Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jodie Fisher has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 22:36, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to
Jodie Fisher. Thank you.--
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
23:14, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. --
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
23:15, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
23:19, 26 February 2018 (UTC) There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible
conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is
Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Jodie_Fisher Thank you.
Jaydoggmarco (
talk)
22:59, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Loveinfo123. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on the page
Jodie Fisher, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Schazjmd (talk) 18:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Jodie Fisher shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Chris Troutman ( talk) 15:36, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at
Jodie Fisher, you may be
blocked from editing.
Chris Troutman (
talk)
15:36, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Just so we're clear, Wikipedia operates on verifiability and consensus. Content in articles has to represent what reliable sources say, not necessarily what we think is true. If you disagree with content or the supprting sources, you need to discuss this on the article's talk page and develop consensus there. Without consensus, you cannot make changes because you have already been reverted by multiple editors. If you cannot understand that Wikipedia works this way then you need to leave Wikipedia. Chris Troutman ( talk) 15:39, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jodie Fisher has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 22:36, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to
Jodie Fisher. Thank you.--
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
23:14, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. --
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
23:15, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
23:19, 26 February 2018 (UTC) There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible
conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is
Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Jodie_Fisher Thank you.
Jaydoggmarco (
talk)
22:59, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Loveinfo123. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on the page
Jodie Fisher, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Schazjmd (talk) 18:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Jodie Fisher shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Chris Troutman ( talk) 15:36, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at
Jodie Fisher, you may be
blocked from editing.
Chris Troutman (
talk)
15:36, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Just so we're clear, Wikipedia operates on verifiability and consensus. Content in articles has to represent what reliable sources say, not necessarily what we think is true. If you disagree with content or the supprting sources, you need to discuss this on the article's talk page and develop consensus there. Without consensus, you cannot make changes because you have already been reverted by multiple editors. If you cannot understand that Wikipedia works this way then you need to leave Wikipedia. Chris Troutman ( talk) 15:39, 1 March 2024 (UTC)