ( talk) 11:39, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I'm NimaFallah or You said AmirHossein7055. You're the only administrator in Wikipedia??? Why others don't have been do for me only you must delet my images and block me??? I said you please don't block me but you do no problem! I said please don't remove my images but you do no problem so! but why you deleted images that was free??????? What's problem in the image for Iranian rial. What was problem in . What??? PLEASE ANSWER. 80.191.41.225 ( talk) 10:52, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
UserSpray2132143242 Hello Martin H One question well why block me give reason
109.121.141.253 (
talk) 14:44, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Hey Martin, I noticed your removed several images from the Tegucigalpa article citing copyright violations. While I can't vouch for every image you removed, some images did have permission from their original creator to be distribute for amusement or instructional purposes. A couple of the images were in fact, windows paint-style graphs which I would venture to say were "hand drawn" for the purpose of illustrating the content on the article. Not sure if the Google terrain map with roads highlighted in color through some graphics painting program was permitted under fair use rationale. I have contacted some of the authors whose images appeared on the article to request permission, three have replied stating we may use the images on Wikipedia, I will attempt to replace these images (ones with confirmed permission from authors) onto the article. Thank you.-- Usfirstgov ( talk) 05:05, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
You may well be correct - however I do known Flickr is notorious for being incorrect and users putting up copies of other people's photos, claiming their own. Had User:Souvik.arko claimed it as his "own" - I would have deleted it on the spot. Maybe I assume too much WP:AGF as times - c'ést la vie - better than too little I suppose. Joel Chakma may well be fiction - and there are others with the same "author" - I've tagged them all as G11 - I doubt if we'll see any permission from Mr Joel Chakma, so they will be gone next week. I've checked all his uploads - and found another G9. :-) Ronhjones (Talk) 22:04, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Martin: You are indeed correct that I incorrectly listed myself as the source of the LeBlant images rather than the photographer. I work on Wikipedia in fits and spurts and don't always get things listed according to Hoyle. I am busy taking care of someone elderly, so feel free to change the source so it reads correctly. The derivative images are mine, but the source is the painter. Sorry I got that backward. Trying to give a biography to a neglected artist. ArtnHistory ( User talk:ArtnHistory)
Hi Martin, glad that it's all sorted. For future reference, it's impossible to import pages directly from the Wikimedia Commons to the English Wikipedia; one would need to import from Commons to Meta then from Meta to the English Wikipedia. Graham 87 13:53, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
hello,
the painting is in the infobox because the former picture ( File:John Coltrane 1960.jpg) was removed, see [5]. The painting is the only good picture, as it illustrates the adult Coltrane. The other available pictures are one when he was in the youth years, and the other one is an icon. The album covers must not be in the infobox, as it violates WP:NFCC. Regards.-- ♫GoP♫ T C N 21:17, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
I'm sorry to those embarrassing stuff but not all are stolen and im not actually sockpuppetried. Intentionally welled for wiki. Regards.-- Jonas T C N25 November 2011 (UTC)
Nice catch! Peridon ( talk) 17:42, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello can you please have a look at File:HelenaPaparizou002.jpg at commons. It is credited as an own work but all the editor did was photoshop the background. The photo is from a 2008 promo and actually the exact picture can be found on a tour poster on the article Vrisko To Logo Na Zo. It's been in commons so long it's hard to believe nobody commented yet. GreekStar12 ( talk) 18:53, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers nuff said? Gtwfan52 ( talk) 16:55, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
This article is complete advertising BS through and through. In case the PROD gets removed and you see it before I do, hit it with a speedy delete. I put some of the reasons on the talk page there. Sick of this crap. KarlM ( talk) 08:23, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Dear Karl I don't know who you are and I don't understand this anger, this product truly exists and it's the very first product. I asked you help to improve the article and change things which need to be changed why don't you answer me and try to help me ! I am open to suggestions. -- Annerella ( talk) 09:16, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi, you currently blocked me in Wikimedia and I requested for unblock appeal at this session. Reason: The multiple images I upload are taken from the site Flickr. It is uploaded with citations except my own work images which are also deleted in Wikimedia. I haven’t stolen any non-free content in the internet rather, it is from flickr wherein termed to be upload exceptional. It is not my fault that Flickr input to remix but not acceptable to Wikimedia. Whereof, I intend to contribute images not violate any of conditions. I’m sorry if the warning messages I haven’t read on my talk page, I don’t recognize it when I use to upload. Moreover, the accusation socking puppetry is already clarified. I have no any account in Wikipedia. I passed the appeal for socking lacking and indefinite. As a city informative editor of Cagayan de Oro, I’m looking forward to this unblock session for it is my reputation to clean and to contribute. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JonasEncyclopedia ( talk • contribs) 05:07, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Could you please provide a reason for proposing Paul Ankomah for deletion at the PROD template otherwise it will have to be contested on procedural grounds as per WP:PROD you must provide a clear and non-generic reason. Cheers ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 08:15, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi there. You have recently blocked me (User:Ale4115) and I requested for unblock appeal. I understand the reason, I have been a wikipedia editor since 2007, I think there has to be a way to sort this out, most of the images were taken by the same author which I know, from the Skyscrapercity argentine forum which I am full member. I find this block quite disapointing because I personally dedicate part of my time and passion to edit in wikipedia. It is quite a shame because most of the images were going to be part of a major improvement of both spanish and english argentine articles (if you take a look at my contributions at wikipedia spanish). This is really sad and I am really looking forward to hear from you.
Regards, -- Fercho85 ( talk) 21:09, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Ok, fine I assume all the responsability here I have no problem if all the images I uploaded are deleted, I had enough with uploading images and later have copyright issues, do what it needs to be done. Just for the record, my other existent accounts were created in base of good faith (I have lost the password of most of them) Some of them were part of my first edits here in Wikipedia and they had not been active for about five years. I still do not understand the paranoia by treating me as if I committed sock puppetry. Anyway relax it wont happen again.
Cheers, -- Fercho85 ( talk) 08:46, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for including the date of the source pages in the copyvio templates for these images; it made it a lot easier to ensure that the uploader copied from those source pages rather than vice versa. Nyttend ( talk) 02:50, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Arab League is now complete. Thank you for your assistance in the evaluation of this CCI. |
Thank you for uncovering and doing so much to address the problem. :) -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:45, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Can you provide any kind of proof or explanation? Bulwersator ( talk) 13:07, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
PHOTOS ARE NOT STOLEN and it is the proper own work of tech bro user who is uploading them through Wikicommons. He EXCLUSIVELY owns the copyrights as pictures are taken by him irrelevant if they are also shared by his own website blog. Please allow him to use them cause it is his own rights and has the permission to share them in Wikipedia also. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Findblogging ( talk • contribs) 13:39, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Now I see. You are one of the sockpuppets of User:Andreas2009. Wasnt you asked to please leave the project? -- Martin H. ( talk) 14:58, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, I wasn't sure I was doing it right, and I appreciate you pointing it out. I'm fairly new to Wikipedia, and still trying to figure things out here. In each case, the photos were given to me to post. Most of them were snapshots, taken with a personal camera that belonged to the subject of the photos. You say, "the photographer is the author and the copyright holder must give written agreement to the free license." Can you explain how exactly I do that? MartinMartin226 ( talk) 16:36, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello Martin H.. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of File:Jenniffer-gonzalez-28th-house-of-representatives-portrait.jpg, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Photo claims OTRS permission. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 11:53, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
Faizan - Let's talk! 12:44, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Please, note that in here => [6], the argument "self-created artwork spam" was used by you to prohibit display of image, and now the argument "we don't know who created the art-work" ( HERE => [7] )is being used to to prohibit display of image. Isn't that a cool observation about elimination OCD? Luizpuodzius ( talk) 20:33, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
I'm interested to learn how to locate original image sources, such as those taken from other websites, as well as screenshots taken from online videos. Thanks. 77.43.143.31 ( talk) 19:59, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Martin H.. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)