Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! SUN EYE 1 13:57, 16 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Suneye1. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Reservation policy in Tamil Nadu, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SUN EYE 1 13:55, 16 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Reservation policy in Tamil Nadu, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SUN EYE 1 14:10, 16 April 2021 (UTC) reply

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

SUN EYE 1 13:58, 16 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. SUN EYE 1 17:25, 12 May 2021 (UTC) reply

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. SUN EYE 1 18:36, 12 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Your recent editing history at Reservation policy in Tamil Nadu‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. SUN EYE 1 10:45, 13 May 2021 (UTC) reply

I saw that many source links in the 'SC/ST Atrocities Act' page were not working. So I removed them. I agree that I am new to this editing work and did not even know that some discussion is going on regarding me in the notice board. But definitely articles whose reference links are not working can't be kept in Wikipedia. Man of failures ( talk) 17:55, 13 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Did you have an account before?, I am sure you did know about editing Wikipedia before. Did you find the links not working or not accessible to you? Don't worry I'll re-add them with sources. SUN EYE 1 05:59, 14 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Additionally the Doctors Association for Social Equality (DASE) thing on 'Reservation in Tamilnadu' page did not have a reference, which you had allowed. Man of failures ( talk) 18:07, 13 May 2021 (UTC) reply

I can't find what you are referring to. Point this on the article's talk page. SUN EYE 1 05:59, 14 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Multiple reverts of my edits have been made by suneye1 on the sub-topic 'Policy Abuse' in the 'Reservation in Tamilnadu' page basing on an article which is just an individual opinion piece; not a news piece or a survey piece or neutral statement of facts. And the thing being reverted is also not the main topic of discussion in that article and is just an additional line at the end, which has no scientific / survey basis. Man of failures ( talk) 03:04, 14 May 2021 (UTC) reply

So, now you can actually find it, right? [1] [2]. That is not a opinion piece, you were reported on ANI for this WP:GAMING. That is part of the topic and that is a WP:SECONDARY source and is based on WP:PRIMARY sources. Your recent additions fails WP:RECENTISM and I've had reverted it. If you have any concerns raise it on the talk page. You said you are new to editing, so spend time learning WP policies, what you are doing is WP:DE and this will get you blocked. SUN EYE 1 06:10, 14 May 2021 (UTC) reply

So the opinion piece of someone published in an article doesn't come under WP:RECENTISM and can be repeatedly restored by you. But news about a policy not being implemented by a state government which has been implemented all over India and being challenged in High Court for this comes under WP:RECENTISM. You seem to be least concerned about neutral statement of facts or a wholesome description of both sides of the story. Rather you seem to be more interested in propagating your one-sided propaganda. Man of failures ( talk) 11:42, 16 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Responded on the talk page. I advise you to read about recentism. The lead summarizes the entire article. You can write about EWS, what it is, when did it come and why it was not implemented in the history. The content you wrote is only tells it was yet to be implemented like a news story. You were edit warring claiming that you can't see the content in the article but now it is an opinion piece. It was you trying to censor content that you don't seem to like with the "Invalid IP address" edit summaries". [3] That is why I reported you for WP:GAMING. SUN EYE 1 05:53, 17 May 2021 (UTC) reply

After repeatedly mentioning that the links are not working, you seemed to be least concerned about them. Rather you busy in roll backing those edits misusing your power. And your biasedly statement that I knew Wikipedia editing before further exposes your intentions. Man of failures ( talk) 11:47, 16 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Which links? If you are talking about Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 , I reverted it only once when you made the "Invalid Ip address" edits. [4] SUN EYE 1 05:41, 17 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Even after repeatedly mentioning that the links are not working, you seemed to be least concerned about them. Rather you were busy in roll backing those edits misusing your power. And your biasedly statement that I knew Wikipedia editing before further exposes your intentions. Man of failures ( talk) 11:49, 16 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CommanderWaterford were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Acharya Harihar Das and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Acharya Harihar Das, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford ( talk) 07:13, 17 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, Man of failures! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford ( talk) 07:13, 17 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, Man of failures. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Acharya Harihar Das, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 13:02, 17 October 2021 (UTC) reply