This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
You proposed deletion when it was 10 minutes old. Give it a chance. He's a well-known character actor, with over a dozen major roles. Bearian ( talk) 00:20, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
I'm unsual on what your talking about. I got references but, whats the problem? MirandaKool ( talk) 13:46, 1 February 2010 (UTC)Miranda
Hi Radiofan. Please see the talk page on Talk: Moon (film). I just want it discussed because of our dissagreement on the relevance of Duncan Jones being David Bowie's son to the article. We disagree so let's get other people's opinions on it. Kind regards, Phil Nolte ( talk) 19:19, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi Radiofan noticed you have put up the page for quick removal. s3d designs have been instrumental in the combination on various media types, and planned to use wiki to extend this knowledge to the world at large. although a company (UK) we have no interest in advertising that. The goal of the wiki page is to share information and research we have done over the last 10 years, freely. What i have put up there this morning was a quick overview, with content currently being written for research articles / journals etc to be cited. Let me know your thoughts regards Matt www.s3d.co.uk 12:51, 2 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Matyhaty ( talk • contribs)
I lead the research that we do. The research is funded by s3d, but not ever copyrighted, thus free for all to use.
Should I look to rephrase what is on the page now, or leave and get the content together over the coming days for re-evaluation?
regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by Matyhaty ( talk • contribs) 13:00, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
I've seen One Lone Car on tour in NYC countless times with bigger groups. And I've heard their music all over MTV for the past couple of years. Being signed to Uranus Recordings is reason enough they should have a page on here. Have you heard of the Gin Blossoms? The singer of that band owns the label. I don't understand why you chose to delete a legitimate band page like that, when I've seen bands such as "Pomeroy" have a page on here. They don't even have a record deal, and they haven't ever toured the US like One Lone Car has. I don't understand why you chose to pick on the OLC page for no reason. Thanks a lot man. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bball606 ( talk • contribs) 20:35, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
This page was requested to be deleted by you. How do I request a 'hangon' for it? I am trying to build page about women's associations so building pages for those associations is crucial to make my point.
Kindly let me know how to proceed.
Thanks.
```` http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_National_Women%27s_Studies_Association —Preceding unsigned comment added by AugustWind ( talk • contribs) 21:30, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
It seems that you are the one misunderstanding. You obviously have no idea about the music industry. The fact the One Lone Car page was deleted is a loss for Wikipedia. People like you are making this website irrelevant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bball606 ( talk • contribs) 02:08, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Jerry A Shields, Delaware's Enviromental Maverick requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
TTGL (
talk) 18:56, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Take Off magazine, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Take Off magazine. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. - Ahunt ( talk) 02:07, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
I wouldn't mark your speedy deletion as G1. Gibberish text is more like sdgbfhyufjfsjckfsijldxhltgfgn or something like that. Please remember that next time you come across a new unreviewed article. Thank you. Minima c94 ( talk) 15:39, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
The article Kick madden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Wikipedia is not for made up things
You have plenty of articles about the Bible, which, in my opinion, is made up.... no evidence to say otherwise. :)
Actually half the stuff on this site is made up erroneous.
Regardless, I shall not attempt to repost. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Cjamayne (
talk •
contribs) 17:11, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Shouldn't you talk about deleting an article before you nominate it for speedy deletion? - Skaraoke ( talk) 07:43, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi there -- I'm not sure why you've earmarked the above page for deletion. This is a high profile and best selling book that has received praise from various quarters and has even been described in the Guardian as the definitive manual for those who doubt the theory of man made global warming. Best, Jprw ( talk) 15:53, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Paul Longley. I do not think that Paul Longley fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because a professor with ten published books is an indication of importance. I request that you consider not re-tagging Paul Longley for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. You are, of course, free to tag the article with {{ prod}} or nominate it at WP:AFD . TN X Man 19:22, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello RadioFan. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Il Luster, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Made an Oscar nominated film is a credible assertion of notability, plus other awards and nominations. AfD if required. Thank you. Ged UK 20:41, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Autontravel.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse ( talk) 01:57, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Miss Earth Florida. I do not think that Miss Earth Florida fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because a quick Google shows this is real. Maybe not notable, but real. I request that you consider not re-tagging Miss Earth Florida for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page . DES (talk) 03:42, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Earth Florida. Thanks. Drmies ( talk) 05:46, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi, being a fan of Sloan's books, I made a page on wikipedia about him, but he was already mentioned in the article about Zombie Genocide. I don't get why you say he has a lack of notability, as he has both an IMDB page, a multi-subscribed youtube page, published books and over 390.000 google hits. —Preceding unsigned comment added by L E X commons ( talk • contribs) 16:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello RadioFan, I have tried to enhance the content of the ' synType CMS' article which was proposed by you for deletion six days ago.
How do think about that now?
I am a newbee in authoring here - and not I am a non-native speaker in English. Do you have any cues for me what I further should do to prevent the article from deletion?
Regards - Lazerstream ( talk) 16:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi
I am writing an article about Moye Kolodin. Unfortunately, I saved to fast and you set this article for speedy deletion. I think Moye Kolodin is worth beeing in Wikipedia, he has won several prizes and is an upcoming pianist from Germany many engagements.
I will finish the article, please reconsider your deletion action.
Thanks! Marc —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.2.106.174 ( talk) 13:55, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
The article isn't even remotely finished yet. So why are you insisting on jumping the gun!? I still have to polish it and finish out the 2000s decade. Besides, if you want a source, check the external links section! TMC1982 ( talk) 12:03 p.m., 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of NBA on Christmas Day broadcasters. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 21:24, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for cleaning up! I like editing, but little green on the citations. Thanks again, Jjozoko ( talk)jjozoko Jjozoko ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC).
Hey you started the article Boss Audio way back in 2006. I have recently contributed to it; I just wanted to know what you think or why you started the article. Do you know anything about the claim of them being known for being the first to attain 160 dB in a car? Daniel Christensen ( talk) 07:15, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
I added some detailed technical criticism of them since they are well known to way over-inflate their power ratings and falsely advertise; they also often only list max power ratings and leave out RMS. Daniel Christensen ( talk) 07:24, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
I am a new used to wikipedia, and I am simply trying to create a wikipedia page for my company. I do not understand what I am doing wrong and I am not trying to be biased or anything like that. Could you just tell me in simple english what I am doing wrong so I can fix it and get my wikipedia article up that would be great. I do not want to be blocked and I am just trying to do what my boss asked me to do. Any information would be appreciated. Thanks
CSFI ( talk) 13:37, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you turned my article, Noise Won't Stop (song) into a redirect, seconds after I created it. I have a review from MusicOMH for the single, ( http://www.musicomh.com/singles/shy-child_0507.htm), if that counts towards notability. Keytar Shredder : Talk To Me 14:01, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
I have sent below e-mail to 'permissions-en@wikimedia.org', should I do anything else?
I am an employe of GDF, (OGM in Turkish),I wrote that article for our official site and I hereby declare that I grant wikipedia permission to copy already online article http://www.ogm.gov.tr/english/background.htm. to use in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Directorate_of_Forestry .
Sadettin Kocak Sadettin ( talk) 15:46, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Why did you wait until now to propose it for deletion? Daniel Christensen ( talk) 20:46, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Trying to shore up the HUGE article for Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen by putting the extensive character list on a new article. I've done it poorly for which I apologize. I will be working to correct it as time allows. Thanks, The Red Queen ( talk) 05:50, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I am new to this and have started the page that you marked for deletion (please see below). I have it to the point where it seems to meet the criteria I am learning about. Can you get this active again, so that others might contribute to it? Thank you. Bernie
Bernie4321 ( talk) 14:20, 13 February 2010 (UTC)Bernie4321/San_%28artist%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_%28artist%29
Hello RadioFan. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of 360 Kombat, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Doesn't apply to combat systems. PROD or take to AfD if required. Thank you. Ged UK 16:32, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} I find it curious that so many of your edits involve nominating articles for deletion. In fact, of your last 500 edits (as of the writing of this comment), no fewer than 233 of them contain the word "deletion" in your edit comments. It is not uncommon for you to nominate articles for deletion within five minutes of their creation. In fact on at least one occasion you nominated an article within one minute of its creation. As many experienced wikipedians know, many people create articles a little bit at a time. That's just their style. Some people will create an article and edit it a dozen times within an hour or two. Now, if you know that many people do that, why wouldn't you simply wait a mere hour or so before pouncing?
The problem here is that when you flag articles, and then the original creator adds more material, your flag often remains. Consequently, many people (like me) end up wasting their time checking out an article that seems perfectly fine. We then puzzle over why the article was flagged and wonder why we are unable to see the problem. Alas, there is no problem - except that the article was flagged for deletion prematurely.
Your drive to keep Wikipedia free of non-notable information is commendable. But please forgive me if I seem presumptuous in suggesting that you slow it down a bit and wait an hour or so before you initiate the article destruct sequence in the future. Humbly, Disambigutron ( talk) 20:26, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Deletion of Margot Rose I believe it was first tagged for lack of references, but I have since added her IMDB page as the reference, a site which was actually used as an example of a reliable reference source. I hope this addresses your concern. As for her being an actress of notability, I know I have seen MANY others with far less accomplished careers in the Wikipedia pages. The credits I listed in her page were just a small part of her body of work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Twinsdude ( talk • contribs) 23:19, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Hi Dear
Thanks for your message.
abolfazl attar is in [1] fa.wikipedia.org . he is active................is secret .he is famous.I certainly do know he is not Steven Spielberg,he is an iranian filmmaker.................. if i were you , support him. Thanks & best regards Silvercine ( talk) 09:01, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} You tagged It's Showtime 2010 Prague for speedy delete as having no context. But the article as it was when you tagged it made it clear that this was a sporting event, and the article It's Showtime (not linked but an obvious search) makes the rest of the context clear. I have declined the speedy. I do think that when info in an article can be easily (within in less than a minute) be used to clearly indicate a context, a new-page patroller should do so rather than tagging for speedy deletion. We ought to help new editors and articles, not WP:BITE them. I understand that you want standards on Wikipedia to be enforced, and indeed to improve, and I agree. But i think it is more helpful to teach new editors how to make decent pages by example, rather than by deleting low quality but apparently good-faith attempts. DES (talk) 22:52, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} I can't help but notice that the vast majority of articles that you propose for deletion are ultimately retained - even those that you mark for speedy deletion. Have you read Wikipedia:New pages patrol? You should. That page states very clearly, in bold face: "Tagging anything other than attack pages or complete nonsense a minute after creation is not constructive and only serves to annoy the page author.".
If you inspect a new page, and it is not complete nonsense or an attack, how can you possibly ascertain whether the notability requirements are met within sixty seconds? You cannot. Yet you frequently tag pages within a minute of creation. As a result, many people end up wasting their time explaining to you why an article should be retained.
Your time would be put to far better use if you spent more time adding radio stations that are merely licensed to operate and exist only on paper, and which never have and possibly never will actually broadcast anything. Disambigutron ( talk) 17:39, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
I'll gladly discuss concerns tags or edits in specific articles but I would appreciate it if you would stop pointing me to Wikipedia guidelines and policies. You've been active for 2 weeks and have contributed 173 edits to 156 articles, I've been active for nearly 5 years and am approaching 60,000 edits and have contributed to some of the guidelines you are pointing me to.
As for the radio station articles, these articles are within notability guidelines as developed by Wikiproject Radio Stations as well as long established consensus on the topic. If you feel any are not notable, you may tag them as such, but I think you'll find your edits will be reverted with a reason of the general notability consensus of government licensed radio stations.-- RadioFan ( talk) 18:44, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Civility Award | ||
I am glad to be the first to award you the barnstar of civility for how well you handled yourself at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margot Rose. It was very gracious of you to acknowledge that your initial concerns had been addressed and to then withdraw the nomination and close the AFD. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 09:36, 17 February 2010 (UTC) |
Hey, just wanted to let you that since I redirected Laser Resurfacing to Photorejuvenation I've declined your speedy nomination of Laser Resurfacing since the copyvio text is gone. Cheers, XXX antiuser eh? 20:44, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
You have an alter ego.... 7 02:01, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
I thought for one horrified moment I had somehow mixed you up with User:Radiofan1010 but I think I got it right after all (I saw your reversion in my watchlist and I think we both were on the same wrong track for a minute). By all means let me know if this individual seems, like WP:Radiofanclub noted above, to be headed towards abuse or sockpuppetry or if you have other concerns in this area. Accounting4Taste: talk 02:08, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi there. The article above, deleted per AfD, has been recreated by the original author; I thought I'd let you know as you participated in the original AfD that I've relisted it here per the WP:RPDA policy. Cheers, Doonhamer ( talk) 18:53, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
I reomved the copyvio text from Warner Music Nashville, and I think the article should be fine now. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 05:34, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello RadioFan. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Les Percussions de Strasbourg, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. This isn't your usual wannabe pop group article, and Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL suggests that references to establish notability can be found. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 12:41, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm hopelessly overwhelmed by the Cole Smithey article. The references are poorly formatted, but I'm having trouble deciphering which ones might establish notability. I think he might be notable, but I can't confirm the validity of the sources. Can you advise? The article is being edited by, it seems, Colesmithey ( talk · contribs) himself. Thanks! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:13, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I noted that you closed the AfD on Sonicsgate as a non-admin closure. Unfortunately, there are several things wrong with what you did. First, you !voted in the discussion, and closings are not supposed to be done by involved participants. Second, the AfD did not run its prescribed 7 days, you closed it after only two. It's ok to close an AfD earlier under WP:SNOW, but there really weren't enough !votes there to justify a snow closing.
I'm not an admin, and I don't plan on doing anything further on this, but I thought I should bring it to your attention for your future reference, and to prepare you for the possibility that someone might dispute the closing because of the manner in which you did it. Best, Beyond My Ken ( talk) 22:35, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
I don't have any plans to pursue deletion of the Sonicsgate article further. I do feel compelled to say that I am surprised that the article was kept in the manner that it was. When I went to bed the article had two delete votes and nothing else. When I got back from work it was locked as a "keep". The documentary did not appear to meet any of the enumerated criteria on the page for film notability, and references to the film appeared to be contained to a few local media or sports media articles. Chicken Wing ( talk) 00:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
You may be interested to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aw, man! You formerly proposed the article for deletion. Cnilep ( talk) 21:17, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi, do we have to tag this for deletion, cant we just do the redirect like I did here?? why to tag for deletion?? MaenK.A. Talk 17:43, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for correcting my mistake but I misheard Deluga Heights as Luca Hinz. As I cannot move pages, can you change it to Deluga Heights? Thanks :) The Rage Conspiracy ( talk) 17:49, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
You mentioned in the AFD for this article that you found some sources for this company. Could you post on the AFD with your findings? Note, also cross-posting to User:Bearian. -- Dennis The Tiger ( Rawr and stuff) 07:15, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Just wanted to drop you a heads-up. You created this article about a month ago. The station that's at this call sign now actually got there by way of a call sign change back at the start of December. There was already an article at the former call sign that's been around for about 2 years + that has a little bit more detail. So, I'm going to delete your article to make way for a move of the other article to the new call sign.
Like I said, just wanted to drop you a heads-up - didn't want you to see it bombed off your watch list and wonder what the heck was going on! Mlaffs ( talk) 22:53, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
You proposed deletion when it was 10 minutes old. Give it a chance. He's a well-known character actor, with over a dozen major roles. Bearian ( talk) 00:20, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
I'm unsual on what your talking about. I got references but, whats the problem? MirandaKool ( talk) 13:46, 1 February 2010 (UTC)Miranda
Hi Radiofan. Please see the talk page on Talk: Moon (film). I just want it discussed because of our dissagreement on the relevance of Duncan Jones being David Bowie's son to the article. We disagree so let's get other people's opinions on it. Kind regards, Phil Nolte ( talk) 19:19, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi Radiofan noticed you have put up the page for quick removal. s3d designs have been instrumental in the combination on various media types, and planned to use wiki to extend this knowledge to the world at large. although a company (UK) we have no interest in advertising that. The goal of the wiki page is to share information and research we have done over the last 10 years, freely. What i have put up there this morning was a quick overview, with content currently being written for research articles / journals etc to be cited. Let me know your thoughts regards Matt www.s3d.co.uk 12:51, 2 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Matyhaty ( talk • contribs)
I lead the research that we do. The research is funded by s3d, but not ever copyrighted, thus free for all to use.
Should I look to rephrase what is on the page now, or leave and get the content together over the coming days for re-evaluation?
regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by Matyhaty ( talk • contribs) 13:00, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
I've seen One Lone Car on tour in NYC countless times with bigger groups. And I've heard their music all over MTV for the past couple of years. Being signed to Uranus Recordings is reason enough they should have a page on here. Have you heard of the Gin Blossoms? The singer of that band owns the label. I don't understand why you chose to delete a legitimate band page like that, when I've seen bands such as "Pomeroy" have a page on here. They don't even have a record deal, and they haven't ever toured the US like One Lone Car has. I don't understand why you chose to pick on the OLC page for no reason. Thanks a lot man. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bball606 ( talk • contribs) 20:35, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
This page was requested to be deleted by you. How do I request a 'hangon' for it? I am trying to build page about women's associations so building pages for those associations is crucial to make my point.
Kindly let me know how to proceed.
Thanks.
```` http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_National_Women%27s_Studies_Association —Preceding unsigned comment added by AugustWind ( talk • contribs) 21:30, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
It seems that you are the one misunderstanding. You obviously have no idea about the music industry. The fact the One Lone Car page was deleted is a loss for Wikipedia. People like you are making this website irrelevant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bball606 ( talk • contribs) 02:08, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Jerry A Shields, Delaware's Enviromental Maverick requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
TTGL (
talk) 18:56, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Take Off magazine, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Take Off magazine. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. - Ahunt ( talk) 02:07, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
I wouldn't mark your speedy deletion as G1. Gibberish text is more like sdgbfhyufjfsjckfsijldxhltgfgn or something like that. Please remember that next time you come across a new unreviewed article. Thank you. Minima c94 ( talk) 15:39, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
The article Kick madden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Wikipedia is not for made up things
You have plenty of articles about the Bible, which, in my opinion, is made up.... no evidence to say otherwise. :)
Actually half the stuff on this site is made up erroneous.
Regardless, I shall not attempt to repost. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Cjamayne (
talk •
contribs) 17:11, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Shouldn't you talk about deleting an article before you nominate it for speedy deletion? - Skaraoke ( talk) 07:43, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi there -- I'm not sure why you've earmarked the above page for deletion. This is a high profile and best selling book that has received praise from various quarters and has even been described in the Guardian as the definitive manual for those who doubt the theory of man made global warming. Best, Jprw ( talk) 15:53, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Paul Longley. I do not think that Paul Longley fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because a professor with ten published books is an indication of importance. I request that you consider not re-tagging Paul Longley for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. You are, of course, free to tag the article with {{ prod}} or nominate it at WP:AFD . TN X Man 19:22, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello RadioFan. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Il Luster, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Made an Oscar nominated film is a credible assertion of notability, plus other awards and nominations. AfD if required. Thank you. Ged UK 20:41, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Autontravel.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse ( talk) 01:57, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Miss Earth Florida. I do not think that Miss Earth Florida fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because a quick Google shows this is real. Maybe not notable, but real. I request that you consider not re-tagging Miss Earth Florida for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page . DES (talk) 03:42, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Earth Florida. Thanks. Drmies ( talk) 05:46, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi, being a fan of Sloan's books, I made a page on wikipedia about him, but he was already mentioned in the article about Zombie Genocide. I don't get why you say he has a lack of notability, as he has both an IMDB page, a multi-subscribed youtube page, published books and over 390.000 google hits. —Preceding unsigned comment added by L E X commons ( talk • contribs) 16:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello RadioFan, I have tried to enhance the content of the ' synType CMS' article which was proposed by you for deletion six days ago.
How do think about that now?
I am a newbee in authoring here - and not I am a non-native speaker in English. Do you have any cues for me what I further should do to prevent the article from deletion?
Regards - Lazerstream ( talk) 16:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi
I am writing an article about Moye Kolodin. Unfortunately, I saved to fast and you set this article for speedy deletion. I think Moye Kolodin is worth beeing in Wikipedia, he has won several prizes and is an upcoming pianist from Germany many engagements.
I will finish the article, please reconsider your deletion action.
Thanks! Marc —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.2.106.174 ( talk) 13:55, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
The article isn't even remotely finished yet. So why are you insisting on jumping the gun!? I still have to polish it and finish out the 2000s decade. Besides, if you want a source, check the external links section! TMC1982 ( talk) 12:03 p.m., 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of NBA on Christmas Day broadcasters. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 21:24, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for cleaning up! I like editing, but little green on the citations. Thanks again, Jjozoko ( talk)jjozoko Jjozoko ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC).
Hey you started the article Boss Audio way back in 2006. I have recently contributed to it; I just wanted to know what you think or why you started the article. Do you know anything about the claim of them being known for being the first to attain 160 dB in a car? Daniel Christensen ( talk) 07:15, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
I added some detailed technical criticism of them since they are well known to way over-inflate their power ratings and falsely advertise; they also often only list max power ratings and leave out RMS. Daniel Christensen ( talk) 07:24, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
I am a new used to wikipedia, and I am simply trying to create a wikipedia page for my company. I do not understand what I am doing wrong and I am not trying to be biased or anything like that. Could you just tell me in simple english what I am doing wrong so I can fix it and get my wikipedia article up that would be great. I do not want to be blocked and I am just trying to do what my boss asked me to do. Any information would be appreciated. Thanks
CSFI ( talk) 13:37, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you turned my article, Noise Won't Stop (song) into a redirect, seconds after I created it. I have a review from MusicOMH for the single, ( http://www.musicomh.com/singles/shy-child_0507.htm), if that counts towards notability. Keytar Shredder : Talk To Me 14:01, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
I have sent below e-mail to 'permissions-en@wikimedia.org', should I do anything else?
I am an employe of GDF, (OGM in Turkish),I wrote that article for our official site and I hereby declare that I grant wikipedia permission to copy already online article http://www.ogm.gov.tr/english/background.htm. to use in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Directorate_of_Forestry .
Sadettin Kocak Sadettin ( talk) 15:46, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Why did you wait until now to propose it for deletion? Daniel Christensen ( talk) 20:46, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Trying to shore up the HUGE article for Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen by putting the extensive character list on a new article. I've done it poorly for which I apologize. I will be working to correct it as time allows. Thanks, The Red Queen ( talk) 05:50, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I am new to this and have started the page that you marked for deletion (please see below). I have it to the point where it seems to meet the criteria I am learning about. Can you get this active again, so that others might contribute to it? Thank you. Bernie
Bernie4321 ( talk) 14:20, 13 February 2010 (UTC)Bernie4321/San_%28artist%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_%28artist%29
Hello RadioFan. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of 360 Kombat, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Doesn't apply to combat systems. PROD or take to AfD if required. Thank you. Ged UK 16:32, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} I find it curious that so many of your edits involve nominating articles for deletion. In fact, of your last 500 edits (as of the writing of this comment), no fewer than 233 of them contain the word "deletion" in your edit comments. It is not uncommon for you to nominate articles for deletion within five minutes of their creation. In fact on at least one occasion you nominated an article within one minute of its creation. As many experienced wikipedians know, many people create articles a little bit at a time. That's just their style. Some people will create an article and edit it a dozen times within an hour or two. Now, if you know that many people do that, why wouldn't you simply wait a mere hour or so before pouncing?
The problem here is that when you flag articles, and then the original creator adds more material, your flag often remains. Consequently, many people (like me) end up wasting their time checking out an article that seems perfectly fine. We then puzzle over why the article was flagged and wonder why we are unable to see the problem. Alas, there is no problem - except that the article was flagged for deletion prematurely.
Your drive to keep Wikipedia free of non-notable information is commendable. But please forgive me if I seem presumptuous in suggesting that you slow it down a bit and wait an hour or so before you initiate the article destruct sequence in the future. Humbly, Disambigutron ( talk) 20:26, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Deletion of Margot Rose I believe it was first tagged for lack of references, but I have since added her IMDB page as the reference, a site which was actually used as an example of a reliable reference source. I hope this addresses your concern. As for her being an actress of notability, I know I have seen MANY others with far less accomplished careers in the Wikipedia pages. The credits I listed in her page were just a small part of her body of work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Twinsdude ( talk • contribs) 23:19, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Hi Dear
Thanks for your message.
abolfazl attar is in [1] fa.wikipedia.org . he is active................is secret .he is famous.I certainly do know he is not Steven Spielberg,he is an iranian filmmaker.................. if i were you , support him. Thanks & best regards Silvercine ( talk) 09:01, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} You tagged It's Showtime 2010 Prague for speedy delete as having no context. But the article as it was when you tagged it made it clear that this was a sporting event, and the article It's Showtime (not linked but an obvious search) makes the rest of the context clear. I have declined the speedy. I do think that when info in an article can be easily (within in less than a minute) be used to clearly indicate a context, a new-page patroller should do so rather than tagging for speedy deletion. We ought to help new editors and articles, not WP:BITE them. I understand that you want standards on Wikipedia to be enforced, and indeed to improve, and I agree. But i think it is more helpful to teach new editors how to make decent pages by example, rather than by deleting low quality but apparently good-faith attempts. DES (talk) 22:52, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} I can't help but notice that the vast majority of articles that you propose for deletion are ultimately retained - even those that you mark for speedy deletion. Have you read Wikipedia:New pages patrol? You should. That page states very clearly, in bold face: "Tagging anything other than attack pages or complete nonsense a minute after creation is not constructive and only serves to annoy the page author.".
If you inspect a new page, and it is not complete nonsense or an attack, how can you possibly ascertain whether the notability requirements are met within sixty seconds? You cannot. Yet you frequently tag pages within a minute of creation. As a result, many people end up wasting their time explaining to you why an article should be retained.
Your time would be put to far better use if you spent more time adding radio stations that are merely licensed to operate and exist only on paper, and which never have and possibly never will actually broadcast anything. Disambigutron ( talk) 17:39, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
I'll gladly discuss concerns tags or edits in specific articles but I would appreciate it if you would stop pointing me to Wikipedia guidelines and policies. You've been active for 2 weeks and have contributed 173 edits to 156 articles, I've been active for nearly 5 years and am approaching 60,000 edits and have contributed to some of the guidelines you are pointing me to.
As for the radio station articles, these articles are within notability guidelines as developed by Wikiproject Radio Stations as well as long established consensus on the topic. If you feel any are not notable, you may tag them as such, but I think you'll find your edits will be reverted with a reason of the general notability consensus of government licensed radio stations.-- RadioFan ( talk) 18:44, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Civility Award | ||
I am glad to be the first to award you the barnstar of civility for how well you handled yourself at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margot Rose. It was very gracious of you to acknowledge that your initial concerns had been addressed and to then withdraw the nomination and close the AFD. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 09:36, 17 February 2010 (UTC) |
Hey, just wanted to let you that since I redirected Laser Resurfacing to Photorejuvenation I've declined your speedy nomination of Laser Resurfacing since the copyvio text is gone. Cheers, XXX antiuser eh? 20:44, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
You have an alter ego.... 7 02:01, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
I thought for one horrified moment I had somehow mixed you up with User:Radiofan1010 but I think I got it right after all (I saw your reversion in my watchlist and I think we both were on the same wrong track for a minute). By all means let me know if this individual seems, like WP:Radiofanclub noted above, to be headed towards abuse or sockpuppetry or if you have other concerns in this area. Accounting4Taste: talk 02:08, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi there. The article above, deleted per AfD, has been recreated by the original author; I thought I'd let you know as you participated in the original AfD that I've relisted it here per the WP:RPDA policy. Cheers, Doonhamer ( talk) 18:53, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
I reomved the copyvio text from Warner Music Nashville, and I think the article should be fine now. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 05:34, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello RadioFan. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Les Percussions de Strasbourg, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. This isn't your usual wannabe pop group article, and Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL suggests that references to establish notability can be found. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 12:41, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm hopelessly overwhelmed by the Cole Smithey article. The references are poorly formatted, but I'm having trouble deciphering which ones might establish notability. I think he might be notable, but I can't confirm the validity of the sources. Can you advise? The article is being edited by, it seems, Colesmithey ( talk · contribs) himself. Thanks! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:13, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I noted that you closed the AfD on Sonicsgate as a non-admin closure. Unfortunately, there are several things wrong with what you did. First, you !voted in the discussion, and closings are not supposed to be done by involved participants. Second, the AfD did not run its prescribed 7 days, you closed it after only two. It's ok to close an AfD earlier under WP:SNOW, but there really weren't enough !votes there to justify a snow closing.
I'm not an admin, and I don't plan on doing anything further on this, but I thought I should bring it to your attention for your future reference, and to prepare you for the possibility that someone might dispute the closing because of the manner in which you did it. Best, Beyond My Ken ( talk) 22:35, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
I don't have any plans to pursue deletion of the Sonicsgate article further. I do feel compelled to say that I am surprised that the article was kept in the manner that it was. When I went to bed the article had two delete votes and nothing else. When I got back from work it was locked as a "keep". The documentary did not appear to meet any of the enumerated criteria on the page for film notability, and references to the film appeared to be contained to a few local media or sports media articles. Chicken Wing ( talk) 00:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
You may be interested to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aw, man! You formerly proposed the article for deletion. Cnilep ( talk) 21:17, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi, do we have to tag this for deletion, cant we just do the redirect like I did here?? why to tag for deletion?? MaenK.A. Talk 17:43, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for correcting my mistake but I misheard Deluga Heights as Luca Hinz. As I cannot move pages, can you change it to Deluga Heights? Thanks :) The Rage Conspiracy ( talk) 17:49, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
You mentioned in the AFD for this article that you found some sources for this company. Could you post on the AFD with your findings? Note, also cross-posting to User:Bearian. -- Dennis The Tiger ( Rawr and stuff) 07:15, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Just wanted to drop you a heads-up. You created this article about a month ago. The station that's at this call sign now actually got there by way of a call sign change back at the start of December. There was already an article at the former call sign that's been around for about 2 years + that has a little bit more detail. So, I'm going to delete your article to make way for a move of the other article to the new call sign.
Like I said, just wanted to drop you a heads-up - didn't want you to see it bombed off your watch list and wonder what the heck was going on! Mlaffs ( talk) 22:53, 27 February 2010 (UTC)