Welcome!
Hello, Manyanswer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
Brunoy Anastasiya Seryozhenko (
talk)
01:34, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
My reply is on my user page. AgnosticPreachersKid ( talk) 20:20, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Super Bowl XLII, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Super Bowl XLII was changed by Manyanswer (u) (t) deleting 41852 characters on 2008-02-28T05:09:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot ( talk) 05:10, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Reply: I added one possessive apostrophe to this page during this edit. That is all. Obviously there was some bug or data transfer error by Wikipedia. This was reported as a false positive. I successfully completed the proper edit later. Manyanswer ( talk) 02:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to
List of Hot 100 (U.S.) chart achievements and trivia. Your edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's
talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the
sandbox. Thank you. -
eo (
talk)
17:53, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
You have mentioned on his page that he was doing nonconstructive edits, can you clearlfiy what were those edits. User:Yousaf465 ( talk)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, some of your recent edits have been reverted as they could be seen to be defamatory or potentially
libellous. Take a look at our
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you
assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Accusing others of bad faith: Making accusations of bad faith can be inflammatory and hence these accusations may be unhelpful in a dispute. It can be seen as a personal attack if bad faith motives are alleged without clear evidence that others' editing is actually in bad faith. The result is often accusations of bad faith on your part, which tends to create a nasty cycle.
Manyanswer ( talk) 00:53, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Accusing good-faith editors of vandalism, as you did here [3], when there is simply a content dispute is a violation of WP:NPA. Don't do it again William M. Connolley ( talk) 07:30, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
P.S. - thanks for stepping in earlier while I was busy.
Clarification: your warning was for apparently seconding Wm's vandalism warning. You have now said that you did not intend to second the entirety of Wm's warning, only the portion relating to edit warring. As such, my warning becomes irrelevant. I advise you in future to be more careful about your phrasing William M. Connolley ( talk) 15:40, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing out how what I said was confusing. I'll go and make an emendation to this part of my comment in the ani/3r (...to something like "was not warned about the special zero tolerance of edit warring under Obama article probation").
Some suggestions for dealing with edit war attacks that don’t meet the 3RR level:
Hope this is helpful! Manyanswer ( talk) 19:25, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Ironically i just posted this comment to Jayron's page. I'll check out your talkpage section above, thanks. ↜Just M E here , now 19:56, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Manyanswer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
Brunoy Anastasiya Seryozhenko (
talk)
01:34, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
My reply is on my user page. AgnosticPreachersKid ( talk) 20:20, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Super Bowl XLII, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Super Bowl XLII was changed by Manyanswer (u) (t) deleting 41852 characters on 2008-02-28T05:09:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot ( talk) 05:10, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Reply: I added one possessive apostrophe to this page during this edit. That is all. Obviously there was some bug or data transfer error by Wikipedia. This was reported as a false positive. I successfully completed the proper edit later. Manyanswer ( talk) 02:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to
List of Hot 100 (U.S.) chart achievements and trivia. Your edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's
talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the
sandbox. Thank you. -
eo (
talk)
17:53, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
You have mentioned on his page that he was doing nonconstructive edits, can you clearlfiy what were those edits. User:Yousaf465 ( talk)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, some of your recent edits have been reverted as they could be seen to be defamatory or potentially
libellous. Take a look at our
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you
assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Accusing others of bad faith: Making accusations of bad faith can be inflammatory and hence these accusations may be unhelpful in a dispute. It can be seen as a personal attack if bad faith motives are alleged without clear evidence that others' editing is actually in bad faith. The result is often accusations of bad faith on your part, which tends to create a nasty cycle.
Manyanswer ( talk) 00:53, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Accusing good-faith editors of vandalism, as you did here [3], when there is simply a content dispute is a violation of WP:NPA. Don't do it again William M. Connolley ( talk) 07:30, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
P.S. - thanks for stepping in earlier while I was busy.
Clarification: your warning was for apparently seconding Wm's vandalism warning. You have now said that you did not intend to second the entirety of Wm's warning, only the portion relating to edit warring. As such, my warning becomes irrelevant. I advise you in future to be more careful about your phrasing William M. Connolley ( talk) 15:40, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing out how what I said was confusing. I'll go and make an emendation to this part of my comment in the ani/3r (...to something like "was not warned about the special zero tolerance of edit warring under Obama article probation").
Some suggestions for dealing with edit war attacks that don’t meet the 3RR level:
Hope this is helpful! Manyanswer ( talk) 19:25, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Ironically i just posted this comment to Jayron's page. I'll check out your talkpage section above, thanks. ↜Just M E here , now 19:56, 10 August 2009 (UTC)