You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
LaMona ( talk) 20:08, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Notice: In a 2008 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor working on articles concerning the September 11 attacks. Before any such sanctions are imposed, editors are to be put on notice of the decision. |
-- MONGO 07:40, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Response by MannyDantyla to Notice by MONGO
Please take the time to look at the sources I used to cite the text that I added and you removed from the page. They are historical facts, not to be debated.
I understand that there is a problem with people defacing these article. A quick look at the history proves this. All I ask is that you make sure that you are able to separate the garbage from good information. I have not defaced the article. I am not a conspiracy theorist. I urge you to think critically for a moment; we must be vigilant and adhere to the truth.
I will be adding this content back into the article. What you do from there is up to you.
-- Mannydantyla ( talk) 14:17, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Your alterations to Collapse of the World Trade Center have been reverted by three different editors.-- MONGO 16:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Dornicke is indefinitely topic-banned with respect to 9/11-related topics due to long-term disruption. It is not appropriate or fair to topic-banned editors to attempt to engage them on a subject within that ban, as it may lead them to breach the ban. Please do not try to draw out Dornicke on this topic. Acroterion (talk) 17:16, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The NIST World Trade Center Disaster Investigation, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:34, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive editing from the congress IP. Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 17:13, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
★Trekker (
talk) is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Merry Christmas, hope you're having a relaxing time during this period and that next year will be even better for us all here. ★Trekker ( talk) 13:34, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MadeYourReadThis ( talk) 22:00, 10 January 2018 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
LaMona ( talk) 20:08, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Notice: In a 2008 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor working on articles concerning the September 11 attacks. Before any such sanctions are imposed, editors are to be put on notice of the decision. |
-- MONGO 07:40, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Response by MannyDantyla to Notice by MONGO
Please take the time to look at the sources I used to cite the text that I added and you removed from the page. They are historical facts, not to be debated.
I understand that there is a problem with people defacing these article. A quick look at the history proves this. All I ask is that you make sure that you are able to separate the garbage from good information. I have not defaced the article. I am not a conspiracy theorist. I urge you to think critically for a moment; we must be vigilant and adhere to the truth.
I will be adding this content back into the article. What you do from there is up to you.
-- Mannydantyla ( talk) 14:17, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Your alterations to Collapse of the World Trade Center have been reverted by three different editors.-- MONGO 16:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Dornicke is indefinitely topic-banned with respect to 9/11-related topics due to long-term disruption. It is not appropriate or fair to topic-banned editors to attempt to engage them on a subject within that ban, as it may lead them to breach the ban. Please do not try to draw out Dornicke on this topic. Acroterion (talk) 17:16, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The NIST World Trade Center Disaster Investigation, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:34, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive editing from the congress IP. Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 17:13, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
★Trekker (
talk) is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Merry Christmas, hope you're having a relaxing time during this period and that next year will be even better for us all here. ★Trekker ( talk) 13:34, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MadeYourReadThis ( talk) 22:00, 10 January 2018 (UTC)