Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of
your recent edits, such as the edit you made to
Iron Man 3, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the
welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. Thank you.
GSK ●
✉
✓
15:39, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Iron Man 3 &
Mandarin (comics). Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
T-Nuggett (
talk)
21:12, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Well, that is Good. I applaud your Sandbox now. T-Nuggett ( talk) 00:29, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Iron Man 3, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Fandraltastic (
talk)
19:11, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MandarinVengeance, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
GSK ● ✉ ✓ 19:53, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
MisterShiney. I noticed that you recently removed some content from
Talk:Iron Man 3 without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks!
MisterShiney
✉
21:15, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
MisterShiney ✉ 21:34, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing, as you did at
Talk:Iron Man 3. Your edits have been
reverted or removed.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 04:32, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
User:MandarinVengeance/sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MandarinVengeance/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:MandarinVengeance/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. As a note, this is not intended as any sort of comment on the content; merely that the copy-and-paste technique you used to create that sandbox may constitute a violation of Wikipedia's licensing policy. rdfox 76 ( talk) 05:11, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Don't leaving threatening comments on people's talk pages, especially while logged out. Being threatening is an easy way to get blocked, and doing so while logged out makes it appear as if you wanted to make it difficult for people to tell that it was you making the threats.— Kww( talk) 06:24, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
In regard to this edit: you know consensus is against you. Don't make that edit again without gaining consensus for it on the talk page. If I see you resuming this edit war, you will be blocked.— Kww( talk) 02:55, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Just in case you haven't figured it out yet, no one cares what you think about Iron Man or the Mandarin. Your personal opinions about the topic are completely irrelevant. We only care about what reliable sources say about this topic, and our function as editors is to reproduce what those reliable sources say. Edits like this one, where you used an article talk page to express your own personal dissatisfaction with the film's treatment of a character, are unacceptable. Restoring that edit will result in you being blocked. Making similar edits in the future will result in you being blocked as well.— Kww( talk) 04:51, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. — Kww( talk) 03:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
I WANT THIS BLOCK TAKEN DOWN PLEASE! THIS IS HIGHWAY ROBBERY!
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of
your recent edits, such as the edit you made to
Iron Man 3, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the
welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. Thank you.
GSK ●
✉
✓
15:39, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Iron Man 3 &
Mandarin (comics). Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
T-Nuggett (
talk)
21:12, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Well, that is Good. I applaud your Sandbox now. T-Nuggett ( talk) 00:29, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Iron Man 3, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Fandraltastic (
talk)
19:11, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MandarinVengeance, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
GSK ● ✉ ✓ 19:53, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
MisterShiney. I noticed that you recently removed some content from
Talk:Iron Man 3 without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks!
MisterShiney
✉
21:15, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
MisterShiney ✉ 21:34, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing, as you did at
Talk:Iron Man 3. Your edits have been
reverted or removed.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 04:32, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
User:MandarinVengeance/sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MandarinVengeance/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:MandarinVengeance/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. As a note, this is not intended as any sort of comment on the content; merely that the copy-and-paste technique you used to create that sandbox may constitute a violation of Wikipedia's licensing policy. rdfox 76 ( talk) 05:11, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Don't leaving threatening comments on people's talk pages, especially while logged out. Being threatening is an easy way to get blocked, and doing so while logged out makes it appear as if you wanted to make it difficult for people to tell that it was you making the threats.— Kww( talk) 06:24, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
In regard to this edit: you know consensus is against you. Don't make that edit again without gaining consensus for it on the talk page. If I see you resuming this edit war, you will be blocked.— Kww( talk) 02:55, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Just in case you haven't figured it out yet, no one cares what you think about Iron Man or the Mandarin. Your personal opinions about the topic are completely irrelevant. We only care about what reliable sources say about this topic, and our function as editors is to reproduce what those reliable sources say. Edits like this one, where you used an article talk page to express your own personal dissatisfaction with the film's treatment of a character, are unacceptable. Restoring that edit will result in you being blocked. Making similar edits in the future will result in you being blocked as well.— Kww( talk) 04:51, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. — Kww( talk) 03:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
I WANT THIS BLOCK TAKEN DOWN PLEASE! THIS IS HIGHWAY ROBBERY!