![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 15 |
Thanks.. suka94ain Suka94ain ( talk) 18:22, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Sain G.M Syed ,the great revolutionist, a renowed Sindhi leader who professed freedom of Sindhi nation and worked day and night for rights of the sindhi people and for this he tolerated the cruelties of pakistani leaders, police and army. Deletion of SAin GM Syed pages from Wikipedia will be the loss of Wikipedia itself. I request you for the inclusion of Sain GM syeds notes.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.103.234.69 ( talk) 18:13, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Why you delated the article about "G M Syed" the founder of Jeay Sindh Movement, founder of Pakistan, author of above 60 books. You can search about him in Google. some info at http://gmsyed.org
I hope you will restore the page. If have some problem plz tag there we will follow the Wikipedia rules. Thanks Zafar ( talk) 11:29, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
If some of the sections of article or award list is not valid you can remove the section, why whole article deleted? If we get the copy right permission from the site, will solve the problem and will you restore? Zafar ( talk) 14:45, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for detailed reply. I am trying to contact sindhudesh.com owners. In the mean time will you restore the article for some days, I am not saying for whole article but I am saying about the section which will be valid after permission? Zafar ( talk) 15:09, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
I started new article on the same topic, please give us some time to improve it as per terms of Wikipedia, thanks. Zafar ( talk) 12:46, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, I hope we will improve the article. Zafar ( talk) 21:19, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for knocking down some of that backlog. :) Typically, we do delete listings from there, since they are duplicates of their daily listings and we note resolution at those. I've gone ahead and removed the ones you've addressed.
I do see, though, that Richard Levao is still waiting review. Would you prefer I ask somebody like Toon to take a look at it? -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:58, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello again. User:Franamax suggested I asked you to give the newly 're-created' article for Bassett a quick appraisal for copyright purposes. If you need history, then both my and Franamax's talk pages should tell you all you need to know. Much obliged,
Derek R Bullamore ( talk) 22:00, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Based on some feedback I've received, I've updated the instructions at WP:SCV and WP:CP. I've left a more indepth explanation at Wikipedia talk:Suspected copyright violations#Header update along with a request for feedback. As we try to get more people involved in this work, we want to be sure instructions are clear. Given your work, your input there would be very much appreciated. :) Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:48, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
I agree with you that his continuing attacks while attempting to get unblocked called for an extended block. -- SarekOfVulcan ( talk) 00:57, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi MLauba,
I'm not sure you are the correct person to direct this to but I am unsure as to who to contact. Article 25 has only recently become aware that the wikipedia page concerned with this organisation has been deleted due to a number of issues. The comments made prior to deletion of the page have left me slightly confused and I was hoping you would be able to explain clearly exactly what the problems are with the article and therefore how I would be able to fix them and get the page up and running again.
My main concerns are: None of the text has been copy pasted from the Article 25 website/any documents. A number of comments have been made about the organisation not being 'notable' enough to include - a quick google search of 'article 25 charity' results in almost the first 4 pages of results solely relating to the organisation and has had/is getting increasing amounts of press coverage.
If you could point me in the right direction as to exactly what I need to do to fix this page I would be very grateful.
Kind regards, 13Curtain ( talk) 13:16, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
It's recently come to my attention you have deleted the entry for Hydra Vein due to a perceived copyright violation. Please note I am the author of both the Wikipedia entry and the entry on www.hydravein.co.uk to which you referenced your initial notice. What do you need from me to re-allow the entry?
Thanks. Spartakus666 ( talk) 11:15, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
I think I've spotted a copyright violation on the Italy page. Go see
Italy#Environment. Does this page seem similar
[3]? I think it's a copyright vio (the info was inserted by
User:Brutaldeluxe.)--
Theologiae (
talk)
14:05, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
You have deleted my bio page posted by my College seven years ago. could you restore it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.156.24.211 ( talk) 23:30, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
I regret your taking it as hostile tone. I was commenting on your hostile invocation of EEML as an evil, which I came across, when we have never crossed paths before and you know nothing about the alleged perpetrators. Per my request, in the future, please refrain from wiki-linking to EEML and using it to cry WITCH! Best, PЄTЄRS VЄСRUМВА ► talk 01:25, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi MLauba. I'm coming back to you with a problem. Now, I have discussed this with him, yet little changes have occurred. Since you were so helpful, could you help this dispute too.
User:Brutaldeluxe seems to be, somewhat backlashing against me. An example could be seen in his recent message under the heading "poor quality edits", where he (later apologized) for calling all my edits poor, and having bad faith. Ever since then, I have tried my hardest to collaborate with him. Yet he reverts tons of text in Culture in Rome with absolutely no discussion, similarly does so in the now redirected, once an article, page List of tourist attractions in Rome. He just makes brief comments such as "irrelevance is not good". He has nominated several of my pages (which several admins rejected) for speedy deletion with short comments, and no discussion or notices on my talk page, and when one tries to ask him politely to discuss it on his talk page, he seeminlgy answered something like that added irrelevant nonsense is not good, and that he doesn't need to discuss it. Now, having been on wikipedia for over half a year, I realise very clearly that this is not the sort of attitude that wikipedia wants editors to have. Overall, I'd like to get along with him, but it looks like, despite my attempts, nothing good, if not worse things have happened.
Since you're so good at resolving disputes, could you please help resolve this one. I think if you contacted him, and found ways that we could get along I would appreciate it. Thank you and reply-- Theologiae ( talk) 15:11, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Hallo,
I need help with two items. Which I have never done before.
1) I need to delete Carpenter House (disambiguation). I was trying to resolve a DAB issue, and while I did resolve the DAB issue, I found out the orignal Carpenter House was not a DAB page but a LIST page. And no, I did not start the Carpenter House article, but I helped clean it up. See notes on the discussion page of Carpenter House.
2) Carpenter House to List of Carpenter Houses. Since Carpenter House is a list, it needs to be renamed.
Any help would be appreciated.
B-t-w. Thanks for checking David Rosenfelt (author). As soon as I saw my error due to the {copyvio}, I quickly removed the offending material and read up on copyright and Wikipedia.
Jrcrin001 ( talk) 06:20, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
I object to recent deletion of content at List of prophecies of Joseph Smith, Jr.. The claim is that it is a copyright violation. No text was duplicated at all. Could you restore the deleted text so it can be used for discussion on the Talk page. Or, alternatively, here describe where the copyright violation is. Thanks. -- Noleander ( talk) 13:17, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi MLauba. Thank you for saving those two Renaissance pages. I totally agree with you - considering they are copied from a book, the structure, wording and expressions do not sound appropriate for wikipedia, and the page is, of poor wikipedia quality. Yet, apart from the quality, there was, in essence, nothing actually technically wrong with the pages - they just aren't very good as they stand, and need radical improvement (also one question, can you re-word and edit public domain material?)-- Theologiae ( talk) 10:08, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
The Copyright holder has released the text under "" per https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketID=4765079. Nsaa ( talk) 11:36, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
the Page Hydra Vein could probably be restored and this added to the article discussion page: {{ConfirmationOTRS|source=https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketID=4765079|otrs=4765079|note="I am the original author of both the Wikipedia entry and the compared entry on http://www.hydravein.co.uk and the copyright is mine. I'm happy to release this under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike license"}}
Nsaa ( talk) 11:36, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks MRG. MLauba ( Talk) 11:45, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I see that you blocked Special:Contributions/Daniil0299; given this edit and these contributions from that IP, you may want to take further action. Best, Knepflerle ( talk) 17:41, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
I'd suggest you undo it, rather rapidly, and apologise. Pedro : Chat 20:50, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 01:07, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Not wanting to ask any leading questions whatsoever, I thought I'd just come over and vaguely ask your reasons for not implementing this. :) -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:22, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Re: the managing guide, do you object to my proposing alterations directly in the page in the usual BOLD fashion? If you'd prefer, I'd be happy to do so at talk. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:22, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Did you really block Wikid77 for this edit? Yes, we do have a policy which counsels editors against ad hominem remarks ( "Comment on content, not on the contributor"). But it also tells us that it is "repeated or egregious" comments of this nature which may lead to blocks. I rather think that you've over-reacted here by blocking Wikid77 for a comment ("You know you need to get out more if ...") which was a very long way away from being "egregious". If you're intending to block people for comments such as that you'll be busy indeed. Angus McLellan (Talk) 11:05, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi. This one is not due for closure yet, but the contributor is requesting review. Can you review the rewrite? I have been involved in discussing the issue with him, and I think a second (well, really, third; I didn't tag) set of eyes would be beneficial. Note that earlier rewrite edits still contain copied text, so selective deletion there may be beneficial. There's more information here, if you want to read it. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:13, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Monsieur Lauba. If the Frank Hyett temp page is good, can you move to the mainspace. Otherwise, please let me know -- my talkpage or yours, it doesn't matter -- what needs to be fixed. Thanks. Yours, Rms125a@hotmail.com ( talk) 17:32, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
There is potential new CCI under discussion at my talk page at User talk:Moonriddengirl#Palmerston Forts Society. I have reviewed the first 9 articles and find roughly 6 of them very extensive and 4 of them just unusably close. Since this is a judgment call, though, I would really appreciate it if you could take a look at the latest three. The first 8 are from a cc-by-nc-nd source, and it's possible that the contributor thought the content was usable. So far as I know, the other sources are more clear.
If you confirm that this is a pattern, more evaluation would almost certainly be necessary at CCI.
If you don't have time or interest, please let me know, and I'll ask one of the other copyright admins, in short supply though we be. :) -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:19, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Considering your pledge as an uninvolved editor and admin (which I think you should apply to anyone commenting there, including me, who steps over the line), would you mind talking care of that IP that is clearly not here to improve WP but rather to poison the well on a regular bases even at the mediation page (Although mediation was called off by the editor who filed it but this is a different issue)? The IP has a short edit history to check out (and is either a sock or just a plain "pain in the ass"... excuse my French...). I think a block would be appropriate by now or at least (another) strong warning followed by a lengthily block if s/he doesn't cease to post unhelpful personal comments. The IP seems to be static so nobody else would be "hurt" by any block, short or long.
About the latest IP entry: This IP's reinstated entry was removed (in part) by Xeno and again in whole by Pablo X today [4] but please take a look at his/her whole history, incl. the talkpage for the big picture. Thanks for any action or input, The Magnificent Clean-keeper ( talk) 00:59, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Interesting that you choose to warn me rather than the other users. It seems that friendships can have a reasonable impact on the nature of Wikipedia. I shall stop my editing on the Battle of Gettysburg article, but I'll always remember how biased it is-- Valkyrie Red ( talk) 21:58, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi. :) I'm going to be away from Wikipedia from May 13th until May 27th. If you have time, can you pitch in a bit at WP:CP? I'd hate to come back to a two week backlog. :/ (You're not the only person I'm asking; I'm hoping to keep it from overwhelming anybody. :)) My preparation and family obligations have already got me a bit behind, but I'm going to try to get it current through Wednesday, anyway. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:08, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated 2nd Battalion, 18th Field Artillery Regiment, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2nd Battalion, 18th Field Artillery Regiment. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SGGH ping! 17:08, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Salut, désolé, je n'ai pas le temps à l'instant de remplir la paperasserie, je te signale un copyvio sur l'article
İsmail Gaspıralı. Voici le diff :
[5], lajout est comme indiqué dans le copié-collé un copyvio d'Inci Bowman. Cordialement --
Kimdime (
talk) 14:11, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Done C'est fait, merci. Amicalement,
MLauba (
Talk)
11:08, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 15 |
Thanks.. suka94ain Suka94ain ( talk) 18:22, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Sain G.M Syed ,the great revolutionist, a renowed Sindhi leader who professed freedom of Sindhi nation and worked day and night for rights of the sindhi people and for this he tolerated the cruelties of pakistani leaders, police and army. Deletion of SAin GM Syed pages from Wikipedia will be the loss of Wikipedia itself. I request you for the inclusion of Sain GM syeds notes.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.103.234.69 ( talk) 18:13, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Why you delated the article about "G M Syed" the founder of Jeay Sindh Movement, founder of Pakistan, author of above 60 books. You can search about him in Google. some info at http://gmsyed.org
I hope you will restore the page. If have some problem plz tag there we will follow the Wikipedia rules. Thanks Zafar ( talk) 11:29, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
If some of the sections of article or award list is not valid you can remove the section, why whole article deleted? If we get the copy right permission from the site, will solve the problem and will you restore? Zafar ( talk) 14:45, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for detailed reply. I am trying to contact sindhudesh.com owners. In the mean time will you restore the article for some days, I am not saying for whole article but I am saying about the section which will be valid after permission? Zafar ( talk) 15:09, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
I started new article on the same topic, please give us some time to improve it as per terms of Wikipedia, thanks. Zafar ( talk) 12:46, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, I hope we will improve the article. Zafar ( talk) 21:19, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for knocking down some of that backlog. :) Typically, we do delete listings from there, since they are duplicates of their daily listings and we note resolution at those. I've gone ahead and removed the ones you've addressed.
I do see, though, that Richard Levao is still waiting review. Would you prefer I ask somebody like Toon to take a look at it? -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:58, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello again. User:Franamax suggested I asked you to give the newly 're-created' article for Bassett a quick appraisal for copyright purposes. If you need history, then both my and Franamax's talk pages should tell you all you need to know. Much obliged,
Derek R Bullamore ( talk) 22:00, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Based on some feedback I've received, I've updated the instructions at WP:SCV and WP:CP. I've left a more indepth explanation at Wikipedia talk:Suspected copyright violations#Header update along with a request for feedback. As we try to get more people involved in this work, we want to be sure instructions are clear. Given your work, your input there would be very much appreciated. :) Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:48, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
I agree with you that his continuing attacks while attempting to get unblocked called for an extended block. -- SarekOfVulcan ( talk) 00:57, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi MLauba,
I'm not sure you are the correct person to direct this to but I am unsure as to who to contact. Article 25 has only recently become aware that the wikipedia page concerned with this organisation has been deleted due to a number of issues. The comments made prior to deletion of the page have left me slightly confused and I was hoping you would be able to explain clearly exactly what the problems are with the article and therefore how I would be able to fix them and get the page up and running again.
My main concerns are: None of the text has been copy pasted from the Article 25 website/any documents. A number of comments have been made about the organisation not being 'notable' enough to include - a quick google search of 'article 25 charity' results in almost the first 4 pages of results solely relating to the organisation and has had/is getting increasing amounts of press coverage.
If you could point me in the right direction as to exactly what I need to do to fix this page I would be very grateful.
Kind regards, 13Curtain ( talk) 13:16, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
It's recently come to my attention you have deleted the entry for Hydra Vein due to a perceived copyright violation. Please note I am the author of both the Wikipedia entry and the entry on www.hydravein.co.uk to which you referenced your initial notice. What do you need from me to re-allow the entry?
Thanks. Spartakus666 ( talk) 11:15, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
I think I've spotted a copyright violation on the Italy page. Go see
Italy#Environment. Does this page seem similar
[3]? I think it's a copyright vio (the info was inserted by
User:Brutaldeluxe.)--
Theologiae (
talk)
14:05, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
You have deleted my bio page posted by my College seven years ago. could you restore it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.156.24.211 ( talk) 23:30, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
I regret your taking it as hostile tone. I was commenting on your hostile invocation of EEML as an evil, which I came across, when we have never crossed paths before and you know nothing about the alleged perpetrators. Per my request, in the future, please refrain from wiki-linking to EEML and using it to cry WITCH! Best, PЄTЄRS VЄСRUМВА ► talk 01:25, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi MLauba. I'm coming back to you with a problem. Now, I have discussed this with him, yet little changes have occurred. Since you were so helpful, could you help this dispute too.
User:Brutaldeluxe seems to be, somewhat backlashing against me. An example could be seen in his recent message under the heading "poor quality edits", where he (later apologized) for calling all my edits poor, and having bad faith. Ever since then, I have tried my hardest to collaborate with him. Yet he reverts tons of text in Culture in Rome with absolutely no discussion, similarly does so in the now redirected, once an article, page List of tourist attractions in Rome. He just makes brief comments such as "irrelevance is not good". He has nominated several of my pages (which several admins rejected) for speedy deletion with short comments, and no discussion or notices on my talk page, and when one tries to ask him politely to discuss it on his talk page, he seeminlgy answered something like that added irrelevant nonsense is not good, and that he doesn't need to discuss it. Now, having been on wikipedia for over half a year, I realise very clearly that this is not the sort of attitude that wikipedia wants editors to have. Overall, I'd like to get along with him, but it looks like, despite my attempts, nothing good, if not worse things have happened.
Since you're so good at resolving disputes, could you please help resolve this one. I think if you contacted him, and found ways that we could get along I would appreciate it. Thank you and reply-- Theologiae ( talk) 15:11, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Hallo,
I need help with two items. Which I have never done before.
1) I need to delete Carpenter House (disambiguation). I was trying to resolve a DAB issue, and while I did resolve the DAB issue, I found out the orignal Carpenter House was not a DAB page but a LIST page. And no, I did not start the Carpenter House article, but I helped clean it up. See notes on the discussion page of Carpenter House.
2) Carpenter House to List of Carpenter Houses. Since Carpenter House is a list, it needs to be renamed.
Any help would be appreciated.
B-t-w. Thanks for checking David Rosenfelt (author). As soon as I saw my error due to the {copyvio}, I quickly removed the offending material and read up on copyright and Wikipedia.
Jrcrin001 ( talk) 06:20, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
I object to recent deletion of content at List of prophecies of Joseph Smith, Jr.. The claim is that it is a copyright violation. No text was duplicated at all. Could you restore the deleted text so it can be used for discussion on the Talk page. Or, alternatively, here describe where the copyright violation is. Thanks. -- Noleander ( talk) 13:17, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi MLauba. Thank you for saving those two Renaissance pages. I totally agree with you - considering they are copied from a book, the structure, wording and expressions do not sound appropriate for wikipedia, and the page is, of poor wikipedia quality. Yet, apart from the quality, there was, in essence, nothing actually technically wrong with the pages - they just aren't very good as they stand, and need radical improvement (also one question, can you re-word and edit public domain material?)-- Theologiae ( talk) 10:08, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
The Copyright holder has released the text under "" per https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketID=4765079. Nsaa ( talk) 11:36, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
the Page Hydra Vein could probably be restored and this added to the article discussion page: {{ConfirmationOTRS|source=https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketID=4765079|otrs=4765079|note="I am the original author of both the Wikipedia entry and the compared entry on http://www.hydravein.co.uk and the copyright is mine. I'm happy to release this under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike license"}}
Nsaa ( talk) 11:36, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks MRG. MLauba ( Talk) 11:45, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I see that you blocked Special:Contributions/Daniil0299; given this edit and these contributions from that IP, you may want to take further action. Best, Knepflerle ( talk) 17:41, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
I'd suggest you undo it, rather rapidly, and apologise. Pedro : Chat 20:50, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 01:07, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Not wanting to ask any leading questions whatsoever, I thought I'd just come over and vaguely ask your reasons for not implementing this. :) -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:22, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Re: the managing guide, do you object to my proposing alterations directly in the page in the usual BOLD fashion? If you'd prefer, I'd be happy to do so at talk. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:22, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Did you really block Wikid77 for this edit? Yes, we do have a policy which counsels editors against ad hominem remarks ( "Comment on content, not on the contributor"). But it also tells us that it is "repeated or egregious" comments of this nature which may lead to blocks. I rather think that you've over-reacted here by blocking Wikid77 for a comment ("You know you need to get out more if ...") which was a very long way away from being "egregious". If you're intending to block people for comments such as that you'll be busy indeed. Angus McLellan (Talk) 11:05, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi. This one is not due for closure yet, but the contributor is requesting review. Can you review the rewrite? I have been involved in discussing the issue with him, and I think a second (well, really, third; I didn't tag) set of eyes would be beneficial. Note that earlier rewrite edits still contain copied text, so selective deletion there may be beneficial. There's more information here, if you want to read it. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:13, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Monsieur Lauba. If the Frank Hyett temp page is good, can you move to the mainspace. Otherwise, please let me know -- my talkpage or yours, it doesn't matter -- what needs to be fixed. Thanks. Yours, Rms125a@hotmail.com ( talk) 17:32, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
There is potential new CCI under discussion at my talk page at User talk:Moonriddengirl#Palmerston Forts Society. I have reviewed the first 9 articles and find roughly 6 of them very extensive and 4 of them just unusably close. Since this is a judgment call, though, I would really appreciate it if you could take a look at the latest three. The first 8 are from a cc-by-nc-nd source, and it's possible that the contributor thought the content was usable. So far as I know, the other sources are more clear.
If you confirm that this is a pattern, more evaluation would almost certainly be necessary at CCI.
If you don't have time or interest, please let me know, and I'll ask one of the other copyright admins, in short supply though we be. :) -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:19, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Considering your pledge as an uninvolved editor and admin (which I think you should apply to anyone commenting there, including me, who steps over the line), would you mind talking care of that IP that is clearly not here to improve WP but rather to poison the well on a regular bases even at the mediation page (Although mediation was called off by the editor who filed it but this is a different issue)? The IP has a short edit history to check out (and is either a sock or just a plain "pain in the ass"... excuse my French...). I think a block would be appropriate by now or at least (another) strong warning followed by a lengthily block if s/he doesn't cease to post unhelpful personal comments. The IP seems to be static so nobody else would be "hurt" by any block, short or long.
About the latest IP entry: This IP's reinstated entry was removed (in part) by Xeno and again in whole by Pablo X today [4] but please take a look at his/her whole history, incl. the talkpage for the big picture. Thanks for any action or input, The Magnificent Clean-keeper ( talk) 00:59, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Interesting that you choose to warn me rather than the other users. It seems that friendships can have a reasonable impact on the nature of Wikipedia. I shall stop my editing on the Battle of Gettysburg article, but I'll always remember how biased it is-- Valkyrie Red ( talk) 21:58, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi. :) I'm going to be away from Wikipedia from May 13th until May 27th. If you have time, can you pitch in a bit at WP:CP? I'd hate to come back to a two week backlog. :/ (You're not the only person I'm asking; I'm hoping to keep it from overwhelming anybody. :)) My preparation and family obligations have already got me a bit behind, but I'm going to try to get it current through Wednesday, anyway. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:08, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated 2nd Battalion, 18th Field Artillery Regiment, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2nd Battalion, 18th Field Artillery Regiment. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SGGH ping! 17:08, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Salut, désolé, je n'ai pas le temps à l'instant de remplir la paperasserie, je te signale un copyvio sur l'article
İsmail Gaspıralı. Voici le diff :
[5], lajout est comme indiqué dans le copié-collé un copyvio d'Inci Bowman. Cordialement --
Kimdime (
talk) 14:11, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Done C'est fait, merci. Amicalement,
MLauba (
Talk)
11:08, 14 May 2010 (UTC)