![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thanks for allowing me to scavenge your user boxes. - Peter Bjørn Perlsø 17:11, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
You’re probably one of those guys that think everyone is out to get you, even in internet relations! - —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.211.220.24 ( talk • contribs) 14:36, August 13, 2006.
I second that. Bridarshy 08:25, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
You might want to check out the FAR of anarcho-capitalism and have your say before the discussion is over. As of now, it looks like a keep, but you might want to add some extra support. -- AaronS 18:40, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
of this? Did you find no better way to do this than with a stock message? - CrazyRussian talk/ email 02:13, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
To answer your question, they clearly state they are IM accounts, not mail accounts. my WP mail link works fine. However I have taken a cut at making the contact box even clearer. Let me know if you think it's unclear that these are not mail accounts. ++ Lar: t/ c 08:03, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Please see User_talk:Bunchofgrapes/Archive_Recall_Petition. The petition initiated by you was unsuccessful and Bunchofgrapes has not been recalled. Please advise of any questions or concerns. ++ Lar: t/ c 18:16, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
That wasn't a personal attack. Incivil maybe, but certainly not a personal attack. (Copied to Aaron's page) - FrancisTyers · 12:14, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
The latest Wolfy sock claimed I called you a troll. To be clear, I didn't, I was referring to Hogeye. I later thought better of it (had some caffeine and woke up properly) and removed it because it was inappropriate. Donnacha 10:39, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Sorry to bother you, but as an Inclusionist wikipedia things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments "absurd" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion here. Kappa 02:50, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi, You were trying to get Werdnabot to archive your archive 3 page onto itself, which seems to have been upsetting werdnabt. I deleted the request. Regards, Ben Aveling 00:24, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Are you really a furry-loving, gay, Republican Jew from New Hampshire? -- AaronS 03:36, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
I thought I'd copy over to you in the name of fairness. It is a campaign message from Donnacha that she's only sending it to those who are strongly opposed to anarcho-capitalism which biases the vote: "In case you haven't seen it, the AnCaps are trying to delete the Anarchism and anarcho-capitalism article [1]]. Donnacha 23:48, 4 October 2006 (UTC)" Big Boom 15:37, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
The statement "It must be pointed out that vitamin B12, in a form usable by humans, only occurs in animals." is obviously not true as I have pointed out on the talk page. If you feel the wording is not clear enough please deal with that rather than adding statements that are at best misleading. Thanks.-- Michig 15:14, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
My reply on the talk page was not intended as a personal attack. It appeared that you were just arguing for the sake of it, since you seemed to have realised that bacteria are not animals but wanted to keep the controversy going for a little longer anyway. The argument that bacteria are not plants (fairly obvious) had no relevance to the sentence that you added to the article. This article is regularly a target for people who just want to wind other people up. I don't know whether that was your intention or not, but it appeared that this may have been the case. If not, then please accept my apologies for any offence caused.-- Michig 08:45, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
If you still want the info from the vegemite jar, I can help you out. my hotmail is jazza82
Sadly, it is not a real publication. It has been a bit of an inside joke among friends. There is a publication called Mammoth Monthly ( http://www.mammothmonthly.com/) but it doesn't even have a mammoth for a logo. Thanks for commenting on my screenshot. You cheered up my day. -- Munchkinguy 02:36, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I am currently in the process of making a Windows 95 development timeline. I was wondering if you would like to help me in my search for information about all Windows 95 builds. Please leave me a notice on My Talk Page if you want to help. Thank you. Jdlowery 17:21, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
If a page gets deleted, and you don't see any history or explanation, it can be useful to check the "what links here" function; for instance, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Star Wars Imperial personnel. Sorry. DS 14:35, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
www.republicofnh.org
i advise you to read the platforms and check out some of the links. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RevSavitar ( talk • contribs) 16:25, 25 January 2007 (UTC).
Those tags were edit during a review of the article in preparation for preparing the article for GA status. Please don not remove them without providing a sufficient cite of a verifiable source. "Look in the External links" is certainly not sufficient. - BillCJ 01:56, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
First of all, read Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Second, I have thousands more edits than you, and I have authored multiple Featured Articles, Good Articles, A-class Articles, and so on. I know what I'm talking about when I add the fact tags. Common knowledge is not, and proper citations are mandatory. Read the damn links I provided, they will make you a better editor. Or you can stay the course and keep getting your ass reverted. - Emt147 Burninate! 03:02, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Or you can be a dick about it... Good luck getting help and support from other Wikipedians with that chip on the shoulder of yours. (p.s. my output now is two A-class articles in the last month, what's yours? a weblink to a website?) - Emt147 Burninate! 03:12, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Unfortunately you are mixing up two systems on your article. You need to choose one of the following:
or
Either system should work in a table. Let me know if you have any other questions. Christopher Parham (talk) 00:55, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Hiya,
I reformatted the ref tag in PCI Express. Is that what you wanted? -- Ling.Nut 00:57, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Being it's an IP address it's hard to know if the other warnings were meant for the same person or multiple people using the same IP address. Although from his contributions it does look like it's just one person, the vandalism is spread out over too long a time. Don't worry about it. I don't think the admins ban IPs for periods more than a day or two in most cases if that's what you were looking for. In the future, if you see a vandal, you can warn him as you did, choosing the template depending on his previous recent warnings and the extent of his vandalism, and if he vandalises after the level 4 template report him at WP:AIV. RB 9 7 2 03:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
To clarify what I meant, you can see the IP has been banned twice [2], but only for a day and two days. Since he isn't vandalising now, and most of his edits are a few days apart, it probably won't make any difference to get the IP banned for such a short time again. RB 9 7 2 04:04, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
This may not be the most appropriate venue, but, having been influenced in part by the crystal-gripping "coincidentalism" found in The Celestine Prophecies, I retroactively employed a three-coincidence contact test. 1) Crow is my favorite and my eye was instantly drawn to your username on the "Gay Wikipedians" list; 2) I was watching "The Screaming Skull" before I came to work today, lending strength to coincidence 1; 3) After seeing your F-Score information, a concept I had not been previously familiar with, I took the test and got a score of 3.533333333333333. Consider this an overly long-winded hello, and an invitation to collaborate on political/legal/MSTal projects. Keep up the good work. Lemonsawdust 23:22, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Ahem. All the figures in the table are referenced fully below the table - changing from 15W to 14W without quoting the lamp type isn't meeting attribution guidelines. I don't own the table, but I did put in a lot of work checking the manufacturer data for the listed lamps. Cheers. WLD talk| edits 18:07, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
What I would say is that the table is not intended as a reference to all CFLs, nor the best possible output of any particular technology (or I would have used 230V lamps instead of 240V lamps), but as general examples, and I chose to use examples from particular manufacturers' product ranges to illustrate the differing efficiencies at differing power outputs for lamps manufactured in the same way. The CFLs quotes are not spiral CFLs. The manufacturers are known internationally, and the websites with the data are accessible to anyone who wishes to check.
Hmm - The Home Depot - Im sure their "You can do it. We can help" service mark was used by Pepsi when advertising diet Pepsi 20 years or so ago. I digress.
There doesn't seem to be any on-line way of validating the 14W/900 lumen figure. The Home Depot's own website doesn't show it, and the data for the only CFL purchasable from the online store is laughably incorrect - a 23W CFL with a CRI of 10 and a lumen output of 50? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by West London Dweller ( talk • contribs) 23:39, 22 April 2007 (UTC). Darn - the bot got there before me - forgot to sign. WLD talk| edits 23:40, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
I have just reported you for a fourth revert. Your unilateral insistence on your interpretation of the non-existent "united States" is hard to figure. Wahkeenah 00:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as LowerMyBills.com) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. DarkAudit 17:58, 16 May 2007 (UTC) Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages such as LowerMyBills.com. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. DarkAudit 17:59, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as LowerMyBills.com) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Boricuaeddie Talk • Contribs • Spread the love! 17:59, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Emperical observation could be seen as original research. It does not help you when you continually remove tags. It's alright to contest with a hangon tag of your own, but the speedy tag is supposed to stay. The constant removal could be seen as vandalism, and may not sit well with other editors considering the matter. DarkAudit 18:32, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Everyone, I left a comment here, I am taking off. I have talked to Boricuaeddie Talk, and I hope we worked things out. Politics rule 01:21, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
I removed that comment and I am sorry. My comment hurt another member, and I took it off! My sincere sorryness! Politics rule 11:22, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thanks for allowing me to scavenge your user boxes. - Peter Bjørn Perlsø 17:11, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
You’re probably one of those guys that think everyone is out to get you, even in internet relations! - —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.211.220.24 ( talk • contribs) 14:36, August 13, 2006.
I second that. Bridarshy 08:25, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
You might want to check out the FAR of anarcho-capitalism and have your say before the discussion is over. As of now, it looks like a keep, but you might want to add some extra support. -- AaronS 18:40, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
of this? Did you find no better way to do this than with a stock message? - CrazyRussian talk/ email 02:13, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
To answer your question, they clearly state they are IM accounts, not mail accounts. my WP mail link works fine. However I have taken a cut at making the contact box even clearer. Let me know if you think it's unclear that these are not mail accounts. ++ Lar: t/ c 08:03, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Please see User_talk:Bunchofgrapes/Archive_Recall_Petition. The petition initiated by you was unsuccessful and Bunchofgrapes has not been recalled. Please advise of any questions or concerns. ++ Lar: t/ c 18:16, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
That wasn't a personal attack. Incivil maybe, but certainly not a personal attack. (Copied to Aaron's page) - FrancisTyers · 12:14, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
The latest Wolfy sock claimed I called you a troll. To be clear, I didn't, I was referring to Hogeye. I later thought better of it (had some caffeine and woke up properly) and removed it because it was inappropriate. Donnacha 10:39, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Sorry to bother you, but as an Inclusionist wikipedia things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments "absurd" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion here. Kappa 02:50, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi, You were trying to get Werdnabot to archive your archive 3 page onto itself, which seems to have been upsetting werdnabt. I deleted the request. Regards, Ben Aveling 00:24, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Are you really a furry-loving, gay, Republican Jew from New Hampshire? -- AaronS 03:36, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
I thought I'd copy over to you in the name of fairness. It is a campaign message from Donnacha that she's only sending it to those who are strongly opposed to anarcho-capitalism which biases the vote: "In case you haven't seen it, the AnCaps are trying to delete the Anarchism and anarcho-capitalism article [1]]. Donnacha 23:48, 4 October 2006 (UTC)" Big Boom 15:37, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
The statement "It must be pointed out that vitamin B12, in a form usable by humans, only occurs in animals." is obviously not true as I have pointed out on the talk page. If you feel the wording is not clear enough please deal with that rather than adding statements that are at best misleading. Thanks.-- Michig 15:14, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
My reply on the talk page was not intended as a personal attack. It appeared that you were just arguing for the sake of it, since you seemed to have realised that bacteria are not animals but wanted to keep the controversy going for a little longer anyway. The argument that bacteria are not plants (fairly obvious) had no relevance to the sentence that you added to the article. This article is regularly a target for people who just want to wind other people up. I don't know whether that was your intention or not, but it appeared that this may have been the case. If not, then please accept my apologies for any offence caused.-- Michig 08:45, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
If you still want the info from the vegemite jar, I can help you out. my hotmail is jazza82
Sadly, it is not a real publication. It has been a bit of an inside joke among friends. There is a publication called Mammoth Monthly ( http://www.mammothmonthly.com/) but it doesn't even have a mammoth for a logo. Thanks for commenting on my screenshot. You cheered up my day. -- Munchkinguy 02:36, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I am currently in the process of making a Windows 95 development timeline. I was wondering if you would like to help me in my search for information about all Windows 95 builds. Please leave me a notice on My Talk Page if you want to help. Thank you. Jdlowery 17:21, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
If a page gets deleted, and you don't see any history or explanation, it can be useful to check the "what links here" function; for instance, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Star Wars Imperial personnel. Sorry. DS 14:35, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
www.republicofnh.org
i advise you to read the platforms and check out some of the links. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RevSavitar ( talk • contribs) 16:25, 25 January 2007 (UTC).
Those tags were edit during a review of the article in preparation for preparing the article for GA status. Please don not remove them without providing a sufficient cite of a verifiable source. "Look in the External links" is certainly not sufficient. - BillCJ 01:56, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
First of all, read Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Second, I have thousands more edits than you, and I have authored multiple Featured Articles, Good Articles, A-class Articles, and so on. I know what I'm talking about when I add the fact tags. Common knowledge is not, and proper citations are mandatory. Read the damn links I provided, they will make you a better editor. Or you can stay the course and keep getting your ass reverted. - Emt147 Burninate! 03:02, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Or you can be a dick about it... Good luck getting help and support from other Wikipedians with that chip on the shoulder of yours. (p.s. my output now is two A-class articles in the last month, what's yours? a weblink to a website?) - Emt147 Burninate! 03:12, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Unfortunately you are mixing up two systems on your article. You need to choose one of the following:
or
Either system should work in a table. Let me know if you have any other questions. Christopher Parham (talk) 00:55, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Hiya,
I reformatted the ref tag in PCI Express. Is that what you wanted? -- Ling.Nut 00:57, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Being it's an IP address it's hard to know if the other warnings were meant for the same person or multiple people using the same IP address. Although from his contributions it does look like it's just one person, the vandalism is spread out over too long a time. Don't worry about it. I don't think the admins ban IPs for periods more than a day or two in most cases if that's what you were looking for. In the future, if you see a vandal, you can warn him as you did, choosing the template depending on his previous recent warnings and the extent of his vandalism, and if he vandalises after the level 4 template report him at WP:AIV. RB 9 7 2 03:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
To clarify what I meant, you can see the IP has been banned twice [2], but only for a day and two days. Since he isn't vandalising now, and most of his edits are a few days apart, it probably won't make any difference to get the IP banned for such a short time again. RB 9 7 2 04:04, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
This may not be the most appropriate venue, but, having been influenced in part by the crystal-gripping "coincidentalism" found in The Celestine Prophecies, I retroactively employed a three-coincidence contact test. 1) Crow is my favorite and my eye was instantly drawn to your username on the "Gay Wikipedians" list; 2) I was watching "The Screaming Skull" before I came to work today, lending strength to coincidence 1; 3) After seeing your F-Score information, a concept I had not been previously familiar with, I took the test and got a score of 3.533333333333333. Consider this an overly long-winded hello, and an invitation to collaborate on political/legal/MSTal projects. Keep up the good work. Lemonsawdust 23:22, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Ahem. All the figures in the table are referenced fully below the table - changing from 15W to 14W without quoting the lamp type isn't meeting attribution guidelines. I don't own the table, but I did put in a lot of work checking the manufacturer data for the listed lamps. Cheers. WLD talk| edits 18:07, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
What I would say is that the table is not intended as a reference to all CFLs, nor the best possible output of any particular technology (or I would have used 230V lamps instead of 240V lamps), but as general examples, and I chose to use examples from particular manufacturers' product ranges to illustrate the differing efficiencies at differing power outputs for lamps manufactured in the same way. The CFLs quotes are not spiral CFLs. The manufacturers are known internationally, and the websites with the data are accessible to anyone who wishes to check.
Hmm - The Home Depot - Im sure their "You can do it. We can help" service mark was used by Pepsi when advertising diet Pepsi 20 years or so ago. I digress.
There doesn't seem to be any on-line way of validating the 14W/900 lumen figure. The Home Depot's own website doesn't show it, and the data for the only CFL purchasable from the online store is laughably incorrect - a 23W CFL with a CRI of 10 and a lumen output of 50? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by West London Dweller ( talk • contribs) 23:39, 22 April 2007 (UTC). Darn - the bot got there before me - forgot to sign. WLD talk| edits 23:40, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
I have just reported you for a fourth revert. Your unilateral insistence on your interpretation of the non-existent "united States" is hard to figure. Wahkeenah 00:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as LowerMyBills.com) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. DarkAudit 17:58, 16 May 2007 (UTC) Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages such as LowerMyBills.com. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. DarkAudit 17:59, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as LowerMyBills.com) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Boricuaeddie Talk • Contribs • Spread the love! 17:59, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Emperical observation could be seen as original research. It does not help you when you continually remove tags. It's alright to contest with a hangon tag of your own, but the speedy tag is supposed to stay. The constant removal could be seen as vandalism, and may not sit well with other editors considering the matter. DarkAudit 18:32, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Everyone, I left a comment here, I am taking off. I have talked to Boricuaeddie Talk, and I hope we worked things out. Politics rule 01:21, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
I removed that comment and I am sorry. My comment hurt another member, and I took it off! My sincere sorryness! Politics rule 11:22, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |