This is LovelyGirl7's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1 |
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
K2-155d you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Katolophyromai --
Katolophyromai (
talk)
00:02, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi LovelyGirl7, I warned you on April 17 that text should not be copied word-for-word from sources, yet I see you did it again (extensively) on Nova Carinae 2018 on 23 April. This is both plagiarism and copyright infringement, and by doing the latter you're violating the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use. If it happens again, you're likely to be blocked without further warning. Please read Wikipedia:Plagiarism and Wikipedia:Copyright violations carefully.
Sources must be summarized in your own words. If you do use a source's words, you must name your source in the text, and it's often safest to add quotation marks too (e.g. Historian Susan Smith wrote that "x, y and z"). See WP:INTEXT for more information about this. It might help to read the articles Direct speech and Indirect speech.
If you've added text copied from sources to other articles, please go back and remove it, or rewrite it, now. SarahSV (talk) 00:12, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, you're continuing to add text copied from sources, with small tweaks:
SarahSV (talk) 02:45, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
The problem seems to be that you are going sentence-by-sentence through the sources, slightly changing each sentence before adding it to the article, and sometimes not changing it at all. That's not how we're supposed to write articles. We're meant to read the sources, then sum up our own understanding of them. This is very difficult, if not impossible, to do if the topic is something we don't understand well.
Please don't make any further edits that aren't about tidying up any previous copyright violations that you added. Otherwise your account really is likely to be blocked indefinitely. SarahSV (talk) 03:08, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
I just checked back, and I see that you succeeded in getting David Meade to Good Article status - well done! It's a long process, and you deserve a pat on the back for this achievement. I wanted to offer a glass of champagne, but Wikipedia doesn't have that so I can only offer a cup of tea instead ... please know it comes with a full measure of my congratulations. Gronk Oz ( talk) 10:31, 8 May 2018 (UTC) |
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Hi @ Ponyo: seeing this block, I know understand why I was blocked. I must admit I’ve betrayed the project and my best friends here (Katolophyromai and Gronk Oz) by creating a few bad hand accounts. I do want to return sooner than expected, either late August or any day before the day Trump has his summit with Kim, because I don’t have any interest in leaving the project at all, and I have confident I will return again. I will promise you and Wikipedia this, I won’t create anymore accounts and I will only edit using this one. I don’t like indefinite blocks at all, and I understand the block. Katolophyromai even gave me advice and I love that advice. I do want to return earlier than expected, and as I’ve said, I am interested in returning before August or any day before the Trump-Kim summit (when it’s announced), because honestly I believe I love this place and I have no interest in leaving. So like either around late May, early June, or August I hope to return. I’m very sorry for deceiving and betraying people I know here, especially the ones I love the most. I will let you know if I would like to return by pinging you. LovelyGirl7 talk 04:44, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
@ Ponyo: I sent you an email. If you would like to respond feel free to do so. LovelyGirl7 talk 19:27, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
The article
K2-155d you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:K2-155d for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Katolophyromai --
Katolophyromai (
talk)
00:21, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello. I suspect you are probably reading this. Since you have made some good contributions here and I suspect your whole "good hand"/"bad hand" routine was an immature stunt to attract attention, I am offering you this one-time-only advice on what to do if you decide you want to come back:
This is not a threat; this is intended purely as advice. I am still trying to be friendly, even though you have broken policy and betrayed the trust of everyone here, including me. I honestly kind of hope you do decide to come back some day in the distant future, once you have learned from your mistakes. For now, though, go enjoy something off Wikipedia for a while. Goodbye. -- Katolophyromai ( talk) 01:21, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
By the way, I’ve mentioned a few things where Ponyo gave me that block message. LovelyGirl7 talk 11:52, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
@ Ohnoitsjamie: I’m not connected to the Krassensteins but I’ve been interested in them. LovelyGirl7 talk 16:33, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
The AN thread where the sock PAed LG7 so much that some of them were RDed (probably to get attention from others, but whatever..) is located here. L293D ( ☎ • ✎) 02:09, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I’m blocked, however, there are several things I believe should be added at Portal:Current events/2018 May 8:
LovelyGirl7 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #21492 was submitted on May 10, 2018 16:06:41. This review is now closed.
-- UTRSBot ( talk) 16:06, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
| Hello, LovelyGirl7. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for WASP-104b at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 00:48, 18 May 2018 (UTC) |
LovelyGirl7 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #21891 was submitted on Jun 22, 2018 17:24:04. This review is now closed.
This is LovelyGirl7's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1 |
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
K2-155d you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Katolophyromai --
Katolophyromai (
talk)
00:02, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi LovelyGirl7, I warned you on April 17 that text should not be copied word-for-word from sources, yet I see you did it again (extensively) on Nova Carinae 2018 on 23 April. This is both plagiarism and copyright infringement, and by doing the latter you're violating the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use. If it happens again, you're likely to be blocked without further warning. Please read Wikipedia:Plagiarism and Wikipedia:Copyright violations carefully.
Sources must be summarized in your own words. If you do use a source's words, you must name your source in the text, and it's often safest to add quotation marks too (e.g. Historian Susan Smith wrote that "x, y and z"). See WP:INTEXT for more information about this. It might help to read the articles Direct speech and Indirect speech.
If you've added text copied from sources to other articles, please go back and remove it, or rewrite it, now. SarahSV (talk) 00:12, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, you're continuing to add text copied from sources, with small tweaks:
SarahSV (talk) 02:45, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
The problem seems to be that you are going sentence-by-sentence through the sources, slightly changing each sentence before adding it to the article, and sometimes not changing it at all. That's not how we're supposed to write articles. We're meant to read the sources, then sum up our own understanding of them. This is very difficult, if not impossible, to do if the topic is something we don't understand well.
Please don't make any further edits that aren't about tidying up any previous copyright violations that you added. Otherwise your account really is likely to be blocked indefinitely. SarahSV (talk) 03:08, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
I just checked back, and I see that you succeeded in getting David Meade to Good Article status - well done! It's a long process, and you deserve a pat on the back for this achievement. I wanted to offer a glass of champagne, but Wikipedia doesn't have that so I can only offer a cup of tea instead ... please know it comes with a full measure of my congratulations. Gronk Oz ( talk) 10:31, 8 May 2018 (UTC) |
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Hi @ Ponyo: seeing this block, I know understand why I was blocked. I must admit I’ve betrayed the project and my best friends here (Katolophyromai and Gronk Oz) by creating a few bad hand accounts. I do want to return sooner than expected, either late August or any day before the day Trump has his summit with Kim, because I don’t have any interest in leaving the project at all, and I have confident I will return again. I will promise you and Wikipedia this, I won’t create anymore accounts and I will only edit using this one. I don’t like indefinite blocks at all, and I understand the block. Katolophyromai even gave me advice and I love that advice. I do want to return earlier than expected, and as I’ve said, I am interested in returning before August or any day before the Trump-Kim summit (when it’s announced), because honestly I believe I love this place and I have no interest in leaving. So like either around late May, early June, or August I hope to return. I’m very sorry for deceiving and betraying people I know here, especially the ones I love the most. I will let you know if I would like to return by pinging you. LovelyGirl7 talk 04:44, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
@ Ponyo: I sent you an email. If you would like to respond feel free to do so. LovelyGirl7 talk 19:27, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
The article
K2-155d you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:K2-155d for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Katolophyromai --
Katolophyromai (
talk)
00:21, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello. I suspect you are probably reading this. Since you have made some good contributions here and I suspect your whole "good hand"/"bad hand" routine was an immature stunt to attract attention, I am offering you this one-time-only advice on what to do if you decide you want to come back:
This is not a threat; this is intended purely as advice. I am still trying to be friendly, even though you have broken policy and betrayed the trust of everyone here, including me. I honestly kind of hope you do decide to come back some day in the distant future, once you have learned from your mistakes. For now, though, go enjoy something off Wikipedia for a while. Goodbye. -- Katolophyromai ( talk) 01:21, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
By the way, I’ve mentioned a few things where Ponyo gave me that block message. LovelyGirl7 talk 11:52, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
@ Ohnoitsjamie: I’m not connected to the Krassensteins but I’ve been interested in them. LovelyGirl7 talk 16:33, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
The AN thread where the sock PAed LG7 so much that some of them were RDed (probably to get attention from others, but whatever..) is located here. L293D ( ☎ • ✎) 02:09, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I’m blocked, however, there are several things I believe should be added at Portal:Current events/2018 May 8:
LovelyGirl7 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #21492 was submitted on May 10, 2018 16:06:41. This review is now closed.
-- UTRSBot ( talk) 16:06, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
| Hello, LovelyGirl7. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for WASP-104b at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 00:48, 18 May 2018 (UTC) |
LovelyGirl7 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #21891 was submitted on Jun 22, 2018 17:24:04. This review is now closed.