Talk – Sandbox – Suggestions |
This is an archive of past discussion. Please do not modify it.
|
|
Thanks for helping to clean up the stalker's mess. None of the three admins who "warned" me for my so-called "personal attack" even bothered. Sometimes I do clean it up my self, but sometiems I don't, so admins like Thebainer won't accuse me of violation the WP:DENY and WP:DNFT essays. I'm glad to seee that you are willing to help out rather than pile on. I know I don't always handle things perfectly, but I do try. Mess up once tho, and all the do-gooders will join in on the harassment! Of course, I wouldn't blame them, since the stalker usually goes after the admins who revert and block him. So again, thanks for being different, and for reaching out rather than stomping down. - BillCJ ( talk) 06:51, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Are being taken away because you didn't pay. :O -- CableModem^^ ( talk) 10:11, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Do me a favor, and issue me an appropriate block so I can stay away from here and thus from the war-of-words over the ever-shifting interpretations of what is allowable content. I'm fed up with the deletionists here. Give me a one or two day block so I won't be tempted to argue with them any more today or tomorrow. By then, they will have already deleted everything, and it won't matter anymore. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 10:52, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
User:63.246.140.34 you blocked for an hour - it's an anonymizer so longer or not? Cheers -- Herby talk thyme 10:53, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
I've just realized that the image changed depending on whether or not you were around. Nice trick! -- lucasbfr talk 12:53, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Category:Wikipedians who use AOL Instant Messenger, which was deleted per this discussion, which you closed. The review discussion is at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 November 30. I just thought you might want to know. – Black Falcon ( Talk) 20:29, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
My apologies if you're already aware of this, but your block messages are getting cut off (see [1]). Natalie 21:49, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks but no thanks.
I see you revert alot of vandalism. You're good! If i knew how to, i would give you a barnstar! Tech43 07:32, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Yup. You really are good. I liked that team effort thing. Do you ever laugh at how stupid the vandals usually are? I do. Sometimes, vandals are so funny, you almost don't wanna block them or warn them, ya know. Tech43 07:39, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Lulz were had and now it is time to retire. Best of luck... 70.251.67.133 10:44, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks a Trillion for getting this guy blocked! you really are a great editor on this site! Tech43 21:25, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
NHRHS2010 has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
NHRHS2010 talk 00:55, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Is this a correct statement of your position: [2] at User talk:Kirill Lokshin?
Do you indeed endorse User:Perspicacite alias Jose João's position (not my own, which is that he should simply cease reverts and harassment of other editors) that an RfC would be a waste of time and that we should proceed directly to an ArbCom considering my conduct? Alice.S 09:27, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello Luna Santin, can you look if I've filled out the templates correctly (syntax)? Thank you. -- Oxymoron 83 08:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
I've answered you're question to me on my talk page. Elhector 17:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
There is a user who is going around writing "ROFL LOL LEET" in LTTE article. Please can you take a look. KOS can also help. Along with any other admins who petrol recent changes. Thanks Watchdogb ( talk) 21:21, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 49 | 3 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:34, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
My main dispute is over the images I uploaded. I looked at the tag that Betacommand is adding to the screen shots. It asks for the name of each article it is being used in, even though that list appears in the "File lists" section at the bottom of the screen. The source is obvious since they're screen shots. As I'm sure you're aware, there is no legal reason to be alarmed by the images. I even included a rationale below the tag. Perhaps Betacommandbot was looking for a rationale above it. So, any philosophical concern over whether they're "free" in the sense of being useable by other sites is too trivial.
Gnfgb2 ( talk) 05:27, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello there! First off, that is possibly the most amazing lamb I've ever seen. :) The real reason why I'm here; just wanted to compliment you on your excellent vandal fighting. Keep up the good work! Cheers, Master of Puppets Care to share? 03:19, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Chris6730 ( talk · contribs) - Guess it wasn't compromised after all. -- Charitwo talk 15:49, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the note, I will see to it that my actions are improved. Forgive me, as I was frustrated. Marlith T/ C 03:19, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Normally going to admins is not the route I choose. However, I think this has gotten out of hand. Initially I cleaned up the liks at credit crunch and left notes on the article talk page [3] and the users talk page [4]. I also saw that the user had added links to debt money which were not article citations but were just sites that sell the books and I removed them. While the user had initially agreed to leave credit crunch alone, the removal of links to the book sites sent them over the edge whereby I received my first [5] talk page message. I immediately replied [6] and received another rant [7]. I let some frustration get to me and made another reversion. After more rants from the user, I elected to seek a third opinion [8]. Following counsel from another user, I reverted the entire affair as well as the links to debt money. I am sure you will tell me that I could have handled it better. At some point, communication is no longer an option. This person seems more content to rant than discuss. But no one should tolerate the idiotic nature of the comments left on my page. Montco ( talk) 03:52, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
I am not sure I get the abbreviation. Montco ( talk) 02:52, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 50 | 10 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 07:40, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Please move the talkpage for Dustbuster to it's correct title name. ( I love entei ( talk) 03:22, 13 December 2007 (UTC))
Hello, in the past it seems you have dealt with User: Wikzilla who was blocked for disruptive editing and sockpuppetry. The actions by another likely sock created shortly after Wikizila's block and kept as a sleeper account until his other accounts were blocked [10]. The Sock account has a identical style of editing and has edited only the same pages Wikizilla attacked the same editing style [11] [12]. A quick check shows the writing style used is also identical. Because of your status as a veteran administrator I ask you to look into this. Thanks for your time Freepsbane ( talk) 13:37, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
My apologies for not specifing but the sock acount in question is Downtrip ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki), thanks Freepsbane ( talk) 23:43, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thankyou your work is apreciated. Freepsbane ( talk) 23:57, 15 December 2007 (UTC) (perhaps checkuser could be used?)
Actually Luna, I'd EXTEND the block out to 24 hours like the last two, and even extend the blocked range to encompass that entire section of the network (209.47.31.*), here's my rationale;
This terminal appears to be part of a public system (educational, library, etc.). The user, being blocked, can simply move to another terminal on that LAN, and continue their abuse. Waiting an hour is no sweat to some would-be vandals, they simply kill some time, then come back and continue.
This is just an opinion from an experienced BBS and network admin, who has dealt with problems like this in the past... Edit Centric ( talk) 05:09, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
For that revert. For your information, that IP belongs to someone who keeps changing IPs to vandalize both my talk page, and another user's called Chris Chittleborough (see the history of that page). They go though phases of not vandalizing, and it seems they're coming into a new phase. I'm tempted to perform a range-block, but I don't know how to do one. Anyway, thanks again. :) Acalamari 23:52, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Marlith T/ C 00:10, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
I've encountered a couple kooks on Wikipedia before, but this one seems particularly disturbed. Thanks for taking care of it (until OrderOfBush6/7/8...) Best, Dan.— DCGeist ( talk) 09:24, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for replying to my message. I'm having problems logging in. I am entering my correct username and password but it isn't working. I've tried the option of having a new password emailed to me but an error message comes up saying that there is no e-mail address recorded for user "DmanDmythDledge". 83.70.239.84 ( talk) 12:40, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Alright i shall do that! I just dont want what happend to my friend Lav who got his Idea stolen by a game company not just the image the name and made it there own sorry for the inconvinionce —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitlames ( talk • contribs) 01:14, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
I have just had a look at this situation and I have to say that I am amazed at the stance to you have taken with regards to this.
R. friend was in conflict with Domer48 and then R. friend revert to "his version" and blocks Domer48 without warning or an official report or without anything said to any of the editors on "his side". Surely this is not the correct procedure that an admin in conflict with another editor should take.
Domer48 should be unblocked, R. friend should have a sever wrap across the knuckles and then if needed an official report should be filed to determine if any blocks are warranted. I hope you have time to look at this situation with a fresh pair of eyes as it seems pretty unjust to me. regards-- Vintagekits ( talk) 17:28, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Luna, a chara, with all due respect, page protect is not the answer. To suggest edit warring implies culpability from two parties. Look at the discussion page, I have applies our policies to this discussion. I have clearly illustrated the nature of my concerns on the information and the improper synthesis of material. Now we have enough wiki tools and policies to deal with this, page protection will not work here. Just look at this now, are we to page protect this article also. -- Domer48 ( talk) 22:36, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 51 | 17 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 19:11, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Wikzilla I took the initiative and Requested a checkuser on Downtrip ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) and it found that he Is almost certainly a sockpuppet of the Indef blocked Wikzilla ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki). In adition to this it was conclusively shown that he used sockpuppets to bypass 3RR on pages that he has edit warred on and to create the Illusion of wide support. Clearly he has and is violating several Wikipedia rules and some administrative action is in order. Freepsbane ( talk) 03:27, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I'm in the middle of a big IRL "oh crap" crisis and I can't spend much time on WP atm. A user I blocked, User:Danerunsalot emailes me denying he was a sock. Apparently I blocked him after Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Runnerguy this report, but looking (very fast) at his contribs I'm afraid I might have screwed up (ie it wasn't a WP:SOCK violation). Can you check that if you have the time? Thanks! -- lucasbfr talk 11:09, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
R.fiend is editing this article that you have put page protection on. He is blatently using his admin tools in disregard for the template you placed on it here. BigDunc ( talk) 20:34, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
There was no consensus reached. Luna warned them not to edit this article. -- Domer48 ( talk) 21:02, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
For 8 solid months the IP did nothing but make unilateral changes in violation of MOSDATE, despite repeated warnings to stop doing so. Previously it has been warned for vandalism. The IP did not take any note whatsoever of the many warnings, but continued undeterred. That looks like a serial unrepentant vandal to me. Jayjg (talk) 03:18, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
You're welcome... hope things are ok... some of those Rutgers IPs belong to Rutgers computer labs, so it might be anyone making those edits sometimes. 165.230.143.152 ( talk) 03:32, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi Luna. I've made a suggestion at Talk:Easter Rising that if we can agree a form of words in talk, that we will ask you to implement the change. I've also posited that if the edit war is over, you might consider lifting the protection. All very hypothetical at the moment still, but would you be agreeable to that in principle? Best wishes, -- John ( talk) 04:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Can I not add an external link to a band's profile if they represent the "band's official download site" similar to livephish? Totalliveguy ( talk) 04:57, 21 December 2007 (UTC)totalliveguy
Look, I am just trying to keep the page readable in a nonridiculous fashion. I am not sure if that giant sheep on your user page is supposed to scare me but I do not think that keeping a page orderly quite constitutes a war. I would appreciate that, if you disagree with my edits, you would elaborate on how the page was more useful before my edits, insteads of leaving threats on my talk page. 88.66.29.245 ( talk) 04:06, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
For your tireless efforts in combating the endless cavalcade of vandals. Maser ( Talk!) 04:19, 22 December 2007 (UTC) |
I'm bringing this to you because you seem to be the last admin to ban Kitia. Is there a central page for reporting sockpuppets of this editor?
December 21, 2012 ( talk · contribs) is Kitia ( talk · contribs). Evidence: both edit articles on years, and both edit-war in American Pie restoring long tracts of WP:OR. [13] [14]
What's a quick way to address this? I really don't wish to edit war in American Pie for the week or three a report to WP:SSP takes to be considered. / edg ☺ ☭ 09:57, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Wouldn't that be a WP:USERNAME vio as confusing? -- Jack Merridew 10:51, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your help in fixing vandalism. looks like Mr. Dfrt5 is on a vandalism spree now. can you please take care of that. Preetikapoor0 ( talk) 02:22, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
I'm in a situation where someone's making edits that are to my mind not appropriate for Wikipedia, but also possibly not blatant enough vandalism for me to want to risk 3RR stuff (which further action would push me past). As a friendly passing admin, would you be able to advise? Pseudomonas( talk) 11:15, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
I piss off anon IPs sometimes, as I do a bit of recent change patrolling, and I work with a few controversial articles, that anons frequently vandalize. I appreciate your keeping an eye out, and the semi-protection. Mr Which ??? 17:04, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
my pleasure —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.176.217.233 ( talk) 03:36, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I saw where you protected Muhammad. There isn't really an edit war going on there. There are several sleeper accounts that have been sent to Wikipedia by an off-site petition that are vandalizing the article. -- B ( talk) 16:36, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Luna, we've tried to take it to talk. The one side keeps reverting to the version that has only their view on the main article. Mr Which ??? 23:45, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I see you have been involved in matters concerning the block of the ip 24.175.183.44 and the talk page of the same person, Xsyner. I am having trouble with him as he repeatedly removes block warnings and notices from his talk page. I gave him several warnings and eventually reported him at WP:AIAV. Nothing was done about this, and I am now beginning to wonder whether it is actually against policy to do what he has been doing. Several editor have told me it was against policy, and that's what I have been telling Xsyner, although he ignores my warnings. I'd appreciate it if you could help my answer these questions as soon as possible. Thanks. ╦ﺇ₥₥€Ԋ( talk/ contribs) 03:22, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
You reverted faster than me Randomtime ( talk) 11:55, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 52 | 26 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 13:31, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
You protected the wrong version. The version you protected is the gutted version an anon user has been doing since 10 December 2007. That is fine though, I pretty much washed my hands of it. This is why wikipedia has trouble raising money, too many personal agendas. 66.57.36.56 ( talk) 02:14, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Replied on my talk, and on AIV. This does seem to be confusing, including for me, but I am following suit of another, so... Gscshoyru ( talk) 03:26, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
It's great that you are so "neutral." How do you keep from getting nose-bleeds so high up on your pedestal? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dar8888 ( talk • contribs) 04:33, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Why don't wikipedia rspond to this ????????????!!!!!!!! Remove the image from wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by Basem3wad ( talk • contribs) 16:50, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Remember this user? He is still getting on here very few days and adding nonsense images.... as an administrator, do you want to block him? Because clearly, he still hasn't learned his lesson. Please post your response on my talk page, and happy holidays. Tech43 ( talk) 05:36, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
...a hot chick? -- 194.251.240.114 ( talk) 11:11, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the help there Luna. In the end I had to 24 hour block. 3RR violation and POV pushing, plus repeated insertion of discussion into the article mainspace seems to me to be a good enough reason (one hopes!) Pedro : Chat 23:26, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
your protection of the liancourt article did not work, I think... o.d.s.t. : feet first into hell ( talk) 07:40, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
172.212.125.33 and 172.207.208.120 (probably same author) appear to be vandalizing indian and chinese pages. Their changes appear to be very subtle but sometimes very disruptive. can you please do something about it. see
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Economic_history_of_China&diff=prev&oldid=176793086 http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Economic_history_of_India&diff=prev&oldid=176998365 http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Economic_history_of_India&diff=prev&oldid=176792565 http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Economic_history_of_China&diff=prev&oldid=178497448 http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Economic_history_of_China&diff=prev&oldid=178497448 Preetikapoor0 ( talk) 22:38, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
S/he removed a section I added called "Indef" where I said "Can we just indef, this clearly isn't going anywhere". The fact that s/he knows what "indef" is, and that it's bad, probably means this is not a new user, and perhaps a sock of a previously banned user. Equazcion •✗/ C • 13:05, 1 Jan 2008 (UTC)
Yes can you help me here please Luna. I got a threating message from user "wknight94" saying he was going to report this the authorities. I told him it was my idoitic friend that mess with my computer. I told him that. Luna, I have to him and Bugs I didnt do the "death threat". I am talking on my eldorado name. Because this is my user name okay. Can you reply back Luna . ASAP , this is urgent. ! Eldorado91 ( talk) 14:57, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
He took his "case" to the notice board, giving you all a couple more IP addresses suitable for blocking. I also notified Wknight94: [20] Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 16:46, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
January 2008 (UTC)
My IP address was recently used by "spartansuit" because my cousin used my computer to make that account. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Talking Mac ( talk • contribs) 18:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Just got really pissed off. Hopefully won't happen again. Will ( talk) 02:06, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
restoring that page —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vanessahexter ( talk • contribs) 02:37, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
When I click on his dif's, I get the most amazing image instead. I guess he's done something to the software. Dloh cierekim 03:34, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks very much for taking care of related vandalism on my user page. Do you know if there's a fix in the works to prevent abuses like that? - Chardish ( talk) 04:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Do people really think vandalizing m user page affects me at all. By the way thanks. 04:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Wow, three different IP's attacking one userpage! I semi-protected User:Ridernyc. Dloh cierekim 04:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
PS, What's a TOR? Can we get rid of the malicious code he added?? Dloh cierekim 04:38, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Luna,
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage, and protecting it. Harland1 ( t/ c) 19:51, 3 January 2008 (UTC) |
Luna, did you ban that user that had the ip 58.XXX.XX they kept spamming your user page. Iron Valley ( talk) 19:36, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. :) -- Gamer007 ( talk) 00:49, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
This is your range block from a few days ago. This is someone wanting to get out from under it. They seem OK. Your input appreciated. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
68.84.243.63 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Hi, could you block this editor again (you did a few days ago); see, for example, this. -- Jack Merridew 10:27, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
I'd like to know how to nominate an article for deletion please, and also how to have action taken against someone who clearly is only present on Wiki to promote a personal POV agenda. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.188.38.31 ( talk) 07:24, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my page... I didn't even notice it until now. :-) -- Nlu ( talk) 08:01, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm having Luna withdrawal . :/ KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 11:17, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
FYI, a diff involving your name was mentioned in passing at an extension request that I filed at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Request for extension of restrictions at DreamGuy 2, specifically, my extended report at User:Elonka/DreamGuy report. No action is required on your part, I just wanted to let you know. -- El on ka 03:26, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Your protecting Prussian Blue (duo) is appreciated. The req for semi-protection was refused yesterday citeing not enough vandalism ?!?!?! Im glad you can see the truth. Im no fan, but hated seeing it listing every 5th line on my watchlist. Exit2DOS2000• T• C• 05:48, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey Luna santi how come the indians can write anything they wish on azas kashmir articles and when i try to balance the articles some moderators always protect can you please give me some guidance on how to get some non biased moderators. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.156.208.195 ( talk) 11:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I've noticed that you've dealt with some of these impersonators/harassers and would like to ask your advice on how to deal with this situation. There are many, many socks out there and I've probably not seen them all. There are also endless anons reverting away. I've got a category going to help keep track. This may not be a good idea per WP:DENY…
Also, please see the talk on my talk page started by User:Blow of Light; I've created a 'doppelganger' account as suggested but don't see quite what it's for. BoL will probably get back to me, but another opinion would be welcome. Cheers, Jack Merridew 12:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, but I seem to have brought the Wrath of the Anons down on your talk page. -- Jack Merridew 15:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey Luna, I protected your talk page look at the recent activity. I left it at infinite, so unprotect whenever you like. Have a glass of rum for the troubles my good sir. :) KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 16:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi — thanks for helping to cool off the edit war at Blockbuster Inc.. Unfortunately, we're still having problems. I've summarized the issue here. It's a somewhat unusual case, and I was wondering if you could offer some advice as to how best to resolve the dispute. Feezo (Talk) 19:12, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Any thought on anon protection? I see the protection log shows you unprotected today, however wasn't it auto un-protected on the 6th? Since the 6th it appears of the 100 edits aprox 50% are anon vandalism [23]. -- Hu12 ( talk) 19:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
I would appreciate full protection for the unvandalized forms of Cassandra Clare, The Mortal Instruments Trilogy, and City Of Bones. The author has been the subject of several rather vicious smear campaigns on outside sites like LiveJournal and FandomWank; after I successfully opposed efforts to bring that feud here, a small clique of Wikipedia editors with who I (and many other Wikipedia users) have a long and unpleasant editorial dispute began attacking the Clare-related pages to harass me. There is no real doubt as to notability -- the main book was a March 2007 New York Times best-seller, and has been extensively reviewed -- and the other editors have made no reasoned claims for their deletions. (One article has on overlong plot summary, but that should be easily remedied by someone who has read the book, once the article is allowed to stand. VivianDarkbloom ( talk) 23:36, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
City of Bones has been brought to AFD. Immediate reaction among the group that had been resurrecting it was to turn it into a pretty conventional stub. Kww ( talk) 14:17, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I have a question. I made a subpage under my user page that redirects to my contributions so that I could make my signature code shorter (it might look screwed up at the moment until i get it fixed). However, when i go to the redirect page, it doesnt redirect. I don't know what I'm doing wrong or maybe user subpages cant be redirects. Do you know how I can make the redirect work? Thanks in advance. Tim meh C 00:26, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello. I started an ANI topic on him. You may want to comment. Thanks. JetLover ( talk) ( Report a mistake) 01:19, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Sorry to bother, but could you have a second look at Talk:Communist Party of India (Marxist)? The situation there is has just got worse. A request for intervention from admins has been posted at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Advice few days ago, but no answer has been given so far. How should we procede? -- Soman ( talk) 01:19, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure what happened here and here. Change it back if you lik. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 03:40, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Please see: User talk:Blow of Light#Hey jack.... I misunderstood what he was suggesting and don't think I need the other account. Unless you think I'm missing something, could you please block the account and delete and protect the user and talk pages?
Thanks, -- Jack Merridew 09:19, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Please see: 172.207.237.73 who is resurrecting all of Harvey's old edits. FWIW Bzuk ( talk) 13:28, 10 January 2008 (UTC).
I just now realized someone had vandalized my user page 6 months ago and you were right there to revert it back before I even knew about it. I don't know how you knew it was vandalized but some really hurtful things were said and you just popped in and took care of it. I'm still kinda new when it comes to understanding Wiki's behind-the-scenes action and just want to let you know that you're awesome and I appreciate what you did. Caserini ( talk) 16:19, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey Luna, just wanted to ask you a quick question about your block here. I completely agree that the user was up to no good, but do we really block if they haven't edited in two days? Thanks. Glass Cobra 20:44, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 1 | 2 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 2 | 7 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 08:56, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! You can thank others by using {{ subst:Vangel}}! Mysdaao talk 13:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
My friend is back as anons on this and other stuff; could you semi-protect it? -- Jack Merridew 14:30, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Here's you a new Emergency Luna shutoff button...
Looks better. ALLSTAR echo 03:11, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
That would be me. I borrowed your talk page header layout for my own. I hope you don't mind. =) -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 07:36, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk – Sandbox – Suggestions |
This is an archive of past discussion. Please do not modify it.
|
|
Thanks for helping to clean up the stalker's mess. None of the three admins who "warned" me for my so-called "personal attack" even bothered. Sometimes I do clean it up my self, but sometiems I don't, so admins like Thebainer won't accuse me of violation the WP:DENY and WP:DNFT essays. I'm glad to seee that you are willing to help out rather than pile on. I know I don't always handle things perfectly, but I do try. Mess up once tho, and all the do-gooders will join in on the harassment! Of course, I wouldn't blame them, since the stalker usually goes after the admins who revert and block him. So again, thanks for being different, and for reaching out rather than stomping down. - BillCJ ( talk) 06:51, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Are being taken away because you didn't pay. :O -- CableModem^^ ( talk) 10:11, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Do me a favor, and issue me an appropriate block so I can stay away from here and thus from the war-of-words over the ever-shifting interpretations of what is allowable content. I'm fed up with the deletionists here. Give me a one or two day block so I won't be tempted to argue with them any more today or tomorrow. By then, they will have already deleted everything, and it won't matter anymore. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 10:52, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
User:63.246.140.34 you blocked for an hour - it's an anonymizer so longer or not? Cheers -- Herby talk thyme 10:53, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
I've just realized that the image changed depending on whether or not you were around. Nice trick! -- lucasbfr talk 12:53, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Category:Wikipedians who use AOL Instant Messenger, which was deleted per this discussion, which you closed. The review discussion is at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 November 30. I just thought you might want to know. – Black Falcon ( Talk) 20:29, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
My apologies if you're already aware of this, but your block messages are getting cut off (see [1]). Natalie 21:49, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks but no thanks.
I see you revert alot of vandalism. You're good! If i knew how to, i would give you a barnstar! Tech43 07:32, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Yup. You really are good. I liked that team effort thing. Do you ever laugh at how stupid the vandals usually are? I do. Sometimes, vandals are so funny, you almost don't wanna block them or warn them, ya know. Tech43 07:39, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Lulz were had and now it is time to retire. Best of luck... 70.251.67.133 10:44, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks a Trillion for getting this guy blocked! you really are a great editor on this site! Tech43 21:25, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
NHRHS2010 has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
NHRHS2010 talk 00:55, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Is this a correct statement of your position: [2] at User talk:Kirill Lokshin?
Do you indeed endorse User:Perspicacite alias Jose João's position (not my own, which is that he should simply cease reverts and harassment of other editors) that an RfC would be a waste of time and that we should proceed directly to an ArbCom considering my conduct? Alice.S 09:27, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello Luna Santin, can you look if I've filled out the templates correctly (syntax)? Thank you. -- Oxymoron 83 08:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
I've answered you're question to me on my talk page. Elhector 17:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
There is a user who is going around writing "ROFL LOL LEET" in LTTE article. Please can you take a look. KOS can also help. Along with any other admins who petrol recent changes. Thanks Watchdogb ( talk) 21:21, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 49 | 3 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:34, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
My main dispute is over the images I uploaded. I looked at the tag that Betacommand is adding to the screen shots. It asks for the name of each article it is being used in, even though that list appears in the "File lists" section at the bottom of the screen. The source is obvious since they're screen shots. As I'm sure you're aware, there is no legal reason to be alarmed by the images. I even included a rationale below the tag. Perhaps Betacommandbot was looking for a rationale above it. So, any philosophical concern over whether they're "free" in the sense of being useable by other sites is too trivial.
Gnfgb2 ( talk) 05:27, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello there! First off, that is possibly the most amazing lamb I've ever seen. :) The real reason why I'm here; just wanted to compliment you on your excellent vandal fighting. Keep up the good work! Cheers, Master of Puppets Care to share? 03:19, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Chris6730 ( talk · contribs) - Guess it wasn't compromised after all. -- Charitwo talk 15:49, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the note, I will see to it that my actions are improved. Forgive me, as I was frustrated. Marlith T/ C 03:19, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Normally going to admins is not the route I choose. However, I think this has gotten out of hand. Initially I cleaned up the liks at credit crunch and left notes on the article talk page [3] and the users talk page [4]. I also saw that the user had added links to debt money which were not article citations but were just sites that sell the books and I removed them. While the user had initially agreed to leave credit crunch alone, the removal of links to the book sites sent them over the edge whereby I received my first [5] talk page message. I immediately replied [6] and received another rant [7]. I let some frustration get to me and made another reversion. After more rants from the user, I elected to seek a third opinion [8]. Following counsel from another user, I reverted the entire affair as well as the links to debt money. I am sure you will tell me that I could have handled it better. At some point, communication is no longer an option. This person seems more content to rant than discuss. But no one should tolerate the idiotic nature of the comments left on my page. Montco ( talk) 03:52, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
I am not sure I get the abbreviation. Montco ( talk) 02:52, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 50 | 10 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 07:40, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Please move the talkpage for Dustbuster to it's correct title name. ( I love entei ( talk) 03:22, 13 December 2007 (UTC))
Hello, in the past it seems you have dealt with User: Wikzilla who was blocked for disruptive editing and sockpuppetry. The actions by another likely sock created shortly after Wikizila's block and kept as a sleeper account until his other accounts were blocked [10]. The Sock account has a identical style of editing and has edited only the same pages Wikizilla attacked the same editing style [11] [12]. A quick check shows the writing style used is also identical. Because of your status as a veteran administrator I ask you to look into this. Thanks for your time Freepsbane ( talk) 13:37, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
My apologies for not specifing but the sock acount in question is Downtrip ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki), thanks Freepsbane ( talk) 23:43, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thankyou your work is apreciated. Freepsbane ( talk) 23:57, 15 December 2007 (UTC) (perhaps checkuser could be used?)
Actually Luna, I'd EXTEND the block out to 24 hours like the last two, and even extend the blocked range to encompass that entire section of the network (209.47.31.*), here's my rationale;
This terminal appears to be part of a public system (educational, library, etc.). The user, being blocked, can simply move to another terminal on that LAN, and continue their abuse. Waiting an hour is no sweat to some would-be vandals, they simply kill some time, then come back and continue.
This is just an opinion from an experienced BBS and network admin, who has dealt with problems like this in the past... Edit Centric ( talk) 05:09, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
For that revert. For your information, that IP belongs to someone who keeps changing IPs to vandalize both my talk page, and another user's called Chris Chittleborough (see the history of that page). They go though phases of not vandalizing, and it seems they're coming into a new phase. I'm tempted to perform a range-block, but I don't know how to do one. Anyway, thanks again. :) Acalamari 23:52, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Marlith T/ C 00:10, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
I've encountered a couple kooks on Wikipedia before, but this one seems particularly disturbed. Thanks for taking care of it (until OrderOfBush6/7/8...) Best, Dan.— DCGeist ( talk) 09:24, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for replying to my message. I'm having problems logging in. I am entering my correct username and password but it isn't working. I've tried the option of having a new password emailed to me but an error message comes up saying that there is no e-mail address recorded for user "DmanDmythDledge". 83.70.239.84 ( talk) 12:40, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Alright i shall do that! I just dont want what happend to my friend Lav who got his Idea stolen by a game company not just the image the name and made it there own sorry for the inconvinionce —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitlames ( talk • contribs) 01:14, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
I have just had a look at this situation and I have to say that I am amazed at the stance to you have taken with regards to this.
R. friend was in conflict with Domer48 and then R. friend revert to "his version" and blocks Domer48 without warning or an official report or without anything said to any of the editors on "his side". Surely this is not the correct procedure that an admin in conflict with another editor should take.
Domer48 should be unblocked, R. friend should have a sever wrap across the knuckles and then if needed an official report should be filed to determine if any blocks are warranted. I hope you have time to look at this situation with a fresh pair of eyes as it seems pretty unjust to me. regards-- Vintagekits ( talk) 17:28, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Luna, a chara, with all due respect, page protect is not the answer. To suggest edit warring implies culpability from two parties. Look at the discussion page, I have applies our policies to this discussion. I have clearly illustrated the nature of my concerns on the information and the improper synthesis of material. Now we have enough wiki tools and policies to deal with this, page protection will not work here. Just look at this now, are we to page protect this article also. -- Domer48 ( talk) 22:36, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 51 | 17 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 19:11, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Wikzilla I took the initiative and Requested a checkuser on Downtrip ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) and it found that he Is almost certainly a sockpuppet of the Indef blocked Wikzilla ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki). In adition to this it was conclusively shown that he used sockpuppets to bypass 3RR on pages that he has edit warred on and to create the Illusion of wide support. Clearly he has and is violating several Wikipedia rules and some administrative action is in order. Freepsbane ( talk) 03:27, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I'm in the middle of a big IRL "oh crap" crisis and I can't spend much time on WP atm. A user I blocked, User:Danerunsalot emailes me denying he was a sock. Apparently I blocked him after Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Runnerguy this report, but looking (very fast) at his contribs I'm afraid I might have screwed up (ie it wasn't a WP:SOCK violation). Can you check that if you have the time? Thanks! -- lucasbfr talk 11:09, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
R.fiend is editing this article that you have put page protection on. He is blatently using his admin tools in disregard for the template you placed on it here. BigDunc ( talk) 20:34, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
There was no consensus reached. Luna warned them not to edit this article. -- Domer48 ( talk) 21:02, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
For 8 solid months the IP did nothing but make unilateral changes in violation of MOSDATE, despite repeated warnings to stop doing so. Previously it has been warned for vandalism. The IP did not take any note whatsoever of the many warnings, but continued undeterred. That looks like a serial unrepentant vandal to me. Jayjg (talk) 03:18, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
You're welcome... hope things are ok... some of those Rutgers IPs belong to Rutgers computer labs, so it might be anyone making those edits sometimes. 165.230.143.152 ( talk) 03:32, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi Luna. I've made a suggestion at Talk:Easter Rising that if we can agree a form of words in talk, that we will ask you to implement the change. I've also posited that if the edit war is over, you might consider lifting the protection. All very hypothetical at the moment still, but would you be agreeable to that in principle? Best wishes, -- John ( talk) 04:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Can I not add an external link to a band's profile if they represent the "band's official download site" similar to livephish? Totalliveguy ( talk) 04:57, 21 December 2007 (UTC)totalliveguy
Look, I am just trying to keep the page readable in a nonridiculous fashion. I am not sure if that giant sheep on your user page is supposed to scare me but I do not think that keeping a page orderly quite constitutes a war. I would appreciate that, if you disagree with my edits, you would elaborate on how the page was more useful before my edits, insteads of leaving threats on my talk page. 88.66.29.245 ( talk) 04:06, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
For your tireless efforts in combating the endless cavalcade of vandals. Maser ( Talk!) 04:19, 22 December 2007 (UTC) |
I'm bringing this to you because you seem to be the last admin to ban Kitia. Is there a central page for reporting sockpuppets of this editor?
December 21, 2012 ( talk · contribs) is Kitia ( talk · contribs). Evidence: both edit articles on years, and both edit-war in American Pie restoring long tracts of WP:OR. [13] [14]
What's a quick way to address this? I really don't wish to edit war in American Pie for the week or three a report to WP:SSP takes to be considered. / edg ☺ ☭ 09:57, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Wouldn't that be a WP:USERNAME vio as confusing? -- Jack Merridew 10:51, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your help in fixing vandalism. looks like Mr. Dfrt5 is on a vandalism spree now. can you please take care of that. Preetikapoor0 ( talk) 02:22, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
I'm in a situation where someone's making edits that are to my mind not appropriate for Wikipedia, but also possibly not blatant enough vandalism for me to want to risk 3RR stuff (which further action would push me past). As a friendly passing admin, would you be able to advise? Pseudomonas( talk) 11:15, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
I piss off anon IPs sometimes, as I do a bit of recent change patrolling, and I work with a few controversial articles, that anons frequently vandalize. I appreciate your keeping an eye out, and the semi-protection. Mr Which ??? 17:04, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
my pleasure —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.176.217.233 ( talk) 03:36, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I saw where you protected Muhammad. There isn't really an edit war going on there. There are several sleeper accounts that have been sent to Wikipedia by an off-site petition that are vandalizing the article. -- B ( talk) 16:36, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Luna, we've tried to take it to talk. The one side keeps reverting to the version that has only their view on the main article. Mr Which ??? 23:45, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I see you have been involved in matters concerning the block of the ip 24.175.183.44 and the talk page of the same person, Xsyner. I am having trouble with him as he repeatedly removes block warnings and notices from his talk page. I gave him several warnings and eventually reported him at WP:AIAV. Nothing was done about this, and I am now beginning to wonder whether it is actually against policy to do what he has been doing. Several editor have told me it was against policy, and that's what I have been telling Xsyner, although he ignores my warnings. I'd appreciate it if you could help my answer these questions as soon as possible. Thanks. ╦ﺇ₥₥€Ԋ( talk/ contribs) 03:22, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
You reverted faster than me Randomtime ( talk) 11:55, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 52 | 26 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 13:31, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
You protected the wrong version. The version you protected is the gutted version an anon user has been doing since 10 December 2007. That is fine though, I pretty much washed my hands of it. This is why wikipedia has trouble raising money, too many personal agendas. 66.57.36.56 ( talk) 02:14, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Replied on my talk, and on AIV. This does seem to be confusing, including for me, but I am following suit of another, so... Gscshoyru ( talk) 03:26, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
It's great that you are so "neutral." How do you keep from getting nose-bleeds so high up on your pedestal? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dar8888 ( talk • contribs) 04:33, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Why don't wikipedia rspond to this ????????????!!!!!!!! Remove the image from wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by Basem3wad ( talk • contribs) 16:50, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Remember this user? He is still getting on here very few days and adding nonsense images.... as an administrator, do you want to block him? Because clearly, he still hasn't learned his lesson. Please post your response on my talk page, and happy holidays. Tech43 ( talk) 05:36, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
...a hot chick? -- 194.251.240.114 ( talk) 11:11, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the help there Luna. In the end I had to 24 hour block. 3RR violation and POV pushing, plus repeated insertion of discussion into the article mainspace seems to me to be a good enough reason (one hopes!) Pedro : Chat 23:26, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
your protection of the liancourt article did not work, I think... o.d.s.t. : feet first into hell ( talk) 07:40, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
172.212.125.33 and 172.207.208.120 (probably same author) appear to be vandalizing indian and chinese pages. Their changes appear to be very subtle but sometimes very disruptive. can you please do something about it. see
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Economic_history_of_China&diff=prev&oldid=176793086 http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Economic_history_of_India&diff=prev&oldid=176998365 http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Economic_history_of_India&diff=prev&oldid=176792565 http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Economic_history_of_China&diff=prev&oldid=178497448 http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Economic_history_of_China&diff=prev&oldid=178497448 Preetikapoor0 ( talk) 22:38, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
S/he removed a section I added called "Indef" where I said "Can we just indef, this clearly isn't going anywhere". The fact that s/he knows what "indef" is, and that it's bad, probably means this is not a new user, and perhaps a sock of a previously banned user. Equazcion •✗/ C • 13:05, 1 Jan 2008 (UTC)
Yes can you help me here please Luna. I got a threating message from user "wknight94" saying he was going to report this the authorities. I told him it was my idoitic friend that mess with my computer. I told him that. Luna, I have to him and Bugs I didnt do the "death threat". I am talking on my eldorado name. Because this is my user name okay. Can you reply back Luna . ASAP , this is urgent. ! Eldorado91 ( talk) 14:57, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
He took his "case" to the notice board, giving you all a couple more IP addresses suitable for blocking. I also notified Wknight94: [20] Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 16:46, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
January 2008 (UTC)
My IP address was recently used by "spartansuit" because my cousin used my computer to make that account. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Talking Mac ( talk • contribs) 18:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Just got really pissed off. Hopefully won't happen again. Will ( talk) 02:06, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
restoring that page —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vanessahexter ( talk • contribs) 02:37, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
When I click on his dif's, I get the most amazing image instead. I guess he's done something to the software. Dloh cierekim 03:34, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks very much for taking care of related vandalism on my user page. Do you know if there's a fix in the works to prevent abuses like that? - Chardish ( talk) 04:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Do people really think vandalizing m user page affects me at all. By the way thanks. 04:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Wow, three different IP's attacking one userpage! I semi-protected User:Ridernyc. Dloh cierekim 04:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
PS, What's a TOR? Can we get rid of the malicious code he added?? Dloh cierekim 04:38, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Luna,
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage, and protecting it. Harland1 ( t/ c) 19:51, 3 January 2008 (UTC) |
Luna, did you ban that user that had the ip 58.XXX.XX they kept spamming your user page. Iron Valley ( talk) 19:36, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. :) -- Gamer007 ( talk) 00:49, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
This is your range block from a few days ago. This is someone wanting to get out from under it. They seem OK. Your input appreciated. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
68.84.243.63 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Hi, could you block this editor again (you did a few days ago); see, for example, this. -- Jack Merridew 10:27, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
I'd like to know how to nominate an article for deletion please, and also how to have action taken against someone who clearly is only present on Wiki to promote a personal POV agenda. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.188.38.31 ( talk) 07:24, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my page... I didn't even notice it until now. :-) -- Nlu ( talk) 08:01, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm having Luna withdrawal . :/ KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 11:17, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
FYI, a diff involving your name was mentioned in passing at an extension request that I filed at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Request for extension of restrictions at DreamGuy 2, specifically, my extended report at User:Elonka/DreamGuy report. No action is required on your part, I just wanted to let you know. -- El on ka 03:26, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Your protecting Prussian Blue (duo) is appreciated. The req for semi-protection was refused yesterday citeing not enough vandalism ?!?!?! Im glad you can see the truth. Im no fan, but hated seeing it listing every 5th line on my watchlist. Exit2DOS2000• T• C• 05:48, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey Luna santi how come the indians can write anything they wish on azas kashmir articles and when i try to balance the articles some moderators always protect can you please give me some guidance on how to get some non biased moderators. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.156.208.195 ( talk) 11:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I've noticed that you've dealt with some of these impersonators/harassers and would like to ask your advice on how to deal with this situation. There are many, many socks out there and I've probably not seen them all. There are also endless anons reverting away. I've got a category going to help keep track. This may not be a good idea per WP:DENY…
Also, please see the talk on my talk page started by User:Blow of Light; I've created a 'doppelganger' account as suggested but don't see quite what it's for. BoL will probably get back to me, but another opinion would be welcome. Cheers, Jack Merridew 12:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, but I seem to have brought the Wrath of the Anons down on your talk page. -- Jack Merridew 15:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey Luna, I protected your talk page look at the recent activity. I left it at infinite, so unprotect whenever you like. Have a glass of rum for the troubles my good sir. :) KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 16:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi — thanks for helping to cool off the edit war at Blockbuster Inc.. Unfortunately, we're still having problems. I've summarized the issue here. It's a somewhat unusual case, and I was wondering if you could offer some advice as to how best to resolve the dispute. Feezo (Talk) 19:12, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Any thought on anon protection? I see the protection log shows you unprotected today, however wasn't it auto un-protected on the 6th? Since the 6th it appears of the 100 edits aprox 50% are anon vandalism [23]. -- Hu12 ( talk) 19:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
I would appreciate full protection for the unvandalized forms of Cassandra Clare, The Mortal Instruments Trilogy, and City Of Bones. The author has been the subject of several rather vicious smear campaigns on outside sites like LiveJournal and FandomWank; after I successfully opposed efforts to bring that feud here, a small clique of Wikipedia editors with who I (and many other Wikipedia users) have a long and unpleasant editorial dispute began attacking the Clare-related pages to harass me. There is no real doubt as to notability -- the main book was a March 2007 New York Times best-seller, and has been extensively reviewed -- and the other editors have made no reasoned claims for their deletions. (One article has on overlong plot summary, but that should be easily remedied by someone who has read the book, once the article is allowed to stand. VivianDarkbloom ( talk) 23:36, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
City of Bones has been brought to AFD. Immediate reaction among the group that had been resurrecting it was to turn it into a pretty conventional stub. Kww ( talk) 14:17, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I have a question. I made a subpage under my user page that redirects to my contributions so that I could make my signature code shorter (it might look screwed up at the moment until i get it fixed). However, when i go to the redirect page, it doesnt redirect. I don't know what I'm doing wrong or maybe user subpages cant be redirects. Do you know how I can make the redirect work? Thanks in advance. Tim meh C 00:26, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello. I started an ANI topic on him. You may want to comment. Thanks. JetLover ( talk) ( Report a mistake) 01:19, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Sorry to bother, but could you have a second look at Talk:Communist Party of India (Marxist)? The situation there is has just got worse. A request for intervention from admins has been posted at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Advice few days ago, but no answer has been given so far. How should we procede? -- Soman ( talk) 01:19, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure what happened here and here. Change it back if you lik. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 03:40, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Please see: User talk:Blow of Light#Hey jack.... I misunderstood what he was suggesting and don't think I need the other account. Unless you think I'm missing something, could you please block the account and delete and protect the user and talk pages?
Thanks, -- Jack Merridew 09:19, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Please see: 172.207.237.73 who is resurrecting all of Harvey's old edits. FWIW Bzuk ( talk) 13:28, 10 January 2008 (UTC).
I just now realized someone had vandalized my user page 6 months ago and you were right there to revert it back before I even knew about it. I don't know how you knew it was vandalized but some really hurtful things were said and you just popped in and took care of it. I'm still kinda new when it comes to understanding Wiki's behind-the-scenes action and just want to let you know that you're awesome and I appreciate what you did. Caserini ( talk) 16:19, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey Luna, just wanted to ask you a quick question about your block here. I completely agree that the user was up to no good, but do we really block if they haven't edited in two days? Thanks. Glass Cobra 20:44, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 1 | 2 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 2 | 7 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 08:56, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! You can thank others by using {{ subst:Vangel}}! Mysdaao talk 13:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
My friend is back as anons on this and other stuff; could you semi-protect it? -- Jack Merridew 14:30, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Here's you a new Emergency Luna shutoff button...
Looks better. ALLSTAR echo 03:11, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
That would be me. I borrowed your talk page header layout for my own. I hope you don't mind. =) -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 07:36, 12 January 2008 (UTC)