From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Links to user pages and sandboxes

Information icon Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at Wolfoo. Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been deleted, please do not re-add any such links, thank you - Arjayay ( talk) 11:26, 2 September 2022 (UTC) reply

DWPJ moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, DWPJ, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 03:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Nomination of DWPJ for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DWPJ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWPJ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

( t · c) buidhe 18:05, 4 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Do not move the article again to evade the scrutiny of the AfD process. It's been moved back, and I doubt their 'calls' changed when another station in another area holds them legally. Nate ( chatter) 19:35, 6 October 2022 (UTC) reply
Notice

The article DWXS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insufficient sources to pass WP:GNG. If sources are insufficient, this should redirect to an appropriate list.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sammi Brie (she/her •  tc) 21:04, 16 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Nomination of DWXS for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DWXS is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWXS until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sammi Brie (she/her •  tc) 06:31, 17 November 2022 (UTC) reply

An edit filter incorrectly blocked you from creating this article. I have created it for you. Happy editing! -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 05:53, 12 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Upon further review, as flagged by Sammi Brie, this is a hoax, so I have deleted it. Furthermore, as it is the third time you have been caught creating hoaxes, I have blocked you indefinitely. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 06:22, 12 December 2022 (UTC) reply

December 2022

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 06:22, 12 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Speedy deletion nomination of DWLG

A tag has been placed on DWLG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G3 blatant hoax. No station exists with this call sign or on this frequency in this city, per the most recent list of FM stations in the Philippines.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sammi Brie (she/her •  tc) 06:23, 12 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Ok, I will not create a new hoax radio stations in the Philippines. Sammi Brie, Sorry, i just wanted because i played on YouTube. So that's why i create it. MarsTheBigBoy ( talk) 07:24, 12 December 2022 (UTC) reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MarsTheBigBoy ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

Because i created the hoax articles like radio stations and editing and Tamzin blocked me, so, i just wanted to unblock me and i won't create or edit hoaxes. MarsTheBigBoy ( talk) 05:13, 19 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

Blocks only prevent editing, so if you have no intention of making edits, there is no need to remove the block. If you later find there is an edit you want to make, you may request unblock at that time. There is no deadline for this. 331dot ( talk) 09:53, 19 December 2022 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Okay. What edits do you plan to make instead? 331dot ( talk) 09:40, 19 December 2022 (UTC) reply

I will not edit anymore. Because i didn't listen to Tamzin and Arjayay about the hoax radio stations like GB Radio, XFM, editing hoax and more. Arjayay, Tamzin, Sammi Brie, 331dot & to all users there, I'm so very very very super duper ultra mega sorry to edit hoax stations. From now on, i will listen and pay attention to edit not hoax and real edit. Please unblock me. MarsTheBigBoy ( talk) 09:49, 19 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Please unblock me. I won't edit hoax stations and articles anymore. MarsTheBigBoy ( talk) 09:53, 19 December 2022 (UTC) reply

As I said, if there are no edits you intend to make, there is no need to remove the block. 331dot ( talk) 10:08, 19 December 2022 (UTC) reply
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
MarsTheBigBoy ( block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))
127.0.0.1 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "MarsTheBigBoy". The reason given for MarsTheBigBoy's block is: "Disruptive editing: creating hoaxes, third offense".


Decline reason: Not autoblocked, you are blocked directly. And as you have no intention of editing, there's no reason for you to be making unblock requests. Please stop. Yamla ( talk) 12:34, 20 December 2022 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Links to user pages and sandboxes

Information icon Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at Wolfoo. Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been deleted, please do not re-add any such links, thank you - Arjayay ( talk) 11:26, 2 September 2022 (UTC) reply

DWPJ moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, DWPJ, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 03:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Nomination of DWPJ for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DWPJ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWPJ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

( t · c) buidhe 18:05, 4 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Do not move the article again to evade the scrutiny of the AfD process. It's been moved back, and I doubt their 'calls' changed when another station in another area holds them legally. Nate ( chatter) 19:35, 6 October 2022 (UTC) reply
Notice

The article DWXS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insufficient sources to pass WP:GNG. If sources are insufficient, this should redirect to an appropriate list.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sammi Brie (she/her •  tc) 21:04, 16 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Nomination of DWXS for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DWXS is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWXS until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sammi Brie (she/her •  tc) 06:31, 17 November 2022 (UTC) reply

An edit filter incorrectly blocked you from creating this article. I have created it for you. Happy editing! -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 05:53, 12 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Upon further review, as flagged by Sammi Brie, this is a hoax, so I have deleted it. Furthermore, as it is the third time you have been caught creating hoaxes, I have blocked you indefinitely. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 06:22, 12 December 2022 (UTC) reply

December 2022

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 06:22, 12 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Speedy deletion nomination of DWLG

A tag has been placed on DWLG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G3 blatant hoax. No station exists with this call sign or on this frequency in this city, per the most recent list of FM stations in the Philippines.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sammi Brie (she/her •  tc) 06:23, 12 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Ok, I will not create a new hoax radio stations in the Philippines. Sammi Brie, Sorry, i just wanted because i played on YouTube. So that's why i create it. MarsTheBigBoy ( talk) 07:24, 12 December 2022 (UTC) reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MarsTheBigBoy ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

Because i created the hoax articles like radio stations and editing and Tamzin blocked me, so, i just wanted to unblock me and i won't create or edit hoaxes. MarsTheBigBoy ( talk) 05:13, 19 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

Blocks only prevent editing, so if you have no intention of making edits, there is no need to remove the block. If you later find there is an edit you want to make, you may request unblock at that time. There is no deadline for this. 331dot ( talk) 09:53, 19 December 2022 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Okay. What edits do you plan to make instead? 331dot ( talk) 09:40, 19 December 2022 (UTC) reply

I will not edit anymore. Because i didn't listen to Tamzin and Arjayay about the hoax radio stations like GB Radio, XFM, editing hoax and more. Arjayay, Tamzin, Sammi Brie, 331dot & to all users there, I'm so very very very super duper ultra mega sorry to edit hoax stations. From now on, i will listen and pay attention to edit not hoax and real edit. Please unblock me. MarsTheBigBoy ( talk) 09:49, 19 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Please unblock me. I won't edit hoax stations and articles anymore. MarsTheBigBoy ( talk) 09:53, 19 December 2022 (UTC) reply

As I said, if there are no edits you intend to make, there is no need to remove the block. 331dot ( talk) 10:08, 19 December 2022 (UTC) reply
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
MarsTheBigBoy ( block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))
127.0.0.1 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "MarsTheBigBoy". The reason given for MarsTheBigBoy's block is: "Disruptive editing: creating hoaxes, third offense".


Decline reason: Not autoblocked, you are blocked directly. And as you have no intention of editing, there's no reason for you to be making unblock requests. Please stop. Yamla ( talk) 12:34, 20 December 2022 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook